Significant dependency of left atrial strain on left ventricular longitudinal motion.

BACKGROUND: The effects of left ventricular longitudinal function on the left atrial strain, including the left atrial reservoir function, have not been adequately quantified. METHODS: A total of 124 patients who underwent echocardiography were enrolled in this study. Left atrial strain analysis was performed using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography, and the left atrial volume was derived using the modified Simpson's method. The peak left atrial strain (LAS) and left atrial expansion index (LAEI), as indices of left atrial reservoir function, were measured. The global longitudinal strain (GLS) and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE), which are indices of contractile motion toward the left ventricular apex, were also measured. The correlation between LAS and candidate determinants, including left ventricular systolic longitudinal function, was evaluated, and multivariate regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between LAS and left ventricular systolic longitudinal functions, GLS (r = 0.63, p < 0.001), and MAPSE (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). Two models, which were selected by multiple regression analyses for LAS, included GLS or MAPSE as independent determinants. GLS and MAPSE were also the strongest predictors, among other factors. CONCLUSION: LAS, when determined by evaluating the left atrial reservoir function, was significantly associated with left ventricular function, especially the systolic longitudinal function. Left ventricular function should be considered when assessing left atrial function by LAS.

Importance of left ventricular contraction for left atrial reservoir function.

BACKGROUND: The determinants of left atrial (LA) reservoir function have not been clarified. METHODS: To elucidate the effect of left ventricular (LV) contraction on LA reservoir volume (ΔVLA), volume change due to mitral annular downward motion and aortic root anterior motion, which are related to LV contraction during systole, was calculated in 72 consecutive subjects [42 patients without any cardiac disease (control group), 13 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF group) and 17 with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF group)]. LA volume was calculated using the modified Simpson's method of bi-plane 2-D echocardiograms. ΔVLA was the difference between the maximum and minimum LA volumes. LA volume change according to mitral annular motion (ΔVMA) and aortic root motion (ΔVAR) were calculated by assuming an oval frustum and dented wedge, respectively. RESULTS: In the normal control group, ΔVAR + ΔVMA was 11.7 ml on average, correlating to ΔVLA (r = 0.55, p < 0.01), and the contribution rate to LA reservoir volume ((ΔVAR + ΔVMA)/ΔVLA) was 56% on average. In both, the HFrEF and HFpEF groups, ΔVAR, ΔVMA, and the contribution rate were significantly smaller than those in normal control group. Stroke volume correlated to ΔVAR and ΔVMA. The larger the maximum LA volume was, the smaller the contribution rate was. The smaller the rate was, the higher the systolic pulmonary artery pressure was. CONCLUSIONS: Both mitral annular motion and aortic root anterior motion, which are related to ventricular contraction, are important for the LA reservoir volume recruitment.