SEOM-GEICO clinical guideline on epithelial ovarian cancer (2023).

In recent years, the incorporation of new strategies to the therapeutic armamentarium has completely changed the outcomes of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The identification of new predictive and prognostic biomarkers has also enabled the selection of those patients more likely to respond to targeted agents. Nevertheless, EOC is still a highly lethal disease and resistance to many of these new agents is common. The objective of this guideline is to summarize the most relevant strategies to manage EOC, to help the clinician throughout the challenging diagnostic and therapeutic processes and to provide evidence-based recommendations.

Aurora kinase inhibitors: a new class of drugs targeting the regulatory mitotic system.

The present review gives a perspective on the Aurora kinase family members, their function in normal cells, their role in cancer progression as well as their potential as target for anticancer treatment. Mitosis has been an important target for anticancer therapy development, leading to some specific drugs mainly addressing Tubulines, as a key structure of the mitotic spindle. Vinca alkaloids, taxanes or epotilones are good examples of conventionally developed antimitotic agents. However, novel classes of antineoplastic drugs are being studied, targeting the regulatory system that controls functional aspects of mitosis, such as Aurora or Polo-like kinases or Kinespondin inhibitors. The specific role of the different Aurora kinase proteins as regulator enzymes of the mitotic process in normal cells is discussed. Some of the mechanisms that link Aurora overexpression with cancer are also considered. Thereafter, the clinical and preclinical development of the different Aurora kinase inhibitors is presented. This is nowadays a very active area of therapeutic research and at least, sixteen new compounds are being studied as potential antineoplastic drugs. Most of them are in a very early phase of clinical development. However, we summarized the most recently published findings related with these drugs: main characteristics, way of administration, dose limiting toxicities and recommended doses for further studies. Another important aspect in Aurora kinase inhibition is the study and validation of potential biomarkers to optimize the clinical development. Several studies included pharmacodynamic assessments in normal blood cells, skin or/and tumor biopsies. Several proposals included a higher mitotic index, a decreased number of mitosis with bipolar spindles or normal alignment of chromosomes and inhibition of histone H3 phosphorylation. Future strategies and challenges for trials with Aurora kinase inhibitors are also discussed.

Impact of a mammography screening programme on the breast cancer population of the Region of Valencia (Spain).

OBJECTIVE: Randomised clinical trials with a control arm of non-screened patients are nowadays ethically impossible. The aim of this study was to establish the impact of mammography screening on a non-selected population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1993 and December 2002, 3662 patients were included, 2313 in the screened group and 1349 in the unscreened group. RESULTS: 55.3% of the screened patients were diagnosed in stage I vs. 26.1% in the non-screened group. The proportion of stage III-IV was 4.6% and 19.8% for the screened and unscreened groups respectively (p<0.001). 48.8% in the screening group were submitted to mastectomy vs. 66.4% of the unscreened patients (p<0.001). Overall survival was superior for the prevalent cases in the screening group, with a relative risk of 0.49, and was not significant for the incident cases. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of breast cancer in the mammography screening programme of the Region of Valencia significantly increases conservative surgery rates and suggests an improvement in survival in prevalent cases. The increased rate of early stages in these patients could be the main reason of this benefit.

Primary carcinoid tumour of the pancreas.

UNLABELLED: Pancreatic carcinoid tumours are extremely infrequent. Usually, the biological behaviour is indolent and diagnosis is late and often casual. We present the case of a patient initially diagnosed as having liver metastasis of unknown origin. PET identified a primary pancreatic site and the initial histologic diagnosis was adenocarcinoma. Following an uncertain response to chemo- and radio-therapy the repeat histologic assessment indicated a carcinoid tumour of the pancreas. After complete surgical resection and liver transplantation, patient remains free of disease. CONCLUSIONS: The co-existence of several diseases with similar morpho-structural features makes diagnosis complicated. PET is of uncertain use in the evaluation of carcinoid tumours, and is considered inferior to 111Indium-octreotide scan. The only curative treatment is surgical resection, with liver transplantation as a valid option in the treatment of these tumours.