Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-week study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OPA- 15406 (difamilast), a new topical selective phosphodiesterase type-4 inhibitor, in Japanese pediatric patients aged 2-14 years with atopic dermatitis.

The safety and efficacy of OPA-15406 (international non-proprietary name, difamilast; also referred to as MM36), a new topical, selective phosphodiesterase type-4 inhibitor, in Japanese pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis aged 2-14 years were evaluated in a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 4-week study. Seventy-three patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive OPA-15406 0.3%, OPA-15406 1% or vehicle ointment twice daily for 4 weeks. The mean age of patients was similar across treatment groups. No deaths or serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported; all treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation was 4.2% (1/24) in the OPA-15406 0.3% group, 4.0% (1/25) in the OPA-15406 1% group and 16.7% (4/24) in the vehicle group, all of which were worsening of atopic dermatitis. Both OPA-15406 groups demonstrated a higher incidence of success in the Investigator Global Assessment score compared with the vehicle group over the 4-week study. The OPA-15406 groups also showed greater improvements from baseline compared with the vehicle group in the Investigator Global Assessment score, Eczema Area and Severity Index overall score and subscale (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scores, Visual Analog Scale pruritus score, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure score, and percentage of affected body surface area over the 4-week study. Topical OPA-15406 twice daily for 4 weeks was considered a safe and effective treatment option in this phase 2 study in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis, and phase 3 development is currently ongoing.

Efficacy and safety of topical OPA-15406, a new phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with atopic dermatitis for 8 weeks: A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

The efficacy and safety of topical OPA-15406, a new phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, were examined in Japanese patients aged 15-70 years with atopic dermatitis in a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study. Two hundred patients were randomized to three treatment groups at a 1:1:1 ratio to receive OPA-15406 0.3%, OPA-15406 1% or vehicle ointment twice daily for 8 weeks. The OPA-15406 1% group was superior to the vehicle group in terms of the incidence of success based on the Investigator Global Assessment score at week 4 (P = 0.0328), which was the primary end-point, while the OPA-15406 0.3% group showed a trend toward improvement in the primary end-point. The mean Eczema Area and Severity Index total score and subscale (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scores, the Visual Analog Scale pruritus score and the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure score were significantly improved and the percentage of affected body surface area was significantly decreased in both OPA-15406 groups relative to the vehicle group as early as week 1, and the improved scores and decreased percentages were generally maintained until week 8. No deaths or serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in the OPA-15406 treatment groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events frequently observed across treatment groups were worsening of atopic dermatitis, viral upper respiratory tract infection and pruritus, all of which were mild or moderate in severity in the OPA-15406 groups. OPA-15406 1% ointment showed favorable efficacy and safety profiles, indicating a promising treatment option for patients with atopic dermatitis.

A multicenter, open-label, 52-week study of 2% rebamipide (OPC-12759) ophthalmic suspension in patients with dry eye.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of 2% rebamipide ophthalmic suspension administered 4 times daily for 52 weeks in patients with dry eye. DESIGN: Multicenter (17 sites), open-label, single-arm study. METHODS: A total of 154 patients with dry eye were enrolled in this study. After a 2-week screening period, patients received 2% rebamipide, instilled as 1 drop in each eye, 4 times daily for 52 weeks. The signs and symptoms measures were assessed at baseline, at weeks 2 and 4, and at every 4 weeks thereafter. The objective signs were fluorescein corneal staining score, lissamine green conjunctival staining score, and tear film break-up time, while subjective symptoms were dry eye-related ocular symptoms (foreign body sensation, dryness, photophobia, eye pain, and blurred vision). The safety variable was the occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: For all objective signs and subjective symptoms, the scores significantly improved at week 2 compared with baseline (P < .001, paired t test). Interestingly, further improvements of those scores were observed at every visit up to week 52. No deaths were reported, yet serious adverse events that were not thought to be drug related were observed in 6 patients. The incidence of any of the adverse events did not markedly increase throughout the 52-week treatment period. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that 2% rebamipide is effective in improving both the objective signs and subjective symptoms of dry eye patients for at least 52 weeks. In addition, 2% rebamipide treatment was generally well tolerated.

