National Averages for Process and Outcome in Radiation Oncology: Methodology of the Patterns of Care Study.

The purpose of this article is to describe the methodology used by the Patterns of Care Study to conduct surveys of the practice of radiation oncology that not only provide national averages for process and outcome measures but also allow comparisons among important subgroups. The article describes how the sample design assures that these analyses are possible and presents methods used for data collection and analysis.

The Changing Structure of Radiation Oncology: Implications for the Era of Managed Care.

This report presents results from the facilities surveys that are useful for radiation oncology practices facing the challenges of managed care. Facilities surveys collect data from the entire census of facilities practicing megavoltage radiation therapy. Data include equipment, personnel, and patient load. The data presented show that most, but not all, facilities throughout the United States are adequately equipped in terms of highest energy treatment machine, type of treatment planning computer, simulation, and quality assurance programs. The data also present the variation in percentage of new cancer cases receiving radiation therapy and repeat patients as a percentage of new radiation therapy cases by census region. The data show trends in patient load per type of personnel for academic, hospital-based, and freestanding facilities in 1994 show that academic facilities are larger and treat more patients per treatment machine. Academic facilities used more therapists per machine than other facilities.

Assessment of Physics Quality Assurance in United States Radiotherapy Facilities and Comparison With American College of Radiology Standard for Radiation Oncology Physics for External Beam Therapy.

We have assessed radiation therapy physics quality assurance (QA) elements in the United States and compared the results with the Patterns of Care Study (PCS) Consensus Guidelines for Treatment Planning and the American College of Radiology (ACR) Standard for Radiation Oncology Physics for External Beam Therapy. Data were obtained during PCS site visits to 73 facilities randomly selected from the 1,321 radiation therapy facilities in the United States: 21 academic, 26 hospital, and 26 freestanding. The following is a representative sample of results. The estimated national averages for facilities having QA programs for treatment planning systems, simulators, accelerators, film processors, and blocking systems are 44%, 79%, 94%, 62%, and 55%, respectively. Only 63% of facilities obtain an independent check of their accelerator calibrations from a source outside the facilities obtain an independent check of their accelerator calibrations from a source outside the facility. Twenty-six percent of facilities surveyed did not have in vivo dosimetry capability. These results and others in the study were compared with PCS consensus guidelines and ACR standards, This is the first such study performed in the United States, and the results establish a baseline for future studies. A recommendation for a comprehensive national physics QA study is based on deficiencies found in this study and the implementation of new technologies in radiation therapy.