A randomized phase II study of S-1 plus oral leucovorin versus S-1 monotherapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of adding oral leucovorin (LV) to S-1 when compared with S-1 monotherapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer (PC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine-refractory PC patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive S-1 at 40, 50, or 60 mg according to body surface area plus LV 25 mg, both given orally twice daily for 1 week, repeated every 2 weeks (SL group), or S-1 monotherapy at the same dose as the SL group for 4 weeks, repeated every 6 weeks (S-1 group). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Among 142 patients enrolled, 140 were eligible for efficacy assessment (SL: n = 69 and S-1: n = 71). PFS was significantly longer in the SL group than in the S-1 group [median PFS, 3.8 versus 2.7 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.85; P = 0.003]). The disease control rate was significantly higher in the SL group than in the S-1 group (91% versus 72%; P = 0.004). Overall survival (OS) was similar in both groups (median OS, 6.3 versus 6.1 months; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.54-1.22; P = 0.463). After adjusting for patient background factors in a multivariate analysis, OS tended to be better in the SL group (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47-1.07; P = 0.099). Both treatments were well tolerated, although gastrointestinal toxicities were slightly more severe in the SL group. CONCLUSION: The addition of LV to S-1 significantly improved PFS in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced PC, and a phase III trial has been initiated in a similar setting. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center: JapicCTI-111554.

Randomised phase II trial of S-1 plus oxaliplatin vs S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: This randomised, open-label, multicenter phase II study compared progression-free survival (PFS) of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) with that of S-1 alone in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with confirmed progressive disease following the first-line treatment with a gemcitabine-based regimen were randomised to receive either S-1 (80/100/120 mg day(-1) based on body surface area (BSA), orally, days 1-28, every 6 weeks) or SOX (S-1 80/100/120 mg day(-1) based on BSA, orally, days 1-14, plus oxaliplatin 100 mg m(-2), intravenously, day 1, every 3 weeks). The primary end point was PFS. RESULTS: Between January 2009 and July 2010, 271 patients were randomly allocated to either S-1 (n=135) or SOX (n=136). Median PFS for S-1 and SOX were 2.8 and 3.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR)=0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.65-1.08; stratified log-rank test P=0.18). Median overall survival (OS) was 6.9 vs 7.4 months (HR=1.03; 95% CI, 0.79-1.34; stratified log-rank test P=0.82). The response rate (RR) was 11.5% vs 20.9% (P=0.04). The major grade 3/4 toxicities (S-1 and SOX) were neutropenia (11.4% and 8.1%), thrombocytopenia (4.5% and 10.3%) and anorexia (12.9% and 14.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Although SOX showed an advantage in RR, it provided no significant improvement in PFS or OS compared with S-1 alone.

Allo-SCT using reduced-intensity conditioning against advanced pancreatic cancer: a Japanese survey.

Pancreatic cancer is a frequent cause of cancer-related mortality and has an extremely poor prognosis. To evaluate the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT with reduced-intensity conditioning (RICT) against pancreatic cancer, we analyzed the clinical data of 22 patients. After a fludarabine-based conditioning regimen followed by the infusion of PBSCs, all but two achieved engraftment. Complete, partial and minor response was observed in 1, 2 and 2 patients, respectively, with an overall response rate of 23%. Median survival was only 139 days and the major cause of death was tumor progression. Poor performance status before RICT and a lower number of infused CD34-positive cells were associated with shorter survival after RICT. Patients who developed chronic GVHD tended to survive longer than those who did not. These findings support the investigation of a novel treatment strategy to enhance the immunological effect against pancreatic cancer.

Regression of an unresectable pancreatic tumor following nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation.

A 59-year-old female with an unresectable, large pancreatic tumor (10.0 x 8.0 cm(2) on CT scan) underwent nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation from her HLA-identical sibling. Pronounced tumor regression and relief from pain without acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were observed following transplantation. The patient is surviving (more than 300 days) after transplantation, with extensive chronic GVHD, and has tumor regression with an 80% reduction in tumor size. The observed clinical course may suggest a graft-versus-tumor effect on the pancreatic tumor following allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

[Paclitaxel].