A randomized, multicenter phase 3 study comparing 2% rebamipide (OPC-12759) with 0.1% sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of dry eye.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of 2% rebamipide ophthalmic suspension compared with 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution for the treatment of patients with dry eye. DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, active-controlled parallel-group study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-eight patients with dry eye. METHODS: Following a 2-week screening period, patients were allocated randomly to receive 2% rebamipide or 0.1% sodium hyaluronate, administered as 1 drop in each eye 4 or 6 times daily, respectively, for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: There were 2 primary end points: changes in the fluorescein corneal staining (FCS) score to determine noninferiority of 2% rebamipide and changes in the lissamine green conjunctival staining (LGCS) score to determine superiority. Secondary objective end points were Schirmer's test results and tear film breakup time (TBUT). Secondary subjective end points were dry eye-related ocular symptoms (foreign body sensation, dryness, photophobia, eye pain, and blurred vision) score and the patients' overall treatment impression score. RESULTS: In the primary analysis, the mean change from baseline in FCS scores verified noninferiority, indicated significant improvement, and, in LGCS scores, verified the superiority of 2% rebamipide to 0.1% sodium hyaluronate. Values for the Schirmer's test and TBUT were comparable between the 2 groups. For 2 dry eye-related ocular symptoms--foreign body sensation and eye pain--2% rebamipide showed significant improvements over 0.1% sodium hyaluronate. Patients had a significantly more favorable impression of 2% rebamipide than of 0.1% sodium hyaluronate; 64.5% rated treatment as improved or markedly improved versus 34.7%, respectively. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of 2% rebamipide was effective in improving both the objective signs and subjective symptoms of dry eye. Those findings, in addition to the well-tolerated profile of 2% rebamipide, clearly show that it is an effective therapeutic method for dry eye. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Rebamipide (OPC-12759) in the treatment of dry eye: a randomized, double-masked, multicenter, placebo-controlled phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dose response for efficacy of 1% and 2% rebamipide ophthalmic suspension compared with placebo in patients with dry eye. DESIGN: A randomized, double-masked, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-response phase II study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 308 patients with dry eye. METHODS: After a 2-week screening period, patients were randomized to receive placebo or 1% rebamipide or 2% rebamipide administered as 1 drop in each eye 4 times daily for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary objective end point was change in fluorescein corneal staining (FCS) score from baseline to last observation carried forward (LOCF). Secondary objective end points were lissamine green conjunctival staining (LGCS) score, tear film break-up time (TBUT), and the Schirmer's test. Secondary subjective end points included dry eye-related ocular symptoms (foreign body sensation, dryness, photophobia, eye pain, and blurred vision) score and patients' overall treatment impression score. RESULTS: Rebamipide dose response was observed in FCS, LGCS, and TBUT scores. Both 1% and 2% rebamipide were significantly more effective than the placebo in terms of the change from baseline to LOCF for FCS, LGCS, and TBUT scores. There was no significant difference between the rebamipide and placebo groups from baseline to LOCF in Schirmer's test values, and dose response was not observed. In the predefined dry eye subpopulation with a baseline FCS score of 10 to 15, the mean change from baseline in the 2% rebamipide group was larger than that in the 1% rebamipide group. Change from baseline to LOCF for all 5 dry eye-related ocular symptom scores and patients' overall treatment impression showed significant improvements in the 1% and 2% rebamipide groups compared with the placebo group, except for photophobia in the 1% rebamipide group. No deaths or drug-related serious adverse events occurred in any treatment group. The incidence of ocular abnormalities was similar across the rebamipide and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Rebamipide was effective in treating both objective signs and subjective symptoms of dry eye and were well tolerated in this 4-week study. Although 1% and 2% rebamipide were both efficacious, 2% rebamipide may be more effective than 1% rebamipide in some measures. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.