Landfill gas collection efficiency: Categorization of data from existing in-situ measurements.

Landfill methane emissions are commonly estimated using cover-type dependent default collection efficiency values, with a first-order decay model or measured gas collection. Current default collection efficiencies used in the United States were predominately derived from 4 studies conducted during or prior to 2007 that relied on flux chambers. Flux chambers are limited by small sample sizes, placement restrictions, and the inability to measure emissions from gas or leachate collection systems. Since 2007, over 14 new studies have been completed using more advanced technologies that allow for direct measurement of methane plumes from most or all of a landfill's surface. On average, these measurements are 2-3 times greater than emissions predicted by current models and collection efficiency defaults. In lieu of measuring emissions from all landfills, updating collection efficiency defaults can bring modeled emissions into better alignment with measurements. To this end, collection efficiency estimates derived from measured data were categorized into cover types and then adjusted to account for cases where whole plume measurement was an amalgamation of multiple cover types. The resultant adjusted default values were 41% for daily cover, 69% for intermediate cover, and 71% for final cover. Direct measurement of landfill methane emissions is preferrable to account for the full range of variables driving landfill emissions, including collection system design and operation. However, applying these updated defaults back into the landfill emission models eliminates underprediction of landfill emissions for the dataset reviewed, and would provide a more accurate estimate of landfill gas emissions where measurements are unavailable.

Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The most common and gold standard method to diagnose and follow-up on scoliosis treatment is to capture biplanar X-ray images and then use these to determine the sagittal frontal spinal curvature angles by the Cobb method. Reducing exposure to radiation is an important aspect for consideration, especially regarding children. The ZEBRIS spinal examination method is an external, non-invasive measurement method that uses an ultrasound-based motion analysis system. The aim of this study is to compare angle values of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method with the angle values defined by the gold standard Cobb method on biplanar X-ray images. METHODS: Subjects included 19 children with AIS (mean age 14.5±2.1 years, range 8-16 years, frontal plane thoracic Cobb angle 19.95±10.23°, thoracolumbar/lumbar angle 16.57±10.23°). The thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis in the sagittal plane and the thoracic and lumbar scoliosis values were calculated by the Cobb method on biplanar X-ray images. The sagittal frontal spinal curvature angles were calculated from the position of the processus spinosus of 19 vertebrae, as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method. The validity of the ZEBRIS spine examination method was evaluated with Bland-Altman analyses between the sagittal and frontal spinal curvature parameters calculated from data determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and data obtained by the Cobb method on the X-ray images. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Thoracic spinal curvature angles in sagittal and in frontal planes can be measured with sufficient accuracy. The slopes of the linear regression lines for thoracic kyphosis (TK) and thoracic scoliosis (TSC) are close to one (1.00 and 0.79 respectively), and the intercept values are below 5 degrees. The correlation between the TK and TSC values determined by the two methods is significant (p = 0.000) and excellent (rTK = 0.95, rTSC = 0.85). The differences are in the limit of agreement. The lumbar lordosis (LL) in the sagittal plane shows a very good correlation (rLL = 0.76); however the differences between the angles determined by the two methods are out of the limit of agreement in patients with major lumbar lordosis (LL≥50°). The thoracolumbar/lumbar spinal curvature angles in the frontal plane determined by ZEBRIS spine examination were underestimated at curvatures larger than 15°, mainly due to the rotational and pathological deformities of the scoliotic vertebrae. However, the correlation between lumbar scoliosis (LSC) values determined by the two methods is significant (p = 0.000) and excellent (rLSC = 0.84), the slopes are below one (0.71), the intercept values are below 5 degrees, and the differences between the angles determined by the two methods are within the limits of agreement. We could conclude that ZEBRIS spinal examination is a valid and reliable method for determination of sagittal and frontal curvatures during the treatment of patients with scoliosis. However, it cannot replace the biplanar X-ray examination for the visualization of spinal curvatures in the sagittal and frontal planes and the rotation of vertebral bodies during the diagnosis and annual evaluation of the progression.

Reliability analysis of a sensitive and independent stabilometry parameter set.

Recent studies have suggested reduced independent and sensitive parameter sets for stabilometry measurements based on correlation and variance analyses. However, the reliability of these recommended parameter sets has not been studied in the literature or not in every stance type used in stabilometry assessments, for example, single leg stances. The goal of this study is to evaluate the test-retest reliability of different time-based and frequency-based parameters that are calculated from the center of pressure (CoP) during bipedal and single leg stance for 30- and 60-second measurement intervals. Thirty healthy subjects performed repeated standing trials in a bipedal stance with eyes open and eyes closed conditions and in a single leg stance with eyes open for 60 seconds. A force distribution measuring plate was used to record the CoP. The reliability of the CoP parameters was characterized by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), coefficient of variation (CV) and CV compliance rate (CVCR). Based on the ICC, SEM and MDC results, many parameters yielded fair to good reliability values, while the CoP path length yielded the highest reliability (smallest ICC > 0.67 (0.54-0.79), largest SEM% = 19.2%). Usually, frequency type parameters and extreme value parameters yielded poor reliability values. There were differences in the reliability of the maximum CoP velocity (better with 30 seconds) and mean power frequency (better with 60 seconds) parameters between the different sampling intervals.

The assessment of the spinal curvatures in the sagittal plane of children using an ultrasound-based motion analysing system.

In children's posture examinations the question often arises whether an X-ray examination is necessary or appropriate. On screening and in other cases when X-ray is contraindicated, alternative-non-invasive-examinations are available. To measure the shapes of the children's spines beside the Spinal Mouse also the Zebris ultrasound-based spine measuring instrument is accessible and nowadays commonly used. The main aim of the study is to determine the shape of the school-age children's spines in the sagittal plane with an alternative, non-invasive, radiation-free measuring method. From the results calculated from the values measured with the ultrasound-based motion analysing system-geared to age and height-the normal range of the values of kyphosis (TK), lordosis (LL) and inclination (TTI and LI) is determined. The subjects were children between the ages of 6 and 15 and between the heights of 120 and 180 cm (530 healthy, 394 with bad posture and 332 with flat feet). They were divided into groups according to their height with 5 cm long intervals. The age within the groups was irrelevant. So it is appropriate to give normal values according to height and not according to age. It was revealed that both in healthy children, in children with bad posture and in those with pes planus in the height groups, there was a significant difference between the values of males and females. On the basis of these results, normal values should be divided according to the gender. The measurement results also showed that in some of the height groups the pes planus and bad posture significantly affected the spinal curvatures.