Volumetric Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transarterial Chemoembolization and its Impact on Overall Survival.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the prognostic value of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), modified RECIST and volumetric analysis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center prospective cohort study included a total of 61 patients with HCC treated by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The response of TACE was evaluated on preprocedural and postprocedural CT by two radiologists using RECIST/mRECIST and volumetric response to treatment. Each response assessment method was used to classify the response as progressive disease, stable disease, partial response and complete response. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was performed for each method to evaluate its ability to help predict overall survival and progression free survival. Interobserver variability and reproducibility was determined by the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 17.1 months and the median progression-free survival was 11.1 months. Volumetric assessment was proved to be a prognostic factor for overall survival (p<0.01) and progression-free survival (p<0.001), contrasting with RECIST and mRECIST. All three methods featured very small interobserver variability (p<0.001 for Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients). The patients classified as having stable disease had a 3.8-fold higher risk of death than the patients classified as having a complete/partial response (HR=3.82; 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=1.32-11.02; p=0.013) and a 4.5-fold higher risk of progression (HR=4.46; 95% CI=1.72-11.61; p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The prognostic value of volumetric analysis in patients with HCC treated by TACE appears to be superior to RECIST and mRECIST, with a real impact in everyday practice.

Role of miR-653 and miR-29c in downregulation of CYP1A2 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major contributor to the worldwide cancer burden. Recent studies on HCC have demonstrated dramatic alterations in expression of several cytochrome P450 (CYP) family members that play a crucial role in biotransformation of many drugs and other xenobiotics; however, the mechanisms responsible for their deregulation remain unclear. METHODS: We investigated a potential involvement of miRNAs in downregulation of expression of CYPs observed in HCC tumors. We compared miRNA expression profiles (TaqMan Array Human MicroRNA v3.0 TLDA qPCR) between HCC human patient tumors with strong (CYP-) and weak/no (CYP+) downregulation of drug-metabolizing CYPs. The role of significantly deregulated miRNAs in modulation of expression of the CYPs and associated xenobiotic receptors was then investigated in human liver HepaRG cells transfected with relevant miRNA mimics or inhibitors. RESULTS: We identified five differentially expressed miRNAs in CYP- versus CYP+ tumors, namely miR-29c, miR-125b1, miR-505, miR-653 and miR-675. The two most-upregulated miRNAs found in CYP- tumor samples, miR-29c and miR-653, were found to act as efficient suppressors of CYP1A2 or AHR expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed a novel role of miR-653 and miR-29c in regulation of expresion of CYPs involved in crucial biotransformation processes in liver, which are often deregulated during liver cancer progression.

The combination of endoluminal radiofrequency ablation and metal stent implantation for the treatment of malignant biliary stenosis - Randomized study.

PURPOSE: To analyse whether endobiliary radiofrequency ablation prior metal stent insertion in malignant biliary stenosis show improved survival or stent patency. METHODS: 76 patients with histologically proven malignant biliary stenosis have been enrolled in a prospective, randomized study. In control arm, 40 patients underwent self-expandable metal stent insertion. In experimental arm, the endoluminal ablation with a bipolar radiofrequency catheter was performed immediately before stent insertion. A subgroup analysis of cholangiocarcinoma was performed (22 vs 21 patients). The objective of the study was to determine the rate of complications, duration of the stent patency and the survival of patients (Kaplan-Meier analysis). RESULTS: No major complications related to the stent insertion and the endoluminal ablation were found. The mean primary stent patency was 5.2 (95% CI 0.7-12.8) vs 4.8 months (95% CI 0.8-18.2) months (p = 0.79) in control and experimental group, respectively, in the subgroup analysis with cholangiocarcinoma 4.5 (95% CI 0.8-10.3) and 9.6 (95% CI 5.2-11.2) months (p = 0.029). The median survival since the insertion of the stent was 6.8 (95 %CI 3.0-10.6) vs 5.2 (95 %CI 2.4-7.9) months (p = 0.495) and since the initial drainage 9.8 (95 %CI 6.9-12.7) vs 9.1 (95 %CI 5.4-12.7) months (p = 0.720) in the control and experimental arm. CONCLUSION: Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation prior metal stent insertion showed increased patency rate only in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, on the other hand, no improvement in survival was demonstrated in this randomized clinical study.

