RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a lifesaving medical intervention for patients with severe refractory cardiopulmonary dysfunction. This study aims to characterize hospitalizations and resource use burdens associated with ECMO use during the onset of the pandemic. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of ECMO use in United States (US) hospitals between 2019 and 2020, utilizing data from the National Inpatient Sample database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, admission characteristics, inpatient mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), healthcare costs, and ECMO utilization trends were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 17,520 hospitalizations analyzed, the most common reasons for admission were diseases and disorders of the circulatory system (40.5%) and diseases and disorders of the respiratory system (31.2%). The average patient age was 52.5 years, with a male predominance (64.2%). Hospitalizations were predominantly for White Americans (59.5%), followed by Blacks (16.3%) and Hispanics (14.8%). Nearly 88.2% of cases were at an extremely high risk of mortality without intervention. Inpatient mortality was significantly associated with Hispanic descent, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, age >60 years, and a higher All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APRDRG) risk of mortality. Hospitalizations involving ECMO had a significantly higher inpatient mortality rate compared to non-ECMO hospitalizations (43.1% vs. 2.1%, p<0.0001). The mean LOS was 26 days for ECMO hospitalizations, with ECMO initiation occurring approximately five days from admission. ECMO-related hospitalizations often involve over 10 unique procedures, resulting in an average healthcare cost of US$967,647 per hospitalization, totaling US$16.7 billion. Comparatively, non-ECMO hospitalizations had shorter LOS and lower mean costs (mean LOS, 4.7 days, and US$52,659, respectively). ECMO utilization increased significantly from 2019 to 2020, reflecting rising demand for this life-saving therapy. CONCLUSION: Compared to non-ECMO hospitalizations, ECMO patients had higher inpatient mortality, associated with Hispanic descent, higher CCI scores, an age >60 years, and a higher APRDRG risk. ECMO hospitalizations had longer stays (26 days) and higher costs (US$967,647 per case, US$16.7 billion total) compared to pre-pandemic levels. ECMO use increased significantly from 2019 to 2020, reflecting rising demand.
RESUMO
Background Obesity, a widespread national epidemic that impacts one in three U.S. adults, is closely linked with the development and exacerbation of cardiovascular disease. The objective of this study was to assess and contrast the outcomes of adults, both obese and non-obese, who present with cardiac chest pain in the emergency department (ED). Methodology A retrospective analysis of the 2020 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample database was conducted. Multivariate regression models were utilized to examine the association between obesity and mortality, discharge disposition, number of procedures, complications, and hospital costs. Results No significant difference in mortality odds was observed between obese and non-obese patients presenting with cardiac chest pain in the ED (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.59-1.46; p = 0.736). However, obesity was found to be associated with a decreased likelihood of being discharged home from the ED (aOR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.52-0.63; p < 0.001), as well as an increased likelihood of hospital admission from the ED (aOR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.53-1.81; p < 0.001). Obesity also correlated with higher odds of non-home discharge (aOR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.54-1.97; p < 0.001), elevated mean total hospital costs (mean = $13,345 vs. $9,952; mean increase = $3,360; 95% CI = $2,816-$3,904; p < 0.001), and increased risks of cardiac arrests (aOR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.05-1.88; p < 0.001) and acute respiratory failures (aOR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.25-1.96; p < 0.001). Obese patients with cardiac pain underwent more procedures on average than non-obese patients (19 vs. 15; aOR = 3.57; 95% CI = 3.04-4.11; p < 0.001). Conclusions Obesity is associated with higher odds of hospital admission from the ED, non-home discharges, higher total hospital costs, and a greater number of procedures.
RESUMO
To date, loop diuretics are the mainstay treatment for decongestion in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (HF). In clinical practice, loop diuretics have also been utilized for patients with chronic HF with reduced and preserved ejection fractions. There is a paucity of quality evidence of the effect of loop diuretics use and dosing on clinical outcomes in HF patients beyond symptomatic relief. In this review, we aimed to summarize recently published data on the use of loop diuretics in patients with HF, focusing on efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with HF with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and the "Web of Science" databases. Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials published after 2018 and written in English were included in this review. Case reports, case series, cross-sectional studies, review articles, commentaries, articles published more than five years ago, and studies involving children were excluded. Results were divided into the efficacy and safety of loop diuretics in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). A registry-based study included in our review observed a reduced 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF receiving loop diuretics compared to those not receiving loop diuretics (HR=0.73; 95% CI=0.57-0.94; p=0.016), but there was no statistically significant association at the 60-day follow-up of the same group of patients. Most studies reviewed showed that the choice of loop diuretics did not influence clinical outcomes such as mortality and HF rehospitalization in patients with HF with reduced and preserved ejection fraction despite differences in oral bioavailability and half-life. Studies have consistently shown that patients with HF who receive a higher dose of loop diuretics are likely to experience a decline in renal function and hypotension, regardless of their type of HF. Discontinuation or reduction of the dose of loop diuretics should be considered in patients with HF after decongestion.
RESUMO
Background Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is known to contribute to the onset of insulin resistance (IR), which has been speculated to worsen the outcome of the disease. This study examines the impact of IR on the severity and outcomes of hospitalizations for ALD. Methods A retrospective study was performed using the combined 2016 to 2018 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. All admissions for ALD were included. The association between IR and the clinical and resource utilization of hospitalizations for ALD was analyzed using multivariate regression models to adjust for confounding variables. Results About 294,864 hospitalizations for ALD were analyzed. Of these, 383 cases (0.13%) included a secondary diagnosis of IR, while the remaining 294,481 hospitalizations (99.87%) were considered as controls. The incidence of IR in the study was 1.3 per 1000 admissions for ALD. IR was not associated with any significant difference in the likelihood of mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.370-3.251, p=0.867), acute liver failure, or the incidence of complications (aOR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.535-1.274, p<0.001). However, the study found that ALD hospitalizations with IR had longer hospital stays (7.3 days vs. 6.0 days: IRR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.09-1.26; p<0.001) and higher mean hospital costs ($91,124 vs. $65,290: IRR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.20-1.46; p<0.001) compared to patients without IR. Conclusion IR alone does not worsen the outcomes of patients with ALD, and its association with longer hospital stays and higher mean hospital costs could be due to other confounding factors.
