A single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial of osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor exon 18 G719X, exon 20 S768I, or exon 21 L861Q mutations.

BACKGROUND: For patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutations, osimertinib is the standard of care. Investigating the activity and safety of osimertinib in patients with EGFR exon 18 G719X, exon 20 S768I, or exon 21 L861Q mutations is of clinical interest. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer with confirmed EGFR exon 18 G719X, exon 20 S768I, or exon 21 L861Q mutations were eligible. Patients were required to have measurable disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Patients were required to be EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive. The primary objective was objective response rate, and secondary objectives were progression-free survival, safety, and overall survival. The study used a two-stage design with a plan to enroll 17 patients in the first stage, and the study was terminated after the first stage due to slow accrual. RESULTS: Between May 2018 and March 2020, 17 patients were enrolled and received study therapy. The median age of patients was 70 years (interquartile range 62-76), the majority were female (n = 11), had a performance status of 1 (n = 10), and five patients had brain metastases at baseline. The objective response rate was 47% [95% confidence interval (CI) 23% to 72%], and the radiographic responses observed were partial response (n = 8), stable disease (n = 8), and progressive disease (n = 1). The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (95% CI 5.0-15.2 months), and the median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI 7.3-29.2 months). The median duration on treatment was 6.1 months (range 3.6-11.9 months), and the most common adverse events (regardless of attribution) were diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, weight loss, and dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests osimertinib has activity in patients with these uncommon EGFR mutations.

Erlotinib in African Americans with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized study with genetic and pharmacokinetic analyses.

Prospective studies on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in African Americans with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not previously been performed. In this phase II randomized study, 55 African Americans with NSCLC received 150 mg/day erlotinib or a body weight-adjusted dose with subsequent escalations to the maximum-allowable dose, 200 mg/day, to achieve rash. Erlotinib and OSI-420 exposures were lower than those observed in previous studies, consistent with CYP3A pharmacogenetics implying higher metabolic activity. Tumor genetics showed only two EGFR mutations, EGFR amplification in 17/47 samples, eight KRAS mutations, and five EML4-ALK translocations. Although absence of rash was associated with shorter time to progression (TTP), disease-control rate, TTP, and 1-year survival were not different between the two dose groups, indicating the dose-to-rash strategy failed to increase clinical benefit. Low incidence of toxicity and low erlotinib exposure suggest standardized and maximum-allowable dosing may be suboptimal in African Americans.

Clinical benefit of continuing ALK inhibition with crizotinib beyond initial disease progression in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Crizotinib is approved to treat advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but most patients ultimately develop progressive disease (PD). We investigated whether continuing ALK inhibition with crizotinib beyond PD (CBPD) is clinically beneficial and attempted to identify clinicopathologic characteristics associated with patients who experience clinical benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC enrolled in two ongoing multicenter, single-arm trials who developed RECIST-defined PD were allowed to continue crizotinib if they were deriving ongoing clinical benefit. In the present retrospective analysis, continuation of CBPD was defined as >3 weeks of crizotinib treatment after PD documentation. Patients who had PD as best response to initial crizotinib treatment were excluded. Baseline and post-progression characteristics, sites of PD, and overall survival (OS) were compared in patients who continued CBPD versus those who did not. The impact of continuing CBPD on OS after adjusting for potential confounding factors was assessed. RESULTS: Among 194 crizotinib-treated patients with RECIST-defined PD, 120 (62%) continued CBPD. A significantly higher proportion of patients who continued CBPD than patients who did not had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0/1 at PD (96% versus 82%; P=0.02). CBPD patients had significantly longer OS from the time of PD [median 16.4 versus 3.9 months; hazards ratio (HR) 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17-0.42; P<0.0001] and from the time of initial crizotinib treatment (median 29.6 versus 10.8 months; HR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.19-0.46; P<0.0001). The multiple-covariate Cox regression analysis revealed that CBPD remained significantly associated with improved OS after adjusting for relevant factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who continued CBPD were more likely to have good ECOG PS (0/1) at the time of PD. Continuing ALK inhibition with crizotinib after PD may provide survival benefit to patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.