Current view of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primarily resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is now the 11th most common cancer and in 2018 there were 458,918 new cases worldwide. In the Czech Republic, a total of 2,173 patients were diagnosed in 2015, ranking the second in incidence worldwide. In contrast to other malignancies, recent research has not brought any major breakthrough in the treatment of PDAC and hence the prognosis remains very serious. Radical resection is the only curative approach, but after the initiation of the standard pathological evaluation of the resected tissue, according to the Leeds protocol, 80% of the resections are R1 (resections with microscopically positive margins). The results of studies in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC prefer neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. This approach leads to a higher number of radical R0 resections and better survival. For neoadjuvant treatment in patients with primarily resectable PDAC, most results come from retrospective analysis or phase II trials. However, recently, data from three randomized clinical trials with neoadjuvant therapy for resectable PDAC were presented. These results support the use of chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery. In the trials published to date, there are differences in chemotherapeutic regimens, cytostatic doses, and the definition of resectability. Thus, up-front resection with adjuvant chemotherapy is still the standard of care and a well-designed randomized trial using neoadjuvant therapy is now necessary.

New trends in neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer from a surgeons perspective - a commentary.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer treatment advanced rapidly during last decades. The most important factors of this progress are new neoadjuvant therapy options, improvement in imaging (allowing for quality staging and restaging) and routine implementation of the total mesorectal excision technique. For the best outcomes, it is crucial to combine the treatment methods in the best way possible with ideal timing. It is necessary to keep in mind both advantages and complications of the individual kinds of approach. Therefore, interdisciplinary agreement is essential in the treatment of rectal cancer. Considering these new therapeutic possibilities, the debate about timing, indication and radicality of the surgical procedures is reopened. Surgical approaches are currently focused on mini-invasive methods and robotic surgery. New trend with promising potential seems to be clinical complete response achievement with watch and wait follow-up strategy. This approach, in the spirit of the organ sparing philosophy, however asks new questions about indication, timing and conception of this method. Proper answers are essential for sparing, yet radical oncotherapy of this disease.

Prognostic Survival Factors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization.

PURPOSE: Identification of prognostic survival factors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in a single center in 2005-2018. BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma is indicated in Barcelona Liver Cancer Clinic (BLCC) stage B. This stage includes a very large group of patients unsuitable for curative treatment, who are in a good clinical condition and do not show extra-hepatic spread. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to identify factors influencing patient survival and to divide the patients into subgroups based on these risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with HCC indicated for TACE in complex oncological center in 2005-2018 were included in the analysis. The survival rates from the 1st TACE were evaluated in relation to HCC on computed tomography/magnetic resonance prior to the 1st TACE (size of the biggest lesion, single/multiple lesions, unilobar/bilobar involvement), presence and severity of liver disease (cirrhosis, Child-Pugh, portal vein thrombosis) and a combination of other invasive treatment (resection, percutaneous ablation) (single and multivariate analysis). The survival of HCC patients was compared according to the year of the dia-gnosis and the year of the 1st TACE (log-rank test). RESULTS: Out of 382 patients, 157 (29 women) of them were treated with TACE (540 TACEs in total, median 3 TACEs per patient). The most important risk factors for survival were the presence of portal vein thrombosis (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.279), bilobar involvement (HR = 2.257), lesion size (HR = 1.125/cm) and Child-Pugh B in chronic liver disease (HR = 1.922). Based on these risk factors, the patients were divided into 3 prognostic groups with different median survival (52.1 vs. 21.5 vs. 9.0 months). CONCLUSION: Based on the retrospective analysis, predictive factors of HCC survival after TACE were identified and the patients were divided into 3 prognostic groups based on these factors.

[The benefit of new angiogenesis (bevacizumab and aflibercept) inhibitors for multiple angiomatosis therapy: a case report]. / Prínos nových inhibitoru angiogeneze (bevacizumab a aflibercept) pro lécbu mnohocetné angiomatózy: kazuistika.

