Development of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer after neoadjuvant paclitaxel chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer creates new possibilities for the analysis of biological factors in the tumor and/or host, which may play a role in the response to treatment. In this study we analyzed whether changes in local antitumor immunity take place after neoadjuvant paclitaxel therapy and if they correlate with response to treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2 q2w, 4 treatments) was followed by definitive surgical management. Histological sections from the pre- and post-treatment surgical specimens of 25 patients were analyzed for the extent of lymphocytic infiltration and presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). The cumulative apoptotic response in the tumor after the first dose of paclitaxel was also studied in 10 of 25 patients. RESULTS: Pretreatment lymphocytic infiltrate in the tumor was minimal in the majority of patients and showed no relationship with clinical response. In the patients without TILs before treatment, development of TILs after treatment was noted in 0/3 (0%) patients with stable disease, 3/12 (25%) patients with clinical partial response, and 4/6 (67%) patients with clinical complete response and pathological residual disease. These correlated with the tumor cell apoptotic response to the first dose of paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that development of TILs after treatment correlates with clinical response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel therapy. The possible mechanism(s) whereby neoadjuvant chemotherapy may lead to induction of antitumor T cells is discussed. Immunological processes may influence the response of breast cancer patients to neoadjuvant treatment.

Double-blind trial of a polyvalent, shed-antigen, melanoma vaccine.

A polyvalent melanoma vaccine prepared from shed antigens stimulates humoral and cellular immune responses and improves survival compared with historical controls. We conducted a double-blind, prospectively randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess whether this vaccine could slow the progression of resected melanoma. Thirty-eight patients with resected melanoma metastatic to regional nodes (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III) who had a particularly poor prognosis on the basis of the nodes being clinically positive or two or more histologically positive nodes were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with 40 microg of melanoma or placebo (human albumin) vaccine, both of which were bound to alum as an adjuvant. Immunizations were given intradermally into the extremities every 3 weeks x 4, monthly x 3, every 3 months x 2, and then every 6 months for 5 years or until disease progression. Twenty-four patients were treated with the melanoma, and 14 patients were treated with the placebo vaccine. The groups were evenly balanced with respect to prognostic factors. Median length of observation was 2.5 years. There was no local or systemic toxicity. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, median time to disease progression was two and a half times longer in patients treated with melanoma vaccine compared with that in patients treated with placebo vaccine, i.e., 1.6 years (95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.0 years) compared with 0.6 year [95% confidence interval, 0.3-1.9 year(s)]. By Cox proportional hazards analysis, this difference was significant at P = 0.03. Overall survival was 40% longer in the melanoma vaccine-treated group (median overall survival of 3.8 years versus 2.7 years), but this difference was not statistically significant. In a double-blind and placebo-controlled trial, these results suggest that immunization with a melanoma vaccine may be able to slow the progression of melanoma. Although statistically significant, these results must be interpreted with caution because they are based on a small number of patients.

Elective radiation therapy for high-risk malignant melanomas.

PURPOSE: Local-regional recurrence rates of 30%-50% have been reported after resection of high-risk malignant melanomas (multiple node involvement, extracapsular spread, deep invasion, recurrent disease, and/or microscopically involved margins). Recently, we have been offering elective radiation therapy, after definitive surgery, to selected patients who have high-risk malignant melanomas. We herein report our initial results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1993 to 1999, 40 patients who underwent surgery for high-risk malignant melanomas (multiple involved lymph nodes [21 patients]; close or microscopically involved surgical margins [nine patients]; extracapsular extension [six patients]; previously resected, recurrent disease [three patients]; and/or primary tumors more than 4 mm thick [four patients]) received elective radiation therapy. Thirty-six patients received 3000 cGy in five fractions (600 cGy per fraction given twice weekly), and four patients received 3600 cGy in six fractions. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 18.4 months (range, 3.8-74.1 months), the actuarial 5-year local-regional control rate was 84%. Systemic recurrence rates in these patients were similar to those reported for this subset of patients, and the actuarial overall survival rate at 5 years was 39%. Acute toxicity was limited to erythema of the skin and, in one instance, probable cellulitis, with no late sequelae. DISCUSSION: Elective radiation therapy (600 cGy per fraction for five or six fractions) effectively controlled residual subclinical disease after surgery; however, better adjuvant systemic therapies need to be designed to eliminate distant metastases and to alter survival rates.

