Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 27(3): 102-106, 2021 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31703022

RESUMO

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease causing complex hand disability. A reliable tool for hand function assessment in SSc is the Cochin Hand Functional Disability Scale (CHFS). More recently, a short-form CHFS of 6 items (CHFS-6) has been developed. OBJECTIVES: To validate the CHFS and the new CHFS-6 in Romanian patients with SSc. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with SSc who completed the CHFS were included. All patients were assessed according to the recommendations of the European Scleroderma and Research Trials and also completed the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire and the Hand Mobility in Scleroderma questionnaire. Finger range-of-motion distances were measured. RESULTS: Seventy patients, 63 female and 7 male patients (age median, 53.0 years; interquartile range [IQR], 21.0 years), were included. Twenty seven had diffuse cutaneous involvement (dcSSc). Median CHFS and CHFS-6 at baseline were 25.0 (IQR, 37.0) and 8.0 (IQR, 13.0), respectively.The internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.96, respectively, 0.90, in all 70 patients) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98 for both, in 38 patients) of both CHFS and CHFS-6 were excellent. The CHFS-6 had a very high correlation with the CHFS. There were moderate to good correlations with Hand Mobility in Scleroderma, Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire, and the anthropometric measurements (construct validity). In patients with early dcSSc with a second evaluation, we found good to moderate sensitivity to change (standardized response mean of 0.8 and effect size of 0.4 for CHFS, and standardized response mean of 1.1 and effect size of 0.6 for CHFS-6). CONCLUSIONS: The CHFS and CHFS-6 are valid and easy-to-use tools for hand involvement in SSc, which can be used in clinical or research setting.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Escleroderma Sistêmico , Adulto , Feminino , Mãos , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Escleroderma Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
2.
Exp Ther Med ; 20(4): 3438-3443, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32905140

RESUMO

Capillary density on nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) is considered a promising instrument for assessing disease characteristics in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), however, there is no agreement yet over how to analyze and interpret the results. The objective of this study was to investigate the possible associations of the mean number of capillaries with disease characteristics, disease activity [measured by the European Scleroderma Study Group (EScSG) disease activity score] and survival in a single-center cohort of patients with SSc. Sixty-eight patients were included; 54 had follow-up at 6 months. Thirty-two images per patient were assessed independently by two raters, scoring the mean number of capillaries in all fingers (N), in the 3rd finger of the dominant hand (dN3) and in the 4th finger of the non-dominant hand (ndN4) for each patient. NFC 'early', 'active' and 'late' patterns were also assessed. Two thousand and seventy-six images were scored at baseline, 1,728 at follow-up. Baseline N was median (IQR) 5.1 (2.7) for rater 1, and 4.9 (1.7) for rater 2, respectively. N was significantly lower in patients with a history of digital ulcers (DUs), vs. those who never had DUs 4.8 (1.4) vs. 6.4 (3.1), P=0.016. A lower N was associated with higher disease activity at baseline and follow-up (linear regression adjusted for age, sex and history of DUs). A lower ndN4 was associated with increased mortality (logistic regression adjusted for age and sex). In conclusion, in patients with SSc, a lower mean number of capillaries assessed by NFC was associated with higher disease activity after 6 months of follow-up and with shorter survival.

3.
Clin Rheumatol ; 37(9): 2391-2397, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29150737

RESUMO

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major concern in patients receiving TNF inhibitors (TNFi). This study aimed to assess the incidence of active TB and the efficacy of TB prevention measures used over the years, and to determine risk factors for developing TB, in a single-centre cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) receiving TNFi. Data of all patients in whom treatment with TNFi was initiated in our rheumatology clinic until December 1st 2014 have been retrospectively analysed. The cohort was divided into 3 groups per the mandatory LTBI screening method at baseline: tuberculin skin test (TST) with a positive threshold of either 10 mm (group TST1), or 5 mm (group TST2), and QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test (group QFT). The incidence of active TB was analysed for each group and compared to TB incidence data in general population. Five hundred fifty patients were included (305 RA, 42 PsA, 203 AS); 97 patients belonged to the TST1, 229 to the TST2 and 224 to the QFT group. The number of active TB cases/time of exposure to TNFi (person-years, PY) was 8/593.5, 9/1044.0 and 3/555.3, respectively, accounting for an incidence of 1348.0, 862.1 and 540.2 cases per 105 PY. Active TB cases occurring in the first year of TNFi treatment (early TB) per total TB cases were only 3/8, 1/9 and 1/3, respectively, too few to identify statistically significant differences between the 3 LTBI screening protocols. However, less TB cases per total observation time were registered in the QFT group, probably due to the reduced duration of exposure to TNFi. All cases of active TB were registered among patients receiving monoclonal antibodies TNFi agents. We have found no significant risk factors for developing active TB. In our cohort, TB occurring after 1 year of TNFi treatment exceeds 'early TB', suggesting the necessity of further TB prevention measures besides baseline screening for LTBI.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose/induzido quimicamente , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Adalimumab/administração & dosagem , Adalimumab/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/administração & dosagem , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Certolizumab Pegol/administração & dosagem , Certolizumab Pegol/efeitos adversos , Etanercepte/administração & dosagem , Etanercepte/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Infliximab/administração & dosagem , Infliximab/efeitos adversos , Tuberculose Latente/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Teste Tuberculínico , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Tuberculose/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA