Risk of colorectal cancer following CT-verified acute diverticulitis: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

AIM: Routine colonoscopy to exclude colorectal cancer (CRC) after CT-verified acute diverticulitis is controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of CRC in patients with acute diverticulitis with that in the general population. METHOD: Patients with an emergency admission for diverticular disease to any Norwegian hospital between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2010 were included through identification in the Norwegian Patient Registry using International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes K57.1-9. To estimate the age-specific distribution of CT-verified acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) and acute complicated diverticulitis (ACD) in this nationwide study population, numbers from the largest Norwegian emergency hospital were used. Patients diagnosed with CRC within 1 year following their admission for acute diverticulitis were detected through cross-matching with the Cancer Registry of Norway. Based on both Norwegian age-specific incidence of CRC and estimated age-specific distribution of CT-verified diverticulitis, standard morbidity ratios (SMRs) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 7473 patients with emergency admissions for diverticular disease were identified (estimated CT-verified AUD n = 3523, ACD n = 1206); of these 155 patients were diagnosed with CRC within 1 year. Eighty had a CT-verified diverticulitis at index admission [41 AUD (51.3%); 39 ACD (49.7%)]. Compared with the general population, the SMR was 6.6 following CT-verified AUD and 16.3 following ACD, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the first year after CT-verified acute diverticulitis, especially after ACD, the risk of CRC is higher than in the general population. This probably represents misdiagnosis of CRC as acute diverticulitis. Follow-up colonoscopy should be recommended to all patients admitted with acute diverticulitis.

MRI defecography of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis-contributes little to the understanding of functional outcome.

PURPOSE: Variability in functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is to a large extent unexplained. The aim of this study was to use MRI to evaluate the morphology, emptying pattern and other pathology that may explain differences in functional outcome between well-functioning and poorly functioning pouch patients. A secondary aim was to establish a reference of normal MRI findings in pelvic pouch patients. METHODS: From a previous study, the best and worst functioning patients undergoing IPAA surgery between 2000 and 2013 had been identified and examined with manovolumetric tests (N = 47). The patients were invited to do a pelvic MRI investigating pouch morphology and emptying patterns, followed by a pouch endoscopy. RESULTS: Forty-three patients underwent MRI examination. We found no significant morphological or dynamic differences between the well-functioning and poorly functioning pouch patients. There was no correlation between urge volume and the volume of the bony pelvis, and no correlation between emptying difficulties or leakage and dynamic MRI findings. Morphological MRI signs of inflammation were present in the majority of patients and were not correlated to histological signs of inflammation. Of the radiological signs of inflammation, only pouch wall thickness correlated to endoscopic pouchitis disease activity index scores. CONCLUSION: It seems MRI does not increase the understanding of factors contributing to functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Unless there is a clinical suspicion of perianal/peripouch disease or pelvic sepsis, MRI does not add value as a diagnostic tool for pelvic pouch patients. Endoscopy remains the golden standard for diagnosing pouch inflammation.

One-year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized trials demonstrated that laparoscopic lavage compared with resection for Hinchey III perforated diverticulitis was associated with similar mortality, less stoma formation but a higher rate of early reintervention. The aim of this study was to compare 1-year outcomes in patients who participated in the randomized Scandinavian Diverticulitis (SCANDIV) trial. METHODS: Between February 2010 and June 2014, patients from 21 hospitals in Norway and Sweden presenting with suspected perforated diverticulitis were enrolled in a multicentre RCT comparing laparoscopic lavage and sigmoid resection. All patients with perforated diverticulitis confirmed during surgery were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis of 1-year results. RESULTS: Of 199 enrolled patients, 101 were assigned randomly to laparoscopic lavage and 98 to colonic resection. Perforated diverticulitis was confirmed at the time of surgery in 89 and 83 patients respectively. Within 1 year after surgery, neither severe complications (34 versus 27 per cent; P = 0·323) nor disease-related mortality (12 versus 11 per cent) differed significantly between the lavage and surgery groups. Among the 144 patients with purulent peritonitis, the rate of severe complications (27 per cent (20 of 74) versus 21 per cent (15 of 70) respectively; P = 0·445) and disease-related mortality (8 versus 9 per cent) were similar. Laparoscopic lavage was associated with more deep surgical-site infections (32 versus 13 per cent; P = 0·006) but fewer superficial surgical-site infections (1 versus 17 per cent; P = 0·001). More patients in the lavage group underwent unplanned reoperations (27 versus 10 per cent; P = 0·010). Including stoma reversals, a similar proportion of patients required a secondary operation (28 versus 29 per cent). The stoma rate at 1 year was lower in the lavage group (14 versus 42 per cent in the resection group; P < 0·001); however, the Cleveland Global Quality of Life score did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: The advantages of laparoscopic lavage should be weighed against the risk of secondary intervention (if sepsis is unresolved). Assessment to exclude malignancy (although uncommon) is advised. Registration number: NCT01047462 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Randomized clinical trial comparing collagen plug and advancement flap for trans-sphincteric anal fistula.

BACKGROUND: The role of a collagen plug for treating anal fistula is not well established. A randomized prospective multicentre non-inferiority study of surgical treatment of trans-sphincteric cryptogenic fistulas was undertaken, comparing the anal fistula plug with the mucosal advancement flap with regard to fistula recurrence rate and functional outcome. METHODS: Patients with an anal fistula were evaluated for eligibility in three centres, and randomized to either mucosal advancement flap surgery or collagen plug, with clinical follow-up at 3 and 12 months. The primary outcome was the fistula recurrence rate. Anal pain (visual analogue scale), anal incontinence (St Mark's score) and quality of life (Short Form 36 questionnaire) were also reported. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included; 48 were allocated to the plug procedure and 46 to advancement flap surgery. The median follow-up was 12 (range 9-24) months. The recurrence rate at 12 months was 66 per cent (27 of 41 patients) in the plug group and 38 per cent (15 of 40) in the flap group (P = 0·006). Anal pain was reduced after operation in both groups. Anal incontinence did not change in the follow-up period. Patients reported an increased quality of life after 3 months. There were no differences between the groups with regard to pain, incontinence or quality of life. CONCLUSION: There was a considerably higher recurrence rate after the anal fistula plug procedure than following advancement flap repair. Registration number: NCT01021774 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Restorative proctocolectomy with two different pouch designs: few complications with good function.

AIM: The object of this study was to compare function and quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery having two different pouch designs. METHOD: Patients having RPC in an academic unit from 2000 who had had the loop-ileostomy closed by June 2013 were identified from the hospital medical records. They were sent a questionnaire regarding quality of life and interviewed using a pouch function score (PFS) described by Oresland (score 0-16, higher scores denote worse function). RESULTS: One hundred and three patients underwent surgery, of whom 56 had a J-pouch design and 47 a K-pouch design, this being a double-folded Kock pouch without the nipple valve. No patients have had the pouch removed or defunctioned due to failure at a mean of 8 years. The reoperation rate was 11.6%. The mean PFS was 5.43 and 5.27 for J- and K-pouches, respectively (P = 0.766). More patients with a J-pouch reported a social handicap due to poor bowel function (P = 0.041). Patients with a PFS ≥ 8 had a poorer quality of life. A score of ≥ 8 was reported by 16% of K-pouch and 25% of J-pouch patients (P = 0.29). CONCLUSION: RPC is a safe procedure with a low complication rate and good functional outcome. Small improvements in function have an impact on a patient's quality of life. Although the J-pouch is the most commonly used, the K-pouch has some advantages. Other pouch designs deserve further evaluation.

Bowel function and quality of life after superior mesenteric nerve plexus transection in right colectomy with D3 extended mesenterectomy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain the impact of injury to the superior mesenteric nerve plexus caused by right colectomy with D3 extended mesenterectomy as performed in the prospective multicenter trial: "Safe Radical D3 Right Hemicolectomy for Cancer through Preoperative Biphasic Multi-detector Computed Tomography" in which all soft tissue surrounding the superior mesenteric vessels from the level of the middle colic artery to that of the ileocolic artery was removed. METHODS: Bowel function and gastrointestinal quality of life in two consecutive cohorts that underwent right colectomy with and without D3 extended mesenterectomy were compared. Main outcome measures were the Diarrhea Assessment Scale (DAS) and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). The data were collected prospectively through telephone interviews. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients per group, comparable for age, sex, length of bowel resected but with significantly shorter follow-up time in the experimental group, were included. There was no difference in total DAS scores, subscores or additional questions except for higher bowel frequency scores in the D3 group (p = 0.02). Comparison of total GIQLI scores and subscales showed no difference between groups. Regression analysis with correction for confounding factors showed 0.48 lower bowel frequency scores in the D2 group (p = 0.022). Within the D3 group presence of jejunal arteries cranial to the D3 dissection area showed 1.78 lower DAS scores and 0.7 lower bowel frequency scores. CONCLUSIONS: Small bowel denervation after right colectomy with D3 extended mesenterectomy leads to increased bowel frequency but does not impact gastrointestinal quality of life. Individual anatomical variants can affect postoperative bowel function differently despite standardized surgery.

Effect of probiotics (Lactobacillus plantarum 299 plus Bifidobacterium Cure21) in patients with poor ileal pouch function: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Poor pouch function after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis is a considerable problem. Pouchitis and functional disorders are the most common reasons. Probiotics seem to have a beneficial effect in pouchitis but have not been assessed in functional pouch disorders. The aim was to analyse the effects of probiotics in patients with poor pouch function. METHODS: Thirty-three patients were randomized to probiotics (Lactobacillus plantarum 299 and Bifidobacterium infantis Cure 21) or placebo in a double blinded, 1:1 fashion. The treatment effect was assessed by the pouch functional score (PFS; 0-15, 15 worst), pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI; 0-18, 18 worst), and levels of four faecal biomarkers of inflammation (calprotectin, lactoferrin, myeloperoxidase [MPO] and eosinophilic cationic protein [ECP]). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included (probiotics = 17, placebo = 16). There was no difference in change in the PFS from before to after treatment between the groups (median difference: -1.00, 95% C.I. -3.00 to 0.00, p = 0.119). Furthermore, probiotics had no effect on PDAI (median difference: 0.00, 95% C.I. 0.00-1.00, p = 0.786), or on faecal biomarkers. Significant correlations were observed between PDAI and each of the faecal biomarkers at study start. There were no correlations between PFS or PDAI symptom subscore and the biomarkers. PDAI endoscopic and histologic subscores correlated significantly to each of the biomarkers. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis that probiotics improves pouch-related dysfunction was not confirmed. Faecal biomarkers could play a future role in the management of pouch patients.

Management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis without antibiotics: a single-centre cohort study.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of nonantibiotic management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis at a large university hospital in Norway with regard to management failure, disease recurrence and complications. METHOD: On 1 January 2013 we implemented a new policy for the management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis without antibiotics. Antibiotic treatment was only provided in the case of defined criteria. All patients admitted from 1 January 2013 to 30 June 2014 with a CT-verified, left-sided, acute uncomplicated diverticulitis were included in the study and evaluated retrospectively, with 12 months' follow-up. RESULTS: Of 244 admissions with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, 177 (73%) were managed without antibiotics. Among these there were seven (4%) management failures, including five patients in whom a deteriorating clinical picture prompted antibiotic treatment and two readmissions within 1 month due to persisting symptoms. The only complication in this group was one fistula (< 1%). Eight (5%) patients had a recurrence of acute diverticulitis requiring hospital care and two (1%) underwent elective surgery within the first year. Twenty (8%) patients met predefined exemption criteria and received antibiotics from admission, six (30%) of whom developed complications. The recurrence rate in this group was 10% and none had surgery performed. The 47 (20%) policy violators treated with antibiotics from admission had no complications. Their recurrence rate was 11% and one (2%) patient underwent elective surgery. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that nonantibiotic management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis is safe and feasible. Most complications occurred in a small group of high-risk patients treated with antibiotics.

Complications in surgery for Crohn's disease after preoperative antitumour necrosis factor therapy.