Decrease in circulating tumor cells as an early marker of therapy effectiveness.

As melanoma cells are present in the circulation of many patients with this cancer, decreases in their number could provide an early indication of therapy effectiveness. To evaluate this possibility, we examined the effect of treatment with a melanoma vaccine on the number of melanoma cells present in the circulation. PCR was used to detect melanoma cells that expressed the melanoma-associated antigens MART-1, MAGE-3, tyrosinase and/or gp100 in 91 patients with melanoma. Melanoma cells that expressed one or more of these markers were present more often in advanced disease, i.e. in 80% of patients with advanced stage IV compared to in less than one-third of patients with less advanced disease. We then measured circulating melanoma cells in a subset of 43 of these patients who were treated with a polyvalent, shed antigen, melanoma vaccine. The vaccine contains multiple melanoma-associated antigens including MART-1, MAGE-3, tyrosinase and gp100. Immunizations were given intradermally q2-3 weeks x4 and then monthly x3. Prior to vaccine treatment, circulating melanoma cells were detected in 14 (32%) patients. Following 4 and 7 months of vaccine treatment, melanoma cells that expressed any of these markers were present in only nine (21%) and three (7%) of patients, respectively. Thus, vaccine therapy was associated with clearance of melanoma cells from the circulation in 78% of initially positive patients. As the number of these cells declined steadily with increasing length of therapy, it is unlikely that this was due to a random change in their number. Rather it suggests that the decline was a result of the therapy. These observations suggest that the presence of melanoma cells in the circulation is related to the extent of the melanoma, and that their disappearance may provide an early marker of the efficacy of therapy. However, the practical utility of assaying circulating tumor cells as a guide to the effectiveness of therapy or of prognosis will need to be confirmed by correlations with clinical outcome.

Identification of HLA-A*03, A*11 and B*07-restricted melanoma-associated peptides that are immunogenic in vivo by vaccine-induced immune response (VIIR) analysis.

With the discovery of increasing numbers of tumor antigens, there is a need to rapidly determine whether these antigens and the individual peptides they express are able to stimulate immune responses in vivo and thus, can be used to construct cancer vaccines. In this study we used the method of vaccine-induced immune response (VIIR) analysis to identify multiple immunogenic peptide epitopes derived from several melanoma associated antigens and presented by HLA-A*03, A*11 and B*07. Thirty-one patients with melanoma were immunized to a polyvalent vaccine containing multiple antigens, including MAGE-3, Melan A/MART-1, gp100 and tyrosinase. Their peripheral blood was tested for peptide-specific, vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell responses before and after immunization using an enzyme-linked immune spot (ELISPOT) assay with panels of peptides restricted by these three alleles. The peptides were selected for immunogenic potential based on their strong binding affinity in vitro to HLA-A*03, A*11 or B*07. Overall, 60% of the 20 peptides studied were recognized by at least one patient and 50% of the patients showed a vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell response to at least one peptide that matched their HLA specificity. We conclude that VIIR analysis is an effective strategy to directly identify immunogenic peptides that are good candidates for vaccine construction.

Paclitaxel-induced apoptosis and mitotic arrest assessed by serial fine-needle aspiration: implications for early prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment.

