Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Educ ; 71(2): 241-5, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24602716

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections adversely affect patients' well-being. In this study, hand-washing details and adherence to surgical site antisepsis applications among surgical staff were observed and recorded. Then, a questionnaire was given to test surgeons' theoretical knowledge on operating room principles. METHODS: Staffs from 5 surgical units were selected (surgeons and nurses from general surgery, urology, plastic surgery, thoracic surgery, and gynecology and obstetrics) and observed. They were questioned on the choice and properties of antiseptics, proper duration of hand washing and use of brushes, and essentials of patient skin antisepsis. RESULTS: A total of 107 observations (53 residents, 27 nurses, 6 attending staff, and 21 academic staff) were done. Overall mean (± standard deviation) hand-washing time was 69.1 (49.8) seconds (range: 43.8-98; p: 0.001). Overall, 79 (73.8%) never used a brush, 18 (16.8%) used the brush for the nails only, and 10 (9.4) used the brush for hands and arms as well as the nails. Mean (± standard deviation) time from the application of skin antiseptic to surgical incision time was 6.7 (3.5) minutes (p: 0.088). According to the questionnaire, surgeons believed that proper hand-washing time should be 4.2 ± 2.8 minutes (p = 0.13). Brush usage was questioned and 50 (70.4%) favored brush usage whereas 21 (29.6%) were against it. The question for mechanism of action of povidone iodine is answered as 'bactericidal' by only 69%. CONCLUSION: The study shows that both adherence to local hand-hygiene protocols and surgical staffs' basic knowledge about surgical antisepsis are low.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pele/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Antissepsia , Cirurgia Geral , Desinfecção das Mãos/normas , Humanos
2.
Int J Vitam Nutr Res ; 78(2): 70-3, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18791975

RESUMO

Whey is a dairy product containing milk serum proteins with diverse biological effects. In this study, the effect of dietary whey supplementation on wound healing was investigated. Rats were fed a standard or whey-supplemented diet for three weeks. Wound healing parameters, glutathione, and lipid peroxide levels were determined three days after the application of two different models of wound healing, i.e. laparotomy and colonic anastomosis. Dietary whey supplementation significantly increased glutathione levels and suppressed lipid peroxidation after experimental laparotomy and colonic anastomosis. Bursting pressures, hydroxyproline, and cytokine levels were not changed. Our results show that dietary whey supplementation increases glutathione synthesis and cellular antioxidant defense. Long-term effects of whey feeding on wound healing remains to be investigated.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Proteínas do Leite/administração & dosagem , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Animais , Feminino , Glutationa/metabolismo , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos e Macrófagos/metabolismo , Hidroxiprolina/metabolismo , Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Laparotomia , Peróxidos Lipídicos/metabolismo , Fígado/metabolismo , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Proteínas do Soro do Leite
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA