Evaluation of a pediatric dermatology electronic consult program in a rural state with subanalysis of infantile hemangioma cases.

An electronic consultation (e-Consult) store-and-forward teledermatology program was implemented to improve access to dermatologic care in Maine. While initially designed to triage potential skin cancers, we found this program to be heavily used for pediatric patients, especially infants. Our findings suggest e-Consult expedites care for pediatric dermatology patients, particularly those with infantile hemangiomas. The addition of dermoscopy to e-Consult platforms has the potential to expand e-Consult effectiveness.

"Sick or not sick?" A mixed methods study evaluating the rapid determination of illness severity in a pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Experienced physicians must rapidly identify ill pediatric patients. We evaluated the ability of an illness rating score (IRS) to predict admission to a pediatric hospital and explored the underlying clinical reasoning of the gestalt assessment of illness. METHODS: We used mixed-methods to study pediatric emergency medicine physicians at an academic children's hospital emergency department (ED). Physicians rated patients' illness severity with the IRS, anchored by 0 (totally well) and 10 (critically ill), and shared their rationale with concurrent think-aloud responses. The association between IRS and need for hospitalization, respiratory support, parenteral antibiotics, and resuscitative intravenous (IV) fluids were analyzed with mixed effects linear regression. Area under the curve (AUC) receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and test characteristics at different cut-points were calculated for IRS as a predictor of admission. Think-aloud responses were qualitatively analyzed via inductive process. RESULTS: A total of 141 IRS were analyzed (mean 3.56, SD 2.30, range 0-9). Mean IRS were significantly higher for patients requiring admission (4.32 vs. 3.13, p<0.001), respiratory support (6.15 vs. 3.98, p = 0.033), IV fluids (4.53 vs. 3.14, p < 0.001), and parenteral antibiotics (4.68 vs. 3.32, p = 0.009). AUC for IRS as a predictor of admission was 0.635 (95% CI: 0.534-0.737). Analysis of 95 think-aloud responses yielded eight categories that describe the underlying clinical reasoning. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid assessments as captured by the IRS differentiated pediatric patients who required admission and medical interventions. Think-aloud responses for the rationale for rapid assessments may form the basis for teaching the skill of identifying ill pediatric patients.

Pediatric Hospitalists' Performance and Perceptions of Script Concordance Testing for Self-Assessment.

OBJECTIVES: The cognitive expertise of Pediatric Hospitalists (PH) lies not in standard knowledge but in making decisions under conditions of uncertainty. To maintain expertise, PH should engage in deliberate practice via self-assessments that promote higher-level cognitive processes necessary to address problems with missing or ambiguous information. Higher levels of cognition are purported with Script Concordance Test (SCT) questions compared to Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ). To determine if PH use higher levels of cognition when answering SCT versus MCQ questions and to analyze participants' perceptions of the utility of using SCT self-assessment for deliberate practice in addressing clinical problems encountered in daily practice. METHODS: This is a mixed methods study comparing the cognitive level expressed according to Bloom's Taxonomy by PH answering MCQ versus SCT questions using a "think aloud" (TA) exercise, followed by qualitative analysis of interviews conducted afterward. RESULTS: A significantly greater percentage of comments were coded as higher cognitive processes (apply, analyze, evaluate, and create) for SCT versus MCQ (74% vs 19%) compared with lower order (remember, understand); chi-square P < .00001. Analysis of interviews revealed 6 themes. CONCLUSION: SCT questions elicited higher level cognition essential to clinical reasoning compared to MCQ questions. PH-indicated MCQ questions measure standard knowledge, while SCT questions better measure decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. PH-perceived SCT could be useful for deliberate practice in Pediatric Hospital Medicine decision-making if they could compare their rationale in answering questions with that of experts.

A Multimodal Quality Improvement Curriculum for Pediatric GME Program Directors.

The 2016 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Clinical Learning Environment Review report identified knowledge gaps for quality in the clinical environment. It suggested quality improvement (QI) training is necessary to develop skills to improve health care quality. However, at the authors' institution, there is limited department-level QI mentorship and engagement, thus limiting QI experiences for residents and fellows. The authors developed pediatric graduate medical education program director (PD) proficiency in QI through a fellowship-focused QI project. PDs underwent an 18-month QI curriculum consisting of focused online QI education, a half-day workshop, additional QI didactic sessions, project presentations, and individual QI coaching. QI knowledge in 9 domains and participants' confidence were assessed. Participants' self-perceived confidence and skills increased by at least 20% in most domains. Overall, PDs felt prepared to help with their fellows' future QI projects. Fellowship-focused QI projects and individual coaching were key to course engagement.

Successful Implementation of a Novel Collaborative Interprofessional Educational Curriculum for Nurses and Residents in a Pediatric Acute Care Setting.

Interprofessional collaboration is vital to maintain a successful healthcare team. We describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of an interprofessional educational curriculum on a large inpatient, acute care pediatric unit. Our objective was to improve attitudes towards collaborative care and collegial relations between staff nurses and pediatric medical residents. Nurses and residents participated in several interventions including a video for the nurses, a video for the residents, a team-building exercise, and three interprofessional clinical simulations. Participants' attitudes toward collaborative care were evaluated by a self-reported questionnaire, adapted from several validated survey instruments, before and after the intervention. Each question was mapped to one of the four domains of interprofessional practice: Teams and Teamwork, Interprofessional Communication, Values and Ethics for Interprofessional Practice, and Roles and Responsibilities. The National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators - Practice Environment Scale (NDNQI-PES) question on collegial nurse and physician relations was also queried to corroborate these findings. There was a statistically significant improvement in the nurses' response to 7/24 (29%) survey questions, of which 4 were within the domain of Teams and Teamwork. There was a statistically significant improvement in the residents' response to 5/24 (21%) questions, of which 3 fell within the domain of Interprofessional Communication. None of the survey questions demonstrated a statistically significant decrease. There was also an improvement on NDNQI-PES scores for the target unit, both during and immediately following the intervention. In conclusion, this educational curriculum involving nurses and residents led to improved participants' attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration.

