Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Transl Res ; 13(12): 14157-14167, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35035761

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have unveiled the occurrence of re-detectable positive (RP) RNA test result after hospital discharge among recovered COVID-19 patients, but the clinical characteristics of RP patients (RP patients) and the potential features affecting RP RNA test outcome remain unclear. METHODS: A total of 742 COVID-19 patients discharged between March 1st, 2020 and March 20th, 2020 were enrolled. All patients were followed-up for SARS-CoV-2 RNA test and RP patents were identified. The clinical characteristics between RP patients and NRP patients were compared, and the potential features affecting re-detectable RNA test outcome were further evaluated. RESULTS: Up to April 9th, 2020, 60 recovered patients (8.09%) had been re-detected to be SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive. Among those 60 RP patients, the median RP time was 12 days from the last negative result of SARS-CoV-2 RNA test or 10 days from hospital discharge. RP patients were prone to be older, having mild/moderate conditions, unilateral lung involvement and fatigue, chills, stuffy or runny nose, with high lymphocyte count. Multivariate logistic analysis and COX regression analysis demonstrated that age, lymphocyte count, urea nitrogen, stuffy or runny nose as well as lung involvement were independently associated with RP RNA test (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients accompanied with stuffy or runny nose, low urea nitrogen as well as unilateral lung involvement were more likely to develop RP RNA test result after hospital discharge. Therefore, we strongly suggest using broncho-alveolar lavage fluid for RNA detection, extending quarantine time, and conducting continual follow-up medical examination for those discharged patients.

2.
Virulence ; 11(1): 1006-1014, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32722990

RESUMO

Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has spread globally since the end of 2019. Asymptomatic carriers are of great concern as they can undermine the interventions to stop the pandemic. However, there is limited information about the characteristics and outcomes of the asymptomatic patients. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study and retrieved data of 79 asymptomatic COVID-19 patients at admission from three designated hospitals in Wuhan, China. The asymptomatic patients could happen at any age, ranged from 9 to 96 years. These patients also had lower levels of alanine aminotransferase and C-reactive protein. Patchy shadowing was the most common manifestation in computed tomography scan. Some asymptomatic carriers developed mild or moderate symptoms during hospitalization. Age and comorbidities, especially hypertension, may be predictive factors for symptom development in the initially asymptomatic carriers at admission. Early detection and treatment for these presymptomatic patients before symptom onset can shorten the communicable period for the coronavirus and reduce the occurrence of severe cases.


Assuntos
Infecções Assintomáticas/epidemiologia , Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/patologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19 , Criança , China/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/fisiopatologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/fisiopatologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Eliminação de Partículas Virais , Adulto Jovem
3.
Pak J Med Sci ; 32(2): 279-83, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27182223

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The quantity and quality of publications in critical care medicine from East Asia haven't been reported. This study aimed to investigate the contribution of publications from East Asia. METHODS: Articles from China, Japan and South Korea in 2005 to 2014 were retrieved from Web of Science and Pubmed. The number of publications, impact factor, citation, and article types were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 3076 publications from East Asia (1720 from China, 913 from Japan, and 443 from South Korea). There were a significant decrease in publications from Japan (p = 0.024) and significant increases from China (p = 0.000) and South Korea (p = 0.009). From 2006, the number of articles from China exceed Japan. China had the highest total impact factor (6618.48) and citation (18416), followed by Japan (4566.03; 15440) and South Korea (1998.19; 5599). Japan had the highest mean impact factor (5.00) and citations (16.91), followed by South Korea (4.51; 12.64) and China (3.85; 10.71). CONCLUSIONS: China and South Korea`s contributions to critical care medicine had significant increases during the past 10 years, while Japan had a significant decrease. China was the most productive region in East Asia since 2006. Japan had the highest quality research output.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA