Efficacy of dual carbapenem treatment in a murine sepsis model of infection due to carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of a dual carbapenem combination containing imipenem plus meropenem against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii producing carbapenemases OXA-23 or OXA-58. METHODS: An experimental model of peritonitis using C57BL/6J female mice was developed and the minimum lethal doses were calculated for infections due to OXA-23 or OXA-58 producers of A. baumannii clinical isolates. The efficacies of the carbapenems in monotherapy and in combination were tested. RESULTS: Meropenem was better than imipenem in mice infected with either of the carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) strains. The combination of meropenem plus imipenem significantly improved the clearance of CRAbs from spleen compared with non-treated groups. The carbapenem-containing combination was better than imipenem for treating mice infected with both carbapenemase producers. In blood, the carbapenem combination significantly decreased the bacterial load of the OXA-23 producers compared with imipenem or meropenem used in monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that dual carbapenem combination could be an option for the treatment of infections due to carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii such as OXA-23 and OXA-58 producers.

Efficacy of Lysophosphatidylcholine in Combination with Antimicrobial Agents against Acinetobacter baumannii in Experimental Murine Peritoneal Sepsis and Pneumonia Models.

Immune response stimulation to prevent infection progression may be an adjuvant to antimicrobial treatment. Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) is an immunomodulator involved in immune cell recruitment and activation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LPC in combination with colistin, tigecycline, or imipenem in experimental murine models of peritoneal sepsis and pneumonia. We used Acinetobacter baumannii strain Ab9, which is susceptible to colistin, tigecycline, and imipenem, and multidrug-resistant strain Ab186, which is susceptible to colistin and resistant to tigecycline and imipenem. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters for colistin, tigecycline, and imipenem and the 100% minimal lethal dose (MLD100) were determined for both strains. The therapeutic efficacies of LPC, colistin (60 mg/kg of body weight/day), tigecycline (10 mg/kg/day), and imipenem (180 mg/kg/day), alone or in combination, were assessed against Ab9 and Ab186 at the MLD100 in murine peritoneal sepsis and pneumonia models. The levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, i.e., tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-10 (IL-10), were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the same experimental models after inoculating mice with the MLD of both strains. LPC in combination with colistin, tigecycline, or imipenem markedly enhanced the bacterial clearance of Ab9 and Ab186 from the spleen and lungs and reduced bacteremia and mouse mortality rates (P < 0.05) compared with those for colistin, tigecycline, and imipenem monotherapies. Moreover, at 4 h post-bacterial infection, Ab9 induced higher TNF-α and lower IL-10 levels than those with Ab186 (4 µg/ml versus 3 µg/ml [P < 0.05] and 2 µg/ml versus 3.4 µg/ml [P < 0.05], respectively). LPC treatment combined with colistin, tigecycline, or imipenem modestly reduced the severity of infection by A. baumannii strains with different resistance phenotypes compared to LPC monotherapy in both experimental models.

Efficacy of cecropin A-melittin peptides on a sepsis model of infection by pan-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Pan-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii have prompted the search for therapeutic alternatives. We evaluate the efficacy of four cecropin A-melittin hybrid peptides (CA-M) in vivo. Toxicity was determined in mouse erythrocytes and in mice (lethal dose parameters were LD(0), LD(50), LD(100)). Protective dose 50 (PD(50)) was determined by inoculating groups of ten mice with the minimal lethal dose of A. baumannii (BMLD) and treating with doses of each CA-M from 0.5 mg/kg to LD(0). The activity of CA-Ms against A. baumannii was assessed in a peritoneal sepsis model. Mice were sacrificed at 0 and 1, 3, 5, and 7-h post-treatment. Spleen and peritoneal fluid bacterial concentrations were measured. CA(1-8)M(1-18) was the less haemolytic on mouse erythrocytes. LD(0) (mg/kg) was 32 for CA(1-8)M(1-18), CA(1-7)M(2-9), and Oct-CA(1-7)M(2-9), and 16 for CA(1-7)M(5-9). PD(50) was not achieved with non-toxic doses (≤ LD(0)). In the sepsis model, all CA-Ms were bacteriostatic in spleen, and decreased bacterial concentration (p < 0.05) in peritoneal fluid, at 1-h post-treatment; at later times, bacterial regrowth was observed in peritoneal fluid. CA-Ms showed local short-term efficacy in the peritoneal sepsis model caused by pan-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Efficacy of rifampin, in monotherapy and in combinations, in an experimental murine pneumonia model caused by panresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains.

The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of rifampin, and its combinations with imipenem or sulbactam, in an experimental pneumonia model caused by two panresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains (HUVR99 and HUVR113). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) (µg/ml) of the strains were rifampin 128/>128 for both strains, imipenem 128/>256 and 256/>256 for HUVR99 and HUVR113, respectively, and sulbactam >256/>256 for both strains. In time-kill studies, at MICs, rifampin was bactericidal for both strains and sulbactam against the HUVR99 strain. Rifampin plus imipenem or sulbactam, at the MIC or mice C (max), were synergistic. In vivo, against HUVR99 and HUVR113, rifampin (73% and 40%) and its combinations improved the survival with respect to the control group (20% and 0%, p < 0.05), respectively. Rifampin (87% and 46%) and its combinations improved the sterilization of blood cultures with respect to the control groups (0%, p < 0.05). In regard to the bacterial clearance from lungs, rifampin (2.57 ± 2.47 and 5.35 ± 3.03 log(10) cfu/g) and its combinations with imipenem or sulbactam diminished the bacterial lung concentration with respect to the control group (10.89 ± 3.00 and 11.86 ± 0.49, p < 0.05) with both strains. In conclusion, rifampin alone or associated to imipenem or sulbactam were effective for the treatment of murine pneumonia caused by selected panresistant A. baumannii strains.

Local imipenem activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa decreases in vivo in the presence of siliconized latex.

Zinc eluted from siliconized latex (SL) increases resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem in vitro. A foreign body peritonitis model was used to evaluate the activity of imipenem using SL or silicone (S) implants. No differences were observed in mortality, positive blood cultures and tissue bacterial counts between SL and S implants. Implant-associated counts, however, were significantly higher in the SL group. It is concluded that SL decreases the activity of imipenem against P. aeruginosa.

Efficacy of fosfomycin and its combination with linezolid, vancomycin and imipenem in an experimental peritonitis model caused by a Staphylococcus aureus strain with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of therapies including fosfomycin against clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (hGISA). Time-kill curves were performed over 24 h. Peritonitis in C57BL/6 mice was induced by intraperitoneal inoculation of 10(8) CFU/ml. Four hours later (0 h), therapy was started and the treatment groups were: control (not treated), fosfomycin (100 mg/kg/5 h), vancomycin (60 mg/kg/5 h), imipenem (30 mg/kg/5 h), fosfomycin plus linezolid, fosfomycin plus vancomycin and fosfomycin plus imipenem, receiving subcutaneous therapy over 25 h. Bacterial counts in peritoneal fluid, bacteraemia and mortality rates were determined. In vitro, fosfomycin showed a synergistic effect when combined with the other antimicrobials tested. In the animal model, fosfomycin combinations were effective and significantly reduced the bacteraemia rates achieved in the control, imipenem and vancomycin groups (p < 0.05). The best combination in vivo was fosfomycin plus imipenem. Also, fosfomycin plus linezolid was significantly better than vancomycin alone, reducing the bacterial concentration in the peritoneal fluid. In conclusion, in vitro and in vivo, fosfomycin in combination with linezolid, vancomycin or imipenem exerted a good activity. Fosfomycin plus imipenem was the most active combination, decreasing 3 log CFU/ml, and appears to be a promising combination for clinical practice.

