Does adding neuromuscular electrical stimulation to rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty lead to a better quadriceps muscle strength recovery? A systematic review.

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) show postsurgical quadriceps weakness. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been shown to be an effective treatment for muscle strength recovery in a number of orthopaedic conditions. The aim of this review is to investigate whether adding NMES to TKA rehabilitation leads to a better quadriceps strength recovery in comparison with standardized rehabilitation. A second aim is to investigate which are the most commonly used NMES pulse settings and their effectiveness. A systematic review of literature was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and Web-of-Science. Intervention studies evaluating the effects of a rehabilitation intervention based on quadriceps NMES in patients undergoing TKA were retrieved. Methodological quality was assessed using the risk of bias-2 Cochrane tool. Features of NMES rehabilitation and technical data on NMES settings were extracted from the studies. Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to the limited number and the heterogeneity of the selected studies, it was not appropriate to carry out a meta-analysis. All the studies reported higher quadriceps strength in patients undergoing quadriceps NMES, particularly early after TKA. The addition of NMES or traditional strength training shows similar long-term effects. Short duration and low-intensity NMES have limited effects on quadriceps strength. Heterogeneity was found on NMES methodologies and pulse settings. In conclusion, NMES is effective for quadriceps strength recovery following TKA. NMES intensity and duration are essential for good NMES outcomes on quadriceps strength. Further studies on NMES methodologies, pulse features and settings are required to address the gaps in knowledge on NMES following TKA.

Comparison of a fast track protocol and standard care after hip arthroplasty in the reduction of the length of stay and the early weight-bearing resumption: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: To date, hip arthroplasty is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures, with growing worldwide demand. In recent decades, major progress made in terms of surgical technique, biomechanics, and tribology knowledge has contributed to improve the medical and functional management of the patient. This study aims to assess if the application of a fast track protocol, consisting of a preoperative educational intervention, adequate postoperative pain control, and intensive rehabilitation intervention, reduces the length of stay (LOS) and allows the early functional recovery compared to standard clinical practice for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The study population consists of 90 patients with primary arthrosis of the hip with an anterior indication of hip arthroplasty. The exclusion criteria are older than 70 years, a contraindication to performing spinal anesthesia, and bone mass index (BMI) greater than 32. Participants, 45 for each group, are randomly allocated to one of two arms: fast track clinical pathway or standard care protocol. During allocation, baseline parameters such as Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index are collected. On the third postoperative day, the functional autonomy for each patient is assessed by the Iowa Level of Assistance (ILOA) scale, and it is expected the discharge for patients in the fast track group (primary outcome). On the other hand, standard care patient discharge is expected after 5-7 days after surgery. During follow-up fixed at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months, HHS and WOMAC scores are collected for each patient (secondary outcomes). DISCUSSION: Although total hip replacement has become a widespread standardized procedure, to the authors' knowledge, only few randomized controlled trials were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of fast track pathway vs. standard care procedure in the reduction of the LOS after hip arthroplasty. It is expected that our results collected by the application of minimally invasive surgical interventions with concomitant management of perioperative pain and bleeding and early functional rehabilitation will contribute to enriching the understanding of clinical and organizational aspects linked to fast track arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03875976 . Registered on 15 March 2019-"retrospectively registered".

One-year mortality after hip fracture surgery and prognostic factors: a prospective cohort study.

Older adult patients with hip fractures are 3-4 times more likely to die within one-year after surgery than general population. The study aimed to identify independent predictive factors associated with one-year mortality after hip fracture surgery. A prospective prognostic cohort study was performed. All patients aged ≥65 years, consecutively admitted in three Italian hospitals with a diagnosis of fragility hip fracture were included. Patients with periprosthetic or pathological fractures were excluded. Multivariate analysis was used to determine variables that significantly increased the risk of one-year mortality and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess their predictive capacity on the outcome.1083 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and the one-year follow-up was reached in 728 patients. The 16.6% of patients died within one-year after surgery. At the multivariate analysis, advancing age (OR = 1.094, 95% CI = 1.057-1.132), higher baseline Charlson Index (OR = 1.257, 95% CI = 1.114-1.418) and Activities of Daily Living scores (OR = 1.259, 95% CI = 1.143-1.388), presence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (PUs) (OR = 1.579, 95% CI = 1.002-2.489) and lack recovery of ambulation (OR = 1.736, 95% CI = 1.115-2.703), were found to be independent predictive factors of one-year mortality after surgery. The area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.780 (CI95% 0.737-0.824) for one-year mortality in elderly hip fractures patients. Early ambulation and careful long-term follow-up, with attention to frailty in elderly people, should be promoted.

What Factors Are Associated With the Recovery of Autonomy After a Hip Fracture? A Prospective, Multicentric Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with recovering autonomy in activities of daily living (ADL) in patients who have had a hip fracture. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: The orthopedic and orthogeriatric departments of 2 regional hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=742) aged ≥65 years with a diagnosis of fragility hip fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The level of autonomy at 4 months was assessed using the ADL scale. RESULTS: The median score on the ADL scale at 4 months was 3 (interquartile range, 5). Half of the population was unable to recover their prefracture autonomy levels. The following were found to be risk factors: increasing age (B=.02, P<.001); an elevated number of comorbidities (B=.044, P=.005); a lower level of prefracture autonomy (B=.087, P<.001); more frequent use of an antidecubitus mattress (B=.211, P<.001); an increased number of days with disorientation (B=.002, P=.012); failure to recover deambulation (B=.199, P<.001); an increased number of days with diapers (B=.003, P<.001), with a urinary catheter (B=.03, P<.001), and with bed rails (B=.001, P=.014); and a nonintensive care pathway (B=.199, P=.014). CONCLUSIONS: Recovery of deambulation, treatment of disorientation and management of incontinence are modifiable factors significantly associated with the functional recovery of autonomy.