Effect of mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair on indices of left atrial performance in chronic mitral regurgitation.

INTRODUCTION: Effect of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using MitraClip in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) on left atrial (LA) kinetic energy (LAKE), an index of LA work, and LA strain, a measure of LA performance, have not been well defined. METHODS: Patients with chronic primary or secondary 3+ or 4+ MR were analyzed pre- and post-TEER using MitraClip. LAKE was determined by echocardiography using LA stroke volume and A-wave velocity. Peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS), peak atrial strain in early diastole, and peak atrial contraction strain (PACS) were obtained by speckle tracking echocardiography. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients undergoing TEER with MitraClip were screened, 12 met criteria for analysis (9 primary and 3 secondary MR). Compared to pre-TEER, there was a significant increase post-TEER in LAKE (71.0 ± 64.1 vs. 177.5 ± 167.9 dyne·cm·103 , respectively; p = .008) and Doppler transmitral A-wave velocity (87.8 ± 41.4 vs. 138.5 ± 43.7 cm/s, respectively; p < .001); LA stroke volume did not change significantly. Mitral valve mean gradient significantly increased post-TEER compared to pre-TEER (5.7 ± 2.1 vs. 3.3 ± 2.1 mmHg, respectively; p = .01). There was a trend toward decrease in PALS post-TEER compared to pre-TEER (16.2 ± 4.8 vs. 20.7 ± 9.9%, respectively; p = .05). Peak atrial strain in early diastole significantly decreased post-TEER compared to pre-TEER (7.2 ± 3.0 vs. 14.1 ± 7.2%; respectively, p < .001), while PACS did not significantly change (9.1 ± 3.5 vs. 6.7 ± 5.2%, respectively; p = .07). CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic MR, LAKE increases after TEER with MitraClip driven by an increase in LA emptying velocities. Changes were also seen in LA strain with MitraClip. These procedurally induced changes due to mild mitral stenosis may have clinical implications.

Comparison of Catheterization Versus Echocardiographic-Based Gradients in Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: In patients with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), accurate assessment of gradients is important to assess valve function and durability, which drives clinical decision-making. We sought to evaluate discrepancies in aortic valve mean gradients with balloon-expandable and self-expanding TAVI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 507 patients that underwent TAVI and compared mean gradients by catheterization to transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Mean gradients by Doppler in balloon-expandable (11.0 ± 5.8 mm Hg) and self-expanding devices (8.7 ± 4.5 mm Hg) were significantly higher than catheterization (3.2 ± 4.0 mm Hg vs 3.5 ± 4.1 mm Hg, respectively; P<.001). In a subgroup analysis of skirted valves, Doppler gradients in balloon-expandable (9.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg) and self-expanding devices (8.6 ± 5.1 mm Hg) were significantly higher than catheterization (3.5 ± 4.1 mm Hg vs 4.2 ± 4.8 mm Hg, respectively; P<.001). When the effect of valve size on gradients was analyzed, Doppler gradients were significantly higher than catheterization for all comparisons. When indexed for valve size, patients with large aortas who received a balloon-expandable TAVI had greater pressure differential than those who received a self-expanding TAVI (8.24 ± 0.46 mm Hg vs 5.16 ± 0.66 mm Hg; P<.001). This trend was not seen in patients with a small aorta-to-valve index. CONCLUSION: Following TAVI, aortic valve mean gradients acquired by Doppler were higher than catheterization and the discrepancy was more pronounced in balloon-expandable than self-expanding prostheses. These differences persist in skirted valves and across valve sizes. These observations may reflect periprocedural hemodynamic changes, differences between prosthetic flow acceleration, and/or pressure recovery.

Natural history of nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis treated with warfarin.

We report on the natural history of a cohort of patients presenting with transient ischemic attack or stroke and nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis treated with warfarin.Patients with valvular vegetations on echocardiography, stroke, or transient ischemic attack presenting to a single neurologist were included. All patients were treated with warfarin until the vegetation resolved or for two years, then were switched to aspirin and had at least one clinical and echocardiographic follow-up.Twenty-nine patients were included and followed for a median of 27 months. Average age was 42 years and 72% were female. Two patients had vegetations on two valves. Five patients (17%) had recurrent strokes, three had systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid antibodies, one had antiphospholipid antibodies alone and one had neither condition. Three of the five patients did not have resolution of the vegetation at the time of the event. The valvular vegetations resolved in 23 of the 31 affected valves (74%) after a median of 11 months (range 4.5-157.5). Eleven patients had at least one follow-up echocardiogram after resolution of the vegetation and none had recurrent vegetations after warfarin was stopped.This study should serve to provide general recommendations regarding treatment of patients with TIA/stroke with nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis. Valvular vegetations resolve in most patients and the risk of recurrent stroke is low. Warfarin can safely be switched to aspirin in most patients when the vegetation resolves or after two years if it does not resolve. Prolonged warfarin may be warranted in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, positive antiphospholipid antibodies, and a persistent vegetation.

The Use of MitraClip in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation and Heart Failure.

Secondary (also known as functional) mitral regurgitation (MR) has increased substantially over the last several decades due to an increase in the prevalence of dilated cardiomyopathy (ischemic and non-ischemic). Mortality and morbidity in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy is much greater when associated with MR as compared to without MR. MR will result in further left ventricular (LV) volume overload, LV dilation, and pupillary muscle displacement resulting in deterioration of the severity of MR leading to a vicious cycle. Optimization of heart failure medical therapy, and cardiac resynchronization therapy for those that qualify, can improve severity of MR; however, significant MR will persist in certain patients. Transcatheter mitral valve repair to treat significant MR using the MitraClip (Abbott, Menlo Park, California), which grasps and coapts the posterior and anterior mitral valve leaflets, in appropriately selected patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and secondary MR has been shown to improve quality of life and prolong survival.

Impact of Stroke Volume Index and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Mortality After Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of stroke volume index (SVI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis, comparing those undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and those with surgical AVR (SAVR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 742 patients from the CoreValve US Pivotal High-Risk Trial randomized to TAVR (n=389) or SAVR (n=353) from February 2011 to September 2012 were stratified by an SVI of 35 mL/m2 and LVEF of 50% for comparing all-cause mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: The prevalence of an SVI of less than 35 mL/m2 in patients who underwent TAVR and SAVR was 35.8% (125 of 349) and 31.3% (96 of 307), respectively; LVEF of less than 50% was present in 18.1% (63 of 348) and 19.6% (60 of 306), respectively. Among patients with an SVI of less than 35 mL/m2, 1-year mortality was similar between patients with TAVR and SAVR (16.3% vs 22.2%; P=.25). However, in those with an SVI of 35 mL/m2 or greater, 1-year mortality was lower in those with TAVR than SAVR (10.3% vs 17.3%; P=.03). In patients with an LVEF of less than 50%, mortality was not affected by AVR approach (P>.05). In patients with an LVEF of 50% or higher, TAVR was associated with lower mortality than SAVR when SVI was preserved (9.8% vs 18.6%; P=.01). Mortality was not affected by SVI within the same AVR approach when LVEF was 50% or higher. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe aortic stenosis at high risk, there is a significant interaction between AVR approach and the status of SVI and LVEF. When LVEF or SVI was reduced, prognosis was similar regardless of AVR approach. In those with preserved LVEF or SVI, TAVR was associated with a better prognosis than SAVR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01240902.

Imaging Device Therapy: Essentials for the Imager.

Treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction has evolved. Recently, a fully implantable remote hemodynamic monitoring sensor in the pulmonary artery was approved in the treatment of patients at risk of heart failure readmissions. Several novel devices designed to offload the left atrium by creating a small interatrial shunt are being investigated. Cardiac imaging plays a vital role in the selection process, implantation, and monitoring of individuals with such devices. This article discusses in detail various imaging techniques and key clinical points relating to several cardiac devices used in the treatment of patients with heart failure.