Angiomatosis is a term for multiple, gradually proliferating hemangiomas (angiodysplasia), affecting multiple organs or tissues at the same time. We describe a 12-year course of treatment of a patient with multiple hemangiomas located in the abdomen, retroperitoneum, oesophagus, mediastinum and also in vertebrae. The diagnosis was made in 2005 within probatory laparotomy, at the age of 28 years. The treatment was commenced right after making the diagnosis with interferon α. Due to its adverse effects (fatigue, anorexia), the use of interferon α was limited to the first year, after which the interferon dose was gradually being reduced until it was discontinued completely. From 2006 to 2011 the treatment was based on thalidomide and temporarily also on lenalidomide. By the end of the year 2011 the patient was stabilized through the effect of these drugs, without a need of repeated blood transfusions. In 2012 his condition got worse again, which required several transfusions in one month. We tested metronomic administration of cyclophosphamide and further administration of propranolol, however neither of them improved the patients situation. Injections of octreotide (Sandostatin 0.1 mg twice a day) helped reduce losses during bleeding into the alimentary tract. Still the patient continued to depend on blood transfusions. Therefore, in 2013, bevacizumab was added to the therapy (7.5 mg/kg in 3-week intervals). This treatment stabilized the patient, it reduced the use of transfusions for a period of 2 years, however after 2 years of a successful therapy with bevacizumab there was disease progression shown on CT imaging and hemorrhagic pleural effusion was also detected. After the treatment of hemorrhagic effusion, early in 2015 we transferred to the administration of aflibercept, at first at the dose of 4 mg/kg in 14-day intervals. Arising of massive proteinuria led to the dose reduction to 2 mg/kg while maintaining 14-day intervals. While receiving this dose, the patient tolerates aflibercept thera-py without significant adverse effects. At the time of publication, the patient has been treated with aflibercept for 24 months already, of that for the last ten months he has been fully independent of transfusions. Just before commencement of treatment with aflibercept his conditions required several transfusions in a week. This description demonstrates that the efficiency of individual medications for multiple angiomatosis is always time-limited and newly developed and more efficient drugs are needed to manage the disease. Bevacizumab and aflibercept are beneficial for patients with serious forms of multiple angiomatosis.Key words: aflibercept - angiomatosis - angiodysplasia - bevacizumab - hemangiomas.

[Osteoprotective therapy with bisphosphonates or denosumab in patients with multiple myeloma: benefit and risks]. / Osteoprotektivní lécba bisfosfonáty nebo denosumabem u nemocných s mnohocetným myelomem: prínos a rizika.

Bisphosphonates have been used during the complete treatment of multiple myeloma for more than twenty years. They slow osteolysis and thereby contribute to the improvement of quality of life. Their long-term use, however, is related to 2 serious, usually later appearing complications: osteonecrosis of the jaw, occurring in 6-9 % of patients, and rarer atypical bone fractures. Both these complications are very difficult to heal, and all the more emphasis is therefore laid on prevention. This first of all includes discussion about the risk with the patient, followed by a dental checkup before the commencement of therapy and then repeated during its course, as well as reduced use of these drugs for a necessary period of time. However osteonecrosis of the jaw does not only develop as a consequence of bisphosphonate therapy. The complication is also caused by some new drugs (denosumab and others) used in cancer therapies. The text includes an overview of the drugs currently used in cancer treatment, which also increase the risk of appearance of osteonecrosis of the jaw. For patients with multiple myeloma, who achieve the complete or very good partial remission after chemotherapy, it is recommended to administer these drugs for more than 1 year after achieving the positive treatment response, but not longer than for 2 years. Only regarding those who do not reach the good treatment response, bisphosphonates are administered over the long term, as long as osteolytic activity of the disease lasts.Key words: atypical bone fractures - bisphosphonates - drug induced osteonecrosis of the jaw - multiple myeloma.

Efficacy of bevacizumab and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: broadening KRAS-focused clinical view.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present retrospective study was to analyze clinical outcome and risk factors associated with treatment outcomes according to KRAS status in patient with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab (bev) plus chemotherapy in the first-line setting. METHODS: We performed observational study on 1622 patients with mCRC treated with bev plus oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy, and correlated treatment outcomes with KRAS mutation status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and additionally overall survival (OS). Adverse events of bevacizumab and risk factors including location of metastases were evaluated. RESULTS: Mutation in KRAS was present in 40.6% of mCRC cases. The median PFS in patients with wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS) vs mutant KRAS was 11.5 vs 11.4 months, respectively. The median OS was 30.7 vs 28.4 months (p = 0.312). Patients with KRAS mutation had lung metastases more frequently than wtKRAS individuals (32.0% vs 23.8%; p = 0.001). We observed no difference in clinical outcome between hepatic and extrahepatic metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: KRAS mutation does not interfere with clinical benefit from first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in mCRC patients.