Relationship between patient self-assessment of erectile dysfunction and the sexual health inventory for men.

BACKGROUND: The Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) has been shown to possess favorable statistical properties in diagnosing the presence and severity of erectile dysfunction (ED). However, the SHIM has not been compared with patient self-assessment of ED. OBJECTIVE: This article describes an independent-validation study examining the correlation and agreement between the SHIM and patient self-assessment of ED with respect to the severity of ED at baseline and after treatment, and in terms of change from baseline. METHODS: The study population consisted of 247 male outpatients with ED participating in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose (25-100 mg/d) Phase IIIb clinical trial in which they were randomized equally to sildenafil citrate or placebo. Patients assessed their degree of ED as severe, moderate, minimal/mild, or no problem at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. They also responded to the 5 questions on the SHIM, after which their degree of ED was calculated based on the SHIM total score. RESULTS: In general, the SHIM and the single-item self-assessment question produced similar descriptive profiles of the severity of ED. Kendall tau-b correlations were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.58-0.74) at baseline, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.90) after treatment, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.67-0.77) for change from baseline. Agreement between instruments, measured by the weighted kappa statistic, mirrored the correlations at baseline and after treatment. As expected, both measures correlated moderately with improvement in erections and treatment satisfaction of both patient and partner. CONCLUSION: The moderate-to-high correlation and agreement between the SHIM and patient self-assessment of ED validate the SHIM for use in the diagnostic classification of ED severity.

A dose-escalation study to assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in men with erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra, Pfizer Inc., USA) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study over a period of 26 weeks in men with erectile dysfunction of a broad spectrum of aetiology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 315 patients from five countries were randomized to receive treatment with placebo (156 men) or sildenafil (159 men). Significant concomitant medical conditions were hypertension (20%), a history of pelvic surgery (19%), diabetes mellitus (15%), and ischaemic heart disease (10%). Patients randomized to treatment received a starting dose of 25 mg of sildenafil or matching placebo, which could be increased to 50 mg and then to 100 mg of sildenafil, based on efficacy and tolerability. Assessments of efficacy comprised the 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), including question three (ability to achieve an erection) and question four (ability to maintain an erection), a partner questionnaire, an overall efficacy question, and event-log data. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, 26%, 32% and 42% of patients were taking 25, 50 and 100 mg of sildenafil, respectively. A similar distribution of doses was reported after 26 weeks of treatment. Treatment with sildenafil significantly improved the patients' abilities to achieve and maintain an erection compared with treatment with placebo (P < 0.001). Scores for four of the five sexual function domains of the IIEF (erectile function, orgasmic function, intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction) also improved significantly (P < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in the mean score for the erectile function domain, regardless of the aetiology of erectile dysfunction (P < 0.001). After 12 weeks and 26 weeks of treatment, 82% and 79% of patients receiving sildenafil reported improved erections, compared with 24% and 23% of patients receiving placebo, respectively (P < 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate and occurred in 27% of patients receiving sildenafil, compared with 8% of patients receiving placebo. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for men with erectile dysfunction of a broad spectrum of aetiology.

Long-term efficacy and safety of oral Viagra (sildenafil citrate) in men with erectile dysfunction and the effect of randomised treatment withdrawal.

The long-term efficacy and safety of oral Viagra (sildenafil citrate), a selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, and the effect of withdrawing treatment were evaluated in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). In 233 men with ED of psychogenic or mixed organic/psychogenic aetiology, 16 weeks of open-label, flexible-dose sildenafil treatment (10-100 mg) was followed by eight weeks of double-blind, fixed-dose, randomised withdrawal to placebo or continued treatment with sildenafil. Sildenafil was taken as needed (not more than once daily) approximately 1 h prior to sexual activity. The main outcome measures were a global efficacy question, a sexual function questionnaire, an event log of erections, and adverse event recording. In the open-label phase, 200 of 216 patients (93%) reported improved erections with sildenafil; 28 patients (12%) discontinued treatment. In the double-blind phase, the significant improvements in the frequency and duration of erections were maintained in the sildenafil group but returned to pre-treatment values in patients on placebo (P values < 0.0001 versus placebo). The most frequent adverse events in the sildenafil group during the double-blind phase were flushing (7%), headache (6%), and dyspepsia (5%). Of the 192 patients enrolled in the 1-y extension, 90% completed the study; only two patients (1%) were withdrawn due to lack of efficacy. In men with ED of psychogenic or mixed aetiology, oral sildenafil is effective and well-tolerated both at the initiation of therapy and during long-term treatment. For most patients, sildenafil treatment must be continued for improvements in erectile function to be maintained.

