Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet J ; 199(3): 439-45, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24456797

RESUMO

Six serological assays for the diagnosis of ovine brucellosis, due to Brucella melitensis were evaluated. Reference serum samples from sheep of known B. melitensis infection status (n=118) were assessed using the Rose Bengal test (RBT), complement fixation test (CFT) and four commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), including two indirect ELISAs (iELISAs), one competitive ELISA (cELISA) and one blocking ELISA (bELISA). The highest differential positive rates (DPR) were obtained with the cELISA and bELISA, while the lowest DPR was estimated using iELISAs. A latent class analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of the CFT, RBT and bELISA using 1827 sera from sheep undergoing testing as part of a surveillance and control programme. Lower sensitivity and specificity were obtained for the three serological tests when the field samples were used. A higher DPR was achieved by the CFT, compared to bELISA and RBT. The results suggest that ELISAs, and particularly the bELISA, might be suitable for inclusion in the European Union legislation on intra-community trade for diagnosing B. melitensis infection in sheep, as it has a similar test performance compared to the RBT.


Assuntos
Brucella melitensis/isolamento & purificação , Brucelose/veterinária , Testes de Fixação de Complemento/veterinária , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/veterinária , Rosa Bengala , Doenças dos Ovinos/diagnóstico , Animais , Brucelose/diagnóstico , Brucelose/microbiologia , Testes de Fixação de Complemento/métodos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/veterinária , Ovinos , Doenças dos Ovinos/microbiologia , Espanha
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...