Programa de atención farmacéutica integrada en pacientes con enfermedades crónicas / Integrated pharmaceutical care programme in patients with chronic diseases

Objetivo: Valorar si un programa de atención farmacéutica integrada (PAFI) en pacientes crónicos mejora la evolución clínica, la calidad de vida de los pacientes y disminuye el consumo de recursos sanitarios. Material y métodos Ensayo clínico, paralelo, abierto y multicéntrico de un PAFI en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) y/o enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) en 8 áreas de salud de Cataluña. Al paciente en intervención le realizaban seguimiento farmacoterapéutico los farmacéuticos de hospital, atención primaria y farmacia comunitaria. Al control, seguimiento habitual. Todos los pacientes fueron seguidos 12 meses y se les realizó un test de calidad de vida al inicio y final del seguimiento. Resultados Participaron 8 hospitales, 8 centros de atención primaria y 109 farmacias comunitarias. Finalizaron el estudio 238 pacientes con un porcentaje de pérdidas del 2,9%. No hubo diferencias significativas en reingresos, visitas al médico o urgencias. Se detectaron 50 problemas relacionados con medicamentos (PRM) en 37 pacientes, siendo estadísticamente significativa la diferencia de PRM entre el grupo intervención y control en pacientes con IC y casi significativa en pacientes con EPOC. El 36% de los PRM fueron moderados-graves. El 94% PRM fueron evitables y el farmacéutico los resolvió en el 90% de los casos. No hubo diferencias entre la calidad de vida al inicio y final del estudio ni en el consumo de recursos sanitarios. Conclusiones Los programas de atención farmacéutica integrada permiten la mejora de la calidad asistencial al paciente, no obstante es necesaria la utilización de registros electrónicos que faciliten la comunicación entre niveles asistenciales (AU)

Objectives: To assess whether an integrated pharmaceutical care programme (IPCP) improvesclinical evolution, patient quality of life, and reduces health costs in chronic patients. Material and methods: A parallel, open, and multi-centre clinical trial of an IPCP in patients with heart failure (HF) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 8 different health areas in Cataluña. The intervened patient was monitored for pharmacotherapeutic evolution by hospital pharmacists, primary care physicians, and community pharmacists. Controls received normal follow-up. All patients were monitored for 12 months, with quality of life tests administered at the beginning and end of follow-up. Results: We had the participation of 8 different hospitals, 8 primary care centres, and109 community pharmacies. 238 patients completed the study, with 2.9% of participants lost during the study period. There were no significant differences in terms of readmissions, visits to the doctors, or to emergency services. We detected 50 different medication-related problems(MRP) in 37 patients, with a statistically significant difference in terms of MRP between the control and treatment groups of patients with HF, and almost significant differences in COPD patients. MRP were moderate-severe in 36% of cases. MRP were avoidable in 94% of cases, and the pharmacist resolved the issue in 90% of cases. There were no differences in terms of patient quality of life or health costs between the start and end of the study. Conclusions: Integrated pharmaceutical care programs facilitate an improvement in the quality of patient care, but electronic registries are necessary to promote communication between sections of the health care network (AU)

[Integrated pharmaceutical care programme in patients with chronic diseases]. / Programa de atención farmacéutica integrada en pacientes con enfermedades crónicas.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether an integrated pharmaceutical care programme (IPCP) improves clinical evolution, patient quality of life, and reduces health costs in chronic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A parallel, open, and multi-centre clinical trial of an IPCP in patients with heart failure (HF) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 8 different health areas in Cataluña. The intervened patient was monitored for pharmacotherapeutic evolution by hospital pharmacists, primary care physicians, and community pharmacists. Controls received normal follow-up. All patients were monitored for 12 months, with quality of life tests administered at the beginning and end of follow-up. RESULTS: We had the participation of 8 different hospitals, 8 primary care centres, and 109 community pharmacies. 238 patients completed the study, with 2.9% of participants lost during the study period. There were no significant differences in terms of readmissions, visits to the doctors, or to emergency services. We detected 50 different medication-related problems (MRP) in 37 patients, with a statistically significant difference in terms of MRP between the control and treatment groups of patients with HF, and almost significant differences in COPD patients. MRP were moderate-severe in 36% of cases. MRP were avoidable in 94% of cases, and the pharmacist resolved the issue in 90% of cases. There were no differences in terms of patient quality of life or health costs between the start and end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated pharmaceutical care programs facilitate an improvement in the quality of patient care, but electronic registries are necessary to promote communication between sections of the health care network.