The optimal dose and schedule of paclitaxel is not yet defined and is the subject of a number of clinical trials. These studies have not shown a clear-cut dose-response relationship. Trials evaluating administration schedule have not found either 24 h or 96 h infusion to be superior to 3 h infusion. These clinical evidence suggests that optimal dose and schedule of single-agent paclitaxel is 175 mg/m2 over 3 h. Weekly moderate-dose paclitaxel administration is generating much interest, as dose dense therapy, with very modest myelosuppression.

[New combination therapies for gastrointestinal cancer].

Recently, cisplation (CDDP) and CPT-11 have joined the other drugs used for gastrointestinal chemotherapy, and the combination of I-leucovorin (I-LV)/5-FU has become available for use in medical treatment in Japan. This enables doctors to make a variety of regimens for gastrointestinal cancers. In this paper, we explain the new combinations, especially LV/5-FU/platinum, CPT-11/CDDP, and LV/5-FU/CPT-11. The combination of 5-FU/LV/CPT-11 has shown a higher antitumor activity than 5-FU/LV alone, with increased progression free survival or time-to-treatment failure. This combination will be considered the new standard regimen for colorectal cancer. It is worthy of note that the combination of UFT/LV provided on equally effective but safe and more convenient oral alternative to the standard i.v. 5-FU/LV regimen for colorectal cancer.

[Standard chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies based on evidence].

It has been said that there is no standard chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies. However, standard guidelines are essential to increase the level of medical treatment, and the death rate from gastrointestinal malignancies is very high in Japan. FAMTX, standard therapy for gastric cancer abroad, cannot be standard in Japan due to its toxicities. A combination of 5-FU and cisplatin (FP) is most commonly used as the the first choice for chemotherapy, but it's regimens vary. For colon cancer, it is said that a combination of 5-FU and Leucovorin (LV) is standard, but CPT-11, made in Japan, is a promising agent. There is no recommended drug for advanced pancreatic cancer, so palliative care or no chemotherapy are also available alternatives.

Dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of a humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer.

We conducted a phase I pharmacokinetic dose escalation study of a recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody (MKC-454) in 18 patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to chemotherapy. Three or six patients at each dose level received 1, 2, 4 and 8 mg kg(-1) of MKC-454 as 90-min intravenous infusions. The first dose was followed in 3 weeks by nine weekly doses. Target trough serum concentration has been set at 10 microg ml(-1) based on in vitro observations. The mean value of minimum trough serum concentrations at each dose level were 3.58 +/- 0.63, 6.53 +/- 5.26, 40.2 +/- 7.12 and 87.9 +/- 23.5 microg ml(-1) respectively. At 2 mg kg(-1), although minimum trough serum concentrations were lower than the target trough concentration with a wide range of variation, trough concentrations increased and exceeded the target concentration, as administrations were repeated weekly. Finally 2 mg kg(-1) was considered to be sufficient to achieve the target trough concentration by the weekly dosing regimen. One patient receiving 1 mg kg(-1) had grade 3 fever, one at the 1 mg kg(-1) level had severe fatigue defined as grade 3, and one at 8 mg kg(-1) had severe bone pain of grade 3. No antibodies against MKC-454 were detected in any patients. Objective tumour responses were observed in two patients; one receiving 4 mg kg(-1) had a partial response in lung metastases and the other receiving 8 mg kg(-1) had a complete response in soft tissue metastases. These results indicate that MKC-454 is well tolerated and effective in patients with refractory metastatic breast cancers overexpressing the HER2 proto-oncogene. Further evaluation of this agent with 2-4 mg kg(-1) weekly intravenous infusion is warranted.

[Progress in the treatment of colorectal cancer].

The chemotherapeutic management of advanced colorectal cancer has been a challenge to oncologists for the last 30 years, with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) being used as the core drug. However, its effectiveness is far from satisfactory, and there has been no evidence of improved survival. Recently, a method of biochemical modulation was used to enhance the effect of 5-FU. In colorectal cancer patients with recurrent or metastatic sites, survival was significantly prolonged for a group receiving LV.5-FU therapy, based on biochemical modulation, compared with a group receiving no chemotherapy (best supportive care). Still more, LV.5-FU therapy was proved to be beneficial for survival when it was used as a postoperative adjuvant. In this way, the most recent chemotherapy for colorectal cancer was proved to be effective.

Clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic breast cancer with complete remission following systemic treatment.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have variable clinical courses. The purpose was to describe the clinical characteristics of MBC patients with complete remissions (CR) following systemic treatment. METHODS: We analyzed 315 consecutive MBC patients treated with several types of systemic treatments at the National Cancer Center Hospital between January 1988 and December 1993. RESULTS: The median survival time (MST) and median progression-free survival were 28.0 and 17.1 months, respectively. Forty patients were defined as 'first-CR' following initial or second-line systemic treatment and the majority of them had a good performance status, low number of metastatic sites and low incidence of liver involvement. Nine of 40 patients with first-CR continued progression-free 5 years after beginning systemic treatments. The major sites of metastasis were the lung and bone and there were no cases with liver metastasis. Five patients received standard doxorubicin-containing combination chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen. Two of these nine patients remain progression free in first-CR. Three of them remained in first-CR after 5 years and died of progressive breast cancer and two others died of unrelated causes. Two patients relapsed after obtaining a first-CR for at least 5 years and remain alive with active metastatic disease. The MST and median progression-free survival of nine patients were 10.6 and 9.0 years, respectively. These nine patients represented 22.5% of all first-CR patients and 3.2% of the total patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although MBC is commonly recognized to be an incurable disease, a small percentage of patients clearly are alive and progression free for prolonged periods after initiation of systemic treatments.

Construction and validation of a practical prognostic index for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To identify the readily available prognostic factors most helpful in predicting survival and to construct and validate a prognostic index for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 233 MBC patients, accrued on a multiinstitutional randomized phase III trial (Japan Clinical Oncology Group [JCOG] study 8808), were analyzed to identify significant prognostic factors and a prognostic index was constructed by incorporating these prognostic factors. For validation of the prognostic index, another data set from 315 consecutive MBC patients, who had been treated with standard anthracycline-containing regimens, was analyzed. RESULTS: In multivariate regression analyses, history of adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJCT) (P = .0005), presence of distant lymph nodes (DLNs) (P = .0117) and liver (HEP) (P = .0099) metastases, elevation of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P < .0001), and shorter disease-free interval (DFI) (P < .0001) significantly contributed to poorer survival. The prognostic index was constructed as follows: Prognostic Index = ADJCT (not received = 0, received = 1) + DLNs (absent = 0, present = 1) + HEP (absent = 0, present = 1) + LDH (< or = one times normal = 0, > one times normal = 1) + DFI (> or = 24 months = 0, < 24 months = 2). With this prognostic index, patients could be stratified into three risk groups. The median survival times (MSTs) of low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups were 45.5, 24.6, and 10.6 months, respectively (P < .0001). This prognostic index was applied to the validation patients. The respective MSTs for each risk group were 49.6,22.8, and 10.0 months (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: ADJCT, DLNs, HEP, LDH, and DFI were important prognostic factors for MBC patients. The prognostic index readily enables MBC patients to be stratified into three risk groups and is worth considering for future clinical trials.

A phase I trial of docetaxel and 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.

To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the recommended doses for further trials of docetaxel in combination with a 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients who had been treated previously with at least one chemotherapeutic regimen, patients were treated with docetaxel as a 1-h infusion on day 1 followed by 5-FU as a continuous infusion on days 1 through 5 every 3-4 weeks. Three or six patients were assessed at the following escalating dose levels of docetaxel/5-FU per day: 40/150, 40/300, 50/300, 50/500 and 60/500 mg m(-2). Nineteen patients entered this trial, of whom 18 could be assessed for adverse event and therapeutic efficacy. The DLTs were neutropenia and diarrhoea. The MTDs were 60 mg m(-2) of docetaxel on day 1 and 500 mg m(-2) per day of 5-day continuous infusion of 5-FU. One of 18 patients achieved a complete response and eight achieved partial response (over all response rate: 50%). The recommended doses of docetaxel and 5-day continuous infusion of 5-FU for a phase II trial are 50 mg m(-2) and 500 mg m(-2) per day every 3 or 4 weeks.

Antibiotic no. 6016, a polyether antibiotic.

A new polyether antibiotic, No. 6016, was isolated from the culture of Streptomyces albus strain No. 6016. The antibiotic was obtained as colorless prisms having a molecular formula of C46H77O16Na, m.p. 192 approximately 195 degrees C (dec.), and has only end absorption in ultraviolet region. The infrared and NMR spectra of the antibiotic suggest the presence of carbonyl and methoxyl groups. The antibiotic No. 6016 exhibits activity against Gram-positive bacteria including mycobacteria and is effective in the treatment of coccidiosis of fowl.