BACKGROUND: The use of biological therapy (biologicals) is established in the treatment of Crohn's disease. This study aimed to determine whether preoperative treatment with biologicals is associated with an increased rate of complications following surgery for Crohn's disease with intestinal anastomosis. METHODS: All patients receiving biologicals and undergoing abdominal surgery with anastomosis or strictureplasty were identified at six tertiary referral centres. Demographic data, and preoperative, operative and postoperative details were registered. Patients who were treated with biologicals within 2 months before surgery were compared with a control group who were not. Postoperative complications were classified according to anastomotic, infectious or other complications, and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Some 111 patients treated with biologicals within 2 months before surgery were compared with 187 patients in the control group. The groups were well matched. There were no differences between the treatment and control groups in the rate of complications of any type (34·2 versus 28·9 per cent respectively; P = 0·402), anastomotic complications (7·2 versus 8·0 per cent; P = 0·976) and non-anastomotic infectious complications (16·2 versus 13·9 per cent; P = 0·586). In univariable regression analysis, biologicals were not associated with an increased risk of any complication (odds ratio (OR) 1·33, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·81 to 2·20), anastomotic complication (OR 0·89, 0·37 to 2·17) or infectious complication (OR 1·09, 0·62 to 1·91). CONCLUSION: Treatment with biologicals within 2 months of surgery for Crohn's disease with intestinal anastomosis was not associated with an increased risk of complications.

Colectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis - what next?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) occurs in 2%-8% of patients who suffer from ulcerative colitis (UC). For patients who require colectomy, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) or ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is employed to preserve continence.We evaluated the outcomes after IPAA and IRA for patients with UC-PSC, using patients with UC but without PSC as controls (UC-only group). PATIENTS: In a case-control study conducted at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden, patients with UC-PSC (N=48; 31 IPAA and 17 IRA) were compared to patients with UC only (N=113; 62 IPAA and 51 IRA). Functional outcomes (Öresland score), pouchitis, surgical complications, and failure were evaluated. RESULTS: For patients with IPAA, the median Öresland scores were similar for the two groups: 5 (range, 0-13) for the UC-PSC group and 5 for the UC-only group (range, 0-12; p>0.05). However, the IRA scores were significantly different at 7 (range, 2-11) and 3 (range, 0-11) for the respective groups (p=0.005). Pouchitis was more frequent in patients with UC-PSC. Complication rates did not differ. For patients with IPAA, the failure rate was 16% for those in the UC-PSC group versus 6% for those in the UC-only group (p>0.05); the corresponding results for IRA were 53% versus 22% (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: For cases of IPAA, pouchitis seems to be more common in patients with UC-PSC. However, the functional outcomes and failure rates are unaffected by concurrent PSC. For patients with UC-PSC, functional outcome is poor and the failure rate is high after IRA.

Transcutaneous implant evacuation system: a new approach to continent stoma construction.

AIM: Several attempts have been made to construct a mechanical continent stoma without success. A system based on a titanium implant has been developed in an animal model. Following evaluation of this device in animals, the transcutaneous implant evacuation system (TIES) has now been tested in humans. METHOD: The implant consists of a titanium cylinder including a mesh and a plastic cap. This design allows the intestine and subcutaneous tissue to grow into the device. Four patients with inflammatory bowel disease underwent surgery. The indications for surgery were malfunctioning pouches or skin problems around the stoma. Following abdominal surgery, implantation of the device was made behind the external fascia with diversion of the ileum through the device to create a permanent stoma. RESULTS: Primary surgery was uncomplicated. Skin tissue growth into the implant was delayed in one case and one patient had impaired healing between intestine and the device. In these cases minor surgical correction was necessary. The tested cap design in the current device was inconvenient and needs to be further developed. No local infections occurred. CONCLUSION: This first clinical study of the TIES device has shown few device-related complications and no significant safety concerns. In our experience bridging of connective tissue between the intestine and skin is crucial for healing. Further development of the lid, the implant and the implantation method within clinical trials is necessary before the device can be introduced in general practice.

