Physical and chemical characteristics of pitaya fruits at physiological maturity.

The aim of this study was to analyze the physical and chemical characteristics of the maturation process of pitaya fruit (Hylocereus undatus) to identify indicators that can be used to determine the point of physiological maturity and establish the optimal timing of physiological maturity for harvesting the fruit. A completely randomized experimental design was employed and four biological repeats were performed. Physiological maturity was assessed using various physical characteristics: longitudinal length (LL), equatorial diameter (ED), pericarp thickness (PeT), pulp thickness (PuT), fruit mass (FM), pulp mass (PuM), pericarp mass (PeM), pericarp percentage (%Pe), pulp percentage (%Pu), pulp/pericarp ratio (Pu/Pe), pericarp color index (CI), hue color angle (h°), lightness index (L*), chroma (C*), blue-yellow variation (b*), and green-red variation (a*). Additionally, chemical characteristics such as soluble solid content (SS), titratable acidity (TA), SS/TA ratio, and pH were screened. The data were statistically analyzed by fitting regression models and computing Pearson's correlation coefficients (P < 0.05). Physiological maturity in pitaya fruits occurred between the 30th and 32nd days after anthesis, and this proved to be the optimal period for harvest. At this time, the fruit was completely red with high SS, and had the recommended values of TA, pH, and SS/TA ratio. During this period, ED, PuT, FM, PuM, %Pu, and Pu/Pe increased while PeT, PeM, and %Pe fell; these changes are considered desirable by producers and/or consumers. PuM was the variable that displayed more strong's association with other variables in the analysis.

Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.

1. Earlier studies have shown that changes in the difficulty of sensory discrimination in a choice reaction time task result in a prolongation of the peak latency for several components of the long-latency event-related potential (ERP). With the use of the technique of response-locked averaging, we have previously shown that manipulation of the difficulty of sensory discrimination also affects response execution as assessed by the interval between the ERP and onset of the response. In the present paper we examine the hypothesis that changing the compatibility of the responses may also affect the difficulty of the discrimination, as well as the execution of the response, as assessed by the interval between stimulus onset and the ERP. Such an effect of response compatibility would provide further evidence for the close integration of motor and sensory processes in the performance of choice reaction time tasks. 2. We continuously recorded the electroencephalogram (EEG) from the scalp and the electromyogram (EMG) from the responding muscles in both compatible and noncompatible visual choice reaction time tasks. In the compatible task subjects responded to a lateralized visual stimulus with the hand ipsilateral to the stimulus, whereas in the noncompatible task they responded with the contralateral hand. EEG and EMG responses were analyzed and averaged off-line, aligning the waveforms by either stimulus onset (stimulus-synchronized averages) or response onset (response-synchronized averages), and averaged separately for both correct and incorrect response outcomes. 3. Response times were significantly faster for frequent stimuli than rare stimuli and were significantly faster to rare stimuli in the compatible than the noncompatible condition. In responses to the frequent stimuli (where both hands were required to respond), the right hand was slightly but consistently faster than the left hand. The right hand also accounted for 83% of the errors made. 4. Stimulus-synchronized and response-synchronized ERPs to either frequent or rare stimuli had a similar appearance for correct responses in both the compatible and noncompatible conditions. The coupling of the response to the ERP for the rare stimuli, however, was different for the two conditions: the response occurred later relative to the ERP components in the response-synchronized average in the noncompatible condition compared with the compatible condition. By contrast, the coupling of the ERPs to the onset of the stimulus was the same in the two conditions. 5. Stimulus-synchronized averages for error responses in which the rare tone was mistaken for a frequent tone showed early sensory processing (as judged by the ERPs) that was similar to that of correct responses to the rare stimuli. After the apparent positive (P2) component of the cerebral response, however, the processing differed, with a superimposed broad negativity possibly reflecting awareness by the subject that a mistake had been made. By contrast, the response-synchronized averages for these error trials appeared like those to frequent stimuli, with the response being coupled to the P2 component of the cerebral response. 6. These results suggest that response compatibility affects response selection processes but does not alter sensory discrimination. However, despite the similarly tight coupling of the response to the ERP in both the compatible and noncompatible conditions, the response occurred later relative to the ERPs in the noncompatible condition. This suggests that different components of the ERP are responsible for triggering the response in different circumstances. Our observations on the error trials suggests that the decision to respond (on these trials) is based on the occurrence of cerebral events that are evoked by either rare or frequent stimuli, whereas this decision (on correct response trials) is based on cerebral events elicited only by the rare stimuli.

Response times and handedness in simple reaction-time tasks.

