Ziverel for PPI-refractory reflux symptoms: efficacy and mechanisms of action in humans.

OBJECTIVES: It is thought that esophageal hypersensitivity in combination with an impaired mucosal barrier function contributes to PPI-resistant reflux symptoms. Ziverel, a bioadhesive agent that coats the esophageal wall, was shown to have a positive effect on reflux symptoms. However, the mechanisms of action are unclear. We aimed to assess the effect of Ziverel on esophageal sensitivity to acid and mucosal barrier function. METHODS: We performed a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial in PPI-refractory patients with reflux symptoms. Patients were assigned (1:1) to 14 days of Ziverel followed by 14 days of placebo or opposite treatment order. The effect was evaluated using acid perfusion tests, an upper endoscopy with electrical tissue impedance spectroscopy (ETIS) and esophageal biopsies. The primary outcome was the esophageal sensitivity based on perfusion sensitivity score. Secondary outcomes included mucosal barrier function and reflux symptoms and correlations between the different outcomes. RESULTS: Perfusion sensitivity score was not significantly different during treatment with Ziverel (106 (73-115)) and placebo (102 (67-110)) (p = 0.508) along with total RDQ score (2.6 (1.9-3.3) vs 2.8 (1.6-3.5) p = 0.456). ETIS showed comparable values during treatment with Ziverel (13514 (8846-19734)Ω·m) and placebo (13217 (9127-24942)Ω·m (p = 0.650)). Comparing Ziverel and placebo no difference was seen in transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) 203 (163-267) Ω.cm2 vs 205 (176-240) Ω.cm2 (p = 0.445) and fluorescein flux 775 (17-6964) nmol/cm2/h vs 187 (4-12209) nmol/cm2/h (p = 0.638). CONCLUSION: Ziverel did not show a benefit on acid sensitivity, reflux symptoms or esophageal mucosal integrity compared to placebo in PPI-refractory patients with reflux symptoms.Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register number: NL7670.

The Effect of STW5 (Iberogast) on Reflux Symptoms in Patients With Concurrent Dyspeptic Symptoms: A Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial.

Background/Aims: It has been suggested that STW5 (Iberogast) reduces heartburn symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia, but underlying mechanisms of action are unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate whether STW5 affects esophageal sensitivity or esophageal motility, thereby reducing occurrence and perception of reflux events. Methods: We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in patients with functional dyspepsia (Rome IV) and reflux symptoms. After 4 weeks of treatment with either placebo or STW5, patients were studied with an esophageal acid perfusion test and ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring. Results: A total of 18 patients (7 men, median age 54, range [19-76]), were included in the study. Although we found no statistical difference in our primary outcome the total Reflux Disease Questionnaire score 2.33 (0.25-4.33) vs 2.67 (1.17-4.00), P = 0.347, "gastroesophageal reflux disease" and "regurgitation" subscale scores were lower after STW5 treatment compared to placebo (P = 0.049 and P = 0.007). There was no statistical difference in number of reflux events, acid exposure time and acid sensitivity scores between STW5 and placebo. In a subgroup analysis of patients with pH-metry confirmed gastroesophageal reflux disease, treatment with STW5 significantly reduced the total number of acidic reflux events (P = 0.028). Moreover, in patients with reflux esophagitis, the median lag time to acid perception increased after STW5 treatment (P = 0.042). Conclusions: We found some indications pointing towards a beneficial effect of STW5 on reflux symptoms in dyspeptic patients, with reduction of esophageal hypersensitivity as a potential underlying mechanism. Our findings will have to be confirmed in larger studies.

