RESUMO
Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heritable skin blistering disease caused by variants in genes coding for proteins that secure cell-cell adhesion and attachment of the epidermis to the dermis. Interestingly, several proteins involved in inherited EB are also associated with autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD). In this study, we present a long-term follow-up of 15 patients suffering from recessive dystrophic or junctional EB. From these patients, 62 sera were analysed for the presence of autoantibodies associated with AIBD. We show that patients suffering from recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB) are more susceptible to developing autoantibodies against skin proteins than patients suffering from junctional EB (70% vs. 20%, respectively). Interestingly, no correlation with age was observed. Most patients showed reactivity to Type XVII collagen/linear IgA bullous dermatosis autoantigen (n = 5; 33%), followed by BP230 (n = 4; 27%), Type VII collagen (n = 4; 27%) and laminin-332 (n = 1; 7%). The pathogenicity of these autoantibodies remains a subject for future experiments.
Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes , Epidermólise Bolhosa Distrófica , Epidermólise Bolhosa Juncional , Epidermólise Bolhosa , Humanos , Epidermólise Bolhosa Distrófica/genética , Autoanticorpos , Pele/metabolismo , Epidermólise Bolhosa/metabolismo , Epidermólise Bolhosa Juncional/genéticaAssuntos
Eosinófilos , Penfigoide Bolhoso , Humanos , Basófilos , Imunoglobulina E , Colágeno Tipo XVII , Autoanticorpos , Tetraspanina 30RESUMO
This guideline has been initiated by the task force Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, including physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus-based guideline that systematically reviewed the literature on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until June 2019, with no limitations on language. While the first part of this guideline addressed methodology, as well as epidemiology, terminology, aetiology, clinical presentation and outcome measures in MMP, the second part presents the diagnostics and management of MMP. MMP should be suspected in cases with predominant mucosal lesions. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy to detect tissue-bound IgG, IgA and/or complement C3, combined with serological testing for circulating autoantibodies are recommended. In most patients, serum autoantibodies are present only in low levels and in variable proportions, depending on the clinical sites involved. Circulating autoantibodies are determined by indirect IF assays using tissue substrates, or ELISA using different recombinant forms of the target antigens or immunoblotting using different substrates. The major target antigen in MMP is type XVII collagen (BP180), although in 10-25% of patients laminin 332 is recognized. In 25-30% of MMP patients with anti-laminin 332 reactivity, malignancies have been associated. As first-line treatment of mild/moderate MMP, dapsone, methotrexate or tetracyclines and/or topical corticosteroids are recommended. For severe MMP, dapsone and oral or intravenous cyclophosphamide and/or oral corticosteroids are recommended as first-line regimens. Additional recommendations are given, tailored to treatment of single-site MMP such as oral, ocular, laryngeal, oesophageal and genital MMP, as well as the diagnosis of ocular MMP. Treatment recommendations are limited by the complete lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials.
Assuntos
Dermatologia , Penfigoide Mucomembranoso Benigno , Penfigoide Bolhoso , Venereologia , Autoanticorpos , Autoantígenos , Humanos , Mucosa , Penfigoide Mucomembranoso Benigno/diagnóstico , Penfigoide Mucomembranoso Benigno/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
This guideline on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) has been elaborated by the Task Force for Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) with a contribution of physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus-based guideline encompassing a systematic review of the literature until June 2019 in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. This first part covers methodology, the clinical definition of MMP, epidemiology, MMP subtypes, immunopathological characteristics, disease assessment and outcome scores. MMP describes a group of autoimmune skin and mucous membrane blistering diseases, characterized by a chronic course and by predominant involvement of the mucous membranes, such as the oral, ocular, nasal, nasopharyngeal, anogenital, laryngeal and oesophageal mucosa. MMP patients may present with mono- or multisite involvement. Patients' autoantibodies have been shown to be predominantly directed against BP180 (also called BPAG2, type XVII collagen), BP230, laminin 332 and type VII collagen, components of junctional adhesion complexes promoting epithelial stromal attachment in stratified epithelia. Various disease assessment scores are available, including the Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (MMPDAI), the Autoimmune Bullous Skin disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS), the 'Cicatrising Conjunctivitis Assessment Tool' and the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS). Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including DLQI, ABQOL and TABQOL, can be used for assessment of quality of life to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and monitor disease course.
Assuntos
Dermatologia , Penfigoide Mucomembranoso Benigno , Penfigoide Bolhoso , Venereologia , Autoanticorpos , Autoantígenos , Humanos , Mucosa , Penfigoide Mucomembranoso Benigno/diagnóstico , Penfigoide Mucomembranoso Benigno/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Revisões Sistemáticas como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Non-bullous pemphigoid (NBP) is a pemphigoid variant which frequently resembles other pruritic skin diseases. In contrast with bullous pemphigoid (BP), blisters are absent. In BP, previous studies showed that IgE autoantibodies may be involved in its pathogenesis. IgE-activated mast cells, basophils and eosinophils may participate in BP by inducing pruritus and possibly blister formation, although the differential role of IgE in NBP compared with BP has not yet been described. OBJECTIVE: To assess IgE in serum and skin of NBP and BP patients. METHODS: We examined total IgE and pemphigoid-specific IgE in the serum of 68 NBP and 50 BP patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Sera of 25 pemphigus patients and 25 elderly patients with pruritus were included as controls. Skin biopsies of 14 NBP and 14 BP patients with the highest IgE titres to NC16A were stained for IgE by immunofluorescence techniques. RESULTS: Total IgE was elevated in 63% of NBP and 60% of BP patients, and in 20% of pemphigus controls, as well as 60% of elderly controls. IgE ELISAs were more frequently positive in BP than in NBP (NC16A 18% vs. 9%, P = 0.139; BP230 34% vs. 22%, P = 0.149). IgE ELISAs for NC16A and BP230 were positive in 8% and 20% of elderly controls, respectively, while all pemphigus controls were negative. Two of 28 biopsies (7%; one NBP, one BP) showed linear IgE along the basement membrane zone, while in most biopsies (71% NBP; 86% BP) IgE was bound to dermal cells. CONCLUSION: Since IgE was present in the serum and skin of both NBP and BP patients, this supports IgE-dependent mechanisms common to both diseases, such as pruritus. However, it remains to be elucidated whether IgE contributes to blister formation in BP.
Assuntos
Penfigoide Bolhoso , Idoso , Autoanticorpos , Autoantígenos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E , Colágenos não FibrilaresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antilaminin-332 mucous membrane pemphigoid is a chronic severe pemphigoid disease characterized by autoantibodies to laminin-332. At present no commercial assay is available to demonstrate antilaminin-332 antibodies, and diagnosis relies on in-house techniques with limited sensitivities. OBJECTIVES: In order to move, keratinocytes cultured in vitro secrete laminin-332 to attach to the culture dish. In that way, they leave behind a unique footprint trail of laminin-332. We aimed to develop a sensitive and specific laboratory assay to determine antilaminin-332 autoantibodies in patient serum based on binding of patient IgG to these unique footprints. METHODS: Normal human keratinocytes were grown on glass coverslips and incubated with patient or control serum for 1 h. The binding of IgG was then investigated by immunofluorescence. After validating the test for its ability to identify antilaminin-332 autoantibodies it was converted into a daily available test based on binding of IgG to dried coverslips that can be stored frozen. The staining patterns of sera from patients with antilaminin-332 pemphigoid were then compared with those of sera from patients with other autoimmune bullous diseases and normal human sera. RESULTS: IgG of all antilaminin-332 pemphigoid sera (n = 16) bound to laminin-332 footprints, while all normal human controls (n = 55) were negative. From the sera of patients with other diseases (n = 72) four sera tested positive. The footprint assay was also positive for sera that were negative by salt-split skin analysis, demonstrating that it is a very sensitive technique. CONCLUSIONS: The keratinocyte footprint assay is a fast and specific assay to confirm or rule out the presence of antilaminin-332 autoantibodies. What's already known about this topic? Antilaminin-332 mucous membrane pemphigoid is a severe form of pemphigoid, and patients may have an increased risk of malignancies. The diagnosis of antilaminin-332 mucous membrane pemphigoid is complicated by the lack of specific commercial tests for antilaminin-332 antibodies and can be confirmed only in specialized laboratories. Keratinocytes in culture need laminin-332 for adhesion and migration and therefore deposit it on the bottom of the culture dish. What does this study add? The keratinocyte footprint assay detects antilaminin-332 autoantibodies in patient serum using the native laminin-332 produced by cultured keratinocytes. What is the translational message? The keratinocyte footprint assay is a fast and specific assay to confirm or rule out the presence of antilaminin-332 autoantibodies.
Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes , Penfigoide Mucomembranoso Benigno , Penfigoide Bolhoso , Autoanticorpos , Autoantígenos , Feminino , Humanos , Queratinócitos , Masculino , Penfigoide Bolhoso/diagnósticoRESUMO
Pemphigoid diseases are autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases affecting the skin and mucous membranes, which are caused by autoantibodies targeting structural hemidesmosomal proteins or hemidesmosome-associated proteins. Variants of pemphigoid can be differentiated based on targeted antigens and clinical aspects. In this review, we will discuss pemphigoid variants that predominantly affect the skin, and provide clinicians with clues to diagnosis.
Assuntos
Epidermólise Bolhosa Adquirida/diagnóstico , Dermatose Linear Bolhosa por IgA/diagnóstico , Penfigoide Gestacional/diagnóstico , Penfigoide Bolhoso/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , GravidezAssuntos
Antígenos de Histocompatibilidade Classe II/genética , Pênfigo/genética , Brasil/etnologia , Estudos Transversais , Frequência do Gene/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença/etnologia , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Heterozigoto , Homozigoto , Humanos , Países Baixos/etnologia , Pênfigo/etnologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Various different mucocutaneous symptoms may affect up to 80 % of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate, various unspecific, but otherwise typical clinical symptoms of skin and mucous membranes that arise in SLE patients other than those defined as SLE criteria such as butterfly rash, chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, oral ulcers, and increased photosensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extensive search of peer-reviewed scientific articles was performed, medical histories of several SLE patients seen in our department were analyzed, and the rare disease courses in three SLE patients are presented. RESULTS: Here we present a variety of unspecific but typical mucocutaneous manifestations in SLE patients: periungual erythema, periungual telangiectasia and periungual splinter hemorrhage, papules on the dorsum of the hands, scaling erythema, sometimes associated with necrosis, especially of the ears, along with complement deficiency, and the bizarre necroses of antiphospholipid syndrome. Furthermore, we show the typical clinico-histological features of neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis, as well as those of bullous SLE and finally a severe course of bacterial sepsis with Neisseria flavescens/macacae. CONCLUSIONS: Here we show several unspecific but rather typical mucocutaneous symptoms in lupus patients that are indicative of SLE and thus may lead to an early diagnosis. Also, life-threatening bacterial sepsis may occur with microorganisms that are commonly considered "apathogenic", such as Neisseria flavescens/macacae, which exclusively affect immunosuppressed patients.