Predictive Potential of Flow Cytometry Crossmatching in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients Subjected to Peritransplant Desensitization.

Recipient sensitization is a major risk factor of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and inferior graft survival. The predictive effect of solid-phase human leukocyte antigen antibody testing and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) in the era of peritransplant desensitization remains poorly understood. This observational retrospective single-center study with 108 donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive deceased donor kidney allograft recipients who had undergone peritransplant desensitization aimed to analyze variables affecting graft outcome. ABMR rates were highest among patients with positive pretransplant FCXM vs. FCXM-negative (76 vs. 18.7%, p < 0.001) and with donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensity (DSA MFI) > 5,000 vs. <5,000 (54.5 vs. 28%, p = 0.01) despite desensitization. In univariable Cox regression, FCXM positivity, retransplantation, recipient gender, immunodominant DSA MFI, DSA number, and peak panel reactive antibodies were found to be associated with ABMR occurrence. In multivariable Cox regression adjusted for desensitization treatment (AUC = 0.810), only FCXM positivity (HR = 4.6, p = 0.001) and DSA number (HR = 1.47, p = 0.039) remained significant. In conclusion, our data suggest that pretransplant FCXM and DSA number, but not DSA MFI, are independent predictors of ABMR in patients who received peritransplant desensitization.

Heterologous Cytomegalovirus and Allo-Reactivity by Shared T Cell Receptor Repertoire in Kidney Transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with allograft rejection but the mechanisms behind are poorly defined yet. Although cross-reactivity of T cells to alloantigen and CMV has been hypothesized, direct evidence in patients is lacking. In this observational cohort study, we tested the pre-transplant effector/memory T cell response to CMV peptide pools and alloantigen in 78 living donor/recipient pairs using the interferon-gamma Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot (ELISPOT) assay. To prove the hypothesis of cross-reactivity, we analyzed by applying next-generation sequencing the T cell receptor ß (TCR- ß) repertoire of CMV- and alloantigen-reactive T cells enriched from peripheral pre-transplant blood of 11 CMV-seropositive and HLA class I mismatched patients. Moreover, the TCR-repertoire was also analyzed in the allograft biopsies of those patients. There was a significant association between the presence of pre-transplant CMV immediate-early protein 1 (IE-1)-specific effector/memory T cells and acute renal allograft rejection and function (p = 0.01). Most importantly, we revealed shared TCR-ß sequences between CMV-IE1 and donor alloantigen-reactive T cells in all pre-transplant peripheral blood samples analyzed in CMV-seropositive patients who received HLA class I mismatched grafts. Identical TCR sequences were also found in particular in post-transplant allograft biopsies of patients with concomitant CMV infection and rejection. Our data show the presence of functional, cross-reactive T cells and their clonotypes in peripheral blood and in kidney allograft tissue. It is therefore likely that CMV-donor cross-reactivity as well as CMV specific T cell elicited inflammation is involved in the processes that affect allograft outcomes.

Molecular Patterns Discriminate Accommodation and Subclinical Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Accommodation in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation and subclinical antibody-mediated rejection in HLA-incompatible (HLAi) transplantation share several morphological similarities. Because the clinical long-term outcomes differ, we hypothesized different molecular processes involved in ABOi transplantation and subclinical antibody-mediated rejection. METHODS: Using Illumina Human HT-12 v4 Expression BeadChips, the whole transcriptome was evaluated based on 3-month protocol C4d+ biopsies in otherwise stable ABOi and HLAi kidney grafts, as well as in C4d-negative HLA-compatible grafts exhibiting normal histological findings. Top differently regulated genes were further validated using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in another patient cohort and complement regulatory proteins by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In the case of genes involved in immune response-related biological processes, ABOi and HLAi cohorts had similar transcriptomic profiles to C4d-negative controls. The majority of deregulated genes in the ABOi and HLAi groups consisted of metallothioneins and epithelial transporter genes. Increased expression of epithelial transporters (SLC4A1, SLC4A9, SLC17A3, SLC12A3, and SLC30A2) and class 1 metallothioneins (MT1F, MT1G, and MT1X) in HLAi transplantation was validated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. In comparison to controls, both incompatible cohorts were characterized by the upregulation of intrarenal complement regulatory genes. CD46 and CD59 transcripts were increased in the ABOi cohort, whereas CD46 solely in HLAi group, and CD59 protein expression was similar in both incompatible groups. CONCLUSIONS: Several epithelial transporters and metallothioneins discriminate subclinical antibody-mediated rejection in HLAi transplantation from accommodation in ABOi transplantation, which suggest different involved downstream mechanisms and increased risk of injury in HLAi settings. Metallothioneins with their antioxidative properties may help to attenuate the inflammation response induced by donor-specific anti-HLA antibody binding.