Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Care ; 22(1): 243, 2018 Sep 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30268133

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) reduce colonization with antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (ARGNB), incidence of nosocomial infections and improve survival in ICU patients. The effect on bacterial gut colonization might be caused by growth suppression by antibiotics during SDD/SOD. We investigated intestinal colonization with ARGNB after discharge from ICU and discontinuation of SDD or SOD. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational follow-up study in regular hospital wards of three teaching hospitals in the Netherlands in patients discharged from the ICU, who were participating in a cluster randomized trial comparing SDD with SOD. We determined rectal carriage with ARGNB at ICU discharge (time (T) = 0) and 3, 6 and 10 days after discharge. The primary endpoint was time to first colonization with ARGNB that was not present at T = 0. Bacteria that are intrinsically resistant to antibiotics were not included in the primary analysis, but were included in post-hoc analysis. RESULTS: Of 1370 patients screened for inclusion, 996 patients had samples at T = 0 (507 after SDD and 489 after SOD). At ICU discharge, the prevalence of intestinal carriage with any ARGNB was 22/507 (4.3%) after SDD and 87/489 (17.8%) after SOD (p < 0.0001): 426 (SDD) and 409 (SOD) patients had at least one follow-up sample for analysis. The hazard rate for acquiring carriage of ARGNB after discontinuation of SDD, compared to SOD, in the ICU was 0.61 (95% CI 0.40-0.91, p = 0.02), and cumulative risks of acquisition of at least one ARGNB until day 10 were 13% (SDD) and 18% (SOD). At day 10 after ICU discharge, the prevalence of intestinal carriage with ARGNB was 11.3% (26/230 patients) after SDD and 12.5% (28/224 patients) after SOD (p = 0.7). In post-hoc analysis of all ARGNB, including intrinsically resistant bacteria, colonization at ICU discharge was lower after SDD (4.9 vs. 22.3%, p < 0.0001), but acquisition rates after ICU discharge were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal carriage at ICU discharge and the acquisition rate of ARGNB after ICU discharge are lower after SDD than after SOD. The prevalence of intestinal carriage with ARGNB at 10 days after ICU discharge was comparable in both groups, suggesting rapid clearance of ARGNB from the gut after ICU discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR3311 . Registered on 28 february 2012.


Assuntos
Descontaminação/métodos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Orofaringe/efeitos dos fármacos , Orofaringe/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 24(5): 505-513, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28870727

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) improved intensive care unit (ICU), hospital and 28-day survival in ICUs with low levels of antibiotic resistance. Yet it is unclear whether the effect differs between medical and surgical ICU patients. METHODS: In an individual patient data meta-analysis, we systematically searched PubMed and included all randomized controlled studies published since 2000. We performed a two-stage meta-analysis with separate logistic regression models per study and per outcome (hospital survival and ICU survival) and subsequent pooling of main and interaction effects. RESULTS: Six studies, all performed in countries with low levels of antibiotic resistance, yielded 16 528 hospital admissions and 17 884 ICU admissions for complete case analysis. Compared to standard care or placebo, the pooled adjusted odds ratios for hospital mortality was 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.93) for SDD and 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.97) for SOD. Compared to SOD, the adjusted odds ratio for hospital mortality was 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.97) for SDD. The effects on hospital mortality were not modified by type of ICU admission (p values for interaction terms were 0.66 for SDD and control, 0.87 for SOD and control and 0.47 for SDD and SOD). Similar results were found for ICU mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In ICUs with low levels of antibiotic resistance, the effectiveness of SDD and SOD was not modified by type of ICU admission. SDD and SOD improved hospital and ICU survival compared to standard care in both patient populations, with SDD being more effective than SOD.


Assuntos
Descontaminação , Desinfecção , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Orofaringe/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Descontaminação/métodos , Desinfecção/métodos , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Razão de Chances , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 69(3): 797-804, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24144922

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) and selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) are associated with improved outcomes among patients in intensive care units (ICUs), but uncertainty remains about their long-term effects on resistance levels. We determined trends in antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacteria in 38 Dutch ICUs using and not using SOD/SDD. METHODS: The Infectious Disease Surveillance Information System-Antibiotic Resistance (ISIS-AR) was used to identify all Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. isolates from blood and respiratory tract specimens from ICUs between January 2008 and April 2012. Per patient, the last isolate per species per specimen per month was selected to determine cumulative resistance rates (per 100 beds/month) for colistin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime and cefotaxime/ceftriaxone in ICUs that continuously used or did not use SOD/SDD, and ICUs that introduced SOD/SDD. Time trends were analysed by multilevel Poisson regression. RESULTS: Seventeen ICUs continuously used SOD/SDD (859 months), 13 did not use SOD/SDD (663 months) and 8 introduced SOD/SDD (223 and 117 months before and after introduction). There were no discernible trends in antibiotic resistance among 637 blood isolates. For the 8353 respiratory isolates, resistance to cefotaxime/ceftriaxone increased in ICUs that did not use SOD/SDD (P < 0.001) and decreased in those that continuously used SOD/SDD (P = 0.04), as did resistance to ciprofloxacin (P < 0.001). The introduction of SOD/SDD was followed by statistically significant reductions in resistance rates for all antimicrobial agents. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous use of SOD/SDD was associated with decreasing trends for resistance to cefotaxime/ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin. The introduction of SOD/SDD was associated with reductions in resistance rates for all antimicrobial agents included.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Biota/efeitos dos fármacos , Descontaminação/métodos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Orofaringe/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/classificação , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Países Baixos , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...