Aortic Dysfunction in Mitral Regurgitation Due to Floppy Mitral Valve/Mitral Valve Prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Floppy mitral valve/mitral valve prolapse (FMV/MVP), a heritable disorder of connective tissue, often leads to mitral regurgitation (MR) and is the most common cause for mitral valve surgery in developed countries. Connective tissue disorders may affect aortic function, and a stiff aorta may increase the severity of MR. Aortic function, however, has not been studied in FMV/MVP with MR. METHODS: A total of 17 patients (11 men, 6 women) with FMV/MVP and significant MR were compared with 20 controls matched for age and gender. Aortic diameters (AoD) were measured from left ventriculograms at 2 and 4 cm above the aortic valve. Aortic pressures were measured directly using fluid-filled catheters. Aortic distensibility was calculated using the formula: 2(systolic AoD-diastolic AoD)/(diastolic AoD x pulse pressure). RESULTS: Aortic distensibility was significantly lower in FMV/MVP compared with control at 2 cm above the aortic valve (1.00 ± 0.19 versus 3.78 ± 1.10 10-3 mm Hg-1, respectively; p = 0.027) and 4 cm above the aortic valve (0.89 ± 0.16 versus 3.22 ± 0.19 10-3 mm Hg-1, respectively; p = 0.007). FMV/MVP patients had greater left ventricular (LV) end-systolic (88 ± 72 mL versus 35 ± 15 mL, p = 0.002) and end-diastolic (165 ± 89 mL versus 100 ± 41 mL, p = 0.005) volumes, and lower LV ejection fraction, compared with control (50 ± 12% versus 57 ± 6%, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Aortic distensibility is decreased (consistent with a stiff aorta) in patients with FMV/MVP and MR. A stiff aorta may increase the severity of MR. Thus, abnormal aortic function, which also deteriorates with age, may play an important role in the natural history of MR due to FMV/MVP.

Usefulness of Integrating Heart Failure Risk Factors Into Impairment of Global Longitudinal Strain to Predict Anthracycline-Related Cardiac Dysfunction.

The prediction of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is an essential aspect of care for individuals who receive potentially cardiotoxic oncologic treatments. Certain clinical risk factors have been described for incident CTRCD, and measurement of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain by speckle tracking 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is the best-validated myocardial mechanical imaging assessment to detect subtle changes in LV function during cancer treatment. However, the direct integration of clinical and imaging risk factors to predict CTRCD has not yet been extensively examined. This was a retrospective study of 183 women with breast cancer aged 50.9 ± 10.8 years who received treatment with anthracyclines (doxorubicin dose of 422 ± 69 mg/m2, with 41.2% of subjects also receiving trastuzumab) and underwent 2DE at clinically determined intervals. CTRCD was diagnosed when LV ejection fraction dropped ≥10% to a subnormal (<53%) value by 2DE. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) was assessed offline. The risk prediction tool based only on clinical factors previously described by Ezaz et al was applied to our cohort and accurately stratified these subjects into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with incident CTRCD in 7.4%, 26.9%, and 54.6%, respectively (chi-square = 20.7, p <0.0001). We developed novel multivariate models to predict CTRCD using (1) demographic variables only (c = 0.8674), (2) echocardiographic (peak LV-GLS) variables only (c = 0.8440), or (3) a combination of demographic and echocardiographic variables, with the combined model exhibiting superior receiver-operating characteristics (c = 0.9629). In conclusion, estimation of CTRCD risk should integrate all available data, including both clinical variables and an imaging assessment.