Relationship between patient self-assessment of erectile function and the erectile function domain of the international index of erectile function.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of severity classes on the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function by determining their relationship with the self-assessment of EF, before and after treatment, in an independent cohort of patients. METHODS: Two hundred forty-seven men with clinically diagnosed erectile dysfunction (ED) and in a stable heterosexual relationship were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week, flexible-dose study. Patients assessed their degree of ED as severe, moderate, minimal/mild, or no problem at baseline and after treatment. They also responded to the six questions of the EF domain, with the total score indicating the following degrees of ED: severe, EF score 1 to 10; moderate, EF score 11 to 16; mild to moderate, EF score 17 to 21; mild, EF score 22 to 25; and no ED, EF score 26 to 30. Descriptive profiles of the two diagnostic instruments were compared. The correlations between the instruments were evaluated with Kendall's tau-b at baseline, after treatment at 12 weeks, and at change from baseline. RESULTS: The two measures gave generally similar descriptive profiles of ED severity. The correlations were 0. 65 (95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.73) at baseline, 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.89) after 12 weeks of treatment, and 0. 73 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.79) at change from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The moderate-to-high correlation between the patients' self-assessment of EF and the EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function provides a validation of this domain for the reliable diagnostic classification of ED severity.

Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) as a diagnostic tool to discriminate between men with and without erectile dysfunction (ED) and to develop a clinically meaningful gradient of severity for ED. METHODS: One thousand one hundred fifty-one men (1035 with and 116 without ED) who reported attempting sexual activity were evaluated using data from four clinical trials of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) and two control samples. The statistical program Classification and Regression Trees was used to determine optimal cutoff scores on the EF domain (range 6 to 30) to distinguish between men with and without ED and to determine levels of ED severity on the EF domain using the IIEF item on sexual intercourse satisfaction. RESULTS: For a 0.5 prevalence rate of ED, the optimal cutoff score was 25, with men scoring less than or equal to 25 classified as having ED and those scoring above 25 as not having ED (sensitivity 0.97, specificity 0.88). Sensitivity analyses revealed a robust statistical solution that was well supported with different assumed prevalence rates and several cross-validations. The severity of ED was classified into five categories: no ED (EF score 26 to 30), mild (EF score 22 to 25), mild to moderate (EF score 17 to 21), moderate (EF score 11 to 16), and severe (EF score 6 to 10). Substantial agreement was shown between these predicted and "true" classes (weighted kappa 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The EF domain possesses favorable statistical properties as a diagnostic tool, not only in distinguishing between men with and without ED, but also in classifying levels of ED severity. Clinical validation with self-rated assessments of ED severity is warranted.

Randomized trial of sildenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in spinal cord injury. Sildenafil Study Group.

Erectile dysfunction is a common complication of spinal cord injury. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study assessed the efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction caused by traumatic spinal cord injury. A total of 178 men (mean age, 38 years) received placebo or sildenafil 1 hour before sexual activity for 6 weeks; after a 2-week washout period, the men received the alternate treatment for 6 weeks. The 50-mg starting dose could be adjusted to 100 or 25 mg based on efficacy and tolerability. Efficacy was assessed by using global efficacy questions, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and a patient log of erectile activity. Of 143 men with residual erectile function at baseline, 111 (78%) reported improved erections and preferred sildenafil to placebo. For all men (including those who reported no residual erectile function at baseline), 127 of 168 (76%) reported improved erections and preferred sildenafil to placebo. For all men, 132 of 166 (80%) reported that sildenafil improved sexual intercourse compared with 17 of 166 men (10%) reporting improvement with placebo. IIEF questions assessing the ability to achieve and maintain erections and satisfaction with sexual intercourse demonstrated significant improvement with sildenafil. Sildenafil was well tolerated, with a low rate of discontinuation because of treatment-related adverse events (2% vs 1% for placebo). Oral sildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for erectile dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury.

Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction of various etiologies.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose oral sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) of various etiologies. METHODS: In a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose study, 514 men (mean age 56 years) with ED were randomized to receive 25, 50, or 100 mg of sildenafil or placebo. The primary etiology of ED was determined to be organic in 32% of men, psychogenic in 25%, or mixed in 43%. Sildenafil or placebo was taken in the home setting approximately 1 hour before sexual activity, not more than once daily. Efficacy was determined by responses to question 3 (ability to achieve an erection) and question 4 (ability to maintain an erection) of the 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Other measures of efficacy included the five sexual function domains of the IIEF, a global efficacy question, event log data, and a partner questionnaire. RESULTS: Sildenafil significantly increased patients' ability to achieve and maintain erections (P <0.0001), with efficacy increasing with increasing dose. Significant improvements were also observed in the IIEF domains for erectile function, orgasmic function, intercourse satisfaction, and overall sexual satisfaction (P <0.0001). The proportion of subjects who felt that treatment with sildenafil improved their erections was significantly greater (67% to 86%) than that with placebo treatment (24%, P <0.0001). The proportion of successful attempts at sexual intercourse also increased significantly with sildenafil treatment (P <0.001). Partner responses corroborated patient reports. Sildenafil was well tolerated at the three doses studied. CONCLUSIONS: Oral sildenafil is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for ED of various etiologies.

Sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in erectile dysfunction: near normalization in men with broad-spectrum erectile dysfunction compared with age-matched healthy control subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sildenafil in men with broad-spectrum erectile dysfunction (ED), with reference to age-matched healthy control subjects. METHODS: One hundred eleven patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week, flexible-dose study. Efficacy assessments included the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), a global assessment question, and patient event log data. In a separate, nontreatment study, 109 control subjects also completed the IIEF. RESULTS: Mean IIEF scores at baseline were significantly lower for patients with ED than for control subjects without a history of ED. After treatment, mean IIEF scores for patients receiving sildenafil approached values observed in control subjects and were significantly higher than mean scores for patients receiving placebo (P<0.01). Responses to the global assessment question and patient log data corroborated the IIEF results. Sildenafil was well tolerated, with no discontinuations because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that sildenafil, an effective oral therapy for the treatment of broad-spectrum ED, is associated with a near normalization of patient erectile function.

Overall cardiovascular profile of sildenafil citrate.

Sildenafil, a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), is the first in a new class of orally effective treatments for erectile dysfunction. During sexual stimulation, the cavernous nerves release nitric oxide (NO), which induces cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) formation and smooth muscle relaxation in the corpus cavernosum. Sildenafil facilitates the erectile process during sexual stimulation by inhibiting PDE5 and thus blocking the breakdown of cGMP. Sildenafil alone can cause mean peak reductions in systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 10/7 mm Hg that are not dose related, whereas the heart rate is unchanged. Sildenafil and nitrates both increase cGMP levels in the systemic circulation but at different points along the NO-cGMP pathway. The combination is contraindicated because they synergistically potentiate vasodilation and may cause excessive reductions in blood pressure. Erectile dysfunction is a significant medical condition that shares numerous risk factors with ischemic heart disease, and hence a substantial overlap exists between these patient groups. From extensive clinical trials, the most commonly reported cardiovascular adverse events in patients treated with sildenafil were headache (16%), flushing (10%), and dizziness (2%). The incidences of hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, and syncope and the rate of discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events were <2% and were the same in patients taking sildenafil and those taking placebo. Retrospective analysis of the concomitant use of antihypertensive medications (beta blockers, alpha blockers, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and calcium antagonists) in patients taking sildenafil did not indicate an increase in the reports of adverse events or significant episodes of hypotension compared with patients treated with sildenafil alone. In clinical trials, the incidence of serious cardiovascular adverse events, including stroke and myocardial infarction, was the same for patients treated with sildenafil or placebo. Concurrent disease states, such as renal or hepatic impairment, or concomitant use of inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 isozyme CYP3A4 could increase systemic exposure to sildenafil. Since the US market launch in April 1998, monitoring of spontaneous adverse event reports in association with sildenafil has demonstrated a pattern that is generally consistent with the experience observed during clinical development, with the exception of infrequent reports of priapism. In conclusion, extensive clinical testing has shown that overall treatment with sildenafil for up to 1 year is well tolerated and is associated with a low incidence of adverse events that result in discontinuation of treatment in <3% of patients.

A two-part pilot study of sildenafil (VIAGRA) in men with erectile dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a two-part pilot study in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) due to spinal cord injury (SCI: cord level range T6-L5). Part I was a randomised, double-blind, two-way cross-over study comparing a single dose of sildenafil 50 mg or placebo. Part II was a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group evaluation of sildenafil 50 mg or placebo, taken as required (not more than once daily) approximately 1 h prior to sexual activity, over a period of 28 days. OBJECTIVES: To assay the efficacy and safety of sildenafil 50 mg and placebo. SETTING: Clinic- and home-based assessments in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A total of 27 subjects who were able to achieve at least a grade 2 erection (hard, but not hard enough for penetration) in response to penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) were recruited. In Part I, the reflexogenic response of the penis to PVS was evaluated in the clinic while in Part II, the response to treatment was assessed in the home (global efficacy. questionniare, diary). RESULTS: In Part I, 17/26 (65%) subjects had erections of >60% rigidity at the penile base (median duration 3.5 min) after sildenafil compared with 2/26 (8%) (median duration 0 min) alter placebo (P=0.0003). In Part II, 9/12 (75%) subjects on sildenafil and 1/14 (7%) subjects on placebo reported that the treatment had improved their erections (P<0.005), and 8/12 (67%) and 2/13 (15%) men, respectively, indicated that they wished to continue treatment (P<0.02). An analysis of diary data showed no difference between the groups with respect to the mean number of erections hard enough for penetration (P = 0.08). The mean proportion of attempts at sexual intercourse that were successful was 30 and 15%, respectively (P=0.21). Similarly, responses to the end-of-treatment questionnaire indicated that there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the frequency of erections hard enough for sexual intercourse (P=0.47) or that lasted as long as the subject would have liked (P=0.11). No subject discontinued sildenafil due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is an effective, well-tolerated oral treatment for ED in SCI subjects.

Clinical safety of oral sildenafil citrate (VIAGRA) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Sildenafil citrate has been shown to be effective in a wide range of patients with erectile dysfunction and has been approved in the United States for this indication. The overall clinical safety of oral sildenafil, a potent inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, in the treatment of erectile dysfunction was evaluated in more than 3700 patients (with a total of 1631 years of exposure worldwide). Safety and tolerability data were analysed from a series of double-blind, placebo-controlled studies and from 10 open-label extension studies of sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. A total of 4274 patients (2722 sildenafil, 1552 placebo; age range 19-87 y) received double-blind treatment over a period of up to six months' duration, and 2199 received long-term, open-label sildenafil for up to 1 y. The most commonly reported adverse events (all causes) were headache (16% sildenafil, 4% placebo), flushing (10% sildenafil, 1% placebo), and dyspepsia (7% sildenafil, 2% placebo) and they were predominantly transient and mild or moderate in nature. These adverse events reflect the pharmacology of sildenafil as a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. No cases of priapism were reported. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events (all causes) was comparable for patients treated with sildenafil (2.5%) and placebo (2.3%). In open-label extension studies, 90% of patients completed long-term sildenafil treatment, with only 2% withdrawing due to adverse events. Sildenafil is a well-tolerated oral treatment for erectile dysfunction.

The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a brief, reliable, self-administered measure of erectile function that is cross-culturally valid and psychometrically sound, with the sensitivity and specificity for detecting treatment-related changes in patients with erectile dysfunction. METHODS: Relevant domains of sexual function across various cultures were identified via a literature search of existing questionnaires and interviews of male patients with erectile dysfunction and of their partners. An initial questionnaire was administered to patients with erectile dysfunction, with results reviewed by an international panel of experts. Following linguistic validation in 10 languages, the final 15-item questionnaire, the international index of Erectile Function (IIEF), was examined for sensitivity, specificity, reliability (internal consistency and test-retest repeatability), and construct (concurrent, convergent, and discriminant) validity. RESULTS: A principal components analysis identified five factors (that is, erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction) with eigenvalues greater than 1.0. A high degree of internal consistency was observed for each of the five domains and for the total scale (Cronbach's alpha values of 0.73 and higher and 0.91 and higher, respectively) in the populations studied. Test-retest repeatability correlation coefficients for the five domain scores were highly significant. The IIEF demonstrated adequate construct validity, and all five domains showed a high degree of sensitivity and specificity to the effects of treatment. Significant (P values = 0.0001) changes between baseline and post-treatment scores were observed across all five domains in the treatment responder cohort, but not in the treatment nonresponder cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The IIEF addresses the relevant domains of male sexual function (that is, erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction), is psychometrically sound, and has been linguistically validated in 10 languages. This questionnaire is readily self-administered in research or clinical settings. The IIEF demonstrates the sensitivity and specificity for detecting treatment-related changes in patients with erectile dysfunction.

Sildenafil: an orally active type 5 cyclic GMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor for the treatment of penile erectile dysfunction.

Sildenafil (Viagra, UK-92,480) is a novel oral agent under development for the treatment of penile erectile dysfunction. Erection is dependent on nitric oxide and its second messenger, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). However, the relative importance of phosphodiesterase (PDE) isozymes is not clear. We have identified both cGMP- and cyclic adenosine monophosphate-specific phosphodiesterases (PDEs) in human corpora cavernosa in vitro. The main PDE activity in this tissue was due to PDE5, with PDE2 and 3 also identified. Sildenafil is a selective inhibitor of PDE5 with a mean IC50 of 0.0039 microM. In human volunteers, we have shown sildenafil to have suitable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties (rapid absorption, relatively short half-life, no significant effect on heart rate and blood pressure) for an oral agent to be taken, as required, prior to sexual activity. Moreover, in a clinical study of 12 patients with erectile dysfunction without an established organic cause, we have shown sildenafil to enhance the erectile response (duration and rigidity of erection) to visual sexual stimulation, thus highlighting the important role of PDE5 in human penile erection. Sildenafil holds promise as a new effective oral treatment for penile erectile dysfunction.

An update on the safety of amlodipine.

A previous article on the safety of amlodipine reviewed data from over 4,000 subjects who participated in clinical trials sponsored by Pfizer Central Research. Once-daily amlodipine was shown to be a well-tolerated treatment of hypertension and myocardial ischemia. Although amlodipine is a potent vasodilator, there was a low incidence of side effects such as headache, flushing, and dizziness. Amlodipine was not associated with adverse effects on hematologic or biochemical safety parameters nor on serum cholesterol or triglyceride levels. Amlodipine did not alter electrical conduction in the heart. Amlodipine had a favorable safety profile in comparative trials vs. beta-blockers. The data base of comparative trials vs. other calcium antagonists was small but the toleration of amlodipine was similar to that of verapamil and diltiazem. No data from comparative trials vs. another calcium antagonist of the dihydropyridine class have been available. This article reviews data from recently completed trials vs. nitrendipine and from trials in which amlodipine was used in combination with other agents. Amlodipine was better tolerated than nitrendipine and had a much lower incidence of side effects usually related to vasodilatation. This difference in side-effect profile was especially marked during the first days of treatment. Amlodipine was well tolerated when used in combination with beta-blockers, diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and nitrates. The gradual onset of action and relatively long half-life of amlodipine are the probable cause for the improved toleration in comparison with other dihydropyridines. Besides the low incidence of trivial side effects, increasing clinical experience with amlodipine provides no evidence that amlodipine is a cause of rare but serious adverse effects. It is concluded that amlodipine is an antihypertensive and anti-ischemic agent that has the combined advantages of a good safety profile with once-daily dosage and a smooth onset and long duration of action.