The utility of adding expiratory or decubitus chest radiographs to the radiographic evaluation of suspected pediatric airway foreign bodies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare test characteristics of standard (lateral and posteroanterior or anteroposterior) chest radiographs with and without special views (expiratory or bilateral decubitus) in the emergency department evaluation of children with suspected airway foreign bodies. METHODS: From 1997 to 2008, 328 patients with a suspected airway foreign body had standard and special view chest radiographs: 192 with left and right decubitus views, 133 with expiratory views, and 3 with both. Patients were excluded for cardiorespiratory disease, chest wall deformity, visible airway foreign bodies on standard views, or spontaneously expelled airway foreign bodies. After blinded radiologist review, standard plus special view test characteristics were compared to standard views. RESULTS: Nine upper airway and 70 tracheobronchial airway foreign bodies were identified by direct visualization or bronchoscopy, and the remainder were ruled out by bronchoscopy (50 patients) or clinically (199 patients). The sensitivity and specificity of the radiographs were, respectively, decubitus cohort, standard views, 56% and 79% and standard+decubitus views, 56% and 64%; expiratory radiograph cohort, standard views, 33% and 70% and standard+expiratory views, 62% and 72%. For standard plus decubitus views versus standard views alone, the relative sensitivity was 1.0 (0.56/0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 to 1.23) and the relative 1-specificity was 1.76 (0.36/0.21; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.37). For standard plus expiratory views versus standard views alone, the relative sensitivity was 1.87 (0.62/0.33; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.83) and the relative 1-specificity was 0.93 (0.28/0.3; 95% CI 0.6 to 1.44). CONCLUSION: The addition of decubitus to standard views increases false positives without increasing true positives and lacks clinical benefit. The addition of expiratory to standard views increases true positives without increasing false positives, but test accuracy remains low and the clinical benefit is uncertain.

A randomized clinical trial comparing oral, aerosolized intranasal, and aerosolized buccal midazolam.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine whether aerosolized intranasal or buccal midazolam reduces the distress of pediatric laceration repair compared with oral midazolam. METHODS: Children aged 0.5 to 7 years and needing nonparenteral sedation for laceration repair were randomized to receive oral, aerosolized intranasal, or aerosolized buccal midazolam. Patient distress was rated by blinded review of videotapes, using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Score. Secondary outcomes included activity scores, sedation adequacy, sedation onset, satisfaction, and adverse events. RESULTS: For the 169 subjects (median age 3.1 years) evaluated for the primary outcome, we found significantly less distress in the buccal midazolam group compared with the oral route group (P=.04; difference -2; 95% confidence interval -4 to 0) and a corresponding nonsignificant trend for the intranasal route (P=.08; difference -1; 95% confidence interval -3 to 1). Secondary outcomes (177 subjects) favored the intranasal group, including a greater proportion of patients with an optimal activity score (74%), a greater proportion of parents wanting this sedation in the future, and faster sedation onset. Intranasal was the route least tolerated at administration. Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: When comparing the administration of midazolam by 3 routes to facilitate pediatric laceration repair, we observed slightly less distress in the aerosolized buccal group. The intranasal route demonstrated a greater proportion of patients with optimal activity scores, greater proportions of parents wanting similar sedation in the future, and faster onset but was also the most poorly tolerated at administration. Aerosolized buccal or intranasal midazolam represents an effective and useful alternative to oral midazolam for sedation for laceration repair.

Environmental enrichment attenuates cue-induced reinstatement of sucrose seeking in rats.

This study examined the effect of environmental enrichment on sucrose seeking in rats made abstinent from sucrose for 1 month, as measured by response for a tone+light cue previously associated with 10% sucrose self-administration. Rats were either enriched throughout the study (experiment 1) or only after sucrose self-administration training (experiment 2). Enrichment consisted of either housing the rats in pairs or grouping four rats (ENR4) in a large environment, both with novel objects. Controls (CON) were singly housed without novel objects. In experiment 1, ENR4 rats responded less to the sucrose-paired cue versus CON rats, but this difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, the decrease in response of ENR4 rats versus CON rats in experiment 2 was dramatic and significant. These findings, along with findings from other laboratories, support a hypothesis that the enrichment may provide individuals with a greater ability to discriminate the availability of reward. This may impart a decreased vulnerability to relapse behavior. Therefore, these results are relevant to both eating disorder and drug addiction - disorders characterized by relapse.