Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device Assistance on Glycemic Control of 2023 Kahramanmaras Doublet Earthquake Survivors with Type 1 Diabetes in Adana, Turkey.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the devastating 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake on the glycemic control of children with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) in Adana, Turkey. Additionally, the study aimed to assess the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device assistance on glycemic control after the earthquake. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted involving 134 children with T1DM receiving intensive insulin treatment. Participants were divided into 2 groups: CGM (+) (n = 58), who benefited from CGM device assistance, and CGM (-) (n = 76), who did not utilize CGM device after the earthquake. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were recorded before and after the earthquake. RESULTS: Following the earthquake, the median HbA1c for all participants changed insignificantly from 8.9% to 8.6% (P = .491). However, in the CGM (+) group, HbA1c levels significantly improved post earthquake (P = .001). Conversely, the CGM (-) group experienced a deterioration in glycemic control (P = .027). A 2-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect between CGM device usage and the earthquake on HbA1c levels (F = 17.257, P <.001). Subgroup analysis based on age indicated that the effectiveness of CGM was more pronounced in adolescents (≥12 years) than in younger children (<12 years). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the adverse impact of the earthquake on glycemic control in children with T1DM and underscores the effectiveness of CGM in improving glycemic control, particularly among adolescents. The provision of CGM devices following the earthquake led to enhanced outcomes, mitigating the negative effects of the disaster on glycemic control.

The utility of annual growth velocity standard deviation scores and measurements of biochemical parameters in long-term treatment monitoring of children with 21-hydroxylase deficiency.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the utility of annual growth velocity (GV) standard deviation scores (SDSs) and compatibility and effectiveness of biochemical parameters in long-term treatment monitoring and management of 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21-OHD) in children. METHODS: Fifty children with 21-OHD were included in this study, and the biochemical parameters obtained during 402 visits were retrospectively evaluated. The follow-up period was divided between two GV SDS groups (GV SDS < 2 and GV SDS ≥ 2) and compared with auxological, biochemical, and clinical findings. RESULTS: Elevation of 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) values was observed at 193/402 visits, and both adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and total testosterone (tT) were observed at 53 of 193 (27.5%) visits. The calculated cut-off value for 17-OHP was > 4.3 ng/ml, with a sensitivity of 85.48% and specificity of 37.59% in the GV SDS ≥ 2 group. In the GV SDS ≥ 2 group, the corrected final height SDS (cFH SDS) was lower, and the delta height was higher than in the GV SDS < 2 group (p = 0.005 and p = 0.008, respectively). Linear regression analysis of the GV SDSs revealed that 17-OHP values and the hydrocortisone dose (mg/m2) were affected (ß = 0.037, p = 0.035, and ß = - 0.147, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Annual GV was critical in the final height (FH) of children with 21-OHD. However, we observed inconsistency between the biochemical parameters in the follow-ups, and there were difficulties in evaluating these markers. Therefore, annual GV SDSs and biochemical findings should be used together in patients with 21-OHD at follow-ups.

Experience with the targeted next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets.

OBJECTIVES: Hereditary Hypophosphatemic Rickets (HHR) is a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by hypophosphatemia. Although the X-linked dominant HHR is the most common form, the genetic etiology of HHR is variable. Recently, developed next-generation sequencing techniques may provide opportunities for making HHR diagnosis in a timely and efficient way. METHODS: We investigated clinical and genetic features for 18 consecutive probands and their 17 affected family members with HHR. All patient's clinical and biochemical data were collected. We first analyzed a single gene with Next-generation sequencing if the patients have a strong clue for an individual gene. For the remaining cases, a Hypophosphatemic Rickets gene panel, including all known HHR genes by Next-generation sequencing, was employed. RESULTS: We were able to diagnosis all of the consecutive 35 patients in our tertiary care center. We detected nine novel and 10 previously described variants in PHEX (9; 50%), SLC34A3 (3; 17%), ENPP1 (3; 17%), SLC34A1 (1; 5%), CLCN5 (1; 5%), and DMP1 (1; 5%). CONCLUSIONS: To delineate the etiology of HHR cases in a cost and time-efficient manner, we propose single gene analysis by next-generation sequencing if findings of patients indicate a strong clue for an individual gene. If that analysis is negative or for all other cases, a Next-generation Sequence gene panel, which includes all known HHR genes, should be employed.

Mutations Within the Transcription Factor PROP1 in a Cohort of Turkish Patients with Combined Pituitary Hormone Deficiency

Objective: Mutations of the genes encoding transcription factors which play important roles in pituitary morphogenesis, differentiation and maturation may lead to combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD). PROP1 gene mutations are reported as the most frequent genetic aetiology of CHPD. The aim of this study was to describe the phenotypes of Turkish CPHD patients and define the frequency of PROP1 mutations. Methods: Fifty-seven CPHD patients from 50 families were screened for PROP1 mutations. The patients were affected by growth hormone (GH) and additional anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies. Results: All patients had GH deficiency. In addition, 98.2% had central hypothyroidism, 45.6% had hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, 43.8% had adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency and 7.1% had prolactin deficiency. Parental consanguinity rate was 50.9% and 14 cases were familial. Mean height standard deviation score (SDS) and weight SDS were -3.8±1.4 and -3.1±2.0, respectively. Of 53 patients with available pituitary imaging, 32 (60.4%) showed abnormalities. None had extra-pituitary abnormalities. Eight index patients had PROP1 gene mutations. Five sporadic patients were homozygous for c.301_302delAG (p.Leu102CysfsTer8) mutation, two siblings had exon 2 deletion, two siblings had complete gene deletion and two siblings were homozygous for the novel c.353A>G (p.Q118R) mutation. The frequency of the PROP1 mutations was 16% in our cohort. Mutation rate was significantly higher in familial cases compared to sporadic cases (42.8% vs 11.6%; p<0.01). Conclusion: Phenotype of patients regarding hormonal deficiencies, pituitary morphology, presence of extra-pituitary findings, family history of CPHD and parental consanguinity are important for deciding which pituitary transcription factor deficiency should be investigated. PROP1 mutation frequencies vary in different populations and its prevalence is high in Turkish CPHD patients.