Differences in baseline risk estimated by physicians and patients with early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Physicians recommend adjuvant therapy to patients based on baseline risk. A common recognition for baseline risk between patients and physicians is critical for successful adjuvant therapy. We prospectively investigated the differences in estimated baseline risk between physicians and patients with early breast cancer. METHODS: This analysis was performed at a single institution in Japan. Early breast cancer patients over 18 years old were enrolled after surgery. After explaining the pathological results, physicians asked each patient about an estimated baseline risk. Differences in estimated baseline risk were defined as the baseline risk estimated by patients minus the baseline risk estimated by physicians. The primary endpoint was that the number of patients who estimate baseline risk higher than physicians was higher than those who estimate a lower baseline risk. The secondary endpoints were differences in estimated baseline risk by stage, subtype and the influence of patient factors to differences in estimated baseline risk. RESULTS: From July 2017 to December 2018, 262 patients were enrolled. Among the 262 patients, 190 estimated a higher baseline risk than physicians, 53 estimated a lower baseline risk and 19 estimated the same. Overall, patients estimated a significantly higher baseline risk than physicians (P < 0.001). Differences in estimated baseline risk was significantly smaller in patients who knew the term 'baseline risk' than patients who did not (P = 0.0037). Differences in estimated baseline risk were also significantly smaller in patients with stage II breast cancer than patients with stage I (P = 0.0239). However, there were no statistically significant differences of differences in estimated baseline risk according to other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with early breast cancer estimated a significantly higher baseline risk than physicians. Physicians should accurately explain baseline risk to patients for shared decision making.

The overall survival of breast cancer patients without adjuvant therapy.

PURPOSE: There are little data regarding the overall survival (OS) of patients without adjuvant systemic therapy, because most patients have been subject to standardized systemic therapies. We evaluated the baseline risk to facilitate making decisions about adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1835 breast cancer patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy between 1964 and 1992 were retrospectively evaluated. We investigated the 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) and OS according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes, pathological T classification, stage, and estrogen receptor (ER) status. RESULTS: Survival curves showed that as the number of metastatic lymph nodes, pathological T classification, and staging increased, the 10-year OS and DFS decreased. In univariate and multivariable analyses, the number of metastatic lymph nodes was significantly associated with the DFS and OS, while in a univariate analysis, the pathological T classification and stage were significantly associated with the DFS and OS. ER positivity was a good prognostic factor for the 5-year DFS. However, between 6 and 7 years after surgery, ER negativity was a better prognostic factor than ER positivity. CONCLUSION: We showed survival rates of patients without adjuvant therapy according to TNM classification and ER status. This information can aid in treatment selection for doctors and patients through a shared decision-making approach.

Prediction of pathological margin status using preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with early breast cancer who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy.

Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate reconstruction is standard surgical treatment for early breast cancer with widespread ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The local recurrence rate after SSM is up to 7.0%. We investigated prediction of the pathological margin using contrast-enhanced MRI, and evaluated the cut-off point to obtain the safety margin. We performed SSM with immediate reconstruction in 216 early breast cancer patients with widespread DCIS and/or invasive cancer from January 2014 to December 2015. Forty cases were retrospectively reviewed after excluding those with >15 mm between skin and tumor, determined by preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI, or involving reconstructive surgery for local recurrence, immeasurable lesion by preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We defined a positive pathological margin as <1 mm from the cancer nest. We reviewed the distance between skin and tumor by MRI and pathological examination. To identify the cut-off for predicting a positive pathological margin, we performed sensitivity analysis using an ROC curve. The margin-positive rate by pathological examination was 27.5% (n = 11/40), with a moderate correlation of MRI margin and pathological margin (r = 0.44). The best cut-off point for margin positivity was 5 mm of MRI margin, with sensitivity and specificity of 54% and 86%, respectively (P = 0.009). This is the first prediction of pathological margin by preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI in early breast cancer patients with SSM. Care is required for SSM if the MRI margin is less than 5 mm due to pathological margin positivity.