The extent of tumor reduction from neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer correlates with outcome. We investigated whether the initial cellular responses to paclitaxel are related to the extent of tumor reduction. Eleven women with breast cancer received paclitaxel (every 2 weeks for 4 cycles) as neoadjuvant treatment. Serial fine-needle aspirations (FNA; 25-gauge, 1 pass) were obtained before treatment and at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after the first paclitaxel dose. Microscopic counts of apoptotic and mitotic indices were performed. The change in cancer volume from treatment was determined using radiological measurements with allowance for change in the histopathological amount of cancer. Apoptotic and mitotic responses usually subsided within 4 days. The duration of the initial apoptotic response was different for women with different treatment results. Cumulative apoptotic response for the first 4 days inversely correlated with the proportion of residual cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. FNA is a versatile clinical method to obtain breast cancer cells for therapy response studies. Apoptotic response to the first dose of paclitaxel is almost complete within 4 days, implying that more frequent (weekly) paclitaxel dosing might be beneficial. The apoptotic response to the first dose of paclitaxel appeared to predict the amount of cancer reduction from this treatment. This is a promising start toward the development of an early chemopredictive assay for paclitaxel treatment of breast cancer.

HLA-independent heterogeneity of CD8+ T cell responses to MAGE-3, Melan-A/MART-1, gp100, tyrosinase, MC1R, and TRP-2 in vaccine-treated melanoma patients.

An important element in melanoma vaccine construction is to identify peptides from melanoma-associated Ags that have immunogenic potential in humans and are recognized by CD8+ T cells in vivo. To identify such peptides, we evaluated HLA-A*02+ melanoma patients immunized to a polyvalent vaccine containing multiple Ags, including MAGE-3, Melan-A/MART-1, gp100, tyrosinase, melanocortin receptor (MC1R), and dopachrome tautomerase (TRP-2). Using a filter spot assay, we measured peripheral blood CD8+ T cell responses, before and after immunization, to a panel of 45 HLA-A*0201-restricted peptides derived from these Ags. The peptides were selected for immunogenic potential based on their strong binding affinity in vitro to HLA-A*0201. Vaccine treatment induced peptide-specific CD8+ T cell responses to 22 (47.8%) of the peptides. The most striking finding was the HLA-independent heterogeneity of responses to both peptides and Ags. All responding patients reacted to different combination of peptides and Ags even though the responding patients were all A*0201+ and the peptides were all A*0201-restricted. From 9 to 27% of patients developed a CD8+ T cell response to at least one peptide from each Ag, but no more than 3 (14%) reacted to the same peptide from the same Ag. This heterogeneity of responses to individual peptides and Ags in patients with the same haplotype points to the need to construct vaccines of multiple peptides or Ags to maximize the proportion of responding patients.

Biologic activity of interleukin 1 (IL-1) alpha in patients with refractory malignancies.

Interleukin 1 alpha (IL-1 alpha) is a cytokine with pleiotropic effects, including cytotoxic-cytostatic activity against some tumor cell lines. We have conducted a phase I study of recombinant human IL-1 alpha (rhIL-1 alpha) in 17 patients with refractory malignancies to examine its toxicity and biologic activity. rhIL-1 alpha was given as a 2-h IV infusion daily for 5 days at five dose levels (0.08, 0.2, 0.8, 2.0, and 5.0 micrograms/m2). Seventeen patients with malignancies were treated, with no objective tumor responses noted. Common toxicities included: fever (100%), rigors and/or chills (96%), myalgia (54%), and headache (48%). Three patients developed grade III hypotension. The maximum tolerated dose was 2.0 micrograms/m2. rhIL-1 alpha induced a significant increase in absolute neutrophil count over baseline (p < 0.05), a delayed but significant increase in platelet count over baseline (p < 0.05), and there was a marked increase in the number of progenitors [colony-forming units (CFU)-G, CFU-M, CFU-GM, CFU-GEMM and burst-forming units (BFU-E)] observed in the peripheral blood. Nine of 12 evaluable patients showed an increase in bone marrow cellularity or myeloid:erthyroid ratio. Immunophenotyping did not demonstrate an increase in peripheral blood or bone marrow CD34+ cells. Interferon-gamma-mediated monocyte cytotoxicity (MCCTX) was significantly enhanced from baseline (p < 0.001), although an increase in direct MCCTX did not reach statistical significance. In summary, rhIL-1 alpha administration is well tolerated at a dose of 2.0 micrograms/m2 with fever, rigors, myalgia, and headache being the most frequent toxicities. Although there were no objective tumor responses, we have demonstrated significant biologic activity with increased neutrophil and platelet counts, increased peripheral blood progenitor cells, and enhanced interferon-gamma-mediated MCCTX.

