Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and postoperative complications after gastric surgery for cancer (POWER 4): a nationwide, prospective multicentre study / Asociación entre el uso de protocolos de recuperación intensificada y complicaciones postoperatorias tras cirugía gástrica por cáncer (POWER 4): estudio nacional, prospective multicéntrico

Introduction: The effectiveness of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in gastric cancer surgery remains controversial. Methods: Multicentre prospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. Adherence with 22 individual components of ERAS pathways were assessed in all patients, regardless of whether they were treated in a self-designed ERAS centre. Each centre had a three-month recruitment period between October 2019 and September 2020. The primary outcome was moderate-to-severe postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were overall postoperative complications, adherence to the ERAS pathway, 30 day-mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: A total of 743 patients in 72 Spanish hospitals were included, 211 of them (28.4 %) from self-declared ERAS centres. A total of 245 patients (33 %) experienced postoperative complications, graded as moderate-to-severe complications in 172 patients (23.1 %). There were no differences in the incidence of moderate-to-severe complications (22.3% vs. 23.5%; OR, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41); P = 0.068), or overall postoperative complications between the self-declared ERAS and non-ERAS groups (33.6% vs. 32.7%; OR, 1.05 (95 % CI, 0.70 to 1.56); P = 0.825). The overall rate of adherence to the ERAS pathway was 52% [IQR 45 to 60]. There were no differences in postoperative outcomes between higher (Q1, > 60 %) and lower (Q4, ≤ 45 %) ERAS adherence quartiles. Conclusions: Neither the partial application of perioperative ERAS measures nor treatment in self-designated ERAS centres improved postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing gastric surgery for cancer. (AU)

Introducción: La efectividad de los protocolos de recuperación intensificada o ERAS en la cirugía del cáncer gástrico sigue siendo controvertida. Métodos: Estudio de cohortes prospectivo multicéntrico de pacientes intervenidos de cáncer gástrico. Se evaluó la adherencia a 22 elementos ERAS en todos los pacientes, independientemente de la existencia de un protocolo ERAS. Cada centro tuvo un período de reclutamiento de tres meses, con un seguimiento de 30 días. La medida de resultado primario fue el numero de complicaciones posoperatorias moderadas a graves. Las medidas de resultado secundarias fueron el número total de complicaciones, la adherencia a los elementos ERAS, la mortalidad y la estancia. Resultados: Se incluyeron 743 pacientes en 72 hospitales, 211 (28,4 %) en centros ERAS. 245 pacientes (33 %) experimentaron complicaciones posoperatorias, moderadas o graves en 172 (23,1 %). No hubo diferencias en la incidencia de complicaciones moderadas a graves (22,3 % vs. 23,5 %; OR, 0,92 (IC 95 %, 0,59 a 1,41); P = 0,068), o complicaciones posoperatorias totales entre los centros ERAS y no ERAS (33,6 % vs. 32,7 %; OR, 1,05 (IC 95 %, 0,70 a 1,56); P = 0,825). La adherencia a los elementos ERAS fue del 52% [IQR 45 a 60]. No hubo diferencias entre los cuartiles de cumplimiento ERAS más alto (Q1, > 60 %) y más bajo (Q4, ≤ 45 %). Conclusiones: Ni la aplicación parcial de medidas ERAS ni el tratamiento en centros ERAS mejoraron los resultados en pacientes sometidos a cirugía gástrica por cáncer. (AU)

Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and postoperative complications after gastric surgery for cancer (POWER 4): a nationwide, prospective multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in gastric cancer surgery remains controversial. METHODS: Multicentre prospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. Adherence with 22 individual components of ERAS pathways were assessed in all patients, regardless of whether they were treated in a self-designed ERAS centre. Each centre had a three-month recruitment period between October 2019 and September 2020. The primary outcome was moderate-to-severe postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were overall postoperative complications, adherence to the ERAS pathway, 30 day-mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: A total of 743 patients in 72 Spanish hospitals were included, 211 of them (28.4 %) from self-declared ERAS centres. A total of 245 patients (33 %) experienced postoperative complications, graded as moderate-to-severe complications in 172 patients (23.1 %). There were no differences in the incidence of moderate-to-severe complications (22.3% vs. 23.5%; OR, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41); P = 0.068), or overall postoperative complications between the self-declared ERAS and non-ERAS groups (33.6% vs. 32.7%; OR, 1.05 (95 % CI, 0.70 to 1.56); P = 0.825). The overall rate of adherence to the ERAS pathway was 52% [IQR 45 to 60]. There were no differences in postoperative outcomes between higher (Q1, > 60 %) and lower (Q4, ≤ 45 %) ERAS adherence quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the partial application of perioperative ERAS measures nor treatment in self-designated ERAS centres improved postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing gastric surgery for cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03865810.