Radiation exposure of cardiac sonographers working in an academic noninvasive cardiovascular imaging laboratory.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Exposure to workplace radiation among cardiac sonographers has been felt to be low, and patient-related sources have been considered negligible. Sonographers may be exposed to radiation from patient emitted sources as well as external sources in interventional laboratories. This study quantified radiation exposure to cardiac sonographers. METHODS: Cardiac sonographers, vascular imaging technologists, exercise physiologists, noninvasive nursing staff, and CT/MRI technologists were provided body dosimeter badges. Sonographers were provided dosimeter rings for their scanning hands. Radiation exposure was quantified from the dosimeter data, reported in millirems (mrem) for deep, eye, and shallow exposure, as well as shallow exposure data from the rings. Data were prospectively collected for 63 employees over a 12-month period and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The mean annual deep body exposure in sonographers was 8.2 mrem/year, shallow exposure 9.8 mrem/year, eye exposure 8.5 mrem/year, and ring exposure 207 mrem/year. There was a significant difference between body and ring exposure (P = .0002). When comparing exposure data between the vascular imaging technologists, CT/MRI technologists, noninvasive nursing staff, and the cardiac sonographers, there were no statistical differences (P > .23). Exercise physiologists had significantly higher exposure compared to sonographers (P < .03). CONCLUSION: This single-center experience demonstrates that, while exposure is low, cardiac sonographers are exposed to workplace radiation, most likely from patient emitted radiation. The finding that radiation exposure from rings exceeded body exposure supports this conclusion. Continued education and assessment of work flow practices should be employed to minimize staff radiation exposure.

Accreditation Status and Geographic Location of Outpatient Echocardiographic Testing Facilities Among Medicare Beneficiaries: The VALUE-ECHO Study.

OBJECTIVES: Accreditation of echocardiographic testing facilities by the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) is supported by the American College of Cardiology and American Society of Echocardiography. However, limited information exists on the accreditation status and geographic distribution of echocardiographic facilities in the United States. Our study aimed to identify (1) the proportion of outpatient echocardiography facilities used by Medicare beneficiaries that are IAC accredited, (2) their geographic distribution, and (3) variations in procedure type and volume by accreditation status. METHODS: As part of the VALUE-ECHO (Value of Accreditation, Location, and Utilization Evaluation-Echocardiography) study, we examined the proportion of IAC-accredited echocardiographic facilities performing outpatient echocardiography in the 2013 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services outpatient limited data set (100% sample) and their geographic distribution using geocoding in ArcGIS (ESRI, Redlands, CA). RESULTS: Among 4573 outpatient facilities billing Medicare for echocardiographic testing in 2013, 99.6% (n = 4554) were IAC accredited (99.7% in the 50 US states and 86.2% in Puerto Rico). The proportion IAC-accredited echocardiographic facilities varied by region, with 98.7%, 99.9%, 99.9%, 99.5%, and 86.2% of facilities accredited in the Northeast, South, Midwest, West, and Puerto Rico, respectively (P < .01, Fisher exact test). Of all echocardiographic outpatient procedures conducted (n = 1,890,156), 99.8% (n = 1,885,382) were performed in IAC-accredited echocardiographic facilities. Most procedures (90.9%) were transthoracic echocardiograms, of which 99.7% were conducted in IAC-accredited echocardiographic facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all outpatient echocardiographic facilities billed by Medicare are IAC accredited. This accreditation rate is substantially higher than previously reported for US outpatient vascular testing facilities (13% IAC accredited). The uniformity of imaging and interpretation protocols from a single accrediting body is important to facilitate optimal cardiovascular care.

Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.

BACKGROUND: The CoreValve US High-Risk Clinical Study compared clinical outcomes and serial echocardiographic findings in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding bioprosthesis or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to TAVR with a self-expanding bioprosthesis or SAVR (N=747). Echocardiograms were obtained at baseline, discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure and were analyzed at a central core laboratory. Compared with SAVR patients (N=357), TAVR patients (N=390) had a lower mean aortic valve gradient, larger valve area, and less patient-prosthesis mismatch (all P<0.001), but more paravalvular regurgitation at discharge, which decreased at 1 year. SAVR patients experienced significant right ventricular systolic dysfunction at discharge and 1 month with normal right ventricular function at 1 year. One-year all-cause mortality was 14.2% for TAVR and 19.1% for SAVR patients. Preimplantation aortic regurgitation ≥mild was associated with reduced mortality hazard for both the TAVR (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.85; P=0.01) and the SAVR groups (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.87; P=0.01). Aortic regurgitation ≥mild after TAVR was associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.08-3.53; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased surgical risk, TAVR was associated with better systolic valve performance, similar left ventricular remodeling, more paravalvular regurgitation, and less right ventricular systolic dysfunction compared with SAVR. Despite an overall mortality reduction for the TAVR group, ≥mild aortic valve regurgitation after TAVR was associated with an increased mortality hazard. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01240902.

The diagnosis and treatment of a mycotic coronary artery aneurysm: a case report.

Aneurysms of the coronary arteries are rare and are usually associated with atherosclerosis in adults. Mycotic coronary artery aneurysms are exceedingly uncommon and are typically associated with systemic bacteremia, endocarditis, or septic emboli. Literature and data describing the management of mycotic coronary artery aneurysms are limited. This case describes the successful diagnosis of a large right coronary artery aneurysm by transesophageal echocardiogram as well as the successful management of the aneurysm.

The role of repeat transesophageal echocardiography in patients without atrial thrombus prior to cardioversion or ablation.

BACKGROUND: Cardioversion (CV) and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) are often used to restore sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). These procedures are associated with a risk for stroke. The use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to guide the management of AF is a validated strategy for patients in whom CV is planned, as well patients before RFA. For patients in whom the initial procedure fails, repeat TEE is often performed before repeat CV or RFA. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients with initial negative results on TEE would be unlikely to have thrombi detected on subsequent TEE and thus may avoid repeat procedures. METHODS: A total of 2,999 patients with AF were identified via retrospective review who had undergone TEE before CV or RFA, and 418 of these individuals underwent repeat TEE. After excluding patients who underwent repeat TEE >365 days from the initial study (n = 135) and those with thrombi on initial TEE (n = 20), 263 patients who had underwent two or more examinations were identified and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 263 eligible patients, two (0.8%; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-2.7%) had thrombi on subsequent TEE. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 1% of patients with AF with negative results on baseline TEE had thrombi detected on repeat TEE before subsequent CV or RFA. Thus, it may be possible to selectively screen patients to identify those at low risk for developing thrombi subsequent to negative results on initial TEE, especially if patients are in sinus rhythm. These results suggest the need for a prospective trial to definitively answer the question regarding repeat TEE in low-risk patients.

Aortic root bentall graft disarticulation following repair of type a aortic dissection.

A 47-year-old man presented with chest pain and was found to have an ascending aortic dissection. He underwent aortic arch resection and replacement with a hemishield tube graft with a valve conduit, better known as the Bentall technique. Five months later he presented with shortness of breath. A transesophageal echocardiogram revealed near-complete dehiscence of the mechanical valve conduit and a periaortic root abscess. He underwent removal of the conduit and placement of a homograft aortic root and valve. One month later he developed rigors. A transthoracic echocardiogram showed worsening systolic function and a periaortic hematoma or abscess. Serial transthoracic echocardiograms revealed increasing size in the periaortic echogenic free space and subsequent evidence of flow from the left ventricle into the periaortic space. He was determined not to be a surgical candidate and discharged to hospice in fair condition. He subsequently expired.

Aortic valve thrombosis after implantation of temporary left ventricular assist device.

The use of assist devices for ventricular support after myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock has become common practice. Thrombosis, bleeding, and infection are common complications. However, native valve thrombosis is a rare complication. We present a case of aortic valve thrombosis after implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) treated with thrombus removal at time of device exchange.