Streamlining care in two neurosurgical practices in a rural trauma center.

ABSTRACT: To maximize cost-effective care and evaluate the use of physician associates/assistants (PAs) and NPs in an academic inpatient setting, we investigated the effect of streamlining care by using a common PA position between two neurosurgery groups. Trauma registry data were obtained and analyzed to gain insight into hospital length of stay (LOS) and clinical outcomes before and after implementing this new position. The average hospital LOS was reduced for less severely injured patients, and the time to initiation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis decreased for injured neurosurgical patients. These results indicate the successful facilitation of time-sensitive, value-based healthcare for this specific clinical population at our Level 2 trauma center.

Utility of an Emergency Department Observation Unit in Providing Care for Patients With Blunt Thoracic Trauma.

Background The use of Emergency Department Observation Units (EDOUs) to treat patients with a variety of complaints has grown over recent years. However, the treatment of patients with traumatic injuries in EDOUs is infrequently described. Our study sought to describe the feasibility of treating patients with blunt thoracic trauma in an EDOU in consultation with our trauma and acute care surgery (TACS) team. Together, our Emergency Department (ED) and TACS teams designed a protocol for the treatment of patients with specific blunt thoracic injuries (fewer than three rib fractures, nondisplaced sternal fractures) that we felt would require less than 24 hours of care in a hospital setting. Methods This study is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis comparing two groups before (pre-EDOU) and after (EDOU) the creation of the EDOU protocol, which was implemented in August 2020. Data was collected at a single, Level 1 trauma center with approximately 95,000 annual visits. Similar inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select patients in both groups. We conducted two-sample t-tests and Chi-square testing to assess for significance. Primary outcomes include length of stay and bounce-back rate. Results A total of 81 patients were included in our data set across both groups. Forty-three patients were included in our pre-EDOU group while 38 patients were treated in our EDOU once the protocol was implemented. Patients in both groups were of similar age, gender and had similar Injury Severity Scores (ISS) ranging from 9 to 14. Hospital length of stay was shorter for the EDOU group (31.5 hours) compared to the pre-EDOU group (36.4 hours) although not statistically significant. When risk stratified by ISS, hospital length of stay did reach statistical significance and was found to be shorter for patients with ISS scores greater than or equal to 9 that were treated in the EDOU (29.1 hours vs. 43.8 hours, p = .028). Both groups had one patient each bounce back for repeat evaluation and additional care. Conclusion This study demonstrates the potential use of EDOUs to treat patients with mild to moderate blunt thoracic injuries. The availability of trauma surgeons for consultation along with ED provider experience may be rate-limiting steps in utilizing observation units to care for trauma patients. Additional research with more participants is needed to determine the impact of implementing such a practice at other institutions.

Collaborative Approach to Organ Donation in a Level II Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: Although a shortage of organ donors is a continuing global problem in health care, obtaining authorization for donation after an individual experiences a traumatic nonsurvivable event can be difficult. OBJECTIVE: To improve organ donation practices at a level II trauma center. METHODS: After reviewing trauma mortality cases and performance improvement metrics with their organ procurement organization's hospital liaison, leaders at the trauma center implemented a multidisciplinary performance improvement initiative to engage the facility's donation advisory committee, provide education for staff members, and increase program visibility to create a more donation-friendly culture for the facility. RESULTS: The initiative led to an improved donation conversion rate and a greater number of organs procured. Continued education increased staff and provider awareness of organ donation, contributing to the positive outcomes. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary initiative that includes continuing staff education can improve organ donation practices and program visibility, ultimately benefiting patients in need of organ transplantation.