Abordaje interdisciplinar de la conciliación de la medicación crónica al ingreso en un hospital / An interdisciplinary approach to reconciling chronic medications on admission to Mora d’Ebre local hospital

Objetivos. Reducir los errores de medicación y evitar las interacciones y duplicidades mediante un programa de conciliación de la medicación crónica al ingreso. Crear una lista actualizada de medicamentos conciliados resolviendo las discrepancias antes de 24h del ingreso en planta. Garantizar la medicación necesaria a la dosis, vía e intervalos correctos según la situación clínica del paciente. Material, pacientes y métodos. Estudio observacional, prospectivo, no aleatorizado y no controlado durante el periodo de octubre 2008 a marzo 2009 (ambos incluidos) en un hospital comarcal de primer nivel, donde se concilió la medicación crónica con la del ingreso hospitalario a todos los pacientes ingresados que cumplían los criterios de inclusión. Resultados. Se incluyeron 469 pacientes, conciliándose 3.609 medicamentos de los cuales 2.466 (68,3%) tenían discrepancias: 667 (27,1%) no justificadas y 1.799 (72,9%) justificadas; no tenían discrepancias 1.143 (31,7%). Las discrepancias no justificadas mayoritarias fueron las omisiones de prescripción 662 (26,8%) y las duplicidades 5 (0,2%). En 640 (25,9%) ocasiones el error llegó al paciente sin ocasionar daños y solo en 4 (0,16%) fue precisa su monitorización. Discusión. Mediante el abordaje interdisciplinario del proceso de conciliación de la medicación crónica se han detectado y neutralizado muchos errores de medicación, se han resuelto las discrepancias, neutralizando omisiones, interacciones, duplicidades y se han eliminado los fármacos de bajo valor intrínseco farmacológico, registrándose en la historia clínica informatizada el listado de medicamentos conciliados(AU)

Objectives. To reduce medication errors and prevent interactions and duplications using a Chronic Medication Reconciliation Program on patient admission. To create an updated reconciled medications by resolving discrepancies within 24 hours of admission to the ward. To ensure the necessary medication is given at the dose, route and at the correct intervals depending on the clinical situation of the patient. Material, Patients and Methods. Prospective observational, non-randomised and uncontrolled study during the period from October 2008 to March 2009 (both included) in a primary level local hospital, in which all patients admitted to the hospital who met the inclusion criteria had their chronic medication reconciled on hospital admission. Results. A total of 469 patients were included, with 3609 medications being reconciled, of which 2466 (68.33%) had discrepancies: 667 (27.0%) unjustified and 1799 (72.9%) justified. There were no discrepancies in 1143 (31.6%). The majority of unjustified discrepancies were prescription omissions in 662 (26.8%) and duplications in 5 (0.2%). On 640 (25.9%) occasions the error reached the patient without causing any harm, and only 4 (0.16%) required monitoring. Discussion. Using an interdisciplinary approach in the reconciliation of chronic medication, many medication errors have been detected and neutralised. Discrepancies have been resolved, neutralising omissions, interactions and duplications. Drugs with a low intrinsic pharmacological value were withdrawn, and the list of reconciled medications recorded in the clinical notes(AU)

[An interdisciplinary approach to reconciling chronic medications on admission to Mora d'Ebre local hospital]. / Abordaje interdisciplinar de la conciliación de la medicación crónica al ingreso en un hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To reduce medication errors and prevent interactions and duplications using a Chronic Medication Reconciliation Program on patient admission. To create an updated reconciled medications by resolving discrepancies within 24 hours of admission to the ward. To ensure the necessary medication is given at the dose, route and at the correct intervals depending on the clinical situation of the patient. MATERIAL, PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective observational, non-randomised and uncontrolled study during the period from October 2008 to March 2009 (both included) in a primary level local hospital, in which all patients admitted to the hospital who met the inclusion criteria had their chronic medication reconciled on hospital admission. RESULTS: A total of 469 patients were included, with 3609 medications being reconciled, of which 2466 (68.33%) had discrepancies: 667 (27.0%) unjustified and 1799 (72.9%) justified. There were no discrepancies in 1143 (31.6%). The majority of unjustified discrepancies were prescription omissions in 662 (26.8%) and duplications in 5 (0.2%). On 640 (25.9%) occasions the error reached the patient without causing any harm, and only 4 (0.16%) required monitoring. DISCUSSION: Using an interdisciplinary approach in the reconciliation of chronic medication, many medication errors have been detected and neutralised. Discrepancies have been resolved, neutralising omissions, interactions and duplications. Drugs with a low intrinsic pharmacological value were withdrawn, and the list of reconciled medications recorded in the clinical notes.

