An improved approach to followup care for the urological patient: drop-in group medical appointments.

PURPOSE: To increase prompt access to routine office visits the concept of the group appointment was developed in the primary care setting. Drop-in group medical appointments have been piloted at our department. We hypothesized that 1) efficiency could be improved by seeing 6 to 14 patients at 1 appointment, 2) access to appointment times would increase and 3) patient satisfaction would be enhanced with 60 minutes of didactic contact and discussion with the urologist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were invited to participate in a drop-in group medical appointment. Appointments were made based on sex and not on diagnosis. A 60-minute group teaching session was followed by a private 2 to 5-minute physical examination or further testing, as indicated. Confidential satisfaction surveys were administered to drop-in group medical appointment participants and patients seen at traditional individual (solo) appointments. Results were compared. RESULTS: From September 22, 2003 to August 30, 2004, 279 patients attended a drop-in group medical appointment. Mean patient age was 63 years and 142 patients were 65 years or older. Most diagnoses were prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, benign prostatic hyperplasia, incontinence, neurogenic bladder and chronic discomfort syndromes. Of the patients 287 were surveyed, including 177 at drop-in group medical appointments and 110 at solo appointments. Patient satisfaction with the drop-in group medical appointment format was as high as that of solo patients with 87% of drop-in group medical appointment patients rating their experience as excellent or very good vs 88% by solo patients. CONCLUSIONS: Drop-in group medical appointments can be implemented successfully in a urological practice with high patient satisfaction despite the sensitive nature of topics discussed. Ideal patients are those with chronic or complex conditions and those requiring repetitive discussions, such as elderly individuals.

Care of the patient undergoing radical cystectomy with a robotic approach.

Radical cystectomy or cystoprostatectomy with urinary diversion is the gold standard for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cystectomy can be through an open or robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach. Advances in laparoscopy, robotic surgery, and urological oncology have made it possible for select surgeons to perform nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy. Advantages of robotic surgery may be minimal blood loss, shorter hospital stay, quicker recovery, and possibly more precise and rapid removal of the bladder depending on the experience and expertise of the surgeon. Appropriate patient selection and thorough pre-operative evaluation, however, are key in maximizing positive surgical outcomes. The experience at the University of Virginia with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy will be discussed.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy with ileal conduit for urinary diversion.

This case demonstrates the need for flexibility when approaching major abdominal surgery through a robotic approach. While the case was initiated with robotic technology, it ultimately had to be converted to an open procedure for reasons of patient safety and to ensure a good surgical outcome.