Occult breast cancer may originate from ectopic breast tissue present in axillary lymph nodes.

PURPOSE: Occult breast cancer (OBC) is classified as a carcinoma of unknown primary, and involves axillary lymphadenopathy and is histologically consistent with metastatic breast cancer. OBC has been conventionally considered as a metastatic lymph node lesion, the origin of which is an undetectable breast tumor. Therefore, OBC patients would usually have undergone axillary lymph node dissection, and mastectomy or whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT). However, majority of OBC reports have been based on cases that were diagnosed during a period when diagnostics was still relatively primitive, and when magnetic resonance imaging was not yet a standard preoperative assessment. Therefore, there have been many false negatives in the breast based on preoperative assessment. METHODS: We herein hypothesize that the origin of OBC is ectopic breast tissue present in axillary lymph nodes (ALNs). If our hypothesis is true, mastectomy and WBRT may be unnecessary for OBC patients. RESULTS: Our hypothesis is supported by several findings. First, advances in radiological imaging have suggested that a primary breast tumor is absent in OBC patients. Second, proliferative breast lesions arising from ectopic breast present in ALNs have been reported. Lastly, cellular subtypes in OBC based on immunohistochemistry are of various types including ordinary breast cancer and the prognosis is not worse than stage II breast cancer. CONCLUSION: It is important to distinguish between "primary" OBC in ALNs and "metastatic" OBC from micro-primary breast tumor. Further studies are required to determine if omission of mastectomy and WBRT is acceptable.

The investigation study using a questionnaire about the employment of Japanese breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, and its survival rate has improved. As the number of cancer survivors increases, it is important to support their social comeback during and after treatment. METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to breast cancer patients treated in Aichi Cancer Center Hospital between June and November 2014. Responders were categorized according to adjuvant therapy (Group A: none, Group B: endocrine therapy, Group C: chemotherapy), or if they had advanced or recurrent breast cancer (Group D). RESULTS: A total of 279 patients returned questionnaires (62, 79, 92 and 46 patients in Groups A, B, C and D, respectively). In adjuvant treatment groups, 43 patients (18.5%) quit their job during or after treatment. Most patients had quit their jobs at the time of diagnosis (7.5%), followed by those undergoing chemotherapy (5.6%) and those at the time of operation (4.9%). Quit rate from the workplace in which patients worked at the time of diagnosis was highest in Group C (30%), followed by Group B (20%) and Group A (13%). At the time of operation, 127 patients (57%) were absent from work. In Group D, 16 patients (35%) quit their job during treatment. Rates for patients currently working who had anxiety were 62, 30, 26 and 9% in Groups D, C, B and A, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In adjuvant treatment groups, in which quit rate was highest at the time of diagnosis, consultation about working is necessary immediately after diagnosis. Patients treated most heavily had higher quit rates and experienced more anxiety about working.

Assessing residual cancer cells using MRI and US after preoperative chemotherapy in primary breast cancer to omit surgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US) are used to assess residual lesions after preoperative chemotherapy before surgery. However, residual lesion assessments based on preoperative imaging often differ from postoperative pathologic diagnoses. We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of preoperative residual lesion assessments, including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) cases to find criteria for cases in which surgery can be omitted. METHODS: We reviewed 201 patients who received preoperative chemotherapy and surgery in our hospital from January 2013 to November 2016. Presurgical evaluations regarding the possible existence of residual lesions, and clinical Complete Response (cCR) or non-cCR, were compared with postoperative pathological diagnoses. RESULTS: Of the 201 patients, 52 were diagnosed with cCR, and 39 with pathological complete response (pCR). Predictions for residual lesions were 86.4% sensitive, 76.9% specific, and 84.6% accurate. When patients were divided into 4 groups by estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 status, sensitivity in each group was ER+/HER2-: 91.4%; ER-/HER2-: 94.1%; ER+/HER2+: 78.6%; and ER-/HER2+: 78.5%. Of the 22 patients preoperatively assessed with cCR, but diagnosed with non-pCR, the median invasive residual tumor size was 2 mm (range 0-46 mm); 5 patients (22.7%) had only DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: Predicting residual lesions after preoperative chemotherapy by using MRI and US is a reasonable strategy. However, current methods are inadequate for identifying patients who can omit surgery; therefore, a new strategy for detecting small tumors in these patients is needed.

Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy between invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggested that ALND (axillary lymph node dissection) can be avoided in breast cancer patients with limited SLN (sentinel lymph node) metastasis. However, these trials included only several invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) cases, and the validity of omitting ALND for ILC remains controversial. Here, we examined whether omitting ALND is feasible in ILC treatment. METHODS: A total of 3771 breast cancer patients underwent surgery for breast cancer at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital between January 2006 and December 2015. We excluded patients with neoadjuvant therapy or without axillary management, and identified 184 ILC patients and 2402 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) patients. We compared SLN and non-SLN metastasis rates and the number of total ALN metastases between the ILC and IDC cohorts, and we examined the factors that influenced non-SLN metastasis in the SLN micrometastasis group. RESULTS: SLN biopsies were performed in 171 (93%) ILC and 2168 (90%) IDC cases, and 31 (18%) ILC and 457 (21%) IDC cases were SLN micrometastasis and macrometastasis (p = 0.36). Among SLN macrometastasis patients, 17 (68%) ILC cases and 163 (46%) IDC cases showed non-SLN metastasis (p = 0.03). The number of non-SLN metastases was greater in ILC cases compared with IDC cases. Multivariate analysis showed that ILC was the influential factor predicting non-SLN metastasis in patients with SLN macrometastasis. CONCLUSION: ILC cases had more non-SLN metastasis than IDC cases among SLN-positive cases, and ILC was an important factor for the prediction of non-SLN positivity in SLN macrometastasis cases. Omitting ALND for ILC with positive SLNs requires more consideration.

Feasibility study of contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy with breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) for breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations has been reported to not only reduce breast cancer incidence but also to improve survival. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend providing CRRM to women with BRCA mutations who desire CRRM after risk-reduction counseling. However, in Japan, CRRM cannot be performed generally because it is not covered by health insurance. Thus, we conducted a feasibility study to confirm the safety of CRRM. METHODS: CRRM with bilateral breast reconstructions were performed for breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations. The primary endpoint was early adverse events within 3 months, and secondary endpoints were late adverse events. RESULTS: Between August 2014 and November 2016, ten patients were enrolled. The median age was 37.5 years, and five of the patients had the BRCA1 mutation while five had the BRCA2 mutation. Six patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eight patients selected silicone breast implants, and two patients selected transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction. Pathological findings showed no evidence of occult breast cancers in any of the patients. At a median of 25.5 months follow-up time, CRRM-related early adverse events were hematoma (subsequently removed by re-operation; grade 2, n = 1), wound infection (grade 2, n = 1), skin ulceration (grade 1, n = 2) and wound pain (grade 1, n = 1). Overall, there were no grade 3 or more severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that CRRM with reconstruction could be performed safely.

A 12-mm carcinoid tumor of the minor duodenal papilla with lymph node metastases.

Carcinoid tumors located in the minor duodenal papilla are extremely rare, with only a few cases reported in the literature. Herein, we report the case of a 71-year-old man with a 12-mm carcinoid tumor at the minor duodenal papilla with lymph node metastases. Multidetector-row computed tomography with contrast enhancement revealed a 12-mm well-enhanced tumor in the duodenum. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a 12-mm submucosal tumor at the minor papilla of the duodenum. Biopsy specimens revealed a carcinoid tumor, and a subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy was performed. Carcinoid tumors at the minor duodenal papilla have a high prevalence of nodal disease, even for tumors <2 cm in diameter. Therefore, we believe that radical resection with tumor-free margins (i.e. pancreatoduodenectomy) is the treatment of choice.