Estudio de incidencia de los errores de medicación en los procesos de utilización del medicamento: prescripción, transcripción, validación, preparación, dispensación y administración en el ámbito hospitalario / Incident study of medication errors in drug use processes: prescription, transcription, validation, preparation, dispensing and administering in the hospital environment

Objetivo: Determinar la incidencia global y por etapas de los errores de medicación en 6 hospitales de Cataluña, así como los tipos de error y las consecuencias. Método: Diseño prospectivo, cuya variable global es el error de medicación. Se han excluido los errores potenciales. En cada hospital se estudiaron los ingresados en 2 unidades hasta 300 pacientes y se observaron 1.500 administraciones. Se aplicó la taxonomía del National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. El error de prescripción se detectó mediante la revisión de las prescripciones, en la que se comprobaron paciente, medicamento, adherencia a protocolos, interacciones, contraindicaciones, omisión, duplicidad terapéutica, dosis, frecuencia, vía y falta de seguimiento. En la transcripción/validación se comprobó la coincidencia con la orden médica original. En la dispensación, antes de enviar los carros de unidosis, se revisó el contenido de los cajetines, y se contrastó con el listado generado informáticamente. En planta, los observadores comprobaron transcripción, preparación y administración. En todos los procesos se registraron los datos en una hoja específica. La concordancia entre revisores fue moderada (kappa = 0,525). Resultados: Se detectaron 16,94 errores por 100 pacientes-día y 0,98 por paciente: 16 % en prescripción, 27 % en transcripción/validación, 48 % en dispensación y 9 % en administración. El 84,47 % pertenecía a la categoría B (no se alcanzó al paciente), y menos del 0,5 % causaron daño. La población, de 65 años de media, se distribuyó en una relación varón/mujer de 60/40. Los principales grupos terapéuticos fueron: agentes contra la úlcera péptica y el reflujo gastroesofágico, antitrombóticos, y otros analgésicos y antipiréticos, en los que predominaba la forma farmacéutica (..) (AU)

Objective: To determine both the global Incident, and the Incident for stages of medication errors in six Catalonian hospitals, the types of error and the consequences. Method: A prospective design, with the global variable of the medication error. Potential errors have been excluded. The patients admitted to each hospital were studied in 2 groups of up to 300 patients and 1,500 administrations were observed. The NCCMERP taxonomy was applied. The prescription error was detected through the review of prescriptions, checking the patient, medication, adherence to protocols, interactions, contraindications, omission, duplicated therapy, doses, frequency, method, and lack of follow-up. During the transcription/validation, it was verified that the prescription matched the original order. In the dispensing process, the content of the drawers was checked, comparing it to the computer generated list, before sending out the single dose trolley. The transcription, preparation and administration were observed on the wards. The information for all the procedures was registered in a specific data sheet. There was moderate concordance amongst the inspectors (kappa = 0.525). Results: 16.94 errors were detected per 100 patients-day and 0.98 errors per patient: 16 % in prescription, 27 % in transcription/validation, 48 % in dispensing, and 9 % in administration. 84.47 % were category B errors (they did not reach the patient), and < 0.5 % of the errors were harmful. The population, with an average age of 65, had a male/female ratio of 60/40. The principal therapeutic groups were: agents against peptic ulcer and GERD, antithrombotic agents, and other analgesics and antipyretics, (..) (AU)

[Incident study of medication errors in drug use processes: prescription, transcription, validation, preparation, dispensing and administering in the hospital environment]. / Estudio de incidencia de los errores de medicación en los procesos de utilización del medicamento: prescripción, transcripción, validación, preparación, dispensación y administración en el ámbito hospitalario.

OBJECTIVE: To determine both the global Incident, and the Incident for stages of medication errors in six Catalonian hospitals, the types of error and the consequences. METHOD: A prospective design, with the global variable of the medication error. Potential errors have been excluded. The patients admitted to each hospital were studied in 2 groups of up to 300 patients and 1,500 administrations were observed. The NCCMERP taxonomy was applied. The prescription error was detected through the review of prescriptions, checking the patient, medication, adherence to protocols, interactions, contraindications, omission, duplicated therapy, doses, frequency, method, and lack of follow-up. During the transcription/validation, it was verified that the prescription matched the original order. In the dispensing process, the content of the drawers was checked, comparing it to the computer generated list, before sending out the single dose trolley. The transcription, preparation and administration were observed on the wards. The information for all the procedures was registered in a specific data sheet. There was moderate concordance amongst the inspectors (kappa = 0.525). RESULTS: 16.94 errors were detected per 100 patients-day and 0.98 errors per patient: 16 % in prescription, 27 % in transcription/validation, 48 % in dispensing, and 9 % in administration. 84.47 % were category B errors (they did not reach the patient), and < 0.5 % of the errors were harmful. The population, with an average age of 65, had a male/female ratio of 60/40. The principal therapeutic groups were: agents against peptic ulcer and GERD, antithrombotic agents, and other analgesics and antipyretics, principally in a solid oral drug form (58 %). The medications per patient-day were 5.5 and the units of medication were on average 11.21, varying greatly among the institutions. The adjustment of 10 units made the results more uniform. In all the stages, omission was the most frequent error. DISCUSSION: The different methods used and different areas of the investigations make comparisons difficult. This is evident in the harmful errors, the proportion of which is affected by the detection procedure. The number of mistakes avoided during the execution of this project demonstrates the need to improve the planning of the work systems and to establish safety measures.

