Estudio prospectivo acerca de la precisión diagnóstica del test inmunológico de sangre oculta en materia fecal en una única ronda para la realización de pesquisa del cáncer colorrectal en pacientes de riesgo promedio en la Argentina / Prospective study on the diagnostic accuracy of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test in a single round for colorectal cancer screening in average risk patients in Argentina

Introducción: El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer en Argentina. Debido a su alta prevalencia es fundamental normatizar un programa de pesquisa para la prevención y detección temprana. La precisión del test de sangre oculta en materia fecal inmunológico (SOMFi) para pesquisa de CCR en población de riesgo promedio ha demostrado ser adecuada según la bibliografía internacional, no habiendo, sin embargo, información a nivel local. El objetivo es evaluar en nuestro medio la precisión diagnóstica del test de SOMFi en una única ronda para la pesquisa de CCR en pacientes de riesgo promedio. Diseño: Prospectivo de precisión diagnóstica. Material y Método: Se incluyeron pacientes con riesgo promedio que consultaron para realizar una videocolonoscopía (VCC) por pesquisa de CCR en el Hospital Alemán de Buenos Aires, entre el 1 de junio del 2015 y 31 diciembre de 2017. Se excluyeron todos los pacientes con riesgo incrementado para CCR. Todos los pacientes realizaron el test de SOMFi y posteriormente la VCC. Los endoscopistas estaban ciegos para el resultado del test al momento de realizar la VCC. Se evaluó la precisión diagnóstica del test SOMFi para detectar lesiones neoplásicas avanzadas (LNA) calculando la sensibilidad (S), especificidad (E), valor predictivo positivo (VVP) y negativo (VVN), coeficiente de probabilidad positivo (CP+) y negativo (CP-). Se evaluó también la precisión para la detección de adenomas de bajo riesgo, pólipos aserrados y CCR. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 300 pacientes; 273 (91%) entregaron la muestra de materia fecal para realizar el test de SOMFi y completaron la VCC. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 56.9 (40-85) años y 54% fueron hombres. Del total de pacientes que realizaron ambos estudios (273), 53 pacientes (19%) presentaron al menos un adenoma de bajo riesgo, en 18 pacientes (6,59%) observamos al menos un adenoma aserrado sésil y en 21 pacientes (7,7%) al menos una lesión neoplásica avanzada (LNA). Solo 4 pacientes (1.5%) presentaron CCR. En cuanto a la precisión diagnóstica del test de SOMFi en una única ronda para detectar LNA observamos una S de 30%, E de 84%, VPP de 13% y un VPN de 94%. Para adenomas de bajo riesgo observamos una S de 13%, E de 84%, VPP de 17%, VPN de 79%. Para adenomas aserrados sésiles observamos una S de 16.7%, E de 87%, VPP de 11% y de VPN 91%. La precisión para el CCR fue la siguiente, S de 75%, E de 83%, VPP 6%, VPN 99%. No se observaron complicaciones post procedimientos. Conclusiones: La precisión diagnóstica del test de SOMFi en nuestro medio es comparable a los resultados internacionales. Sin embargo, la baja precisión observada en una única ronda realza la necesidad de realizarlo de forma anual o bianual para poder optimizar su precisión y lograr programas de pesquisa efectivos.(AU)

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in Argentina. Due to its high prevalence, it is essential to standardize a screening program for prevention and early detection. According to international literature, the accuracy of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FIT) for CRC screening in an average-risk population has proven to be adequate, but there is no information at the local level. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the FIT test in a single round for CRC screening in average-risk patients in our setting. Design: Diagnostic accuracy prospective study. Material and Methods: Average-risk patients who consulted for a CRC screening video colonoscopy (VCC) at the Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, between June 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017 were included. All patients with increased risk for CRC were excluded. All patients performed FIT and subsequently VCC. The endoscopists were blind to FIT result at the time of VCC. The diagnostic accuracy of FIT to detect advanced neoplastic lesions (ANL) was evaluated by calculating sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-). The accuracy for the detection of low-risk adenomas, serrated polyps and CRC was also evaluated. Results: A total of 300 patients were included; 273 (91%) submitted the stool sample to perform FIT and completed VCC. The mean age of patients was 56.9 (40-85) years and 54% were men. Of the total number of patients who carried out both studies (273), 53 (19%) patients had at least one low-risk adenoma, 18 (6.59%) patients had at least one sessile serrated adenoma and 21 (7.7%) patients had at least one ANL. Only 4 (1.5%) patients presented CRC. The diagnostic accuracy of FIT in a single round to detect ANL was: S 30%, Sp 84%, PPV 13%, NPV 94%; for low-risk adenomas: S 13%, Sp 84%, PPV 17%, NPV 79%; for sessile serrated adenomas: S 16.7%, Sp 87%, PPV 11%, NPV 91% and for CRC: S 75%, Sp 83%, PPV 6%, NPV 99%. No post-procedure complications were observed. Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of FIT in our setting is comparable to international results. However, the low precision observed in a single round highlights the need to do it annually or biannually in order to optimize its accuracy and achieve effective screening programs. (AU)

Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines / Prevalencia de quistes pancreáticos incidentales clínicamente relevantes al momento del diagnóstico basada en las guías actuales

BACKGROUND: Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. AIMS: To determine and compare the prevalence of incidental clinically important PCs (CIPCs). METHODS: Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans performed during a one-year period were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidental PCs. CIPCs were defined as those cysts that would be capable of triggering further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound, immediate surveillance (within 3-6 months) and/or surgery. Prevalence was calculated as the number of patients with CIPCs per 100 subjects imaged (%). RESULTS: Sixty patients (mean age 70 ± 14 years) out of 565 were found to have incidental PCs, representing a prevalence of 8.7% (95% CI 6.3-11.5) in CT scans and 27.5% (95% CI 16-41) in MRI scans. Seven patients (11.6%, 95% CI 5-22) had CIPCs based on size ≥ 30 mm (n = 5), size ≥ 30 mm and pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (n = 1) and PD dilation and presence of solid component (n = 1). Based on the Fukuoka guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 1.2% (95% CI 0.4-2.5) in CT scans (6/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1-9) in MRI scans (1/58). Based on the AGA and European guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1-1) in CT scans (1/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1-9) in MRI scans (1/58). Patients with PCs initially classified as "AGA- or European-positive" had a higher surgical probability and this decision was taken earlier in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the prevalence of important incidental pancreatic cysts was not negligible at around 1% according to current guidelines

ANTECEDENTES: La mayoría de los quistes de páncreas (PC) hallados incidentalmente en las tomografías (TC) y las resonancias magnéticas (RMN) podrían no ser clínicamente importantes de acuerdo con las actuales guías Fukuoka, American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) y europea. OBJETIVOS: Determinar y comparar la prevalencia de PC incidentales clínicamente importantes (CIPCs). MÉTODOS: Se revisaron retrospectivamente las TC de abdomen con contraste y las RMN durante un período de un año para identificar PCs incidentales. Los CIPC se definieron como aquellos quistes que serían capaces de desencadenar una evaluación ulterior con ecoendoscopia, vigilancia en un corto intervalo (3-6 meses) y/o cirugía. La prevalencia se calculó como el número de pacientes con CIPC por cada 100 sujetos estudiados (%). RESULTADOS: Se encontró que 60 (edad media 70 ± 14 años) de 565 pacientes tenían PC incidentales, lo que representó una prevalencia de 8,7% (IC95% 6,3-11,5) en las TC y 27,5% (IC95% 16-41) en las RMN. Siete pacientes (11,6%, IC 95% 5-22) tenían CIPC basados en el tamaño ≥ 30 mm (n = 5), tamaño ≥ 30 mm y dilatación del conducto pancreático (PD) (n = 1), y dilatación de PD y presencia de componente sólido (n = 1). Basándonos en la guía Fukuoka, la prevalencia de CIPC fue de 1,2% (IC95% 0,4-2,5) en las TC (6/507) y 1,7% (IC95% 0,1-9) en las RMN (1/58). Basado en las guías AGA y europea, la prevalencia de CIPC fue de 0,2% (IC95% 0,1-1) en las TC (1/507) y 1,7% (IC 95% 0,1-9) en las RMN (1/58). Los pacientes con PC inicialmente clasificados como "AGA o europea positivo" tuvieron una mayor probabilidad quirúrgica y esta decisión se tomó antes en el seguimiento. CONCLUSIONES: En nuestra cohorte, la prevalencia de quistes pancreáticos incidentales y relevantes no fue despreciable, siendo cercana al 1% según las guías actuales

Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Most pancreatic cysts (PCs) found incidentally by CT and MRI scans might not be clinically important according to the Fukuoka guidelines, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and European guidelines. AIMS: To determine and compare the prevalence of incidental clinically important PCs (CIPCs). METHODS: Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans performed during a one-year period were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidental PCs. CIPCs were defined as those cysts that would be capable of triggering further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound, immediate surveillance (within 3-6 months) and/or surgery. Prevalence was calculated as the number of patients with CIPCs per 100 subjects imaged (%). RESULTS: Sixty patients (mean age 70±14 years) out of 565 were found to have incidental PCs, representing a prevalence of 8.7% (95% CI 6.3-11.5) in CT scans and 27.5% (95% CI 16-41) in MRI scans. Seven patients (11.6%, 95% CI 5-22) had CIPCs based on size ≥ 30mm (n=5), size ≥ 30mm and pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (n=1) and PD dilation and presence of solid component (n=1). Based on the Fukuoka guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 1.2% (95% CI 0.4-2.5) in CT scans (6/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1-9) in MRI scans (1/58). Based on the AGA and European guidelines, the prevalence of CIPCs was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1-1) in CT scans (1/507) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.1-9) in MRI scans (1/58). Patients with PCs initially classified as "AGA- or European-positive" had a higher surgical probability and this decision was taken earlier in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the prevalence of important incidental pancreatic cysts was not negligible at around 1% according to current guidelines.

Inserción de prótesis metálicas autoexpandibles totalmente recubiertas en patología biliar benigna / Insertion of fully covered self-expanding metal stents in benign biliary diseases

Introducción: las enfermedades biliares benignas se han tratado, tradicionalmente, mediante la colocación de prótesis plásticas. Sin embargo, en la actualidad, las prótesis metálicas autoexpandibles totalmente recubiertas están ganando aceptación para el tratamiento de dichas patologías. Objetivo: evaluar la eficacia y las complicaciones de la inserción endoscópica temporal de prótesis metálicas totalmente recubiertas para el tratamiento de patologías biliares benignas. Materiales y métodos: estudio retrospectivo y observacional realizado a partir de una base de datos prospectiva en un centro de tercer nivel entre marzo de 2012 y mayo de 2016. Se incluyeron pacientes a los que se les colocó una prótesis metálica totalmente recubierta por patología benigna de la vía biliar. Se documentaron las indicaciones, las tasas de resolución, las de éxito técnico y los eventos adversos. Resultados: se incluyeron 31 pacientes a los que se insertaron 34 prótesis. Las indicaciones fueron las siguientes: 8 (25%) estenosis biliares poscolecistectomía, 11 (31%) coledocolitiasis de gran tamaño o múltiple, 3 (8,3%) fístulas biliares, 2 (6%) estenosis postrasplante hepático, 3 (8,3%) estenosis papilares, 2 (6%) perforaciones y 2 (6%) sangrados. La tasa de éxito global de resolución de la patológica fue del 88%: 87,5% (7/8) en estenosis poscolecistectomía, 73% (8/11) en litiasis gigante, y 100% en el resto de las indicaciones. Se retiraron mediante endoscopia 33 de las 34 tras un promedio de 133 días (rango 10-180 días). No se registraron complicaciones. Conclusión: las prótesis metálicas autoexpandibles totalmente recubiertas son una alternativa efectiva y segura en la resolución de patologías biliares benignas (AU)

