A consensus-based practical and daily guide for the treatment of acne patients.

BACKGROUND: Many current guidelines provide detailed evidence-based recommendations for acne treatment. OBJECTIVE: To create consensus-based, simple, easy-to-use algorithms for clinical acne treatment in daily office-based practice and to provide checklists to assist in determining why a patient may not have responded to treatment and what action to take. METHODS: Existing treatment guidelines and consensus papers were reviewed. The information in them was extracted and simplified according to daily clinical practice needs using a consensus-based approach and based on the authors' clinical expertise. RESULTS: As outcomes, separate simple algorithms are presented for the treatment of predominant comedonal, predominant papulopustular and nodular/conglobate acne. Patients with predominant comedonal acne should initially be treated with a topical retinoid, azelaic acid or salicylic acid. Fixed combination topicals are recommended for patients with predominant papulopustular acne with treatment tailored according to the severity of disease. Treatment recommendations for nodular/conglobate acne include oral isotretinoin or fixed combinations plus oral antibiotics in men, and these options may be supplemented with oral anti-androgenic hormonal therapy in women. Further decisions regarding treatment responses should be evaluated 8 weeks after treatment initiation in patients with predominant comedonal or papulopustular acne and 12 weeks after in those with nodular/conglobate acne. Maintenance therapy with a topical retinoid or azelaic acid should be commenced once a patient is clear or almost clear of their acne to prevent the disease from recurring. The principal explanations for lack of treatment response fall into 5 main categories: disease progression, non-drug-related reasons, drug-related reasons, poor adherence, and adverse events. CONCLUSION: This practical guide provides dermatologists with treatment algorithms adapted to different clinical features of acne which are simple and easy to use in daily clinical practice. The checklists to establish the causes for a lack of treatment response and subsequent action to take will facilitate successful acne management.

Bacteriology of hidradenitis suppurativa exacerbations and deep tissue cultures obtained during carbon dioxide laser treatment.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown different bacteria in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) lesions, but the literature regarding bacteria in acute exacerbation of HS is sparse. OBJECTIVES: To determine the type of bacteria isolated from HS lesions during exacerbations of the disease. METHODS: Patients with HS with acute nodules or abscesses were examined and treated by carbon dioxide laser vaporization. Bacterial samples for aerobic and anaerobic cultures were taken from the skin surface (before surgery) and then from the deeper layers (during surgery) of the lesions. At each level two samples were taken, one with a punch biopsy and one by pressing a soft agar gel against the skin. The bacterial findings were typed and quantified. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients (eight women and two men), with a mean age of 37·2 years and a mean HS duration of 14·5 years, were included. All of them had an ongoing exacerbation (mean duration 5·6 days) of their HS, with one inflamed lesion that was treated by carbon dioxide laser vaporization. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were found in the deep layers in all 10 patients. Nine of the patients carried Corynebacterium spp. and two alpha-haemolytic streptococci at various levels. Among the anaerobic microorganisms, Gram-positive cocci were the most common bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: As found in a previous study, CNS were the most common bacteria, but contrary to what we expected, Staphylococcus aureus was not found in any cultures from acute inflammatory nodules of HS exacerbations.

European surveillance study on the antibiotic susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes.

Propionibacterium acnes strains are recovered from infections linked to surgical procedures, foreign bodies and septicaemia. This study investigated the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of P. acnes isolates from different systemic infections and determined the genomic diversity among resistant P. acnes isolates with low-frequency restriction analysis of chromosomal DNA by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). In total, 304 P. acnes isolates from 13 laboratories in 13 European countries were tested against six antimicrobial agents by the NCCLS reference agar dilution method and the breakpoints recommended by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Blood isolates were encountered most frequently, followed by those from skin and soft tissue infections, and abdominal infections. Of the isolates examined, 2.6% were resistant to tetracycline, 15.1% to clindamycin, and 17.1% to erythromycin. No resistance was observed to linezolid, benzylpenicillin or vancomycin. There was considerable variation between countries in the proportion of resistant strains, ranging from 83% in Croatia and 60% in Italy to 0% in The Netherlands. Isolates from blood were predominant among the resistant isolates. Seventeen clones and 78 banding patterns were identified among the resistant isolates. It was concluded that antimicrobial resistance has now emerged among P. acnes isolates from systemic infections.