Accuracy of Anorectal Manometry to Detect the Rectoanal Inhibitory Reflex in Children: Awake Versus Under General Anesthesia.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to investigate if there is a difference in the detection of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) when an anorectal manometry (ARM) is performed awake or under general anesthesia. METHODS: A retrospective review of ARM studies was performed to identify children who had undergone ARMs both while awake and under general anesthesia. We compared ARM outcomes including the detection of the RAIR and anal canal resting pressure. RESULTS: Thirty-four children had received ARMs both while awake and under general anesthesia (53% female, median age at first ARM 7.5 years [range 3-18 years]). In 9 of 34 (26%) children the RAIR was solely identified during ARM under general anesthesia and not during ARM while awake. In 6 of 9 (66%) this was unrelated to the balloon volumes used during balloon inflations. In 4 of 34 (12%) children, assessment of the RAIR was inconclusive during ARM under general anesthesia due to too low, or loss of anal canal pressure. In 2 of those children, ARMs while awake showed presence of a RAIR. Anal canal resting pressures were higher during ARM while awake versus ARM under general anesthesia (median 70 [interquartile range, IQR 59-85] vs 46 mmHg [IQR 36-65] respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia may affect the detection of a RAIR in 2 ways. On the one hand, it may facilitate better visualization in children in whom a RAIR could not be visualized while awake. On the other hand, it may cause a loss of anal canal pressure resulting in an inconclusive test result.

The inability to belch syndrome: A study using concurrent high-resolution manometry and impedance monitoring.

INTRODUCTION: Although inability to belch has previously been linked to dysfunction of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES), its underlying pathogenesis remains unclear. Our aim was to study mechanisms underlying inability to belch and the effect of UES botulinum toxin (botox) injections in these patients. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with symptoms of inability to belch. Patients underwent stationary high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) with belch provocation and ambulatory 24-h pH-impedance monitoring before and 3 months after UES botox injection. RESULTS: Eight patients (four males, age 18-37 years) were included. Complete and normal UES relaxation occurred in response to deglutition in all patients. A median number of 33(15-64) gastroesophageal gas reflux episodes were observed. Despite the subsequent increase in esophageal pressure (from -4.0 [-7.7-4.2] to 8 [3.3-16.1] mmHg; p < 0.012), none of the gastroesophageal gas reflux events resulted in UES relaxation. Periods of continuous high impedance levels, indicating air entrapment (median air presence time 10.5% [0-43]), were observed during 24-h impedance monitoring. UES botox reduced UES basal pressure (from 95.7[41.2-154.0] to 29.2 [16.7-45.6] mmHg; p < 0.02) and restored belching capacity in all patients. As a result, esophageal air presence time decreased from 10.5% (0-43.4) to 0.7% (0.1-18.6; p < 0.02) and esophageal symptoms improved in all patients (VAS 6.0 [1.0-7.9] to 1.0 [0.0-2.5]; p < 0.012). CONCLUSION: The results of this study underpin the existence of a syndrome characterized by an inability to belch and support the hypothesis that ineffective UES relaxation, with subsequent esophageal air entrapment, may lead to esophageal symptoms.

Characterisation of patients with supine nighttime reflux: observations made with prolonged wireless oesophageal pH monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Although nighttime reflux symptoms are common, the presence of nocturnal reflux is seldom confirmed with a standard 24 hours pH study. AIM: To study patients with supine nighttime reflux symptoms using prolonged wireless pH monitoring. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with typical acid reflux symptoms were studied using 96-h pH monitoring. Patients with nighttime reflux symptoms were compared to those without. Night-to-night variability and diagnostic accuracy of 24-, 48- and 72-hours pH studies compared to the 96-hours "gold standard" were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 105 included patients (61.9% females; mean age 46.8 ± 14.4 years), 86 (81.9%) reported nighttime reflux symptoms, of which 67.4% had pathological supine nocturnal acid exposure in at least one night. There was high variance in night-to-night acid exposure (94% [IQR0-144]), which was larger than the variance in upright acid exposure (58% [IQR32-88]; P < 0.001). When analysing the first 24 hours of the pH study, 32% of patients were diagnosed with pathological supine nighttime acid exposure versus 51% of patients based upon the 96-hours pH-test. The diagnostic accuracy and yield improved with study duration (P < 0.001). Reflux episodes with a lower nadir pH or longer acid clearance time were more prone to provoke nightly symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with nocturnal reflux symptoms had pathological acid exposure in at least one night of the prolonged pH recording. A high night-to-night variability in acid exposure reduces the clinical value and diagnostic yield of pH monitoring limited to 24 hours. Prolonged testing is a more appropriate diagnostic tool for patients with nocturnal reflux symptoms.

