Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 21(6): 766-773, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30448957

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-choline PETCT in staging prostate cancer (PC) and whether the use of this imaging modality changes the therapeutic decision in patients previously staged by conventional imaging. The secondary aim was to determine the prognostic factors associated with positive choline PETCT findings in both detection of disseminated disease and in changes in the therapeutic indication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicentre, retrospective, observational study of 269 patients diagnosed with PC. Mean age was 69 ± 9.2 years. Of the 269 patients, 62 (23%) had high-risk localized PC (group 1), 118 (43.9%) biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (group 2), and 89 (33.1%) biochemical failure after radiotherapy (group 3). None of the patients showed clear evidence of distant disease on computed tomography or bone scans. The following potential prognostic factors were assessed: PSA level at diagnosis; primary and secondary Gleason; Gleason score (GS); clinical and pathologic T and N stage; number of positive cylinders in the biopsy; presence of vascular or lymphatic invasion; status of surgical margins; androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); time to biochemical recurrence; and PSA, PSA doubling time (PSADT), and PSA velocity (PSAV) at failure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, and receiver-operating curves calculated. RESULTS: The mean PSA by groups was, group 1: 31.22 ng/ml, group 2: 2.52 ng/ml and group 3: 5.85 ng/ml. The tumor detection rate with 18F-choline PETCT was 74% (group 1: 85.5%, group 2: 55.1% and group 3: 91%). Prognostic factors for positive 18F-choline PETCT were identified only in group 2: PSA at failure and PSADT. 18F-choline PETCT changed the therapeutic indication in 62.8% (group 1: 71%, group 2: 55.2% and group 3: 70.1%). The prognostic factors for a change in treatment were identified only in group 1: secondary Gleason ≤ 4 and GS ≤ 7 and in group 2: PSA at failure, PSA nadir after surgery and pathologic stage N0. 18F-choline PETCT identified lymph node and/or metastatic disease in 32.7% (group 1: 25.8%, group 2: 29.7% and group 3: 41.6%). Prognostic factors for detecting lymph node/metastasis were identified in the group 2: PSA failure ≥ 1.37 ng/ml and PSADT < 4 months and in the group 3: PSADT < 4.6 months and time to failure < 5 years. CONCLUSION: These findings support the clinical use de 18F-choline PET-CT in staging high-risk patients with a secondary Gleason ≤ 4 and GS ≤ 7, in restaging patients with biochemical recurrence after RP if PSA at failure ≥ 1.37 ng/ml or PSADT ≤ 4 months and in patients with biochemical failure after RT, if PSADT ≤ 4.6 months and time to failure < 5 years, because it determines a change in the therapeutic indication.


Assuntos
Colina/metabolismo , Radioisótopos de Flúor/metabolismo , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Idoso , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Gradação de Tumores , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/metabolismo , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Curva ROC , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/metabolismo , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 14(6): 401-412, jun. 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-126808

RESUMO

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare primary cutaneous carcinoma of the skin that is highly aggressive, and has a high risk of locoregional and distant spread, a mortality rate considerably higher than that of cutaneous melanoma and poor survival. Its incidence has increased during the past twenty years. The studies published since 2008 have introduced changes in the understanding of its epidemiology and pathogenesis, and consequently the therapeutic approach. Despite this, there is still controversy surrounding its optimal management, which requires clarification. This is the purpose of this review (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/patologia , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/terapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA