Biatrial Approach Provides Better Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Cardiac Myxomas.

Objective: We aimed to present clinical features, surgical approaches, importance of surgical technique and long-term outcomes of our patients with cardiac myxoma who underwent surgery. Methods: We retrospectively collected data of patients with cardiac myxoma who underwent surgical resection between February 1990 and November 2014. Biatrial approach is the preferred surgical method in a large proportion of patients that are operated due to left atrial myxoma because it provides wider exposure than the uniatrial approach. To prevent recurrence during surgical resection, a large excision is made so as to include at least 5 mm of normal area from clean tissue around the tumor. Moreover, special attention is paid to the excision that is made as a whole, without digesting the fragment of tumor with gentle dissections. Results: Forty-three patients (20 males, mean age of 51.7±8.8 years) were included. Most common symptom was dyspnea (48.8%). Tumor was located in the left atrium in 37 (86%) patients. Resections were achieved via biatrial approach in 34 patients, uniatrial approach in 8 patients, and right atriotomy with right ventriculotomy in 1 patient. One patient died due to low cardiac output syndrome in the early postoperative period. Mean follow-up time was 102.3±66.5 months. Actuarial survival rates were 95%, 92% and 78% at five, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Recurrence was observed in none of the patients during follow-up. Conclusion: Although myxomas are benign tumors, due to embolic complications and obstructive signs, they should be treated surgically as soon as possible after diagnosis. To prevent recurrence, especially in cardiac myxomas which are located in left atrium, preferred biatrial approach is suggested for wide resection of the tumor and to avoid residual tumor.

Biatrial approach provides better outcomes in the surgical treatment of cardiac myxomas

Abstract Objective: We aimed to present clinical features, surgical approaches, importance of surgical technique and long-term outcomes of our patients with cardiac myxoma who underwent surgery. Methods: We retrospectively collected data of patients with cardiac myxoma who underwent surgical resection between February 1990 and November 2014. Biatrial approach is the preferred surgical method in a large proportion of patients that are operated due to left atrial myxoma because it provides wider exposure than the uniatrial approach. To prevent recurrence during surgical resection, a large excision is made so as to include at least 5 mm of normal area from clean tissue around the tumor. Moreover, special attention is paid to the excision that is made as a whole, without digesting the fragment of tumor with gentle dissections. Results: Forty-three patients (20 males, mean age of 51.7±8.8 years) were included. Most common symptom was dyspnea (48.8%). Tumor was located in the left atrium in 37 (86%) patients. Resections were achieved via biatrial approach in 34 patients, uniatrial approach in 8 patients, and right atriotomy with right ventriculotomy in 1 patient. One patient died due to low cardiac output syndrome in the early postoperative period. Mean follow-up time was 102.3±66.5 months. Actuarial survival rates were 95%, 92% and 78% at five, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Recurrence was observed in none of the patients during follow-up. Conclusion: Although myxomas are benign tumors, due to embolic complications and obstructive signs, they should be treated surgically as soon as possible after diagnosis. To prevent recurrence, especially in cardiac myxomas which are located in left atrium, preferred biatrial approach is suggested for wide resection of the tumor and to avoid residual tumor.

Vascular complications of intra-aortic balloon pump usage in coronary bypass surgery: 18 years of experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the vascular complication incidence related to intra-aortic balloon pump usage during coronary bypass surgery and possible risk factors. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at Uludog University Hospital, Turkey, and comprised 147 cases in which intra-aortic balloon pump was used during coronary artery bypass surgery between January 1994 and December 2011. Data was examined in terms of age, gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, peripheral vascular disease, pre-operative serum creatinine, history of congestive heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction, previous infarction and cardiac functional capacity. Time, indication, treatment duration, technique of insertion and complications were recorded about the balloon insertion. Patients in whom peripheral vascular complication developed were evaluated with pulse examination, Doppler ultrasound and angiography. Logistic regression analyses were carried out with the purpose of determining the relation between pre-operative clinical variables and vascular complications and mortality. RESULTS: Of the total, 105 (71%) were males and 42 (28%) were females. The overall mean age was 62.4 +/- 10.1 years. Besides, 16 (41%) cases had diabetes mellitus and 30 (20%) had peripheral artery disease. The mean Euroscore was 7.6 +/- 4.8. Intra-aortic balloon pump was inserted in 16 (10.8%) due to pre-operative high risk and in 75 (51%) cases due to hypotension being non-responsive to inotropes. Balloon catheter was placed with percutaneous technique in 141 (96%) cases and sheath wasn't used in 44 (29%). The balloon stayed for 2.9 +/- 2.1 days on average. Balloon rupture developed in 1 (0.6%) case. Mortality resulted in 58 (39%) cases. Euroscore (p=0.012), staying in hospital (p=0.005), low ejection fraction (p=0.018), hypertension existence (p=0.003) in multivariate logistic regression analyses were found significant in terms of affecting mortality. Duration of therapy (p<0.001), existence of sheath (p=0.002), and existence of peripheral vascular disease (p<0.001) were found significant as factors affecting the development of vascular complication. CONCLUSION: Intra-aortic balloon pump provides mechanical circulation assistance during coronary artery surgery, but peripheral vascular system should be well evaluated in order to avoid vascular complications and the balloon catheter should be placed without the sheath if necessary. The duration of the therapy is a risk factor for the development of vascular complication.

Off-pump bypass grafting in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis.

The aim of this study was to investigate and determine whether patients with significant (> or = %50) left main coronary artery stenosis could undergo coronary bypass on the beating heart and compare the results to those obtained using the conventional method. Prospectively collected data of patients with significant left main coronary artery disease who had undergone coronary bypass on the beating heart (group A, n = 100) or with the conventional method (group B, n = 100) were evaluated retrospectively. EuroSCORE values, preoperative and operative details, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and early results were compared. Groups were similar in terms of EuroSCORE, demographics, and preoperative variables. Number of distal anastomoses per patient was 3.1 +/- 0.9 in the beating heart group while it was 3.3 +/- 0.9 in the conventional group ( P = 0.09). Patients operated on with the conventional method had higher levels of peak creatine kinase-myocardial band, blood and blood product transfusions, and inotropic requirements, while mechanical ventilation times and hospital stay were longer. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, and intra-aortic balloon usage were comparable between the groups. There was no neurological complication in group A whereas five major neurological complications (three transient ischemic attacks, two strokes) occurred in group B ( P = 0.06). Thirty-day mortality occurred in one patient in the beating heart group whereas five early deaths were observed in the conventional group ( P = 0.21). In significant left main coronary artery stenosis coronary bypass on the beating heart is a safe and effective alternative to the conventional method with the same or better early results. The long-term results need to be evaluated.

Is 100% beating heart coronary by-pass justified?

Coronary by-pass on a beating heart may provide a safer form of surgical revascularization by avoiding the well-documented side effects of cardiopulmonary by-pass. In addition, off-pump bypass is suggested to be a good alternative to on-pump especially in high risk patients. This study reviews the feasibility of coronary by-pass on the beating heart in all patients referred to surgery. Two hundred and ninety-four patients operated on the beating heart were prospectively followed and compared to the control group of 100 consecutive patients operated with the conventional method. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to risk factors, except the incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and ejection fraction which were higher in the conventional group, whereas peripheral vascular disease was higher in the beating heart group. There was more distal anastomosis in the conventional group. Postoperative inotrope requirement, peak creatine phosphokinase- MB, ventilation time, blood loss in the first 24 h, transfusion needs, new atrial fibrillation and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the beating heart operations. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of neurological complications, chest infection, intraaortic balloon pump usage and mortality. In conclusion, multivessel off pump coronary by-pass is feasible with the same or better results as it is observed in the conventional technique when postoperative bleeding, neurogenic complications, arrythmias, hospital stay, overall morbidity and mortality are compared.