In vitro and in vivo activities of linezolid alone and combined with vancomycin and imipenem against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of linezolid (35 mg/kg/5 h), vancomycin (60 mg/kg/5 h), imipenem (30 mg/kg/5 h), linezolid+imipenem, linezolid+vancomycin and vancomycin+imipenem against two clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides using time-kill curves and the murine peritonitis model. Time-kill curves were performed over 24 h. For the murine peritonitis model, peritonitis was induced by the intraperitoneal inoculation of 10(8) CFU/ml of each bacterial strain. Four hours later (0 h), the mice were randomly assigned to a control group or to therapeutic groups receiving subcutaneous treatment for 25 h. Bacterial counts in peritoneal fluid, bacteraemia and mortality rates were determined. The time-kill curves showed that the addition of linezolid to imipenem yielded synergistic results after 24 h. The addition of linezolid decreased vancomycin activity. In the animal model, vancomycin and linezolid monotherapies produced comparable bacterial decreases in mice infected with each strain but linezolid achieved higher rates of blood sterilisation. Linezolid tested either in monotherapy or in combination showed similar efficacy against both strains in terms of bacterial killing, number of negative blood cultures and survival. Linezolid and vancomycin were moderately bactericidal and similar in efficacy against glycopeptide-intermediate or -resistant S. aureus. Linezolid combinations, as effective as linezolid tested alone, could be considered as alternative options for the treatment of glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) infections.

Efficacy of tigecycline vs. imipenem in the treatment of experimental Acinetobacter baumannii murine pneumonia.

The in vivo activity of tigecycline was evaluated in an experimental pneumonia model (C57BL/6 mice) by Acinetobacter baumannii. Two clinical strains were used: minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem and tigecycline 1 and 2 microg/mL (imipenem-susceptible, IPM-S), and 8 and 2 microg/mL (imipenem-intermediate, IPM-I), respectively. For imipenem (30 mg/Kg), T/CMI (h) were 1.04 and 0.51 for IPM-S and IPM-I, respectively. For tigecycline (5 mg/Kg), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC(0-24 h) (serum and lung) were 9.24 and 4.37 (for the two strains), respectively. In the efficacy experiments with the IPM-S, imipenem (log CFU/g 3.59 +/- 0.78, p = 0.006) and tigecycline (2.82 +/- 1.2, p = 0.054) decreased the bacterial counts in lungs with respect to its controls; with the IPM-I, both imipenem (1.21 +/- 0.52, p = 0.002) and tigecycline (3.21 +/- 0.28, p = 0.035) decreased the bacterial counts with respect to the controls. In the survival experiments, with the IPM-S, the mortality was the same in the control (67%) and in the tigecycline (77%) groups, and imipenem reduced it (21%, p = 0.025); with the IPM-I, the mortality was the same in the control (87%) and in the tigecycline (85%) groups, and imipenem (0%) reduced it (p < 0.001). In summary, the present study shows that tigecycline is less efficacious than imipenem in the treatment of experimental A. baumannii pneumonia caused by IPM-S and IPM-I strains.

Activity of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in experimental pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae deficient in porins, expressing active efflux and producing QnrA1.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the activities of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in a murine model of pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae C2 (with altered GyrA, deficient in porins and expressing active efflux of quinolones) and the transconjugant C2pMG252 derived from it and expressing the qnrA1 determinant. MICs and MBCs of the two quinolones were determined according to CLSI guidelines. Time-kill curves (at 1x and 4x MIC) were also performed to assess bactericidal activity. An experimental model of pneumonia in mice was evaluated. Groups of 15 mice were infected with either strain and treated with ciprofloxacin (80 mg/kg/day) or levofloxacin (100 mg/kg/day). Control non-treated animals were also evaluated. In the case of strain C2, log(10) CFU/g of lung in non-treated animals was 9.16 +/- 2.16. This value was reduced to 3.53 +/- 1.04 (p <0.001) and 3.38 +/- 0.46 (p <0.001) in animals treated with ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin, respectively. Percentages of surviving mice were 26.7% (control group) and 100% (both ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin; p <0.001 vs. controls). Bacterial counts (log(10) CFU/g) in lungs of animals infected with strain C2pMG252 were 9.65 +/- 2.49 in non-treated animals and 7.74 +/- 2.67 and 7.57 +/- 3.84 for those treated with ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin, respectively (p >0.05 vs. control group). Of non-treated animals infected with strain C2pMG252, 14.3% survived. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin improved the survival in these mice (53.3% for both antimicrobials, p 0.03). In conclusion, the expression of qnrA1 in K. pneumoniae with additional mechanisms of resistance causes decreased efficacy of fluoroquinolones in a pneumonia model in mice.