Phase I study of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in combination with valproic acid in non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the majority of lung cancer and is the most common cause of cancer death in industrialized countries. Epigenetic modifications are observed universally during the tumorigenesis of lung cancer. The development of epigenetic-modulating agents utilizing the synergism between hypomethylating agents and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors provides a novel therapeutic approach in treating NSCLC. METHODS: We performed a phase I trial combining 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) and valproic acid (VPA), in patients with advanced stage NSCLC. Patients were treated with escalating doses of decitabine (5-15 mg/m(2)) IV for 10 days in combination with VPA (10-20 mg/kg/day) PO on days 5-21 of a 28-day cycle. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis included decitabine pharmacokinetics and fetal hemoglobin expression. RESULTS: Eight patients were accrued to this phase I study. All patients had advanced NSCLC and had received prior chemotherapy. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0-2. Major toxicities included myelosuppression and neurotoxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity was seen in two patients suffering grade 3 neurotoxicity during cycle one including disorientation, lethargy, memory loss, and ataxia at dose level 1. One patient had grade 3 neutropenia at the de-escalated dose. No objective response was observed, and stable disease was seen in one patient. Fetal hemoglobin levels increased after cycle one in all seven patients with evaluable results. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that decitabine and valproic acid are an effective combination in reactivating hypermethylated genes as demonstrated by re-expressing fetal hemoglobin. This combination in patients with advanced stage IV NSCLC, however, is limited by unacceptable neurological toxicity at a relatively low dosage. Combining hypomethylating agents with alternative HDAC inhibitors that lack the toxicity of VPA should be explored further.

A phase I, open-label dose-escalation study of continuous treatment with BIBF 1120 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: BIBF 1120 is an oral potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, the three key receptor families involved in angiogenesis. This phase I, open-label dose-escalation study investigated BIBF 1120 combined with paclitaxel (Taxol) and carboplatin in first-line patients with advanced (IIIB/IV) non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received BIBF 1120 (starting dose 50 mg b.i.d.) on days 2-21 and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin [area under curve (AUC)=6 mg/ml/min] on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Primary end points were safety and BIBF 1120 maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in this combination. Pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated (BIBF 1120 50-250 mg b.i.d.). BIBF 1120 MTD was 200 mg b.i.d. in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Six dose-limiting toxicity events occurred during treatment cycle 1 (liver enzyme elevations, thrombocytopenia, abdominal pain, and rash). Best responses included 7 confirmed partial responses (26.9%); 10 patients had stable disease. BIBF 1120 200 mg b.i.d. had no clinically relevant influence on the PK of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml/min and vice versa. CONCLUSIONS: BIBF 1120 MTD was 200 mg b.i.d when given with paclitaxel and carboplatin; this combination demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. No relevant changes in PK parameters of the backbone chemotherapeutic agents or BIBF 1120 were observed.

An epigenetic mechanism for capecitabine resistance in mesothelioma.

