Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ir J Med Sci ; 192(4): 1855-1860, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36336767

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trauma is one of the common reasons for emergency department (ED) presentations. Specifically, severe-trauma patients often present with mortal complications, including traumatic shock or respiratory or multiorgan failure/dysfunction, and these situations cause high-mortality risk. Scoring systems in the triage of trauma patients can help determine the injury's severity and the patient's prognosis. AIM: In this study, we aimed to compare Early-Warning Score (EWS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and CRAMS to predict the severity and prognosis of damage among high-energy-trauma patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult high-energy-trauma patients (> 18 years of age) assessed in our emergency department (ED) from April 1, 2020, to September 31, 2020. We included a total of 177 high-energy-trauma patients in the study. We compared the effectiveness of EWS; RTS; and circulation, respiration, abdomen, motor, and speech (CRAMS) in predicting mortality. The primary outcome of this study was mortality. RESULTS: We included 67 females and 110 males with a mean age of 39.2 in our study. Of those patients, 6 died during ICU hospitalization and 104 were discharged from the ward. RTS (AUC: 0.978, CI: 0.945-0.994, p < 0.001) and CRAMS (AUC: 0.978, CI: 0.944-0.994, p < 0.001) had the same AUC values, but the AUC value of EWS (AUC: 0.966, CI: 0.927-0.987, p < 0.001) was lower. Sensitivity of EWS was 93.1 (CI: 77.2-99.2%), and sensitivity of RTS was 96.55 (CI: 82.2-99.9) and CRAMS' sensivity was 96.55% (CI: 82.2-99.9). RTS showed the highest specivity level (96.62%, CI: 92.3-98.9). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, RTS and CRAMS better predicted mortality in high-energy-trauma patients than EWS.


Assuntos
Triagem , Ferimentos e Lesões , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Prognóstico , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações
2.
Emerg Med Int ; 2020: 8718304, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32211208

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction is the most common cause of death all over the world. There are many studies in predicting mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of hematologic parameters measured at the moment of admission to the emergency room in predicting in-hospital mortality and to determine cutoff values of strongly predictive values. METHODS: A total of 681 patients over 18 years of age, whose date could be obtained, were included in the study. From the hemogram parameters, white blood cells (WBC), red cell distribution width (RDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), and neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio (NLR) values were determined and recorded. CK-MB and high-sensitive troponin T values were recorded as cardiac markers. For statistical analysis, "SPSS for Windows version 21" package program was used. RESULTS: 62.6% (n = 426) of the patients were male, and 37.4% (n = 426) of the patients were male, and 37.4% (. CONCLUSION: According to the hemogram results which were acquired with a simple and cheap method, we found that WBC and especially NLR values obtained with a simple method can be used as powerful predictors.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...