Efficacy of amoxycillin-clavulanate in an experimental model of murine pneumonia caused by AmpC-non-hyperproducing clinical isolates of Escherichia coli resistant to cefoxitin.

The algorithms included in most automated systems used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (e.g., Vitek 2) consider that Escherichia coli isolates resistant to cefoxitin are AmpC-hyperproducers and, consequently, resistant also to amoxycillin-clavulanate. However, a recent study revealed that 30% of E. coli clinical isolates resistant to cefoxitin remained susceptible in vitro to amoxycillin-clavulanate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the in-vivo efficacy of amoxycillin-clavulanate in the treatment of an experimental model of pneumonia, using two clonally related isolates (with identical repetitive extragenic palindromic sequence (REP)-PCR patterns) of AmpC-non-hyperproducing and OmpF-lacking E. coli (Ec985 and Ec571) that were resistant to cefoxitin and susceptible to cefotaxime and amoxycillin-clavulanate. MICs were determined using a microdilution technique, and in-vitro bactericidal activity was tested using time-kill assays. The in-vivo efficacy of amoxycillin, amoxycillin-clavulanate and cefotaxime against both isolates was tested in a murine pneumonia model using immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice. Ec571 (a TEM-1/2 producer) was resistant to amoxycillin, whereas Ec985 (a TEM-1/2 non-producer) was susceptible. Amoxycillin, amoxycillin-clavulanate and cefotaxime were bactericidal for Ec985, and amoxycillin-clavulanate and cefotaxime were bactericidal for Ec571 at different concentrations and time-points, as determined using time-kill assays. Treatment with amoxycillin, amoxycillin-clavulanate and cefotaxime reduced the bacterial lung concentration of Ec985 compared with non-treated controls (p <0.05), whereas amoxycillin-clavulanate and cefotaxime showed efficacy against Ec571 when compared with the control and amoxycillin groups (p <0.05). Regardless of the exact underlying mechanism(s) of resistance, amoxycillin-clavulanate was effective in the experimental murine model in the treatment of pneumonia caused by AmpC-non-hyperproducing strains of E. coli resistant to cefoxitin.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessment of the in-vivo efficacy of imipenem alone or in combination with amikacin for the treatment of experimental multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia.

A guinea-pig pneumonia model involving imipenem-susceptible and imipenem-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii was developed to assess the in-vitro and in-vivo activities of imipenem, alone or in combination with amikacin, and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Serum levels were measured by bioassay (imipenem) or immunoassay (amikacin), followed by calculation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters (Cmax, AUC, t1/2, Cmax/MIC, AUC/MIC, and Deltat/MIC). In-vivo efficacy was evaluated by comparing bacterial counts in the lungs of treatment groups with end-of-therapy controls by anova and post-hoc tests. Decreases in the Cmax (13.4%), AUC (13%), t1/2 (25%) and Deltat/MIC (11.8-32.2%) of imipenem were observed when it was administered with amikacin, compared with administration of imipenem alone. Similarly, decreases in the Cmax (34.5%), AUC (11.6%), Cmax/MIC (34.5%) and AUC/MIC (11.7%) of amikacin were observed when it was administered with imipenem. Bacterial counts in lungs were reduced by imipenem (p 0.004) with the imipenem-susceptible strain, and by amikacin (p 0.001) with the imipenem-resistant strain. The combination of imipenem plus amikacin was inferior to imipenem alone with the imipenem-susceptible strain (p 0.01), despite their in-vitro synergy, and was inferior to amikacin alone with the imipenem-resistant strain (p < 0.0001). In summary, combined use of imipenem with amikacin was less efficacious than monotherapy, probably because of a drug-drug interaction that resulted in decreased pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters for both antimicrobial agents.

