Improving visitors' hand hygiene compliance in a pediatric oncology unit.

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is the single most important method to prevent infections. We aim at improving HH compliance by visitors to a pediatric oncology unit. METHODS: A performance improvement project implemented several Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles in July-November 2018. At baseline, a wall-mounted alcohol-based hand sanitizer dispenser was available at the unit entrance. Cycle 1 (visual cue), cycle 2 (visual cue plus verbal symptom screen), and cycle 3 (visual cue, symptom screen, plus HH verbal instructions) were tested. Patient care associates (PCA) positioned at the entrance implemented the cycles and recorded data about visitor's estimated age, day and time of observations, and covert HH compliance monitoring. Participating PCAs were surveyed regarding process feasibility. RESULTS: Of 1230 (97%) analyzed observations; 204 (17%) were baseline, 293 (24%) in cycle 1, 374 (30%) in cycle 2, and 359 (29%) in cycle 3. The visitors' HH compliance significantly increased to 16.0%, 22.5%, and 48.5% in cycles 1, 2, and 3, respectively, from a baseline of 4.9% (P < .001). Visitors were more likely to perform HH when directly instructed (cycle 3) compared to baseline (adjusted OR = 19.77, 95% CI, 10.30-42.09, P < .001). Although the surveyed PCAs agreed the process is easy and fast, they reported few barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Direct verbal instructions for HH were the most effective in improving visitors' HH compliance.

Outcomes after bloodstream infection in hospitalized pediatric hematology/oncology and stem cell transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric hematology/oncology (PHO) patients receiving therapy or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) often require a central line and are at risk for bloodstream infections (BSI). There are limited data describing outcomes of BSI in PHO and HSCT patients. METHODS: This is a multicenter (n = 17) retrospective analysis of outcomes of patients who developed a BSI. Centers involved participated in a quality improvement collaborative referred to as the Childhood Cancer and Blood Disorder Network within the Children's Hospital Association. The main outcome measures were all-cause mortality at 3, 10, and 30 days after positive culture date; transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 48 hours of positive culture; and central line removal within seven days of the positive blood culture. RESULTS: Nine hundred fifty-seven BSI were included in the analysis. Three hundred fifty-four BSI (37%) were associated with at least one adverse outcome. All-cause mortality was 1% (n = 9), 3% (n = 26), and 6% (n = 57) at 3, 10, and 30 days after BSI, respectively. In the 165 BSI (17%) associated with admission to the ICU, the median ICU stay was four days (IQR 2-10). Twenty-one percent of all infections (n = 203) were associated with central line removal within seven days of positive blood culture. CONCLUSIONS: BSI in PHO and HSCT patients are associated with adverse outcomes. These data will assist in defining the impact of BSI in this population and demonstrate the need for quality improvement and research efforts to decrease them.

Leadership line care rounds: Application of the engage, educate, execute, and evaluate improvement model for the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections in children with cancer.

To prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), leadership line care rounds (LLCRs) used the engage, educate, execute, and evaluate improvement model to audit compliance, identify barriers and opportunities, empower patients and families, and engage leadership. Findings of excellence and improvement opportunities were communicated to unit staff and managers. LLCRs contributed to compliance with CLABSI prevention interventions.