Personal Digital Assistant-Based Self-Work Sampling Study of Pediatric Interns Quantifies Workday and Educational Value.

OBJECTIVE: Optimizing clinical proficiency and education of residents has become more important with restricted residency duty hours. Our objective was to investigate how interns spend their time on inpatient rotations and the perceived educational value of workday activities. METHODS: We performed a descriptive self-work sampling study using a personal digital assistant (PDA) to randomly query interns on inpatient rotations in real time regarding their activity and the perceived educational value of that activity on a 4-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 31 interns participated on 88 workdays over a 5-month period, generating 2082 samples from which the average workday was modeled. Time spent using the electronic health record (EHR) accounted for 33% of intern time, communicating with the health care team 23%, educational activities 17%, and time with patients and families 12%. Time with patients and families was perceived to be the most educational part of clinical service. Time spent using the EHR was perceived as the least educational. Interns perceived clinical service as excellent or good 37% of the time, while planned educational activities were perceived as excellent or good 81% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Interns spend the majority of their time using the EHR and communicating with the health care team. Interns perceive time spent in planned educational activities has more educational value than time spent in clinical service. The distribution of daily activities is discordant with the perceived educational value of those activities.

Pediatric hospitalists and medical education.

Pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) is moving toward becoming an American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) subspecialty, roughly a decade after its formal inception in 2003. Education has played a central role as the field has evolved. Hospitalists are needed to educate trainees, medical students, residents, fellows, and nurse practitioner and physician assistant students in inpatient pediatric practice. Continuous professional development is needed for hospitalists currently in practice to augment clinical skills, such as providing sedation and placing peripherally inserted central catheter lines, and nonclinical skills in areas such as quality improvement methodology, hospital administration, and health service research. To address the educational needs of the current and future state of PHM, additional training is now needed beyond residency training. Fellowship training will be essential to continue to advance the field of PHM as well as to petition the ABP for specialty accreditation. Training in using adult educational theory, curriculum, and assessment design are critical for pediatric hospitalists choosing to advance their careers as clinician-educators. Several venues are available for gaining advanced knowledge and skill as an educator. PHM clinician-educators are advancing the field of pediatric education as well as their own academic careers by virtue of the scholarly approach they have taken to designing and implementing curricula for unique PHM teaching situations. PHM educators are changing the educational paradigm to address challenges to traditional education strategies posed by duty hour restrictions and the increasing drive to shorten the duration of the hospitalization. By embracing learning with technology, such as simulation and e-learning with mobile devices, PHM educators can address these challenges as well as respond to learning preferences of millennial learners. The future for PHM education is bright.

Association between practice setting and pediatric hospitalist career satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric hospital medicine has become a viable long-term career choice. To retain qualified physicians, both academic and community hospital leaders seek to improve their job satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine whether practice in a community versus academic setting is associated with pediatric hospitalists' career satisfaction. METHODS: The study was based on data from an anonymous electronic cross-sectional survey sent to the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine Listserv between November 2009 and January 2010. Questions were rated on a standard 5-point Likert scale. A total career satisfaction score was calculated for each respondent by summing across all 23 questions. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess job satisfaction according to practice setting. RESULTS: A total of 222 pediatric hospitalists responded. Sixty-six percent of respondents practiced in an academic setting and 34% in a community hospital. Fifty-eight percent of academic and 42% of community hospitalists were satisfied with their careers, defined as a mean per-question Likert score > or = 4. Adjusting for gender, average daily census, percentage of complex patients, years as a hospitalist, and years since residency graduation, academic hospitalists were more likely than community hospitalists to be satisfied with their careers (adjusted odds ratio: 2.43 [95% confidence interval: 1.25-4.72]; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric hospitalists practicing in academic settings seem more likely to be satisfied with their careers than those in a community hospital. Overall, however, there is room for improvement in career satisfaction for both groups. Further study is warranted to confirm and clarify these findings on a larger scale, perhaps with oversampling of community hospitalists.

Pediatrics Residents' Perspectives on Family-Centered Rounds: A Qualitative Study at 2 Children's Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Many academic hospitals have incorporated family-centered rounds, yet little is known about pediatrics residents' perspectives on the educational impact of these rounds. OBJECTIVE: To identify pediatrics residents' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about family-centered rounds, including perceived benefits and barriers. METHODS: We conducted focus groups of residents exposed to family-centered rounds at 2 university-affiliated, freestanding children's hospitals. Focus group data were analyzed using grounded theory. RESULTS: A total of 24 residents participated in 4 focus groups. Residents reported that family-centered rounds enhance education by increasing patient encounters and improving physical exam skills, direct observation, real-time feedback, and attending role modeling; improve parent satisfaction, interpersonal and communication skills, and safety; and reduce length of stay. Physical constraints (large teams and small rooms), lack of uniform approaches to family-centered rounds, variable attending teaching styles, and specific conditions (child abuse, patients on isolation) were cited barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatrics residents report that well-conducted family-centered rounds improve their education and the quality of patient care, including parent satisfaction, communication with families, and patients' length of stay. Standardizing family-centered rounds and reducing attending variability in teaching style might further enhance residents' educational experiences.