Pouch design and long-term functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Functional outcome is of utmost importance after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Although pouch design and construction of the anastomosis are known technical determinants of function, there are few long-term results. This retrospective study evaluated functional outcome for two different pouch designs, and for handsewn versus stapled pouch-anal anastomoses. METHODS: The analysis included 412 patients who had either a J or K pouch (double-folded J pouch), of whom 123 had a J pouch (96 handsewn and 27 stapled) and 289 had a K pouch (95 handsewn and 194 stapled). Functional outcome was evaluated by a mailed questionnaire to achieve an Oresland score (0 to 15; 15 worst). RESULTS: Mean functional scores were 6.1 for J pouches and 4.9 for K pouches (P < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that reservoir design and age at surgery were predictors of functional outcome (P < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients with a J pouch and handsewn anastomosis than with a K pouch and stapled anastomosis had a score of 8 or more, a level previously demonstrated to impact negatively on quality of life (32 versus 16 per cent; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The K pouch was associated with a better long-term functional outcome than the J pouch in this patient population.

Can a failed ileal pouch anal anastomosis be left in situ?

OBJECTIVE: Failure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is reported with a frequency of 10-20%. The failed IPAA can be excised or defunctioned. Indications for excision and further management of an indefinitely diverted pouch are poorly described. The aim of the present investigation was to investigate pouch-related problems and the histopathological pattern of the pouch mucosa in this group of patients. METHOD: In a cohort of 620 patients having IPAA with a median follow-up of 14 years, 56 patients with failure were identified. The patients with defunctioned pouches were assessed with regard to pouch-related problems and endoscopy with biopsies was performed. Biopsies were stained with haematoxylin-eosin, PAS for neutral mucins and Alcian blue/high iron diamine for sialomucins/sulphomucins. Morphological changes were grouped into three types modified according to Veress and assessed for dysplasia. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with an indefinitely diverted pouch were found. The follow-up time after surgery for failure was 10 years. Thirteen patients completed the follow-up. Except for two patients with pelvic/perineal pain, there were no clinical problems. The majority of patients displayed mild to moderate macroscopic signs of inflammation. Morphologically, findings ranged from a preserved mucosal pattern to intense inflammatory reaction. No case of dysplasia or carcinoma was found. CONCLUSION: Most patients with an indefinitely diverted pouch had no complaints regarding the pouch. There was no case of dysplasia. Indefinite diversion may be preferable to pouch excision, especially given the associated morbidity.

Long-term function and manovolumetric characteristics after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term pouch function and physiological characteristics after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are poorly described. The aim of this study was to undertake a prospective investigation of long-term pouch function and manovolumetric characteristics. METHODS: Forty-two patients with a median follow-up of 16 years after IPAA were included. Function was assessed using a questionnaire and a score was calculated ranging from 0 to 15 (15 being the worst). Manovolumetry was performed and pouchitis recorded. A paired analysis was conducted, as the results were compared with previous data for each patient. RESULTS: The median functional score was 3.5 (range 0-10) at 2 years and 5 (range 1-11) at 16 years (P = 0.013). Resting anal canal pressures were higher (P < 0.001) and squeeze pressures lower (P = 0.008) at long-term follow-up. Ileal pouch volumes at distension pressures of 10, 20 and 40 cm H(2)O were diminished at 16 years (P < 0.001, P = 0.005 and P = 0.058 respectively). The volume and pressure for first sensation and urge to defaecate were reduced. Increased age correlated positively with a poor functional score. A history of pouchitis did not affect functional or physiological characteristics. CONCLUSION: Ileal pouch function declines in the long term. The reasons are unclear, but the ageing process may have an impact.

Review article: colon-saving medical therapy vs. colectomy in ulcerative colitis - the case for colectomy.

In the era of expanding medical therapy for ulcerative colitis, surgery is still a very valid option in those patients, where medicine is not able to control symptoms, both in the acute and chronic stages, and also for those at risk of developing a cancer. The ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) will, for the vast majority of patients, give a very acceptable functional outcome. There is a risk of surgical complications and pouchitis; however, mortality is very low and compares well with medical therapy. Reduced female fertility is a concern but compared with the preoperative state, overall sexual function is largely improved. The ileorectal anastomosis is undergoing a revival and can be used especially in the case of female fertility concerns. Either the continent ileostomy or a conventional ileostomy is an option for those 10-15% of patients who will eventually experience pouch failure, usually either because of septic complications or an unacceptable bowel function. Quality of life following both these options, and IPAA, is excellent and does not differ from that of the matched background population.