Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(2): 210-4, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26521703

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a frequent cause of orthopedic surgical site infections (SSIs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a bundle approach in the prevention of orthopedic MRSA SSIs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MRSA active surveillance and decolonization were performed preoperatively at our institution from July 2004 until 2007. In January 2008, a bundle approach comprising contact precautions for MRSA-positive patients and cefazolin-based antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) stewardship was implemented. Data on the prevalence of MRSA SSIs, antimicrobial use density, duration of AMP, and the use of an alcohol antiseptic agent (L/1,000 patient-days) were evaluated during 2 periods: July 2004-December 2007 (period A) and January 2008-December 2012 (period B). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The MRSA SSI rate during period B (0.97%; 19 out of 1,966) was significantly lower than that during period A (2.17%; 29 out of 1,333; P = .003). The infection rate correlated negatively with both the cefazolin antimicrobial use density (r = -0.76; P = .0002) and the use of an alcohol antiseptic agent (r = -0.68; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: An infection-prevention bundle consisting of contact precautions for carriers and AMP stewardship in addition to active surveillance was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of orthopedic MRSA SSIs.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/farmacologia , Cefazolina/farmacologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Masculino , Resistência a Meticilina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Prevalência , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Precauções Universais
2.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 37(11): 1811-5, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25366486

RESUMO

The antimicrobial agents vancomycin and metronidazole have been used to treat Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs). However, it remains unclear why patients are at risk of treatment failure and recurrence. Therefore, this study retrospectively examined 98 patients with CDIs who were diagnosed based on the detection of toxin-positive C. difficile to determine the risk factors affecting drug treatment responses and the recurrence of CDI. No significant difference was observed in the cure rate or dosage between the vancomycin and metronidazole groups. The 90-d mortality rate and total number of drugs associated with CDIs, including antiinfective agents used within 2 months before the detection of toxin-positive C. difficile, were significantly lower in the treatment success group than in the failure group. The total number of antiinfective agents and gastric acid-suppressive agents used during CDI therapy was also significantly lower in the success group than in the failure group. The period from the completion of CDI therapy to restarting the administration of anticancer agents and steroids was significantly longer in patients without than in patients with recurrence. These results indicate that the total number of drugs associated with CDIs should be minimized to reduce the risk of CDIs, that not only antibiotics but also gastric acid-suppressive agents should be discontinued during CDI therapy to increase therapeutic efficacy, and that the use of anticancer agents and steroids should be delayed as long as possible after patients are cured by CDI therapy to prevent recurrence.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Clostridioides difficile , Feminino , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Infect Chemother ; 18(2): 269-71, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21894454

RESUMO

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is highly contagious. It is spread by direct contact with MRSA-infected people or objects. Healthcare workers' hands are the most common vehicle for the transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens from patient to patient and within the healthcare environment. The present study aimed to investigate the correlation between the incidence of MRSA among Staphylococcus aureus recovered from clinical culture and the use of alcohol-based hand rub solutions or gloves and antimicrobial use density (AUD). All data were examined every 6 months between January 2005 and June 2008. The increasing use of alcohol-based hand rub solutions was correlated with a decreasing incidence of recovery of MRSA from clinical cultures (r(2) = 0.58). A statistically significant (P < 0.05) correlation (r(2) = 0.68) was observed between glove use and the incidence of MRSA. On the other hand, we did not find any correlation between the AUD of each antibiotic group and the incidence of MRSA. Thus, we suggest that it is important to use not only alcohol-based hand rubs, but also gloves, because MRSA is transmitted from patient to patient by the hands of healthcare workers.


Assuntos
Álcoois/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Luvas Protetoras/estatística & dados numéricos , Desinfecção das Mãos/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Desinfetantes/administração & dosagem , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Higiene , Incidência , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia
4.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 34(6): 589-91, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19748231

RESUMO

Optimal use of carbapenems is an important issue in the prevention of resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this study, we investigated the correlation between antimicrobial use density (AUD) of carbapenems and imipenem/cilastatin (IPM/CS) or meropenem (MEPM) susceptibility of P. aeruginosa strains. The AUD of five carbapenems [IPM/CS, panipenem/betamipron, biapenem, MEPM and doripenem (DRPM)] was examined every 6 months between 2006 and 2008. The AUD was calculated using the defined daily doses methodology developed by the World Health Organisation. A minimum inhibitory concentration of IPM/CS or MEPM of < or =4 mg/L was considered to be sensitive. There was a significant negative correlation between MEPM susceptibility and the total AUD of MEPM and DRPM [r=-0.823, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.035 to -0.980; P=0.044]. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between MEPM susceptibility and IPM/CS susceptibility (r=0.839, 95% CI 0.084 to 0.981; P=0.037). Cross-resistance was therefore investigated and only 5.6% of MEPM-insensitive strains were susceptible to IPM/CS, although 43.3% of IPM/CS-insensitive strains were susceptible to MEPM. These results suggest that curtailing the use of MEPM and DRPM may curb the emergence not only of MEPM-resistant strains but also IPM/CS-resistant strains.


Assuntos
Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Tienamicinas/uso terapêutico , Resistência beta-Lactâmica , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Doripenem , Humanos , Meropeném , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Estatística como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...