RESUMO
Resumen Objetivo: Se estimó la carga económica directa e indirecta de la hipercolesterolemia en población con alto riesgo de presentar un evento cardiovascular. Para ello se definieron específicamente cinco grupos de pacientes: 1) aquellos con hipercolesterolemia familiar; 2, 3 y 4) personas con hipercolesterolemia más el antecedente de diabetes, infarto o evento vascular cerebral; 5) pacientes con hipercolesterolemia más diabetes y antecedente de infarto agudo de miocardio (definidos como pacientes de muy alto riesgo cardiovascular). Los cálculos se hicieron desde la perspectiva de las instituciones de salud pública en México. Método: Para la estimación de los costos directos se incluyó la atención ambulatoria, el tratamiento farmacológico, la atención hospitalaria y las intervenciones quirúrgicas relacionadas con las enfermedades cardiovasculares. Para la carga económica indirecta, se consideraron las muertes reportadas específicamente por causa de hipercolesterolemia, en un momento anterior al final de la edad productiva (muerte prematura). Resultados: La carga económica directa de las cinco categorías de pacientes en riesgo consideradas es de MXN $39,601,464,154 (USD $1,987,526,432), mientras que la carga económica indirecta asciende a MXN $121,646,689 (USD $6,105,229). Conclusiones: El impacto económico de la hipercolesterolemia en población con alto riesgo cardiovascular correspondía a $39,723,110,843 en 2020 (equivalente a USD $1,993,631,661), equivalente al 0.16% del PIB nacional.
Abstract Objective: To estimate the direct and indirect economic burden of hypercholesterolemia in patients with high risk of a cardiovascular event, specifically there were defined 5 groups of patients: 1) familial hypercholesterolemia; 2, 3 and 4) patients with hypercholesterolemia and background of diabetes, myocardial infarction or stroke; 5) diabetes, myocardial infarction and hypercholesterolemia (very high-risk patients) from the Mexican public healthcare institutions. Methods: For the estimation of the direct costs the items included correspond to: outpatient care, pharmacological treatment, inpatient hospital care, and surgical procedures. For indirect economic burden, death certificates, before the end of the productive age due to hypercholesterolemia were calculated (premature mortality). Results: The direct economic burden for the 5 groups of patients at risk is MXN $39,601,464,154 (USD $1,987,526,432), while the indirect economic burden amounts to MXN $121,646,689 (USD $6,105,229). Conclusions: The economic impact of hypercholesterolemia in patients with high cardiovascular risk is $39,723,110,843 (equivalent to USD $1,993,631,661) and corresponds to the 0.16% of GDP.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the direct and indirect economic burden of hypercholesterolemia in patients with high risk of a cardiovascular event, specifically there were defined 5 groups of patients: 1) familial hypercholesterolemia; 2, 3 and 4) patients with hypercholesterolemia and background of diabetes, myocardial infarction or stroke; 5) diabetes, myocardial infarction and hypercholesterolemia (very high-risk patients) from the Mexican public healthcare institutions. METHODS: For the estimation of the direct costs the items included correspond to: outpatient care, pharmacological treatment, inpatient hospital care, and surgical procedures. For indirect economic burden, death certificates, before the end of the productive age due to hypercholesterolemia were calculated (premature mortality). RESULTS: The direct economic burden for the 5 groups of patients at risk is MXN $39,601,464,154 (USD $1,987,526,432), while the indirect economic burden amounts to MXN $121,646,689 (USD $6,105,229). CONCLUSIONS: The economic impact of hypercholesterolemia in patients with high cardiovascular risk is $39,723,110,843 (equivalent to USD $1,993,631,661) and corresponds to the 0.16% of GDP.
OBJETIVO: Se estimó la carga económica directa e indirecta de la hipercolesterolemia en población con alto riesgo de presentar un evento cardiovascular. Para ello se definieron específicamente cinco grupos de pacientes: 1) aquellos con hipercolesterolemia familiar; 2, 3 y 4) personas con hipercolesterolemia más el antecedente de diabetes, infarto o evento vascular cerebral; 5) pacientes con hipercolesterolemia más diabetes y antecedente de infarto agudo de miocardio (definidos como pacientes de muy alto riesgo cardiovascular). Los cálculos se hicieron desde la perspectiva de las instituciones de salud pública en México. MÉTODO: Para la estimación de los costos directos se incluyó la atención ambulatoria, el tratamiento farmacológico, la atención hospitalaria y las intervenciones quirúrgicas relacionadas con las enfermedades cardiovasculares. Para la carga económica indirecta, se consideraron las muertes reportadas específicamente por causa de hipercolesterolemia, en un momento anterior al final de la edad productiva (muerte prematura). RESULTADOS: La carga económica directa de las cinco categorías de pacientes en riesgo consideradas es de MXN $39,601,464,154 (USD $1,987,526,432), mientras que la carga económica indirecta asciende a MXN $121,646,689 (USD $6,105,229). CONCLUSIONES: El impacto económico de la hipercolesterolemia en población con alto riesgo cardiovascular correspondía a $39,723,110,843 en 2020 (equivalente a USD $1,993,631,661), equivalente al 0.16% del PIB nacional.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus , Hipercolesterolemia , Infarto do Miocárdio , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/complicações , Hipercolesterolemia/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , México/epidemiologia , Estresse Financeiro , Custos de Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Achieving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes is important as it reduces the risk of complications and their related clinical and economic burden. Yet therapeutic inertia due to the fear of hypoglycemia, complex treatment regimens, weight gain, and therapy costs, among others, limits achieving glycemic control. This analysis aims to assess the short-term cost of control (cost per patient achieving treatment goals) with insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus other forms of basal insulin intensification (insulin glargine titration, basal-bolus therapy, and the combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide: IGlarLixi) in type 2 diabetes patients not controlled with basal insulin in the Mexican private setting. METHODS: The proportion of patients achieving treatment goals was obtained from DUAL V and DUAL VII studies (full trial population) and a indirect treatment comparison analyzing IDegLira versus IGlarLixi. Annual cost of treatment was estimated using unitary costs from IQVIA's Pharmaceutical Market Mexico (PMM) audit and wholesale acquisition costs (both from December 2021). The cost of control was estimated by dividing the annual cost of treatment by the proportion of patients achieving the corresponding treatment goal: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) < 7.0%, HbA1C < 7.0% without weight gain, HbA1C < 7.0% without hypoglycemia, and HbA1C < 7.0% without hypoglycemia and weight gain. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess how variations in the model inputs impacted cost-effectiveness outcomes. RESULTS: The proportion of patients achieving treatment goals was higher for IDegLira versus other forms of basal insulin intensification in all endpoints assessed. The annual cost of treatment with IDegLira was similar to the cost of treatment versus IGlarLixi or versus basal-bolus therapy ($54,659 versus $55,831 MXN and $51,008 versus $52,987 MXN, respectively), and higher in comparison with insulin glargine titration ($52,186 versus $40,194 MXN). The cost of controlling one patient with IDegLira was lower than any other form of basal insulin intensification, for all treatment goals. CONCLUSION: When integrating the greater clinical efficacy of IDegLira with its annual cost, it can be shown that within 1 year, IDegLira is the best option in terms of value for money for payers in a private healthcare setting in Mexico in comparison with other forms of basal insulin intensification. Thus, investing in IDegLira not only represents a greater clinical benefit, but also an economical one for payers.