Adalimumab Maintenance Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis: Outcomes by Prior Anti-TNF Use and Efficacy of Dose Escalation.

BACKGROUND: The impact of prior anti-TNF use on "real-life" outcomes of adalimumab therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC) is not well known. AIM: To compare the influence of prior anti-TNF use on the outcomes of adalimumab maintenance treatment in UC patients. We also assessed the effectiveness of adalimumab dose escalation. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included consecutive UC who advanced to an adalimumab maintenance regimen. Patients in whom adalimumab was discontinued prior to week eight of treatment were excluded. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were the cumulative probabilities of adalimumab failure-free survival and colectomy-free survival. We also assessed the need for and the effectiveness of adalimumab dose escalation. RESULTS: Of 184 UC on maintenance treatment with adalimumab, 116 (63%) had previous anti-TNF use. After a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range 13-49), 112 patients (60%) maintained corticosteroid-free clinical response. Sixty-nine patients (37%) had adalimumab failure, and 22 (12%) needed colectomy. Anti-TNF-naïve patients had significantly lower adjusted rates of adalimumab failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; p < 0.001), adalimumab dose escalation (HR 0.35; p = 0.002), and need for colectomy (HR 0.26; p < 0.004). Seventy-six patients (41%) needed dose escalation after secondary loss of response, and 47% of these regained response after escalation. Short-term response after escalation was identified as a significant predictor of colectomy avoidance (HR 0.53; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In this "real-life" cohort of UC patients on maintenance treatment with adalimumab, anti-TNF-naïve patients had significantly better long-term outcomes. Adalimumab dose escalation enabled recovery of response in nearly half of patients.

Adalimumab is effective in long-term real life clinical practice in both luminal and perianal Crohn's disease. The Madrid experience

Objetivo Evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de adalimumab en pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn (EC) de la comunidad de Madrid e identificar los factores predictivos de respuesta.MétodosEstudio multicéntrico retrospectivo de todos los pacientes con EC tratados con adalimumab en 9 hospitales de la Comunidad de Madrid (España). Se llevó a cabo análisis univariado y multivariado de predictores de respuesta.Resultados174 pacientes incluidos (50% varones) con una mediana de seguimiento de 40 semanas. El 30% tenía enfermedad fistulosa perianal activa al inicio de la terapia con adalimumab. El 59% habían sido tratados previamente con infliximab, siendo la pérdida de respuesta (42,2%) la causa más frecuente de la retirada del fármaco. Un 33% de los pacientes necesitaron aumentar la dosis de todos los demás cada semana. La mediana del tiempo para este aumento de la dosis fue de 33 semanas (rango 2-120). Los porcentajes de respuesta completa a las 4 semanas, 6 meses y al final del seguimiento fueron de 63, 70 y 63% en la enfermedad luminal y 49, 50 y 41% en la enfermedad perianal, respectivamente. La prevalencia de eventos adversos fue de 18% (más frecuente: 5 abscesos) provocando la retirada del fármaco en el 21% de ellos.ConclusionesEl adalimumab es eficaz y seguro en el tratamiento de la EC, incluso en los casos refractarios a infliximab(AU)

Objective To evaluate effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in CD patients of the Madrid area and identify predictors of response.MethodsMulticenter retrospective survey of all CD patients treated with adalimumab in 9 hospitals of the Madrid area (Spain). Univariate and multivariate analysis of predictors of response was performed.Results174 patients included (50% males) with a median follow-up of 40 weeks. 30% had active perianal fistulizing disease at the beginning of the therapy with adalimumab. 59% had been previously treated with infliximab, being the lost of response (42.2%) the most frequent cause of withdrawal of the drug. 33% of patients needed dose escalation from every-other week to everyweek. The median time for this dose escalation was 33 weeks (range 2-120). The percentages of complete response at 4 weeks, 6 months and end of follow-up were 63, 70 and 63% in luminal disease and 49, 50 and 41% in perianal disease respectively. The prevalence of adverse events was 18% (most frequent was: 5 abscesses) causing the withdrawal of the drug in 21% of them.ConclusionsAdalimumab is effective and safe for the management of CD, even in refractory cases to infliximab(AU)

Adalimumab is effective in long-term real life clinical practice in both luminal and perianal Crohn's disease. The Madrid experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in CD patients of the Madrid area and identify predictors of response. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective survey of all CD patients treated with adalimumab in 9 hospitals of the Madrid area (Spain). Univariate and multivariate analysis of predictors of response was performed. RESULTS: 174 patients included (50% males) with a median follow-up of 40 weeks. 30% had active perianal fistulizing disease at the beginning of the therapy with adalimumab. 59% had been previously treated with infliximab, being the lost of response (42.2%) the most frequent cause of withdrawal of the drug. 33% of patients needed dose escalation from every-other week to every week. The median time for this dose escalation was 33 weeks (range 2-120). The percentages of complete response at 4 weeks, 6 months and end of follow-up were 63, 70 and 63% in luminal disease and 49, 50 and 41% in perianal disease respectively. The prevalence of adverse events was 18% (most frequent was: 5 abscesses) causing the withdrawal of the drug in 21% of them. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab is effective and safe for the management of CD, even in refractory cases to infliximab.

N-acetyl-L-cysteine combined with mesalamine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oral N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) co-administration with mesalamine in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. METHODS: Thirty seven patients with mild to moderate UC were randomized to receive a four-wk course of oral mesalamine (2.4 g/d) plus N-acetyl-L-cysteine (0.8 g/d) (group A) or mesalamine plus placebo (group B). Patients were monitored using the Modified Truelove-Witts Severity Index (MTWSI). The primary endpoint was clinical remission (MTWSI < or = 2) at 4 wk. Secondary endpoints were clinical response (defined as a reduction from baseline in the MTWSI of > or = 2 points) and drug safety. The serum TNF-alpha, interleukin-6, interleukin-8 and MCP-1 were evaluated at baseline and at 4 wk of treatment. RESULTS: Analysis per-protocol criteria showed clinical remission rates of 63% and 50% after 4 wk treatment with mesalamine plus N-acetyl-L-cysteine (group A) and mesalamine plus placebo (group B) respectively (OR = 1.71; 95% CI: 0.46 to 6.36; P = 0.19; NNT = 7.7). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of data indicated a significant reduction of MTWSI in group A (P = 0.046) with respect to basal condition without significant changes in the group B (P = 0.735) during treatment. Clinical responses were 66% (group A) vs 44% (group B) after 4 wk of treatment (OR = 2.5; 95% CI: 0.64 to 9.65; P = 0.11; NNT = 4.5). Clinical improvement in group A correlated with a decrease of IL-8 and MCP-1. Rates of adverse events did not differ significantly between both groups. CONCLUSION: In group A (oral NAC combined with mesalamine) contrarily to group B (mesalamine alone), the clinical improvement correlates with a decrease of chemokines such as MCP-1 and IL-8. NAC addition not produced any side effects.