Chlamydia gallinacea in Brazilian backyard chicken farms.

Avian chlamydiosis is a bacterial infectious disease of birds, considered until recently caused only by Chlamydia psittaci, that now includes the newly described species C. buteonis, C. avium, and C. gallinacea, associated with several avian hosts. Since its recognition as a species in 2014 and having chickens as one of its main hosts, C. gallinacea has already been described in backyard poultry on all continents. The present study aimed to survey by molecular techniques the presence and species of Chlamydia spp. in backyard chickens from three states of the southern region of Brazil (Paraná-PR, Santa Catarina-SC, and Rio Grande do Sul-RS). DNA extracted from cloacal swab samples were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for different species of Chlamydia, namely Chlamydiaceae (23 S rRNA gene), C. psittaci (ompA gene), C. avium (enoA gene) and C. gallinacea (gidA and enoA genes). The 16 S rRNA gene was used for sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. A total of 582 backyard chicken samples were collected and grouped in 238 pools, from 134 properties in 59 municipalities. Chlamydiaceae was detected in 25.2% (60/238) of the samples, in 38.8% (52/134) of the properties and in 66.1% (39/59) of the municipalities. None of the samples yielded positive PCR results for C. psittaci or C. avium. For C. gallinacea, the overall percentage was 16.3% (39/238) according to the results of gidA and enoA genes. Sequence analysis confirmed that the samples corresponded to C. gallinacea. This is the first report of C. gallinacea in Brazil.

Molecular detection of tick-borne rickettsial pathogens in ticks collected from domestic animals from Cauca, Colombia.

Some hard ticks' species can act as vectors of a wide variety of pathogens of human and animal importance such as Anaplasma, Ehrlichia and Rickettsia spp. In Colombia, a total of forty-six tick species have been described, and some of them have been implicated as vectors of some infectious agents. The department of Cauca is one of the thirty-two departments of Colombia. Most of its population lives in rural areas and depends on agriculture as the main economic activity, favoring exposure to ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Thus, the present study aimed to determine the tick species and tick-borne pathogens circulating in this region. From August to November 2017, ticks were collected from dogs, horses and cattle from eight rural areas of four municipalities in the department of Cauca. All collected ticks were classified according to taxonomic keys and organized in pools. DNA was extracted from all tick pools for molecular confirmation of tick species and detection of Anaplasma, Ehrlichia and Rickettsia spp. A total of 2809 ticks were collected which were grouped in 602 pools. Ticks were morphologically identified as Amblyomma cajennense sensu lato, Dermacentor nitens, Rhipicephalus microplus and Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato. The molecular identity of A. cajennense s.l. was confirmed as Amblyomma patinoi. A total of 95% of the pools scored positive for members of the Anaplasmataceae family, of which, 7.8% and 7.3% were positive to Anaplasma and Ehrlichia spp., respectively, being identified as Anaplasma marginale, Ehrlichia minasensis and Ehrlichia canis; and 16.1% were positive for Rickettsia spp. with high identity for Rickettsia asembonensis, Rickettsia felis and Candidatus Rickettsia senegalensis. This is the first report describing the natural infection of ticks with rickettsial pathogens and the occurrence of A. patinoi ticks in Cauca department, Colombia.

Identification of Leptospira spp. in the animal-environment interface (swine-water) in pig production cycle.

INTRODUCTION: Leptospirosis, caused by Leptospira spp., is a zoonosis with multiple hosts and reservoirs. Thus, the "One Health" approach must be addressed in order to guide prevention and control measures regarding this microorganism. There are few studies involving all stages of the pig production cycle and potential sources of infection such as water sources, which could represent a risk for local rural communities. OBJECTIVE: To identify Leptospira spp. in the animal-environment interface (swine-water) in the pig production cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a swine farm in Puerto López in the department of Meta, Colombia. Swine blood samples (n = 65) were collected for microscopic agglutination test (MAT), while urine and water samples (n = 80) were tested for Leptospira using bacterial isolation, serotyping of the isolates, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: A total of 58 (89.2%) porcine sera were positive for at least one Leptospira serogroup, with Grippotyphosa as the most frequent serogroup. Leptospira spp. were isolated in 25% (20/80) of the urine and water samples. Leptospira-positive cultures were 100% (20/20) identified within the genus Leptospira (rrl gene) and 50% (10/20) corresponded to pathogenic species (lipL32 gene) by PCR, and 45% (9/20) were positive to at least one antiserum. None of the direct urine and water samples was positive by PCR. CONCLUSION: It is suggested that the bacteria might be transmitted in the animal-environment interface in the pig production cycle.

Utilidad de las herramientas moleculares para la identificación de Leptospira spp. en muestras humanas, animales y ambientales / Usefulness of molecular tools to identify Leptospira spp. in human, animal and environmental samples

Leptospirosis es una enfermedad zoonótica endémica de potencial epidémico que afecta la salud pública y la producción pecuaria alrededor del mundo. Su agente etiológico es una espiroqueta del género Leptospira, con 20 especies reportadas hasta el momento, son las más importantes Leptospira interrogans (patógena) y Leptospirabiflexa (saprófita). Esta bacteria se transmite mediante contacto directo o indirecto en especial con orinade animales infectados, es la transmisión por medio del agua una de las más importantes. En cuanto al diagnóstico se ha evidenciado que diversas pruebas moleculares tienen una alta especificidad y sensibilidad; sin embargo, el conocimiento de la epidemiología de la leptospirosis se ha basado principalmente en estudios serológicos que han utilizado la prueba de aglutinación microscópica que presenta debilidades en sus resultados e interpretación. El objetivo del presente artículo es presentar una revisión actualizada sobre la utilidad de las herramientas moleculares para la identificación de Leptospira spp. en muestras humanas, animales y ambientales. Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda de literaturaen diferentes bases de datos como Pubmed, Science Direct, SciELO, Scopus y Redalyc.Las publicaciones encontradas fueron artículos originales y de revisión, entre otros, publicados entre 1965 y 2014. Se determinó que las herramientas moleculares permiten una identificación directa, rápida, definitivay precisa del agente etiológico, apoyan el diagnóstico, aportan al conocimiento real de laprevalencia e incidencia de la enfermedad. Las herramientas moleculares permiten la identificación de nuevas especies a partir de aislamientos obtenidos de diversas fuentes y ayudan a orientar los programas de prevención y control de esta zoonosis(AU)

Leptospirosis is an endemic and potentially epidemic zoonosis affecting public health and livestock production worldwide. Its etiological agent is a spirochaete of the genus Leptospira, with 20 species reported to date, of which Leptospira interrogans (pathogenic) and Leptospira biflexa (saprophyte) are the most important. This bacterium is transmitted by direct or indirect contact with urine from infected animals, so water is one of the major transmission ways. Regarding diagnosis, many molecular tests have been evinced to have high specificity and sensitivity; however, knowledge on the epidemiology of leptospirosis has been based mainly on serological studies using the microscopic agglutination test, which has weaknesses in its results and interpretation. The aim of this article is to present an update review on the usefulness of molecular tools in the identification of Leptospira spp. in human, animal and environmental samples. A literature search was conducted in different databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, SciELO, Scopus and Redalyc. The publications found were original and review articles, among others, published between 1965 and 2014. It was found that the molecular tools allow direct, quick, definitive and precise identification of the etiologic agent, support the diagnosis, and contribute to real knowledge on the disease prevalence and incidence. Molecular tools enable the identification of new species isolates obtained from various sources and help guide prevention programs and control of this zoonosis(AU)