Clinical Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Post-Traumatic Elbow Contractures in the Pediatric Age Group: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a common occurrence resulting in potentially substantial functional limitations in both daily activities and recreational endeavors. In children, this can be particularly difficult given the early stages of childhood and development and the challenges of rehabilitation. Several studies have reported favorable results of elbow contracture releases in children, resulting in improvements in outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of elbow contracture releases in the pediatric population (<18 years), along with subgroup analyses comparing age groups, operative approach, and post-traumatic versus nontraumatic etiologies. METHODS: Meta-analysis was performed with a multidatabase search (PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, and Medline) according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines on September 25, 2020. Data from all published literature meeting inclusion criteria were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, comprising 114 post-traumatic elbow contractures. Mean age was 13.7 years. Contracture releases of the elbow led to improvements in flexion-extension arc of motion by 48º, and pronosupination arc of motion by 22º. Subgroup analysis comparing age groups of <10, 10-14 and 15-18 years showed greater improvements in flexion-extension arc in the older age group, whereas subgroup analysis comparing injury patterns revealed a larger improvement in pronosupination motion for radial head fractures. Comparing open and arthroscopic procedures, open releases had greater improvement in both flexion-extension and pronosupination motion by 18º and 21º, respectively, although there were limited patients in the arthroscopy group. CONCLUSION: Operative management of pediatric elbow contractures is effective. Older children, children with radial head fractures, and those receiving open contracture releases may be more likely to have greater improvements. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Comparing outcomes of the anterosuperior and deltopectoral approaches in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative glenohumeral arthritis: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Reverse total shoulder replacement (rTSR) improves pain and function in patients with a wide range of shoulder pathology. Anterosuperior (AS) and deltopectoral (DP) approaches are widely used to gain access to the glenohumeral joint in arthroplasty. Our aim was to systematically review the literature comparing outcomes of these two approaches when performing rTSR for degenerative glenohumeral arthritis. METHODS: Systematic review was performed with an electronic multi-database search (Pubmed, Medline & Embase) according to PRISMA guidelines on 18th September 2022. Data from published studies of any study design that met the inclusion criteria were extracted, reviewed and synthesized. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies were identified for full text review, of which four were included. No significant difference in pain and range of motion were observed between approaches. Scapular notching was more common in the anterosuperior approach. Low rates of instability and intra-operative fracture were observed in both. CONCLUSION: Both approaches demonstrate similar clinical outcomes with reference to pain, range of motion and complications when performing rTSR indicated for degenerative joint disease. However, further well-designed studies are required.

Functional outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Boileau class 1 and class 2 proximal humeral fracture sequelae: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an increasingly popular salvage treatment option for proximal humeral fracture (PHF) sequelae. This meta-analysis aimed to conduct a pooled analysis of functional outcomes of RTSA in PHF sequelae, with subgroup analysis comparing between intracapsular (Class 1) and extracapsular (Class 2) PHF sequelae. Methods: A multi-database search (PubMed, OVID, EMBASE) was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on 27th July 2020. Data from all published literature meeting inclusion criteria were extracted and analysed. Findings: Eleven studies were included, comprising 359 shoulders (167 Class 1 and 192 Class 2). The mean age was 68.2 years, and the mean time between injury and surgery was 49 months, (1-516 months). Constant score and forward flexion improved by 31.8 (95%CI: 30.5-33.1, p < 0.001) and 60o (95%CI: 58o-62o, p < 0.001) respectively between pre-operative and post-operative values for both groups. Constant scores were better in Class 1 patients (MD = 3.60, 95%CI: 1.0-6.2, p < 0.001) pre-operatively and post-operatively (MD = 7.4, 95%CI: 5.8-9.0, p < 0.001). Forward flexion was significantly better in Class 1 patients (MD = 13o, 95%CI: 7o-17o, p < 0.001) pre-operatively, but was slightly better in Class 2 patients post-operatively (MD = 7o, 95%CI: 4o-10o, p < 0.001). Overall complication rate was 16.8%. Conclusion: Salvage RTSA is effective for PHF sequelae, with multiple factors contributing to the high complication rate.

Comparison of dynamic versus static fixation of intramedullary nailing in tibial diaphyseal fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Tibial fractures are common long bone injuries, often surgically fixed with intramedullary nails. Modern intramedullary tibial nails allow for two different fixation modes, namely static and dynamic modes. While studies have demonstrated benefits of using either fixation modes, there has been no consensus as to which fixation mode would produce better outcomes and less complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of dynamic versus static fixation of intramedullary nails in the operative fixation of tibial diaphyseal fractures. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted with a multi-database search (PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, Medline) according to PRISMA guidelines on April 15, 2021. Data from all published literature meeting inclusion criteria were extracted and analysed with fixed- and random-effects models.Findings/results: A total of 478 statically fixed and 234 dynamically fixed patients were included in this meta-analysis. Dynamically fixed patients had a significantly shorter mean time to union (mean difference, MD = 5.18 weeks, 95%CI: 1.95-8.41 weeks, p = 0.002) and reoperation rates (OR = 0.21, 95%CI: 0.10-0.47, p < 0.001) than statically fixed patients. No significant difference was found between both groups in terms of malrotation (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.07-4.41, p = 0.59), non-union (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.24-5.05, p = 0.91), delayed union (OR = 1.15, 95%CI: 0.19-7.17, p = 0.88) and malunion (OR = 2.73, 95% CI: 0.29-25.26, p = 0.38). Conclusion: While acknowledging that there is widespread surgeon preference to dyanamise or statically fix intramedullary nails in certain tibial fracture configurations, primary dynamic fixation of intramedullary tibial nails demonstrated significantly shorter times to bony union and less complications than static nailing in our meta-analysis. Further research on identifying patient factors and fracture patterns that would best benefit from dynamic fixation is required.

Integrated dual lag screws versus single lag screw cephalomedullary nail constructs: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of integrated dual lag screw (IDL) cephalomedullary nails (CMN) when compared with single lag screw (SL) constructs, in the internal fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. METHODS: The Smith & Nephew InterTan IDL was compared with SL CMN group consisting of the Stryker Gamma-3 (G3) and Synthes Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) CMN. A multi-database search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Data from studies assessing the clinical and radiological outcomes, complications and perioperative parameters of InterTan versus G3 or PFNA CMN in patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures were extracted and analysed. RESULTS: 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis, consisting of 2643 patients. InterTan was associated with lower complication rates in terms of all-cause revisions (OR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.51; p < 0.001), cut-outs (OR 0.30; 95% CI, 0.17-0.51; p < 0.001), medial or lateral screw migration (OR 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.65; p = 0.008) as well as persistent hip and thigh pain (OR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.90; p = 0.008). In terms of perioperative parameters, InterTan is associated with longer operative times (MD 5.57 minutes; 95% CI, 0.37-10.78 minutes, p = 0.04) and fluoroscopy times (MD 38.89 seconds, 95% CI, 15.88-61.91 seconds; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of clinical Harris Hip Score and radiological outcomes, non-union, haematoma, femoral fractures, varus collapse, length of stay and mean intraoperative blood loss between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated dual lag screw cephalomedullary nails are associated with fewer revisions and complications. However, there is insufficient data to suggest that either nail construct is associated with better functional outcomes.

Extrusion, meniscal signal change, loss of shape, synovitis and bone marrow oedema are reliable scoring parameters to assess MRI appearance post meniscal transplant.

PURPOSE: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has shown good promise in restoring normal knee joint biomechanics in a meniscal deficient patient. However, MRI appearance of the meniscal allograft is often questioned and raises concerns of its viability and function. This paper aims to introduce and validate a new scoring system for MAT MRI appearance at 12 months [MRI appearance in Meniscal Transplant Score (MIMS)], using key changes such as extrusion, meniscal signal change, loss of shape, synovitis and bone marrow oedema. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 10 patients from a single surgeon series was conducted. All MAT were performed with soft tissue fixation technique. MRI was performed at 12 months post-transplant with two independent consultant musculoskeletal radiologists and one experienced meniscal transplant surgeon scoring the images obtained. Interobserver agreement and intraclass correlation were measured. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement between examiners on individual features of the MIMS was superior for tibial bone oedema, substantial for meniscal extrusion and femoral bone oedema, moderate for meniscal shape and synovitis, and fair for meniscal signal changes. Absolute agreement between raters found good reliability (ICC = 0.774; 95% 0.359, 0.960) for single measures and excellent reliability (ICC = 0.911; 95% 0.627, 0.986) for average measures. CONCLUSION: MIMS is a reliable method of evaluating the meniscal allograft transplant 12 months post-transplant. Further research with larger MAT cohort groups and patient reported outcome measures may be helpful to correlate its clinical significance and guide further management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The use of minimally invasive interspinous process devices for the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis: a narrative literature review.

Minimally invasive interspinous process devices (IPD), including interspinous distraction devices (IDD) and interspinous stabilizers (ISS), are increasingly utilized for treating symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis (LCS). There is ongoing debate around their efficacy and safety over traditional decompression techniques with and without interbody fusion (IF). This study presents a comprehensive review of IPD and investigates if: (I) minimally invasive IDD can effectively substitute direct neural decompression and (II) ISS are appropriate substitutes for fusion after decompression. Articles published up to 22nd January 2020 were obtained from PubMed search. Relevant articles published in the English language were selected and critically reviewed. Observational studies across different IPD brands consistently show significant improvements in clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction at short-term follow-up. Compared to non-operative treatment, mini-open IDD was had significantly greater quality of life and clinical outcome improvements at 2-year follow-up. Compared to open decompression, mini-open IDD had similar clinical outcomes, but associated with higher complications, reoperation risks and costs. Compared to open decompression with concurrent IF, ISS had comparable clinical outcomes with reduced operative time, blood loss, length of stay and adjacent segment mobility. Mini-open IDD had better outcomes over non-operative treatment in mild-moderate LCS at 2-year follow-up, but had similar outcomes with higher risk of re-operations than open decompression. ISS with open decompression may be a suitable alternative to decompression and IF for stable grade 1 spondylolisthesis and central stenosis. To further characterize this procedure, future studies should focus on examining enhanced new generation IPD devices, longer-term follow-up and careful patient selection.

No Difference in Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes Between Direct Anterior or Posterior Approach THA: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Both the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) to THA have known advantages and disadvantages. The comparison between DAA and PA THA has been widely explored during the early postoperative period. However, few randomized trials have compared these approaches at a minimum follow-up of 5 years; doing so would be important to establish any differences in mid-term outcomes or complications. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed a randomized trial comparing DAA and PA in THA in terms of (1) patient-reported outcome scores, (2) quality of life and functional outcomes assessed by the EQ-5D and 10-meter walk test results, (3) radiographic analysis, and (4) survivorship and surgical complications at a minimum of 5 years follow-up. METHODS: Two hip specialist surgeons performed both DAA and PA THA using the same THA components at two hospital sites. One hundred twelve patients on the elective THA surgical waitlist were invited to participate in the study. Thirty-four patients did not meet the study's inclusion criteria and were excluded, and three patients declined to participate in the study. The remaining 75 patients who were eligible were randomized into DAA and PA groups. Thirty-seven patients were initially randomized to receive DAA THA, but two did not and were excluded, resulting in 48% (35 of 73) of patients who received DAA THA; 52% (38 of 73) of patients were randomized into and received PA THA. Over a minimum 5 years of follow-up, 3% (1 of 35) of DAA patients were lost to follow-up, and none of the patients undergoing PA THA were lost. A per-protocol analysis was adopted, resulting in further patients being excluded from analysis. Of the 73 study patients, 99% (72; DAA: 35, PA: 37) were analyzed at 1 year, 95% (69; DAA: 34, PA: 35) were analyzed at 2 years, and 72% (52; DAA: 23, PA: 29) were analyzed at 5 years. The primary outcome was the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and WOMAC score. Secondary outcomes included the EQ-5D and EQ-5D VAS scores, 10-meter walk test results, radiographic evidence of loosening (femoral: lucency > 2 mm at the implant-bone interface, subsidence > 2 mm; acetabular: migration or change in inclination), 5-year survivorship analysis from all-cause revisions, and surgical complications. The study was powered to detect a 10-point difference in the WOMAC score, which is equivalent to the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). RESULTS: There were no differences in primary outcomes (OHS and WOMAC scores) or secondary outcomes (EQ-5D scores, EQ-5D VAS scores, and 10-meter walk test result) between the DAA and PA groups at the 5-year follow-up interval. The median (range) OHS at 5 years was 46 (16 to 48) for DAA and 47 (18 to 48) for PA groups (p = 0.93), and the median WOMAC score was 6 (0 to 81) for DAA and 7 (0 to 59) for PA groups (p = 0.96). The median EQ-5D score was 1 (0.1 to 1) for DAA and 1 (0.5 to 1) for PA groups (p = 0.45), and the median EQ-5D VAS score was 85 (60 to 100) for DAA and 95 (70 to 100) for PA groups (p = 0.29). There were no cases of component loosening on radiographs. There was no difference in component survival between the two approaches at 5 years (DAA: 97% [95% CI 85% to 100%] versus PA: 97% [95% CI 87% to 100%]). Eight of 23 patients in the DAA group reported decreased sensation in the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve distribution. CONCLUSION: DAA and PA are both effective approaches in performing primary THA. Each approach has its associated risks and complications. The choice of THA should be based on individual patient factors, surgeon experience, and shared decision-making. Early registry data indicate DAA and PA THA are comparable, but longer-term data with larger numbers of patients will be required before one can safely conclude equal survivorship between both approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Improved functional outcome and tuberosity healing in patients treated with fracture stems than nonfracture stems during shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures are difficult injuries to treat and obtain satisfactory outcomes. For those treated with arthroplasty, humeral fracture stems have been popular due to better ability for reduction and fixation of tuberosities. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of fracture stems in shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture and the comparison of outcomes between fracture vs. nonfracture stems. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted with a multidatabase search (PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, Medline) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines on May 19, 2020. Data from all published literature meeting inclusion criteria were extracted and analyzed. FINDINGS: Eleven studies were included for analysis, including 383 hemiarthroplasties (HA) (294 fracture stems, 89 nonfracture stems) and 358 reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSA) (309 fracture stems, 49 nonfracture stems). At the final follow-up, meta-analysis shows favorable overall ASES score in all fracture stem prosthesis (mean = 74.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.3-78.7), Constant-Murley score (mean = 67.2, 95% CI: 61.6-72.8), external rotation (mean difference [MD] = 7°, 95% CI: 3°-10°, P < .001), and forward flexion (MD = 17°, 95% CI: 10°-25°, P < .001). Pooled proportion (PP) of greater tuberosity healing (PP = 0.786, 95% CI: 0.686-0.886) was high, whereas all-cause revisions (PP = 0.034, 95% CI: 0.018-0.061) remained low. With the exception of RTSA scapular notching (PP = 0.109, 95% CI: 0.020-0.343), other complication metrics had PP of ≤0.023. In the 4 studies comparing fracture (138 HA, 54 RTSA) vs. nonfracture stems (89 HA, 49 RTSA), fracture stems had statistically significant better American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (MD = 14.29, 95% CI: 8.18-20.41, P < .001), external rotation (MD = 6°, 95% CI: 2°-9°, P = .003), forward flexion (MD = 16°, 95% CI: 7°-24°, P < .001), and greater tuberosity healing (odds ratio = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.28-3.77, P = .004). There was no statistically significant difference in complications. CONCLUSION: Fracture stems showed promising overall clinical outcomes with low complication rates in treating proximal humeral fractures. The use of fracture stems is also associated with greater chance of tuberosity healing compared with nonfracture stems. There is increasing evidence to suggest the superiority of fracture stems over nonfracture stems in clinical outcomes, while maintaining similar complication rates.

Single Level Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Vertebral Hemangiomata - A Review of Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive technique to treat patients with symptomatic vertebral hermangiomata. OBJECTIVES: We present a single-operator series of cases to demonstrate the clinical outcomes and complication profiles for this technique. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective multi-center cohort study. SETTING: Procedures were performed across multiple hospitals in Italy by a single proceduralist. METHODS: All patients with symptomatic vertebral hermangiomata that had percutaneous vertebroplasty over a 14-year period (March 1999 to April 2013) by a single proceduralist were included in this study. Information collected included demographic data, vertebral level of intervention, cement volume used, and the Visual Analogue Score for pain that was assessed pre- and post-intervention. Patients were followed up for a minimum of one year. RESULTS: Percutaneous vertebroplasty was performed for 50 patients. All patients had an improvement in pain, with 39 patients (78%) reporting complete pain relief. A unipedicular approach was undertaken in 41 cases (82%), and bipedicular approach in 8 patients (16%), while a transoral approach was used in one patient. The mean cement volume per vertebral level was 6.8 mL (1 - 18 mL). Recurrent symptoms occurred in 2 patients (4%) requiring repeat vertebroplasty. There were no cases of symptomatic cement leak, and no cases of procedural morbidity or mortality. LIMITATIONS: As a multicenter study conducted over a 14-year time period, there may be heterogeneity in procedural technique and rehabilitation protocols. There were no cases of cement leakage in our study, which could be an underreporting of cases. This is could be due to none of our patients receiving a post procedural computerized tomography scan, which is more sensitive in detecting cement leakage when compared to procedural fluoroscopy. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous vertebroplasty is associated with good post-procedural outcomes in patients with vertebral hermangiomata. Complications such as neurological injury and cement leakages are rare.

Comparable outcomes in mini-midvastus versus mini-medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques in total knee arthroplasties (TKA) have gained popularity over conventional techniques due to benefits of hastened recovery and reduced complications. There are a variety of MIS techniques available and two most common techniques currently employed are the mini-midvastus (mMV) and mini-medial parapatellar (mMPP) approaches. This meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical outcomes and peri-operative parameters between mMV and mMPP in TKA in order to determine the presence of a superior technique. METHODS: A multi-database search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Data from studies comparing clinical outcomes and peri-operative parameters between mMV and mMPP approaches in TKA were extracted and analysed. RESULTS: A total of five randomized controlled trials were included for analysis, consisting of 190 mMV and 189 mMPP knees. Clinically unimportant differences were noted in blood loss and surgical time between the groups (5 mL less blood loss and 7 min less surgical time in mMV, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups for Knee Society Score at 1 and 2 years, range of motion at 1 and 2 years, incision length or incidence of lateral retinacular release (all non-significant, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The mMV and mMPP MIS TKA approaches have equivalent clinical outcomes. Despite a statistically significant longer operative time and higher mean blood loss in mMV than mMPP approach, clinically significant difference was not demonstrated. Both mMV and mMPP MIS techniques are reliable and safe to perform in TKA.