Introduction: Benign biliary diseases are traditionally treated using plastic stents. However, fully covered self-expanding metal stents are currently gaining acceptance for the treatment of these pathologies. Objective: To assess the effectiveness and complications associated with the placement of temporary endoscopic fully covered self-expanding metal stents for the treatment of benign biliary diseases. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective and observational study using a prospective database from a tertiary care center from March 2012 to May 2016. Some patients that had a fully covered metal stent due to a benign biliary disease were also included. The indications, resolution, technical success rates and adverse events were documented. Results: 31 patients were included with a total of 34 stents inserted. The indications were as follows: 8 (25%) post cholecystectomy biliary stenoses, 11 (31%) large or multiple choledocholithiasis, 3 (8.3%) biliary fistulas, 2 (6%) post-liver transplant stenoses, 2 (8.3%) papillary stenoses, 2 (6%) perforations and 2 (6%) bleeds. The global resolution success rate of the stents for all pathologies was 88%, this included 87.5% (7/8) in post cholecystectomy stenoses, 73% (8/11) in large choledocholithiasis and 100% for the remaining indications. Thirty-three of 34 stents were removed after an average of 133 days (ranging from 10 to 180 days). No complications were registered. Conclusion: Fully covered self-expanding metal stents are an effective and reliable alternative for the resolution of benign biliary diseases (AU)

Insertion of fully covered self-expanding metal stents in benign biliary diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Benign biliary diseases are traditionally treated using plastic stents. However, fully covered self-expanding metal stents are currently gaining acceptance for the treatment of these pathologies. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and complications associated with the placement of temporary endoscopic fully covered self-expanding metal stents for the treatment of benign biliary diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective and observational study using a prospective database from a tertiary care center from March 2012 to May 2016. Some patients that had a fully covered metal stent due to a benign biliary disease were also included. The indications, resolution, technical success rates and adverse events were documented. RESULTS: 31 patients were included with a total of 34 stents inserted. The indications were as follows: 8 (25%) post cholecystectomy biliary stenoses, 11 (31%) large or multiple choledocholithiasis, 3 (8.3%) biliary fistulas, 2 (6%) post-liver transplant stenoses, 2 (8.3%) papillary stenoses, 2 (6%) perforations and 2 (6%) bleeds. The global resolution success rate of the stents for all pathologies was 88%, this included 87.5% (7/8) in post cholecystectomy stenoses, 73% (8/11) in large choledocholithiasis and 100% for the remaining indications. Thirty-three of 34 stents were removed after an average of 133 days (ranging from 10 to 180 days). No complications were registered. CONCLUSION: Fully covered self-expanding metal stents are an effective and reliable alternative for the resolution of benign biliary diseases.

Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplastic Lesions in Patients with Sporadic Sessile Serrated Adenomas Undergoing Colonoscopic Surveillance.

OBJECTIVES: The risk of developing metachronous advanced neoplastic lesions (ANLs) during surveillance after resection of sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) has not been quantified. METHODS: Patients with sporadic SSAs resected between 1 April 2007 and 31 December 2009 who underwent surveillance colonoscopy in our institution were prospectively evaluated. Patients with low-risk adenomas (LRAs), high-risk adenomas (HRAs), and negative index colonoscopy (NIC) during the same period were identified using the pathology database and electronic medical records, and were also included as a comparison cohort. The primary outcome was the comparison of the study groups with regard to incidence of metachronous ANLs during surveillance colonoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients had SSAs, of whom 75 with 101 resected polyps were finally included. The comparison cohort consisted of 564 patients: 140 LRAs (160 polyps), 87 HRAs (478 polyps), and 337 NICs. The overall mean colonoscopy follow-up was for 54.5 months (±s.d. 14). SSA patients with synchronous HRA on index colonoscopy presented a higher incidence rate of metachronous ANL (12.96 per 1,000 person-months) compared with patients with HRA (5.07 per 1,000 person-months), whereas those with synchronous LRA and without synchronous adenoma on index colonoscopy presented a low incidence rate of metachronous ANL (0 and 1.41 per 1,000 person-months, respectively) similar to LRA (1.47 per 1,000 person-months). Among patients with SSA the 3- and 5-year ANL free-cumulative probability was 64.3 and 32.1% in those with synchronous HRA, 100 and 100% in those with synchronous LRA, and 95.1 and 91.7% if no synchronous adenoma was found. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resected sporadic SSAs the risk of developing metachronous ANL is influenced by the presence of synchronous HRA on index colonoscopy. Patients with SSAs and synchronous HRA on index colonoscopy require closer surveillance, whereas those with synchronous LRA and those without synchronous adenomas may be followed up in the same way as those with LRAs.