Phase II clinical trial of recombinant alpha 2b interferon and 13 cis retinoic acid in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Treatment for metastatic melanoma is limited by low response rates to single- or combination-agent chemotherapy. Recent studies have examined the role of biologic modifiers and differentiating agents. This phase II study examined the efficacy and toxicity of combining alpha-2b-interferon (IFN alpha) and 13 cis retinoic acid (cRA) in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma. Thirteen patients were treated with IFN alpha (5 x 10(6) units/m2 three times weekly) and cRA (1 mg/kg per day). One patient with lung and adrenal metastases had a partial response 6 months in duration and two patients had stabilization of lung metastases for 2 months. All other patients had progressive disease. Toxicity was substantial with all patients experiencing Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grade 1-2 fatigue, myalgias, anorexia, stomatitis, and cheilitis. In addition, serum cholesterol and triglycerides were elevated in all patients. Seven patients required 50% dose reductions because of hypertriglyceridemia, fatigue associated with a significant decline in performance status, and severe stomatitis with anorexia and weight loss. One patient discontinued therapy because of a decline in performance status. This study suggests this combination of cRA and IFN alpha is inactive in the treatment of metastatic melanoma and is associated with substantial toxicity.

Identification of melanoma antigens that are immunogenic in humans and expressed in vivo.

BACKGROUND: In the development of an antimelanoma vaccine, a critical factor is the identification of antigens that induce a strong immune response in humans and that are expressed by melanoma cells in vivo. The aim of this study was to identify candidate antigens for such vaccine. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with surgically resected melanomas (American Joint Commission on Cancer [AJCC] stage III) were immunized with a polyvalent vaccine containing multiple melanoma antigens. Antimelanoma antibodies generated in the patients' sera were used as probes to identify the melanoma antigens that are immunogenic in humans and that are expressed on the tumor tissue in vivo. Such responses were determined by an immunoblotting assay that employed an antigen source prepared from membrane fractions of freshly excised melanoma tissue. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine treatment stimulated antibody responses in 35 (51%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 39%-63%) of 69 sequentially enrolled patients. The antibodies were directed to one or more antigens with molecular masses of 45, 59, 68, 79, 89, 95, and/or 110 kd. The most immunogenic antigens were p110 and p68, which induced responses in 33% (95% CI = 22%-44%) and 25% (95% CI = 15%-35%) of patients, respectively. Both antigens were commonly expressed on different melanomas, but they were absent on autologous normal tissue and on an unrelated allogeneic tumor. All the above antigens are attractive candidates for vaccine construction.

A phase II study of Didemnin B (NSC 325319) in advanced malignant melanoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (PB687).

PURPOSE: Didemnin B is a novel marine natural product cyclic depsipeptide containing unusual amino acid moieties. This agent demonstrates promising preclinical antitumor activity, including activity against B16 melanoma and against melanoma isolates in the human tumor stem cell assay. METHODS: We conducted a phase II study of Didemnin B, given in Cremophor, at a starting dose of 4.2 mg/m2/IV q 28 days. Patients with measurable metastatic or advanced malignant melanoma were eligible. All patients were previously untreated with chemotherapy and had performance status 0 or 1. Doses were escalated to 4.9 and 5.6 mg/m2 in cycles 2 and 3, respectively. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were entered and treated with a median of one cycle per patient. Eight of these patients went off study for toxicity including 7 with anaphylactoid reactions in the first or second cycle. One patient went off study after 3 cycles with severe myopathy, a newly described toxicity. Two were not evaluable for response and five were considered stable, including one patient with a transient PR of soft tissue disease in the first cycle. Another patient had stable disease for twelve cycles before progressing and one went off study electively after 3 cycles, for a total of 7 patients with stable disease. One patient with a measurable partial remission (PR) and went off study after three cycles due to severe myopathy, a then newly-described toxicity. No hematologic toxicity was seen. Nausea and vomiting were controlled with anti-emetics. CONCLUSIONS: This study was indeterminate with respect to the activity of Didemnin B in melanoma. Signs of activity were seen, particularly in soft tissue masses, though a large number of patients could not be evaluated fully for activity due to the occurrence of anaphylactoid reactions. This study does not preclude a clinically important level of activity for Didemnin B.