[Conversion of fast insulin intensive therapy to lispro insulin in type I diabetes. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of cost-effectiveness]. / Conversión de la terapia intensiva con insulina rápida a insulina lispro en la diabetes tipo 1. Análisis farmacoeconómico de coste-efectividad.

In order to analyze the initial cost-effectiveness of transfer to two treatments with insulin lispro in type 1 diabetes, a pharmaco-economic study was conducted for nine months. After an educational reinforcement, a group of 30 C-peptide-negative patients (31.8 +/- 11.5 years [mean +/- SD], time since diagnosis of diabetes of 9.2 +/- 7.1 years, and on intensive therapy for 5.3 +/- 3.1 years) initiated a 3-month basal period with their usual therapy (preprandial rapid insulin and nocturnal NPH). Patients were then randomly assigned to one of the two groups, changing rapid insulin to either lispro (L1) or lispro combined with 15% to 20% NPH insulin (L2). Cross-over was made 3 months after the first treatment. Efficacy and safety were established by the assessment of HbA1c, self-monitoring blood glucose and hypoglycemia rates. Therapy cost was measured by systematic examination of the injection devices and wastage of insulin. The mean prescribed and actually consumed doses for R, L1, L2 groups were 52.9, 57.1, 55.2 U and 60.3, 64.1, 63 U per day, respectively (p < 0.001). The average of postprandial peak glucose (9.7, 8.4, 8.3 mM; p < 0.001) and HbA1c (7.6%, 7.2%, 7.1%; p < 0.01) were significantly lower after L1 or L2 lispro therapy. Although no statistical differences in overall hypoglycemia rates were observed, fewer nocturnal episodes were detected (0.72, 0.37, 0.41 events/month). The mean daily cost for regular insulin treatment was lower (186.8, 241.8; 215.7 pts and 53.7 pts per day. Efficacy and safety for two MIT regimens containing lispro were similar in the short run. Nevertheless, the preprandial use of the fast-acting insulin analog lispro in combination with a 15%-20% intermediate-acting NPH seemed to be more cost-effective than the premeal lispro therapy alone.

Conversión de la terapia intensiva con insulina rápida a insulina lispro en la diabetes tipo 1. Análisis farmacoeconómico de coste-efectividad / Conversión of intensive therapy with rapid insulin to lispro insulin in type-1 diabetes. A cost-effectiveness assessment

Para analizar el coste y la efectividad inicial de la transferencia a dos tratamientos con insulina lispro en la diabetes tipo 1 se desarrolló un estudio farmacoeconómico durante 9 meses. Después del refuerzo educativo, un grupo de 30 pacientes con péptido-C negativo, de 31,8 ñ 11,5 años (x- ñ DE), duración de la diabetes de 9,2 ñ 7,1 años y en terapia intensiva desde hacía 5,3 ñ 3,1 años inició un período basal de 3 meses con su tratamiento habitual (insulina rápida preprandial y NPH nocturna). Luego se asignaron aleatoriamente a uno de los dos grupos, sustituyendo la insulina rápida por lispro (L1) o bien por lispro mezclada con un 15 por ciento-20 por ciento de insulina NPH (L2), cruzándose a los 3 meses. La eficacia se valoró por la HbA1c y el autoanálisis de la glucemia capilar; la seguridad por el registro minucioso de la hipoglucemia. El coste consideró el consumo real de insulina (teórico y desperdicio) y material de inyección.La dosis total prescrita fue menor en el período basal que en L1 y L2 (52,9; 57,1; 55,2 UI/día; p < 0,001) y también la realmente consumida (60,3, 64,1, 63 UI/día; p < 0,01), sin diferencias entre L1 y L2. La glucemia posprandial (9,7, 8,4, 8,3 mM; p < 0,001) y la HbA1c (7,6 por ciento, 7,2 por ciento, 7,1 por ciento; p < 0,01) disminuyeron en L1 y L2 sin incremento global de la hipoglucemia. Las crisis durante el sueño fueron más infrecuentes (0,72, 0,37, 0,41 crisis/mes; p < 0,05). El coste bruto diario del tratamiento con insulina rápida fue menor (186,8, 241,8, 215,7 pts; p < 0,001). El sobrecoste diario estimado para reducir un 1 por ciento la HbA1c fue 134,1 pts durante L1 y 53,7 en L2. La efectividad y seguridad de ambas terapias con lispro fue parecida, pero la mezcla preprandial de lispro con NPH fue más coste-efectiva (AU)