The anticipatory (preparatory) cerebral events in simple reaction-time tasks may depend on the ability of a subject to predict accurately the time of occurrence of the stimulus requiring a particular response. In order to examine this hypothesis, we recorded cerebral and muscle responses in two different conditions, each involving three simple reaction-time tasks. Auditory tones were presented either regularly (i.e., predictably) or irregularly and subjects were required to respond to each tone with left hand, right hand or both hands in different runs. Responses were simultaneously averaged both backward and forward from the response (response-synchronized) and forward from the stimulus (stimulus-synchronized). Response-synchronized cerebral potentials to the regular tones were characterized by a slow negative shift, the bereitschaftspotential (BP), that began prior to stimulus onset and whose terminal phase was characterized by a small, higher frequency, negative shift (HFNS). By contrast, response-synchronized cerebral potentials to the irregular tones for both groups did not contain a BP, but a more conspicuous HFNS that began after stimulus onset. Both the response time and the latency of the N1 sensory-related component of the cerebral evoked potential recorded in the stimulus-synchronized averages (which aligns with HFNS) were delayed in the irregular condition. These findings suggest that, for both right- and left-handed subjects, the BP is not required for voluntary movement, and that anticipatory cerebral activity, as reflected by the BP, represents not only a preparation to make a particular response but also a preparation to process the stimulus.

Expectancy and response strategy to sensory stimuli.

We investigated the relationship between sensory discrimination and the selection of appropriate responses in subjects performing two different reaction-time tasks, in which three auditory stimuli were presented in random order and with a different likelihood of occurrence. Subjects anticipated the need to make different responses based on the likelihood that a particular stimulus would occur on a particular trial. This was determined by the occurrence and distribution of premovement potentials prior to the stimulus, which were consistent with preparation to respond to the most frequently occurring stimulus. These anticipatory cerebral events, however, could be altered after recognition that this frequent stimulus had not occurred. Thus, after the occurrence of a stimulus other than the anticipated frequent tone, the scalp distribution of cerebral potentials changed in a manner suggesting that the next most frequently occurring stimulus was anticipated. Nonetheless, subjects were able to respond to the least probable stimulus both accurately and rapidly despite a failure to anticipate it correctly, as judged by the cerebral "lateralized readiness potential." These results indicate that stimulus evaluation and response selection are integrated and dynamic cerebral processes, and raise doubt about the functional significance of the so-called premovement readiness potential.

Neural processing in a three-choice reaction-time task: a study using cerebral evoked-potentials and single-trial analysis in normal humans.

1. Previous studies have shown that the long latency event-related potentials (ERPs) reflect certain aspects of the sensory discrimination process, although the coupling of these ERPs to the actual discrimination is variable. Indeed, we have previously shown that during a two-choice reaction time task the discrimination is accomplished as a two-stage process, with the more frequently occurring stimulus discriminated at an earlier point than the rarer stimulus. The present paper examines the hypothesis that, in a three-choice reaction time task, the discrimination is similarly organized, i.e., is accomplished with the use of a three-stage process. 2. In the present experiments, we continuously recorded the electrocerebral activity (EEG) from the scalp and the electromyogram (EMG) from the responding muscles in a three-choice reaction time task in 10 strictly right-handed subjects. EEG and EMG responses were subsequently analyzed off-line by aligning them by the onset of either the stimulus (stimulus-synchronized) or the response (response-synchronized) for both correct and incorrect responses. 3. Subjects could be classified as "fast" or "slow" responders based on the mean response-latency to the most frequently occurring of the three tones (Frequent tone). Fast responders to the Frequent tone were also fast responders to the more frequent of the rare tones (the Rare-1 tone). By contrast, the response latency to the Frequent tone did not predict the speed of response to the most rare tone (the Rare-2 tone). 4. In the response-synchronized averages well-formed premovement potentials were present for the correct responses to all three tones. In the case of the Frequent tone, these potentials were symmetrical over the two cerebral hemispheres (as expected because both hands responded to this tone). They began > or = 200 ms before the average onset of the stimulus, suggesting that the preparation to respond preceded the stimulus. In the case of the two rare tones, the amplitudes of these premovement potentials were asymmetrical over the two hemispheres. For the Rare-1 tone, these potentials were lateralized to the hemisphere contralateral to the hand moved. For the Rare-2 tone, however, these premovement potentials were initially lateralized to the ipsilateral hemisphere, indicating that, even when subjects were able to respond rapidly and correctly to this tone, they were anticipating a need to respond with the incorrect hand (in anticipation of the more frequent Rare-1 tone).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)