Stimulation of CD8+ T cell responses to MAGE-3 and Melan A/MART-1 by immunization to a polyvalent melanoma vaccine.

A critical requirement for cancer vaccines is that they stimulate CD8+ T cell responses. In this study, we tested the ability of a polyvalent melanoma vaccine to induce CD8+ T cell responses to the melanoma associated antigens MAGE-3 and Melan A/MART-1. Fifteen HLA-A2+ patients with resected malignant melanoma were immunized with the vaccine s.c. every 2-3 weeks. CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood reacting to HLA-A2 restricted epitopes on MAGE-3 (FLWGPRALV) and Melan A/MART-1/(AAGIGILTV) were quantitated using a filter spot assay at baseline and following 4 immunizations. Vaccine immunization induced CD8+ T cells reacting to one or both of these peptides in 9 of the 15 (60%) patients. These cells were CD8+ and HLA-A2 restricted, as reactivity was abrogated by monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to CD8 and class I HLA, but not by anti-CD4. All responding patients remained recurrence-free for at least 12 months (median 15 months, range 12 to >21 months), whereas melanoma recurred within 3-5 months in non-responders. The differences in outcome were unrelated to differences in disease severity or overall immunological competence between responders and non-responders. Our results demonstrate directly that MAGE-3 and Melan A/MART-1 can stimulate CD8+ T cell responses in humans, and suggest that these responses are protective and surrogate markers of vaccine efficacy.

Effect of prolonged topotecan infusion on topoisomerase 1 levels: a phase I and pharmacodynamic study.

Topoisomerase 1 (topo-1) inhibitors act on the target enzyme by forming "cleavable complex," a high molecular weight DNA protein adduct. The formation of such cleavable complexes results in depletion of the Mr 100,000 "free" topo-1 band detectable by Western blot. The objectives of this study were to determine the maximally tolerated dose of prolonged topotecan infusion in previously untreated and minimally pretreated patients. A secondary objective was to measure the effect of prolonged topotecan infusion on topo-1 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as a pharmacodynamic end point. In a prior Phase I study of 21-day topotecan infusion (H. Hochster et al., J. Clin. Oncol., 12: 553-559, 1994), the maximum tolerated dose for patients treated previously was 0.53 mg/m2/day for 21 days every 28 days. In this study, patients with no prior therapy were treated similarly at 0.7 mg/m2/day for 21 days, and doses were escalated in 0.1 mg/m2/day increments. Patients who had one prior chemotherapy regimen or radiation therapy to a portal of

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in women with advanced breast cancer: an active regimen with limiting neurotoxicity.

PURPOSE: A phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced breast cancer was performed to determine the objective response rate and make further observations about the toxicity of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the breast with no more than one chemotherapeutic treatment for advanced disease. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 administered as a 24-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. Patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously on day 3 until WBC recovery. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients continued to receive therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-four patients entered the trial. Forty-two patients were assessable for response. Nineteen patients (43%) had no prior chemotherapy and 41 had no chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The median number of cycles administered per patient was five (range, one to seven). There were five complete responses (CRs) (11.9%) and 17 partial responses (PRs) (40.5%), with an overall response rate of 52.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.4% to 68.0%). Nine patients had stage III disease. The response rate for this group was 66.7% (95% CI, 33.0% to 92.5%), with three CRs and three PRs. Among 35 patients with stage IV disease, there were two CRs and 14 PRs, with an overall response rate of 48.5% (95% CI, 30.8% to 66.5%). Overall, the median response duration was 10.6 months. Thirty patients (68%) developed transient grade 4 neutropenia. Cumulative neuropathy was the major dose-limiting toxicity. After five cycles of chemotherapy, 96% of patients had at least grade 1 neurotoxicity and 52% had at least grade 2 neurotoxicity. One patient had a toxic death after cycle 1 of therapy. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for women with advanced breast cancer is an active regimen. However, the cumulative neurotoxicity was significant and dose-limiting in the majority of patients.

Effect of DETOX as an adjuvant for melanoma vaccine.

The identification of effective adjuvants is critical for tumor vaccine development. Towards this end, we examined whether the immunogenicity of a melanoma vaccine could be potentiated by DETOX, an adjuvant consisting of monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) and purified mycobacterial cell-wall skeleton (CWS). Nineteen patients with resected stage III melanoma were immunized with a polyvalent melanoma antigen vaccine (40 micrograms) admixed with DETOX, q3 wks x 4. Seven patients received vaccine + low-dose DETOX (10 micrograms MPL + 100 micrograms CWS) and 12 received vaccine + high-dose DETOX (20 micrograms MPL + 200 micrograms CWS). A non-randomized control group of 35 patients was treated similarly with 40 micrograms vaccine + alum. One week after the fourth vaccine immunization, melanoma antibodies were increased over baseline in 7/7 (100%) patients treated with vaccine + low-dose DETOX, 8/12 (67%) patients treated with vaccine + high-dose DETOX, and in 4/19 (21%) of vaccine + alum patients. For the entire DETOX group, the antibody response rate was 15/19 (79%) compared 4/19 (21%) in the alum group (p < 0.001). In contrast, a strong delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response (> or = 15 mm increase in DTH response over baseline) was induced in 50% of the entire DETOX group versus in 47% of the alum group. Median disease-free (DF) survival for the entire DETOX group was 17.8 months compared with 32.1 months in the alum group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, DETOX markedly potentiated antibody but had little effect on DTH responses to melanoma vaccine immunization. It did not appear to improve disease-free survival in comparison to alum in this non-randomized study.

Improved survival of patients with melanoma with an antibody response to immunization to a polyvalent melanoma vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma vaccine treatment appears to slow the progression of melanoma in some patients, particularly in patients in whom it stimulates cellular antimelanoma immune responses. The relationship of vaccine-induced antibody responses to clinical outcome is less clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of antibody responses to melanoma vaccine immunization. METHODS: Eighty-two evaluable patients with surgically resected American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage III malignant melanoma were immunized to a partially purified, polyvalent, melanoma antigen vaccine. Antimelanoma antibodies were measured by immunoprecipitation and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis before vaccine treatment and 1 week after the fourth immunization. RESULTS: Vaccine treatment induced or augmented antibody responses to melanoma in 32 (39%) of the patients. The antibodies were directed to one or more antigens of 38-43, 75, 110, 150 and/or 210 kDs, which previously have been shown to be expressed preferentially in cultured human melanoma cells. The median disease free survival of patients with a vaccine-induced antibody response to one or more of these antigens was 5.4 years compared with 1.4 years for nonresponders (P = 0.06), and 5-year overall survival was 71% compared with 44%, respectively (P = < 0.01). As determined by Cox multivariate analysis, the difference in overall survival was independent of disease severity or of immunologic competence as evaluated by ability to be sensitized to dinitrochlorobenzene. The difference in survival between antibody responders and nonresponders improved with time. CONCLUSIONS: The antibody response to vaccine treatment is an immune marker of vaccine activity that appears to be predictive of a later reduction in the recurrence of melanoma and is unrelated to the vaccine's ability to induce cellular immune responses. This finding suggests that vaccine treatment may be effective in slowing the progression of melanoma in some patients and that the protective effect is mediated partly by vaccine-induced antimelanoma antibodies.

Phase Ib trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor combined with murine monoclonal antibody R24 in patients with metastatic melanoma.