Clinical Experience With Performing Esophageal Function Testing in Children.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric high-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24-hour pH-impedance with/without ambulatory manometry (pH-MII+/-mano) tests are generally performed using adult-derived protocols. We aimed to assess the feasibility of these protocols in children, the occurrence of patient-related imperfections and their influence on test interpretability. METHODS: Esophageal function tests performed between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All tests were subcategorized into uninterpretable or interpretable tests (regardless of occurrence of patient-related imperfections). For HRM, the following patient-related imperfections were scored: patient-related artefacts, multiple swallowing and/or inability to establish baseline characteristics. For pH-MII(+/-mano), incorrect symptom registration and/or premature catheter removal were scored. Results were compared between age-groups (0-3, 4-12, and >12 years). RESULTS: In total 106 HRM, 60 pH-MII, and 23 pH-MII-mano could be fully analyzed. Of these, 94.8% HRM, 91.9% pH-MII, and 95.7% pH-MII-mano were interpretable. Overall, HRM contained imperfections in 78.3% overall and in 8/8 (100%) in the youngest age group, 36/42 (85.7%) in 4 to 12 years and in 37/56 (66.1%) in children above 12 years; P = 0.011. These imperfections led to uninterpretable results in 4 HRM (3.8%), of which 3 were in the youngest age group (3/8, 37.5%). Imperfections were found in 10% of pH-MII and 17.4% of pH-MII-mano. These led to uninterpretable results in 5.0% and 4.3%, respectively. No age-effect was found. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal function tests in children are interpretable in more than 90% overall. In children under the age of 4 years, all patients had imperfect HRM and 3/8 tests were uninterpretable. HRM in older children and pH-MII+/-mano were interpretable in the vast majority.

The Role of Symptom Association Analysis in Gastroesophageal Reflux Testing.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is characterized by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus with an estimated worldwide prevalence of 8%-33%. The current paradigm in gastroesophageal reflux disease diagnosis relies on recognition of symptoms and/or the presence of mucosal disease at the time of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Recognition of symptoms, however, can arise with challenges, particularly when patients complain of less typical symptoms. Since first reported in 1969 by Spencer et al., the application of prolonged intraesophageal pH monitoring to identify pathologic reflux has evolved considerably. Utility of pH monitoring aims to investigate the degree of acid burden and frequency of reflux episode, and the relationship between symptoms and acid reflux events. This relationship is represented by either the Symptom Index, Symptom Sensitivity Index, Symptom Association Probability, or Ghillebert Probability Estimate. This article reviews symptom-association analysis during esophageal reflux testing, covering the literature on current methods of reflux testing, interpretation of symptom association, and practical issues that can arise during symptom analysis.

The role of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal manometry in clinical practice.

High-resolution manometry revolutionized the assessment of esophageal motility disorders and upgraded the classification through the Chicago Classification. A known disadvantage of standard HRM, however, is the inability to record esophageal motility function for an extended time interval; therefore, it represents only a more snapshot view of esophageal motor function. In contrast, ambulatory esophageal manometry measures esophageal motility over a prolonged period and detects motor activity during the entire circadian cycle. Furthermore, ambulatory manometry has the ability to measure temporal correlations between symptoms and motor events. This article aimed to review the clinical implications of ambulatory esophageal manometry for various symptoms, covering literature on the manometry catheter, interpretation of findings, and relevance in clinical practice specific to the evaluation of non-cardiac chest pain, chronic cough, and rumination syndrome.

Pediatric Achalasia in the Netherlands: Incidence, Clinical Course, and Quality of Life.

OBJECTIVE: To assess incidence and clinical course of Dutch patients with achalasia diagnosed before 18 years of age as well as their current symptoms and quality of life (QoL). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective medical chart review and a cross-sectional study assessing current clinical status using the Eckardt score and reflux disease questionnaire. General QoL was measured using Kidscreen-52 for patients <18 years of age or to 36-Item Short Form Health Survey for patients ≥18 years of age. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2013, 87 children (mean age 11.4 ± 3.4 years, 60% male) diagnosed with achalasia in the Netherlands were included. Mean incidence was 0.1/100,000/y (range 0.03-0.21). Initial treatment was pneumodilation (PD) in 68 (79%) patients and Heller myotomy (HM) in 18 (21%) patients. Retreatment was required more often after initial PD compared with initial HM (88% vs 22%; P < .0001). More complications of initial treatment occurred after HM compared with PD (55.6% vs 1.5%; P < .0001). Three esophageal perforations were seen after HM (16.7%), 1 after PD (1.5%). Sixty-three of 87 (72%) patients were prospectively contacted. Median Eckardt score was 3 (IQR 2-5), with 32 patients (44.5%) having positive scores suggesting active disease. Reflux disease questionnaire scores were higher after initial HM vs PD (1.71 [0.96-2.90] vs 0.58 [0-1.56]; P = .005). The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (n = 52) was lower compared with healthy population norms for 7/8 domains. Kidscreen-52 (n = 20) was similar to population norms. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric achalasia is rare and relapse rates are high after initial treatment, especially after pneumodilation, but with more complications after HM. Symptoms often persist into adulthood, without any clinical follow-up. QoL in adulthood was decreased.

Prevalence of esophageal motility abnormalities increases with longer disease duration in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: During the natural course of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), the risk for esophageal stricture formation increases. It remains unknown whether motility abnormalities in EoE also develop over time. We aimed to determine the relationship between disease duration, clinical characteristics, and manometric pattern of EoE patients. METHODS: We compared esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) measurements of 31 adult EoE patients with HRM data from 31 GERD controls and 31 healthy controls. Subsequently, we assessed differences in disease duration and clinical characteristics between EoE patients with normal and those with abnormal esophageal motility. KEY RESULTS: In EoE patients, peristaltic integrity was more frequently failed (12 vs 6%) or weak (27 vs 15%; p < 0.001) compared with healthy controls; however, this pattern was also seen in GERD controls (failed 14%, weak 27%). We found no differences regarding symptoms and signs of EoE between EoE patients with normal (42%) and abnormal motility (58%). However, disease duration was longer in EoE patients with abnormal motility than in those with normal motility (13 (6-18) years vs 4 (1-11) years; p < 0.05). In EoE, but not GERD, disease duration was identified as a risk factor for abnormal motility (OR for each year 1.142; 95% CI 1.004-1.299), and with longer disease duration, the prevalence of abnormal motility increased from 36% (duration 0-5 years) to 83% (duration ≥16 years; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Weak and failed peristaltic integrity are more often present in adult EoE patients than in healthy controls. The prevalence of manometric abnormalities in EoE patients increases with longer disease duration.

Functional dyspepsia patients have lower mucosal cholecystokinin concentrations in response to duodenal lipid.

BACKGROUND: Dyspeptic symptoms are frequently induced, or exacerbated, by fatty food ingestion. Excessive release of, and/or hypersensitivity to, cholecystokinin (CCK) may explain the exaggerated response to lipid in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). Thus far, plasma CCK response has been evaluated. However, stimulation of CCK1 receptors on duodenal vagal afferents occurs in a paracrine manner, suggesting that mucosal CCK concentrations are relevant to quantify. Apolipoprotein A-IV stimulates mucosal CCK release. AIM: To investigate the hypothesis that fat-induced release of CCK and apolipoprotein A-IV (apoA-IV) is enhanced in the duodenum of FD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen symptomatic FD patients and 10 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent duodenal perfusion with intralipid 20%, 2 kcal/min, for 60 min. Symptoms were scored and blood samples were collected every 15 min during lipid perfusion and 15 min after discontinuation when duodenal biopsies were taken. Plasma and mucosal concentrations of CCK and apoA-IV were quantified. RESULTS: Abdominal discomfort (P=0.001), nausea (P=0.05), and fullness (P=0.005) in response to duodenal lipid increased significantly only in FD patients. Following lipid infusion, the mean mucosal CCK concentration was lower in FD patients compared with HV (P<0.0001). Fasting concentrations and plasma response of CCK were comparable in FD patients and HV. Plasma apoA-IV response appeared to differ between patients and HV, whereas mucosal apoA-IV concentrations were similar. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest excessive local release of CCK in response to duodenal lipid in FD. This likely causes exaggerated stimulation of duodenal vagal afferents, explaining dyspeptic symptom generation. The mechanisms underlying elevated mucosal CCK release warrant further investigation.

Ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring: a comparison between antimony, ISFET, and glass pH electrodes.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Ambulatory oesophageal pH-impedance monitoring is a widely used test to evaluate patients with reflux symptoms. Several types of pH electrodes are available: antimony, ion sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET), and glass electrodes. These pH electrodes have not been compared directly, and it is uncertain whether these different types of pH electrodes result in similar outcome. METHODS: In an in-vitro model the response time, sensitivity, and drift of an antimony, ISFET, and glass pH electrode were assessed simultaneously after calibration at 22 degrees C and at 37 degrees C. All measurements were performed at 37 degrees C and repeated five times with new catheters of each type. Fifteen patients with reflux symptoms underwent 24-h pH monitoring off PPI therapy using antimony, ISFET, and glass pH electrodes simultaneously. RESULTS: After calibration at 22 degrees C, pH electrodes had similar response times, sensitivity and drift. In contrast to glass electrodes, antimony electrodes performed less accurately after calibration at 37 degrees C than after calibration at 22 degrees C. Calibration temperature did not affect ISFET electrodes significantly. During in-vivo experiments, significant differences were found in acid exposure times derived from antimony (4.0+/-0.8%), ISFET (5.7+/-1.1%), and glass pH electrodes (9.0+/-1.7%). CONCLUSION: In vitro, antimony and glass pH electrodes are affected by different buffer components and temperature, respectively. In vivo, significant higher acid exposure times are obtained with glass electrodes compared with antimony and ISFET pH electrodes. ISFET electrodes produce stable in-vitro measurements and result in the most accurate in-vivo measurements of acid exposure time.

Duodenal acid clearance in humans: observations made with intraluminal impedance recording.

Duodenal acid clearance appears to be involved not only in the pathogenesis of duodenal ulcer disease but also in functional dyspepsia. Duodenal contractile activity can help to maintain neutral pH in the duodenum by mixing acid with bicarbonate or by aborally transporting the acid load. Intraluminal impedance recording, allowing the detection of nonacid liquid boluses, can be carried out concomitantly with antroduodenal manometry and pH recording and may thus provide useful information about the mechanisms involved in duodenal clearance of endogenous acid and volume boluses. Eight H. pylori-negative healthy volunteers were studied with two catheters positioned across the pylorus, allowing the recording of five impedance signals (one antral, one pyloric, and three duodenal) simultaneously with six pressure signals (two antral, one pyloric, and three duodenal) as well as distal antral and proximal duodenal pH. During phase II of the migrating motor complex, which is known to be associated with the highest duodenal acid exposure, each duodenal acidification event (defined as a pH drop >2 pH units) was characterized by its maximal amplitude, duration, temporal relationship with antroduodenal manometric events, and relation to impedance variations. Acid was considered to have been cleared from the duodenum when the preacidification pH was restored (+/-0.2 unit). A total of 164 duodenal pH drops were recorded during the 323 min of phase II recordings. Eleven percent of the duodenal acidification events were short-lived (<10 sec). All of these events were temporally associated with a propagated antroduodenal contraction and a short-lived drop in impedance, suggesting rapid aboral passage of the acid bolus. The long-lived duodenal acidification events lasted a mean of 32 sec (range, 25-66 sec). In 90% of these events an antroduodenal propagated contraction was recorded at the time of onset. Repetitive duodenal contractions followed the onset of the long-lived acidification events in 34% of the cases. These remained present until complete clearance of the acid. In 81% of the long-lived acidification events, recovery of the associated impedance drop occurred simultaneously with the pH recovery, suggesting a complete clearance of the bolus. Less frequently (19%), the duodenal pH recovered while the impedance remained low, suggesting that the bolus was not cleared but neutralized. Interdigestive duodenal acidification events usually last about 30 sec. They evoke duodenal contractions in only one-third of cases. Combined pH and impedance recording makes it possible to distinguish between neutralization of acid boluses and their complete total clearance.