RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) often is not diagnosed due to its presentation without heartburn. The aim of this study was to analyze the signs and symptoms of elderly patients undergoing treatment for LPR using subjective as well as objective measures including strobovideolaryngoscopies, 24-hour pH studies, and manometry to highlight appropriate considerations for diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux who were seen from January 2010 to February 2021 in the practice of the senior author (Robert T. Sataloff) who had undergone 24-hour pH testing, and for whom all data were available. Patients aged 60â¯years and older were considered elderly and compared to patients younger than 40 and between the ages of 40 and 59. However, patients in their 60s, 70s, and 80s were evaluated and compared separately. Objective reflux findings, 24-hour pH studies, and manometry were compared between groups. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-eight patients being treated for LPR were included, 100 of whom were over the age of 60. While 94.1% of patients younger than 40 had a chief complaint of hoarseness, 71% percent of those aged 60 and older complained of hoarseness. Patients aged 60 and older were more likely to present with no voice complaint as their age increased (Pâ¯=â¯0.001). Lower esophageal sphincter residual pressure was 12.15⯱â¯6.28 in elderly patients compared to 4.90⯱â¯3.38 in patients younger than 40 (Pâ¯<â¯0.001). Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) basal pressure was decreased in elderly patients at 83.84⯱â¯50.53 compared to 105.92⯱â¯51.49 in patients younger than 60 or younger (Pâ¯=â¯0.029). Older patients in their 70s and 80s also had lower UES basal pressures at 75.79⯱â¯47.66 and 63.45⯱â¯14.50 (Pâ¯=â¯0.003). Additionally, while 71.4% of patients younger than 40 had normal esophageal motility (Chicago classification v4), only 40% of elderly patients had normal esophageal motility (Pâ¯<â¯0.001). More severe ventricular obliteration also was present in elderly patients compared to non-elderly patients (Pâ¯=â¯0.032), and thick endolaryngeal mucus was less likely to be present in elderly patients (Pâ¯=â¯0.007). Reflux finding score differed between age groups with patients aged less than 40 scoring 14.78⯱â¯2.5, 40-59â¯year olds scoring 15.83⯱â¯2.13 and patients 60 and older scoring 15.48⯱â¯2.43 (Pâ¯=â¯0.018). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients diagnosed with LPR have different presentations of the disease compared with younger patients.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Benign vocal fold masses (BVMs) include nodules, polyps, cysts, and other pathology. Nevertheless, some otolaryngologists and other physicians utilize "vocal fold nodules" as an umbrella diagnosis for vocal fold masses. Patients subsequently evaluated by a laryngologist are found to have a different vocal fold mass, which often has a different prognosis and treatment plan compared to nodules. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate at which vocal fold nodules are misdiagnosed. METHODS: Adult voice patients who presented to our voice center having been evaluated elsewhere by an otolaryngologist and diagnosed with vocal fold nodules, or prenodules, were included in this retrospective study. Strobovideolaryngoscopy (SVL) footage from each patient's first visit or prior to any treatment at our center was compiled and de-identified. Three blinded physician raters evaluated the videos to determine if the mass(es) was/were nodules on a binary scale, with 1 indicating a nodule. If the mass was not a nodule (0), the raters were asked to identify it based on a list of five different mass types. RESULTS: There were 56 cases (11 male and 45 female) included in the retrospective cohort. The average age was 38 ± 14.8 with a range of 11-65. Reliability between all raters was fair (κ = 0.3). Individually raters 1 and 2 had very good reliability (κ = 1) and rater 3 had good reliability (κ = 0.6). In 100% of cases, two raters agreed that none of the masses were nodules. Only one rater identified two masses as vocal fold nodules, indicating that at least 97% of cases were not vocal fold nodules and had been misdiagnosed. The most frequently identified mass and the most frequently agreed upon mass by all raters was vocal fold cyst or pseudocyst, followed by fibrous mass. Only one rater was unable to identify the mass type in some cases (n = 7). CONCLUSION: Vocal fold nodules are frequently misdiagnosed. Proper identification of vocal fold masses requires high levels of expertise and SVL. Since treatment of BVMs varies with mass type, accurate diagnosis is essential.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Cochlear Implantation (CI) surgery has long been used as an effective treatment for children with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss who failed to benefit from the use of hearing aids. Among other factors, the age at which implantation is done is thought to have an effect on the speech progression outcome of patients postoperatively. OBJECTIVES: The Jordanian CI Program has limited resources, and Jordan has an underdeveloped early screening and intervention program for deafness. In this study, we aimed to explore the effect of age at time of implantation on receptive and expressive language outcomes in Jordan, to guide funding and focus efforts on patient groups who would benefit most, thus reducing unnecessary longterm morbidity and disability, and improving cost efficiency. METHODS: Data was gathered from all major sectors in Jordan on patients who underwent CI from 2006 to 2018 (a total of 1815 patients). We compared the language outcome 2 to 4 years after implantation for patients aged below 3 years, 3 to under 6, 6 to under 9 years, and 9 and older at the time of implantation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We found a statistically significant difference in language outcomes between patients aged below 6 years vs those 6 and older, with better receptive and expressive language outcomes in the younger age groups.
Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial , Desenvolvimento da Linguagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Fatores Etários , Implante Coclear/estatística & dados numéricos , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/cirurgia , Jordânia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To measure the efficacy of pillar implants in reducing snoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 adult patients who underwent pillar implants were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the implantation. Improvement was measured using snoring frequency, visual analog scale for snoring loudness, and Epworth sleepiness scale for daytime sleepiness. RESULTS: The mean snoring frequency, loudness and Epworth score were reduced from 6.9, 9.2 and 7.4 at the baseline to 5, 5.9 and 5.6, respectively, at 12 months postoperatively (all p < 0.03). The partial implant extrusion rate was 6.7%. CONCLUSION: We suggest that a pillar implant procedure should be considered before proceeding to more morbid surgeries in patients with snoring and daytime sleepiness.
RESUMO
At the end of December, 2019, a new virus was named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 appeared in Wuhan, China, and the disease caused is called as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by World Health Organization, which to date having infected more than 3,588,773 people worldwide, as well as causing 247,503 deaths. A human to human transmission is thought to be predominantly by droplet spread, and direct contact with the patient or contaminated surfaces. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview as well as to highlight essential evidence-based guidelines for how head and neck surgeon and healthcare providers need to take into consideration during their management of the upper airway during the COVID-19 pandemic safely and effectively to avoid the spread of the virus to the health provider.
Assuntos
Manuseio das Vias Aéreas , Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Cabeça/cirurgia , Pescoço/cirurgia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , SARS-CoV-2 , CirurgiõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To demonstrate that reconstructive transoral laser microsurgical (R-TLM) techniques can be used for the treatment of symptomatic laryngeal posterior glottic web-based stenosis (PGWS) in a large cohort of patients utilizing a postcricoid mucosal advancement flap (PCMAF). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort review. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients with PGWS who underwent R-TLM using a PCMAF were reviewed for outcomes. After laser excision of the PGWS scar and mobilization of fixed cricoarytenoid joints, a PCMAF was raised using microinstruments and a scanning free-beam CO2 laser. The flap was advanced and attached over the scar bed using a technique with multiple novel features that make it easy to adopt. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were treated. Of the cases, 42.3% had a tracheostomy at presentation with grade II to IV PGWS, and 46% of cases had grade III to IV PGWS. In all cases, R-TLM was the only treatment approach. No open reconstructions were performed. No airway stents were used. Patients without tracheostomy, regardless of the grade of stenosis, did not require a tracheostomy to undergo this operation. All tracheostomy patients were successfully decannulated. All patients without a tracheostomy had significant improvement of their respiratory symptoms on the Dyspnea Index (mean Δ = 14.75, P value <.01). CONCLUSIONS: RTLM using the PCMAF is a feasible, safe, and effective alternative to open approaches for airway reconstruction for PGWS. This novel transoral technique includes a much simpler endoscopic suturing alternative to knot tying among other new features. It is reproducible and reliable for laryngologists familiar with laryngeal microsurgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 127:685-690, 2017.