Reliability of the E-test method for detection of colistin resistance in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii.

We compared the E-test to the broth microdilution method for testing the susceptibility of 115 clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii to colistin. Twenty-two (19.1%) strains were resistant to colistin and 93 (80.8%) strains were susceptible according to the reference broth microdilution method. A categorical agreement of 98.2% was found, with only two (1.7%) very major errors. Agreement within 1 twofold dilution between the E-test and the broth microdilution was 16.5%. Complete agreement was found for the strains for which MICs fell within the range of 0.25 to 1 microg of colistin/ml. However, there was poor concordance, particularly in extreme dilutions with higher MICs by the E-test method.

Activity of cefepime and carbapenems in experimental pneumonia caused by porin-deficient Klebsiella pneumoniae producing FOX-5 beta-lactamase.

The in-vivo activities of cefepime, imipenem and meropenem against the porin-deficient strain Klebsiella pneumoniae C2 and its derivative K. pneumoniae C2(pMG252) coding for the AmpC-type beta-lactamase FOX-5 were determined. Bactericidal activities were determined with the kill-curve method. A pneumonia model in guinea-pigs was developed, and Cmax, t(1/2) and DeltaT/MIC were calculated for the three agents tested. Animals were treated for 72 h with sterile saline (control group) or with cefepime, imipenem or meropenem (240 mg/kg/day, intramuscularly, three times daily). Bacterial counts in lungs (log10 CFU/g tissue) were determined by serial dilution. MICs (mg/L) of cefepime, imipenem and meropenem against K. pneumoniae C2/K. pneumoniae C2(pMG252), determined by macrodilution, were: 0.5/4, 0.5/0.5 and 0.25/0.5, respectively. Bacterial counts in the lungs of animals infected with K. pneumoniae C2 and treated with antimicrobial agents were always lower than in the control group (cefepime, 4.4 +/- 0.5; imipenem, 4.6 +/- 0.4; meropenem, 4.7 +/- 0.5; control group, 5.6 +/- 0.8; p <0.01). No significant differences were observed among the groups receiving therapy (p >0.05). Bacterial lung clearance was higher in treated animals than in control animals following infection with K. pneumoniae C2(pMG252) (cefepime, 4.5 +/- 0.4; imipenem, 4.0 +/- 0.3; meropenem, 4.6 +/- 0.4; control group, 6.1 +/- 0.6; p <0.01), with imipenem producing better clearance than either cefepime or meropenem (p <0.05). Thus, in the guinea-pig pneumonia model, cefepime, imipenem and meropenem were each effective against the porin-deficient K. pneumoniae strain C2 and its derivative expressing the plasmid-mediated AmpC type beta-lactamase FOX-5.

Morphological changes induced by imipenem and meropenem at sub-inhibitory concentrations in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Abstract Sub-inhibitory concentrations of imipenem and meropenem were evaluated for their ability to induce morphological changes with six strains of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Three strains were susceptible and three were resistant to carbapenems. The strains were grown in the presence of 0 (controls), 0.25x, 0.5x and 1x the MIC of both carbapenems for 4 h, and then examined after Gram's stain. Cells > or = 3 microm in size (spheroplasts) were considered to be altered. Both carbapenems induced significant numbers of spheroplasts compared to controls. Imipenem had more effect against susceptible strains, while meropenem had a greater effect against resistant strains.