Comparative Efficacy of Colchicine and Intensive Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering in Patients with Atherosclerotic Diseases receiving Statins: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

AIMS: Adding intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering agents or colchicine to statin has been shown to result in additional cardiovascular benefits for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these supplementary agents in patients with ASCVD receiving statin. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary efficacy endpoint was the main adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and the secondary efficacy endpoints were myocardial infarct, stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality, respectively. The safety endpoints were treatment discontinuation and non-cardiovascular death. We obtained estimates for efficacy outcomes and safety endpoints and presented these estimates as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. We ranked the comparative efficacy and safety of all drugs with P-scores. RESULTS: Seventeen trials totaling 85,823 participants treated with colchicine (5926 participants), intensive LDL-C lowering (37,854 participants) via proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 protein (NPC1L1) inhibitor or ATP citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor, or statin alone (42,043 participants) were included. Colchicine was associated with a greater reduction in the risk of MACE (RR 0.72, 0.69-0.91), stroke (RR 0.55, 0.33-0.92), and coronary revascularization (RR 0.73, 0.60-0.90) compared with NPC1L1 inhibitor, and it provided a larger reduction in the risk of MACE (RR 0.79, 0.69-0.91) compared to PCSK9 inhibitor. However, colchicine was associated with increased risk of non-cardiovascular death compared with NPC1L1 inhibitor (RR 1.48, 1.04-2.10) and PCSK9 inhibitor (RR 1.57, 1.08-2.27). Although no regimen prolonged survival, colchicine had worse performance on non-cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ASCVD receiving statin, colchicine seems to be more effective than intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy with PCSK9 inhibitor or NPC1L1 inhibitor for cardiovascular prevention. However, using colchicine as an alternative to intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy may need to be weighed against the cardiovascular benefits and the potential harms of higher non-cardiovascular death. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023441385.

Renal nerve stimulation identifies renal innervation and optimizes the strategy for renal denervation in canine.

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) was still performed without any intra-procedural method for nerve mapping. Whether renal nerve stimulation (RNS) is an efficient way to identify renal autonomic innervation and optimize the strategy for RDN remain to be worthy for further exploration. METHODS: The characteristics of renal autonomic innervation at the sites with different blood pressure (BP) responses to RNS were explored. Then, dogs anatomically eligible for RDN were randomly assigned into elevated BP response ablation group, reduced BP response ablation group, and RNS-control group. The postoperative outcomes were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks follow-up. RESULTS: The proportion of afferent sensory nerve was higher at elevated BP response sites (ERS) than reduced BP response sites (RRS) and non-response sites (NRS) (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004). Conversely, the proportion of parasympathetic nerve at RRS was the highest (RRS vs. ERS, P = 0.017; RRS vs. NRS, P = 0.023). More importantly, there was a significant correlation between systolic blood pressure changes and the area ratios of afferent sensory and parasympathetic nerve (R = 0.859; P < 0.001). In addition, ablation at BP-elevation sites can result in a significant decrease in BP and plasma norepinephrine (NE) after 4 weeks (P = 0.002; P = 0.008), while ablation at BP-reduction sites can lead to significant increases in BP and plasma NE (P = 0.016; P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: RNS is an effective method to identify renal autonomic innervation. It could not only help to identify optimal target sites, but also avoid ablation of sympathetic-inhibitory areas during RDN.

Effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan on Restoration and Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: Existing studies have shown that sacubitril-valsartan ameliorated atrial remodeling in atrial fibrillation (AF) and favored maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with AF and heart failure. However, the effect of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with persistent AF is yet unknown. We aimed to evaluate the effect of sacubitril-valsartan on restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF who underwent electrical cardioversion (ECV). Method: Consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent ECV between 1 January 2016 and 30 September 2020 were investigated in this retrospective cohort study. All eligible patients were categorized into sacubitril-valsartan users and sacubitril-valsartan non-users based on whether they received treatment with sacubitril-valsartan or not. The endpoint was ineffictive ECV, defined as the composite of failure to terminate AF or any recurrence of AF during 30 days follow-up. Results: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in this study, including 28 sacubitril-valsartan users and 48 non-users. Within a follow-up of 30 days after ECV, the endpoint had occurred in 7 (25%) of 28 sacubitril-valsartan users and 25 (52%) of 48 non-users. Significantly lower rate of ineffictive ECV in sacubitril-valsartan users compared with non-users was shown in Kaplan-Meier survival curves (P = 0.02; Log-rank test). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that sacubitril-valsartan use (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.91), amiodarone use (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.78), left atrial diameter ≤ 39 mm (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.71) were independently associated with a decreased rate of ineffective electrical cardioversion.

Mapping Renal Innervations by Renal Nerve Stimulation and Characterizations of Blood Pressure Response Patterns.

Increased sympathetic nervous activity is one of main contributors to pathogenesis and progression of hypertension. Renal denervation (RDN) has been demonstrated as a potential therapy for treatment of hypertension; however, lack of indicators of intra-/post-procedure results in inconsistent clinical outcomes. Renal nerve stimulation (RNS), a simple and promising method, could evoke elevated blood pressure as an intraoperative indicator for RDN. But related researches on patterns of blood pressure responses to RNS are still incomplete. To investigate and categorize the phenotypes of blood pressure response to RNS and heart rate alteration before and after RNS, 24 Chinese Kunming dogs were used to perform RNS from bifurcation to ostium of renal arteries after angiography, and a total of 483 stimulated sites were complete. We identified five different patterns of blood pressure response to RNS in 483 stimulated sites, (1) continuous ascending and finally keeping steady above baseline (26.9%), (2) declining and then rising over baseline (11.8%), (3) declining and then rising but below baseline (14.5%), (4) fluctuating in the vicinity of baseline (39.5%), and (5) continuous declining and finally keeping steady below baseline (7.2%), and found no difference in RR intervals among five blood pressure responses before and after renal nerve stimulation. Renal nerve stimulation could elicit different patterns of blood pressure response, which could potentially assist in distinguishing sympathetic-excitatory sites and sympathetic-inhibitory sites from mixed nerve components, which might help to improve the efficacy of RDN.