Mesothelioma is an uncommon malignancy whose global incidence continues to rise. The therapeutic standard for advanced disease is intravenous pemetrexed and cisplatin. The anti-folate capecitabine is significantly less effective than pemetrexed. The balance between thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) is critical to the efficacy of capecitabine. DNA from mesothelioma cell lines was bisulfite treated and examined by MS-PCR, RNA was obtained for real-time PCR analysis, and protein lysates were obtained for Western immunoblot analysis. Cytotoxicity was assessed by MTT assay, comparing 5-aza-CdR pretreated or untreated cells with 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (DFUR), 5-FU, and pemetrexed. Finally bisulfite sequencing of the extracellular growth factor-1 (ECGF-1) gene was performed on 4 mesothelioma samples and pericardial tissue. One of the four cell lines tested (H290) was methylated for ECGF-1. This corresponded to a lack of TP expression by real-time PCR and Western immunoblot. Treatment with 1muM 5-aza-CdR increased TP mRNA and protein expression in H290. DFUR, the substrate for TP, showed increased cytotoxicity when delivered after 5-aza-CdR exposure in the methylated cell line. There was no difference in any of the unmethylated cell lines when cells were exposed to 5-FU or pemetrexed with or without 5-aza-CdR. Patient tumor samples revealed an increased number of methylated CpG sites in ECGF-1 compared to normal pericardium. Methylation of ECGF-1, leads to transcriptional silencing of TP and may explain the lack of any effect of capecitabine, especially when compared to pemetrexed.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of mitomycin C and celecoxib as potential modulators of tumor resistance to irinotecan in patients with solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: Based on the preclinical evidence of topoisomerase I (Topo-1) upregulation by mitomycin C(MMC) and decreased NF-kappaB activation by celecoxib, we evaluated combinations of irinotecan/MMC and irinotecan/MMC/celecoxib in patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS-METHODS: Initially, patients received MMC on day 1 and irinotecan on days 2, 8, 15 and 22, every 6 weeks. MMC dose was fixed at 6 mg/m(2) and cumulative doses of >36 mg/m(2) were not permitted. Irinotecan was escalated in 25 mg/m(2) increments. Due to late-onset diarrhea, the schedule was subsequently shortened to 4 weeks, omitting irinotecan on days 15 and 22. In the second part of the study, celecoxib 400 mg orally twice daily was added to irinotecan/MMC regimen. Potential pharmacokinetic interactions and Topo-1 and DT-diaphorase (NQ01) gene expressions in peripheral-mononuclear cells were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled. Irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 8 in combination with MMC 6 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks is recommended for future studies; myelosuppression and diarrhea are dose-limiting. The addition of celecoxib resulted in unacceptable toxicities despite reductions on irinotecan's dose. No relevant pharmacokinetic interactions occurred between irinotecan and MMC, and mean increases in Topo-1, were observed. Sixteen of 36 patients evaluable for response-assessment had discernable anti-tumor activity, including 1 complete, 4 partial, 10 minor and 1 tumor marker response. Four patients had prolonged (>4 months) disease-stability (stable disease, not included in CR or PR). Patients experiencing complete and partial responses had higher increments in Topo-1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of irinotecan by MMC is feasible, devoid of pharmacological interactions and active in solid malignancies. The lack of improvement in therapeutic index does not support the addition of celecoxib.

MicroRNA-126 inhibits invasion in non-small cell lung carcinoma cell lines.

Crk is a member of a family of adaptor proteins that are involved in intracellular signal pathways altering cell adhesion, proliferation, and migration. Increased expression of Crk has been described in lung cancer and associated with increased tumor invasiveness. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a family of small non-coding RNAs (approximately 21-25 nt long) that are capable of targeting genes for either degradation of mRNA or inhibition of translation. Crk is a predicted putative target gene for miR-126. Over-expression of miR126 in a lung cancer cell line resulted in a decrease in Crk protein without any alteration in the associated mRNA. These lung cancer cells exhibit a decrease in adhesion, migration, and invasion. Decreased cancer cell invasion was also evident following targeted knockdown of Crk. MiR-126 alters lung cancer cell phenotype by inhibiting adhesion, migration, and invasion and the effects on invasion may be partially mediated through Crk regulation.

Noncytotoxic suramin as a chemosensitizer in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of noncytotoxic doses of suramin to reverse chemotherapy resistance in advanced chemonaive and chemoresistant non-small-cell lung cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received paclitaxel (Taxol) (200 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve 6 mg/ml/min) every 3 weeks. The total suramin per cycle dose was calculated using a nomogram derived from the preceding phase I trial to obtain the desirable plasma concentration range of 10-50 microM. RESULTS: Thirty-nine response-assessable chemonaive patients (arm A) received 213 cycles. Thirty-eight cycles were administered to 15 patients with demonstrated resistance to paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm B). The pattern/frequency of toxic effects was similar to those expected for paclitaxel/carboplatin, and pharmacokinetic analyses (199 cycles) showed suramin plasma concentrations maintained between 10 and 50 microM in 94% of cycles. In arm A, response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) response rate was 36% (95% confidence interval 22% to 54%; two complete, 12 partial); 15 patients (38%) had disease stabilization for > or =4 months; median progression-free survival (intention to treat) was 6.4 months; median overall survival (OS) 10.4 months and 1-year survival rate 38%. In arm B, no RECIST responses occurred; four patients had disease stabilization for > or =4 months; median OS was 132 days and 1-year survival rate 7%. Plasma basic fibroblast growth factor levels were higher in chemopretreated/refractory patients compared with chemonaive patients (P = 0.05). Sequence analysis of the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain in a long-term disease-free survivor revealed an ATP-binding pocket mutation (T790M). CONCLUSIONS: Noncytotoxic suramin did not increase paclitaxel/carboplatin's toxicity and the suramin dose was predicted from clinical parameters. No clinically significant reversal of primary resistance was documented, but a modulatory effect in chemotherapy-naive patients cannot be excluded. Controlled randomization is planned for further evaluation of this treatment strategy.

A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of fenretinide combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin for refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Fenretinide is a semi-synthetic retinoid that has pro-apoptotic effects as a single agent and synergistically with chemotherapy in vitro. We performed this study to determine the toxicity of cisplatin, paclitaxel and fenretinide in patients with advanced cancer, the recommended phase II dose of these agents together, and the pharmacokinetics (PK) of fenretinide when administered with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients (mean age 57.3) were assessable for pharmacokinetics, toxicity and response. Fenretinide was given orally in 2 divided daily doses for 7 days, starting 24 hours prior to cisplatin and paclitaxel. Cisplatin and paclitaxel were given in standard fashion. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Cycle one fenretinide PK was obtained on days 2 and 8. RESULTS: Dose limiting toxicity (Gr 3 diarrhea and Gr 4 neutropenia) was encountered in two patients during cycle one at 80/175/1,800 mg/m(2) of cisplatin/paclitaxel/fenretinide (dose level 2), respectively. Seven patients received 2-8 cycles at the recommended level of 60/135/1,800 (dose level 1). Severe cumulative toxicities included fatigue, nausea/vomiting, neuropathy, and dehydration. Two patients had a partial response and 4 patients had stable disease for up to 8 cycles. PK analysis demonstrated a reduction in fenretinide Cmax on day 8 compared to day 2, accompanying a decrease in AUC. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin/paclitaxel/fenretinide can be administered safely at 60/135/1,800 mg/m(2) respectively on an every three-week schedule. This combination may have activity in a variety of tumors, however, the number of pills required complicates oral dosing of fenretinide, and limits the applicability of this regimen.

A phase II study of oxaliplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The treatment regimen was given as defined in a phase I investigation in patients with previously treated ovarian cancer. It consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (1-h infusion) and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) (2-h infusion) given every 21 days. Eligible patients had stage IIIB (pleural effusion)/IV NSCLC, measurable disease, no prior chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were enrolled with the following characteristics: 29% male (n = 11); 71% female (n = 27); median age 64.5 years (range 37-78); performance status of 0-1 84% (n = 32); stage IIIB 8% (n = 3); stage IV 92% (n = 35). One hundred and eighty-one cycles were administered, with a median of four per patient (range one to 12). The overall objective response rate for all 38 patients was 34.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.6% to 51.4%]. This response rate includes 13 patients who met criteria for a partial response. No complete responses were observed. Median overall survival time was 9.2 months (95% CI 6-12.4) and median progression-free survival time was 4.3 months (95% CI 2.1-6.5). The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 37% and 21%, respectively. Hematological toxicity included six patients with grade 4 neutropenia. Non-hematological toxicity consisted mainly of grades 1 and 2 neurosensory toxicity. Laryngodysesthesia was observed in two patients following oxaliplatin infusion. No grade 4 non-hematological toxicities were encountered. CONCLUSION: This regimen is well tolerated, and demonstrates activity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

RT-PCR heteroduplex analysis permits differentiation of transgene and host gene expression in a transgenic animal model.

In transgenic animal models, the conservation of DNA sequences between the transgene and the host wild-type gene can complicate the evaluation of the expression of each gene. The potential for gene silencing may complicate matters further. Here we report the use of RT-PCR heteroduplex analysis to differentiate the expression of a transgene and its homologous wild-type, even when these genes are very similar in their respective DNA sequences. We designed RT-PCR primers to amplify identically sized 243-bp fragments within the DNA binding domain of the p53 gene from both human and mouse mRNA samples. Ten samples from human p53 (273H) transgenic mice and 10 samples from wild-type controls were tested. Heteroduplex bands were formed in all transgenic samples but were absent from all wild-type samples. In addition, RT-PCR heteroduplex analysis was able in one sample to differentiate a silenced transgene from its wild-type allele, without the assistance of sequencing or labeling. In summary, the RT-PCR heteroduplex analysis is easy to use and has the ability to screen a large number of samples in a short time. The RT-PCR heteroduplex analysis is especially useful for the detection of expression when a transgene and the host homologous endogenous allele are too conserved in sequence to design species-specific RT-PCR primers.

A pilot trial of G3139, a bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide, and paclitaxel in patients with chemorefractory small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemorefractory small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is defined as disease that progresses during primary therapy or within 3 months of completion of primary therapy. Patients with chemorefractory SCLC have a very poor prognosis, and no treatment has been shown to be of significant clinical benefit. Elevated expression of Bcl-2 is found in the majority of SCLCs and has been associated with therapeutic resistance. Suppression of Bcl-2 levels through the use of G3139, an antisense oligonucleotide complementary to the mRNA encoding Bcl-2, might increase the antitumor efficacy of cytotoxic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with chemorefractory SCLC participated in this pilot trial of paclitaxel combined with G3139. G3139 was given by continuous i.v. infusion over 7 days at a fixed dose of 3 mg/kg/day. Paclitaxel dose was initially 175 mg/m2 on day 6, but was decreased to 150 mg/m2 due to myelosuppression observed in two of the three patients treated in the first dose cohort. RESULTS: The combination of paclitaxel at 150 mg/m2 and G3139 at 3 mg/kg/day was found to be feasible and well tolerated. No objective responses were observed, but two patients had stable disease, one remaining stable on therapy for >30 weeks. Plasma G3139 levels were determined, and were found to be highest in the patient with prolonged stable disease, suggesting that individual variation in metabolism and clearance of the antisense oligonucleotide may influence activity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that G3139 can be combined with paclitaxel in a cytotoxic dose range, and suggests that a similar combination be tested for activity in the context of chemoresponsive disease.

Increased expression of unmethylated CDKN2D by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in human lung cancer cells.

DNA hypermethylation of CpG islands in the promoter region of genes is associated with transcriptional silencing. Treatment with hypo-methylating agents can lead to expression of these silenced genes. However, whether inhibition of DNA methylation influences the expression of unmethylated genes has not been extensively studied. We analysed the methylation status of CDKN2A and CDKN2D in human lung cancer cell lines and demonstrated that the CDKN2A CpG island is methylated, whereas CDKN2D is unmethylated. Treatment of cells with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-CdR), an inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase 1, induced a dose and duration dependent increased expression of both p16(INK4a) and p19(INK4d), the products of CDKN2A and CDKN2D, respectively. These data indicate that global DNA demethylation not only influences the expression of methylated genes but also of unmethylated genes. Histone acetylation is linked to methylation induced transcriptional silencing. Depsipeptide, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, acts synergistically with 5-Aza-CdR in inducing expression of p16(INK4a) and p19(INK4d). However, when cells were treated with higher concentrations of 5-Aza-CdR and depsipeptide, p16(INK4a) expression was decreased together with significant suppression of cell growth. Interestingly, p19(INK4d) expression was enhanced even more by the higher concentrations of 5-Aza-CdR and depsipeptide. Our data suggest that p19(INK4d) plays a distinct role from other INK4 family members in response to the cytotoxicity induced by inhibition of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation.

Global methylation profiling of lung cancer identifies novel methylated genes.

Epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation, are a common finding in cancer. In lung cancers methylation of cytosine residues may affect tumor initiation and progression in several ways, including the silencing of tumor suppressor genes through promoter methylation and by providing the targets for adduct formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons present in combustion products of cigarette smoke. Although the importance of aberrant DNA methylation is well established, the extent of DNA methylation in lung cancers has never been determined. Restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) is a highly reproducible two-dimensional gel electrophoresis that allows the determination of the methylation status of up to 2000 promoter sequences in a single gel. We selected 1184 CpG islands for RLGS analysis and determined their methylation status in 16 primary non-small cell lung cancers. Some tumors did not show methylation whereas others showed up to 5.3% methylation in all CpG islands of the profile. Cloning of 21 methylated loci identified 11 genes and 6 ESTs. We demonstrate that methylation is part of the silencing process of BMP3B in primary tumors and lung cancer cell lines.

DNA methyltransferase inhibition enhances apoptosis induced by histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Histone acetylation has long been associated with transcriptional activation, whereas conversely, deacetylation of histones is associated with gene silencing and transcriptional repression. Here we report that inhibitors of histone deacetylase (HDAC), depsipeptide and trichostatin A, induce apoptotic cell death in human lung cancer cells as demonstrated by DNA flow cytometry and Western immunoblot to detect cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. This HDAC inhibitorinduced apoptosis is greatly enhanced in the presence of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (DAC). The HDAC inhibitor-induced apoptosis appears to be p53 independent, because no change in apoptotic cell death was observed in H1299 cells that expressed exogenous wild-type p53 (H1299 cells express no endogenous p53 protein). To further investigate the mechanism of DAC-enhanced, HDAC inhibitor-induced apoptosis, we analyzed histone H3 and H4 acetylation by Western immunoblotting. Results showed that depsipeptide induced a dose-dependent acetylation of histones H3 and H4, which was greatly increased in DAC-pretreated cells. By analyzing the acetylation of specific lysine residues at the amino terminus of histone H4 (Ac-5, Ac-8, Ac-12, and Ac-16), we found that the enhancement of HDAC inhibitor-induced acetylation of histones in the DAC-pretreated cells was not lysine site specific. These results demonstrate that DNA methylation status is an important determinant of apoptotic susceptibility to HDAC inhibitors.

Cell cycle regulation of the G0/G1 transition in 5-fluorouracil-sensitive and -resistant human colon cancer cell lines.

PURPOSE: Resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been associated with thymidylate synthase (TS) gene amplification and increased TS protein levels. Increased TS protein expression has also been found to be a significant independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival and overall survival in patients treated with adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy. In these studies and in our prior preclinical studies, TS has been considered a marker of proliferative capacity. The purpose of the current study was to further evaluate the association between TS levels and cell cycle regulation, by investigating cell cycle kinetics in a 5-FU-resistant cell line with constitutive overexpression of TS. The influence of increased TS levels on cell cycle progression may provide insight into methods to overcome 5-FU resistance. MATERIALS: 5-FU-sensitive NCI H630(WT) and 5-FU-resistant NCI H630(R1) (with 15- to 20-fold higher TS protein levels) were utilized in this investigation to determine the influence of constitutive overexpression of TS on cell cycle kinetics. RESULTS: There was no apparent influence of increased TS levels on cell cycle distribution during asynchronous growth, and both cell lines reach plateau growth phase in 120 hours, arresting in G0/G1 as determined by flow cytometry. In the H630(WT) cells, this G0/ G1 arrest was associated with a 14- to 17-fold reduction in TS activity and protein levels (using the TS-106 monoclonal antibody), whereas in the H630(R1) cells, only a two- to fivefold reduction was noted. Flow cytometry analysis utilizing Ki-67 indicated that there was no evidence of a G0 population in the confluent H630(R1), whereas 26% +/- 7% of confluent H630(WT) cells were Ki-67 negative (G0) and the remainder had low Ki-67 signal intensity. Analysis of pRb phosphorylation and p16 and p21 expression suggested that the arrest point for both cell lines was before the point at which Rb phosphorylation takes place, yet the confluent H630(R1) cells had threefold higher p21 than confluent H630(WT) cells. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that the 5-FU-resistant H630(R1) cell lines arrest at a later point in G0/G1 and have a potentially greater capacity for proliferation.

Temperature-sensitive RB mutations linked to incomplete penetrance of familial retinoblastoma in 12 families.

The tumor-suppressor activity of the retinoblastoma protein (RB) is encoded within a protein-binding ("pocket") domain that is targeted for mutations in all cases of familial retinoblastoma and in many common adult cancers. Although familial retinoblastoma is a paradigm for a highly penetrant, recessive model of tumorigenesis, the molecular basis for the phenotype of incomplete penetrance of familial retinoblastoma is undefined. We studied the RB pocket-binding properties of three independent, mutant RB alleles that are present in the germline of 12 kindreds with the phenotype of incomplete penetrance of familial retinoblastoma. Each arises from alterations of single codons within the RB pocket domain (designated "delta 480," "661W," or "712R"). Under the same conditions, we studied the properties of wild-type (WT) RB, an RB point mutant isolated from a lung carcinoma sample (706F) and an adjacent, in vitro-generated point mutant (707W). The delta 480, 661W, and 712R mutants lack pocket protein-binding activity in vitro but retain the WT ability to undergo cyclin-mediated phosphorylation in vivo. Each of the low-penetrant RB mutants exhibits marked enhancement of pocket protein binding when the cells are grown at reduced temperature. In contrast, in this temperature range, no change in binding activity is seen with WT RB, the 706F mutant, or the 707W mutant. We have demonstrated that many families with incomplete penetrance of familial retinoblastoma carry unstable, mutant RB alleles with temperature-sensitive pocket protein-binding activity. The variable frequency for tumor development in these families may result from reversible fluctuations in a threshold level of RB pocket-binding activity.

RET cooperates with RB/p53 inactivation in a somatic multi-step model for murine thyroid cancer.

Mice bred to carry germline Rb and p53 null alleles are associated with a tumor spectrum that overlaps with the inherited multiple endocrine neoplasia-1 (MEN1) and MEN2 syndromes in humans, including medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). To study the genetic basis for these tumors, we microdissected MTC specimens or obtained fresh MTC tissue from nine independent Rb(+/-) p53(+/-) mice, amplified the region of the Ret gene known to be mutated in human MTC, and detected acquired missense Ret mutations in four different mice. These mutations were localized to a group of tandem cysteines which are analogous to activating germline mutations observed in human MEN2A and familial MTC (FMTC). To determine whether the remaining wild type Rb allele was inactivated in these murine MTC samples, we subjected tumor tissue to immunohistochemical staining with an Rb antibody, and demonstrated the absence of RB staining in murine MTC, while normal tissue retained RB nuclear staining. These findings demonstrate the ability of the gene knockout model to recapitulate somatic multi-step tumorigenesis and suggest that the development of a murine neuroendocrine tumor requires mutational dysregulation within both receptor tyrosine kinase and nuclear tumor suppressor gene pathways.

Protein expression and functional analysis of the FHIT gene in human tumor cells.

BACKGROUND: The fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene at chromosome 3p14.2 has been proposed to be a candidate tumor suppressor gene in human cancers. To test whether FHIT exhibits the functional properties of a tumor suppressor gene, we studied the expression of its protein (pFHIT) in human carcinoma cells and examined the ability of FHIT to inhibit the neoplastic phenotype of cancer cells. METHODS: Subcellular localization and patterns of protein expression in tumor cells were determined by immunohistochemical analysis and immunoblotting with the use of polyclonal anti-pFHIT antisera. In tumor cells with undetectable pFHIT, we examined the effect of recombinant pFHIT expression on morphology, growth rate, colony formation, and in vivo tumor formation. RESULTS: We demonstrated that pFHIT is a cytoplasmic 17-kd polypeptide whose expression could not be detected in 30 of 52 human carcinoma cell lines tested. We observed, however, that the stable overexpression of pFHIT did not alter cell morphology, inhibit colony formation, or inhibit cell proliferation in vitro. Furthermore, overexpression of pFHIT did not lead to altered cell cycle kinetics in dividing cells. The in vivo tumorigenicity of a tumor cell line that expressed high levels of recombinant pFHIT was equivalent to that of control transfectants and of parental cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the replacement of pFHIT in human carcinoma cells does not suppress tumor cell growth and that this protein may be involved in tumorigenesis in ways that are distinct from the "classic" tumor suppressor paradigm.