Remyelination in animal models of multiple sclerosis: finding the elusive grail of regeneration.

Remyelination biology and the therapeutic potential of restoring myelin sheaths to prevent neurodegeneration and disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) has made considerable gains over the past decade with many regeneration strategies undergoing tested in MS clinical trials. Animal models used to investigate oligodendroglial responses and regeneration of myelin vary considerably in the mechanism of demyelination, involvement of inflammatory cells, neurodegeneration and capacity for remyelination. The investigation of remyelination in the context of aging and an inflammatory environment are of considerable interest for the potential translation to progressive multiple sclerosis. Here we review how remyelination is assessed in mouse models of demyelination, differences and advantages of these models, therapeutic strategies that have emerged and current pro-remyelination clinical trials.

A first-in-human phase I/IIa gene transfer clinical trial for Duchenne muscular dystrophy using rAAVrh74.MCK.GALGT2.

In a phase 1/2, open-label dose escalation trial, we delivered rAAVrh74.MCK.GALGT2 (also B4GALNT2) bilaterally to the legs of two boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy using intravascular limb infusion. Subject 1 (age 8.9 years at dosing) received 2.5 × 1013 vector genome (vg)/kg per leg (5 × 1013 vg/kg total) and subject 2 (age 6.9 years at dosing) received 5 × 1013 vg/kg per leg (1 × 1014 vg/kg total). No serious adverse events were observed. Muscle biopsy evaluated 3 or 4 months post treatment versus baseline showed evidence of GALGT2 gene expression and GALGT2-induced muscle cell glycosylation. Functionally, subject 1 showed a decline in 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance; an increase in time to run 100 m, and a decline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) score until ambulation was lost at 24 months. Subject 2, treated at a younger age and at a higher dose, demonstrated an improvement over 24 months in NSAA score (from 20 to 23 points), an increase in 6MWT distance (from 405 to 478 m), and only a minimal increase in 100 m time (45.6-48.4 s). These data suggest preliminary safety at a dose of 1 × 1014 vg/kg and functional stabilization in one patient.

Micro-laminin gene therapy can function as an inhibitor of muscle disease in the dyW mouse model of MDC1A.

Gene replacement for laminin-α2-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy 1A (MDC1A) is currently not possible using a single adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector due to the large size of the LAMA2 gene. LAMA2 encodes laminin-α2, a subunit of the trimeric laminin-211 extracellular matrix (ECM) protein that is the predominant laminin expressed in skeletal muscle. LAMA2 expression stabilizes skeletal muscle, in part by binding membrane receptors via its five globular (G) domains. We created a small, AAV-deliverable, micro-laminin gene therapy that expresses these G1-5 domains, LAMA2(G1-5), to test their therapeutic efficacy in the dyW mouse model for MDC1A. We also fused the heparin-binding (HB) domain from HB epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF) to LAMA2(G1-5) to test whether this would increase muscle ECM expression. dyW mice treated intravenously with rAAV9.CMV.HB-LAMA2(G1-5) showed increased muscle ECM expression of transgenic protein relative to mice treated with rAAV9.CMV.LAMA2(G1-5) and showed improved weight-normalized forelimb grip strength relative to untreated dyW mice. Additionally, dyW muscle fibers expressing either micro-laminin protein showed some measures of reduced pathology, although levels of muscle cell apoptosis and inflammation were not decreased. Although systemic expression of rAAV9.CMV.HB-LAMA2(G1-5) did not inhibit all disease phenotypes, these studies demonstrate the feasibility of using a micro-laminin gene therapy strategy to deliver gene replacement for MDC1A.

Short-term treatment of golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) dogs with rAAVrh74.MHCK7.GALGT2 induces muscle glycosylation and utrophin expression but has no significant effect on muscle strength.

We have examined the effects of intravenous (IV) delivery of rAAVrh74.MHCK7.GALGT2 in the golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). After baseline testing, GRMD dogs were treated at 3 months of age and reassessed at 6 months. This 3-6 month age range is a period of rapid disease progression, thus offering a relatively short window to establish treatment efficacy. Measures analyzed included muscle AAV transduction, GALGT2 transgene expression, GALGT2-induced glycosylation, muscle pathology, and muscle function. A total of five dogs were treated, 4 at 2x1014vg/kg and one at 6x1014vgkg. The 2x1014vg/kg dose led to transduction of regions of the heart with 1-3 vector genomes (vg) per nucleus, while most skeletal muscles were transduced with 0.25-0.5vg/nucleus. GALGT2-induced glycosylation paralleled levels of myofiber vg transduction, with about 90% of cardiomyocytes having increased glycosylation versus 20-35% of all myofibers across the skeletal muscles tested. Conclusions from phenotypic testing were limited by the small number of dogs. Treated dogs had less pronounced fibrosis and overall lesion severity when compared to control groups, but surprisingly no significant changes in limb muscle function measures. GALGT2-treated skeletal muscle and heart had elevated levels of utrophin protein expression and GALGT2-induced expression of glycosylated α dystroglycan, providing further evidence of a treatment effect. Serum chemistry, hematology, and cardiac function measures were largely unchanged by treatment. Cumulatively, these data show that short-term intravenous treatment of GRMD dogs with rAAVrh74.MHCK7.GALGT2 at high doses can induce muscle glycosylation and utrophin expression and may be safe over a short 3-month interval, but that such treatments had only modest effects on muscle pathology and did not significantly improve muscle strength.

The history of the antibody as a tool.

Antibodies are essential tools in modern science and medicine, however the history leading to the use of antibodies as tools has not been well-described. The objective of this paper is to analyze the history of immunology from smallpox inoculation to the production of monoclonal antibodies, and to identify turning points in immunological theory leading to the emergence of antibody-tools. In the early 1700's, Western medicine adopted smallpox inoculation from Turkey, along with the idea of acquired immunity. The Germ Theory of disease had to replace spontaneous generation and miasma theory in the 1880's, however, before inoculation could successfully be applied to other diseases. Inquiry into acquired immunity led to the idea of the "antibody" in the 1890's, and the use of antiserum to identify bacteria. Immunostaining was invented in 1942 by repurposing antibody-dye conjugates originally intended as antibiotics. Monoclonal antibody-producing hybridomas were similarly invented in 1975 by repurposing techniques from virology and genetics.