R24, a murine monoclonal antibody, has been shown to mediate complement- and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) of melanoma tumor targets. We conducted a Phase Ib clinical trial using granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and R24 in 20 patients with metastatic melanoma. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that treatment with GM-CSF could up-regulate monocyte and granulocyte ADCC and that the combination of GM-CSF plus R24, which mediates ADCC, would lead to enhanced anti-tumor activity in patients with melanoma. GM-CSF was administered by subcutaneous injection daily for 21 days at a dose of 150 micrograms/m2/day. R24 was administered by continuous intravenous infusion on days 8-15 at three dose levels: 0, 10, and 50 mg/m2/day. All 20 patients received one cycle of treatment only. Immune parameters measured were monocyte and granulocyte direct cytotoxicity and ADCC. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Fifteen patients were evaluable for immune response. Treatment with GM-CSF alone was well tolerated. Toxicity from the combination of GM-CSF plus R24 included diffuse urticaria, nausea and vomiting, hypertension, and hypotension. Hypotension was the dose-limiting toxicity. Two patients on the 50-mg/m2/day dose level of R24 achieved a partial response lasting 2+ and 5+ months. Treatment with GM-CSF led to a statistically significant enhancement of monocyte and granulocyte direct cytotoxicity and ADCC. The maximally tolerated dose of R24 given at this schedule combined with GM-CSF is < 50 mg/m2/day. We conclude that GM-CSF given by subcutaneous injection at 150 micrograms/m2 x 21 days can enhance effector cell ADCC and direct cytotoxicity and that the combination of GM-CSF and R24 can be therapeutic.

Monocyte activation following systemic administration of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Twenty-four patients with solid malignancies were treated with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on a Phase 1b trial. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of GM-CSF on peripheral blood monocyte activation. GM-CSF was administered by subcutaneous injection daily for 14 days. Immune parameters measured were monocyte cytotoxicity against the human colon carcinoma (HT29) cell line, serum tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1 beta, and in vitro TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta induction. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Fifteen patients were evaluable for immunologic response. Treatment with GM-CSF led to a statistically significant enhancement in direct monocyte cytotoxicity against HT29 cells. There was no increase in serum TNF-alpha or IL-1 beta and no consistent in vitro induction of TNF-alpha or IL-1 beta from monocytes posttreatment. Treatment was well tolerated overall. We conclude that treatment with GM-CSF can lead to enhanced monocyte cytotoxicity. Further studies are in progress to evaluate the effect of GM-CSF on other parameters of monocyte functions.

Phase I trial of low-dose continuous topotecan infusion in patients with cancer: an active and well-tolerated regimen.

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan for a 21-day infusion schedule, repeated every 28 days, in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of four patients received continuous ambulatory infusions of topotecan in escalated duration with doses beginning at 0.20 mg/m2/d for 7 days. Forty-four patients with a histologic diagnosis of cancer refractory to standard therapy were treated with infusions of topotecan for a total of 115 cycles and 1,780 patient-days of infusion. The median number of treatment cycles per patient was two (range, one to eight). All patients were heavily pretreated with chemotherapy and/or radiation. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was myelo-suppression, with thrombocytopenia greater than neutropenia seen at the dose level of 0.70 mg/m2/d for 21 days. At the MTD of 0.53 mg/m2, ten patients were treated for a total of 20 courses, resulting in one episode of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and leukopenia, one grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and two grade 3 leukopenias. This dose regimen was well tolerated, with minimal nonhematologic toxicity. Local infusion port complications developed in two patients and two had bacteremia, including one patient with repeated local skin infections. Objective responses were observed in this heavily pretreated population for patients with ovarian cancer (two partial responses and one mixed response in six patients), breast cancer (one partial response and one mixed response in two patients), and for one patient each with renal and non-small-cell lung cancer (two partial remissions). CONCLUSION: Twenty-one-day topotecan infusion is well tolerated at 0.53 mg/m2, with dose-intensity exceeding other schedules for administration of topotecan. The DLT is hematologic, with thrombocytopenia somewhat exceeding leukopenia. Objective responses were observed in seven patients with breast, ovarian, renal, and non-small-cell lung cancer.