Managed Care after Acute Myocardial Infarction (MC-AMI) improves prognosis in AMI survivors with pre-existing heart failure: A propensity score matching analysis of Polish nationwide program of comprehensive post-MI care.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treatment, post-discharge mortality remains high. The outcomes are supposed to be even worse in patients with post-MI heart failure (HF), as only a half of patients with newly diagnosed HF survive four years. AIMS: The study aimed to analyze whether managed care after acute myocardial infarction (MC-AMI) is associated with better survival in AMI survivors with a pre-existing diagnosis of HF. RESULTS: The study included 7228 patients with a pre-existing diagnosis of HF who survived the hospitalization for AMI in Poland between November 2017 and December 2020, of whom 2268 (31.4%) were referred for the MC-AMI program. The median follow-up was 1.5 (0.7-2.3) years. In the unmatched analysis, patients without MC-AMI had more than twice higher 12-month mortality (21.8% vs. 9.9%; P <0.01) than MC-AMI participants. The difference remained significant after propensity score matching (16,8% vs. 10.0%; P <0.01). In multivariable analysis, participation in MC-AMI was an independent factor of 12-month survival. MC-AMI participants had a lower stroke rate (1.5% vs. 3.0%; P <0.01) and fewer hospital admissions due to HF (22.9% vs. 27.6%; P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: After propensity score matching, participation in MC-AMI was associated with lower rates of stroke, HF hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality in the 12-month follow-up and was an independent factor of 12-month survival in AMI survivors with pre-existing HF.

Managed Care after Acute Myocardial Infarction (MC-AMI) Reduces Total Mortality in 12-Month Follow-Up-Results from a Poland's National Health Fund Program of Comprehensive Post-MI Care-A Population-Wide Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Advances in the acute treatment of myocardial infarction (AMI) substantially reduced in-hospital mortality, but the post-discharge prognosis is still unacceptable. The Managed Care in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MC-AMI) is a program of Poland's National Health Fund that aims at comprehensive post-AMI care to improve long-term prognosis. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of MC-AMI on all-cause mortality in one-year follow-up. METHODS: MC-AMI includes acute MI treatment, complex revascularization, cardiac rehabilitation (CR), scheduled one-year outpatient follow-up, and prevention of sudden cardiac death. In this retrospective observational study performed in a province of Silesia, Poland, we analyzed 3893 MC-AMI participants, and compared them to 6946 patients in the control group. After propensity score matching, we compared two groups of 3551 subjects each. To assess the effect of MC-AMI and other variables on mortality, we preformed a Cox regression. RESULTS: MC-AMI was related with mortality reduction by 38% in a 12-month observation period and the effect persisted even after. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed MC-AMI participation to be inversely associated with 1-year mortality (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.42-0.65, p < 0.001). Besides that, older age (HR 1.47/10 y), ST-elevation AMI (HR 1.41), heart failure (HR 2.08), diabetes (HR 1.52), and dialysis (HR 2.38) were significantly associated with the primary endpoint. Among MC-AMI components, cardiac rehabilitation (HR 0.34) and strict outpatient care (HR 0.42) are the crucial factors affecting mortality reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in MC-AMI reduced 1-year mortality by 38% and the effect persisted after the program had been completed.

New-generation drug eluting stent vs. bare metal stent in saphenous vein graft - 1 year outcomes by a propensity score ascertainment (SVG Baltic Registry).

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the efficacy of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-designed drug-eluting stent (new-DES) vs. bare metal stent (BMS) of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) stenosis is scarce. The primary objective was to compare one-year clinical outcomes of PCI in stenosis of SVG using new-DES vs. BMS in a real-world population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We carried out a multi-center registry comparing new-DES with BMS in all consecutive patients undergoing PCI of SVG. The primary composite endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year. This observation included 792 consecutive patients (mean age 69 ±â€¯8.9y), treated with either new-DES (n = 379, 47.9%) or BMS (n = 413, 52.1%). Among patients treated with new-DES compared with BMS, there was a lower risk of MACCE (21.4% vs. 28.3%, HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95, p = 0.025) as well as myocardial infarction (MI) (6.3% vs. 12.1%; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.82, p = 0.005) at 1 year. After propensity score adjustment, the similar, significant reduction in MACCE and MI was observed in favor of new-DES (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, p = 0.030; and HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.92, p = 0.020, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PCI of SVG, the use of new-DES is associated with a reduced 1-year rate of MACCE and MI compared to BMS.

Reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 12 to 24 hours of the onset of symptoms (from a prospective national observational study [PL-ACS]).

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves 12-month survival in late presenters with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We analyzed 2,036 patients with STEMI presenting 12 to 24 hours from onset of symptoms, without cardiogenic shock or pulmonary edema and not reperfused by thrombolysis, of 23,517 patients with STEMI enrolled in the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes from June 2005 to August 2006. An invasive approach was chosen in 910 (44.7%) of late presenters and 92% of them underwent reperfusion by PCI. Patients with an invasive approach had lower mortality after 12 months than patients with a conservative approach (9.3% vs 17.9%, p <0.0001). The benefit of an invasive approach was also observed after multivariate adjustment with a relative risk 0.73 for 12-month mortality (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.96) and in a subpopulation of patients selected by a propensity-score matching procedure with an adjusted relative risk 0.73 for 12-month mortality (0.58 to 0.99). In conclusion, almost 1/2 of late presenters with STEMI were considered eligible for reperfusion by primary PCI. These patients had a lower 12-month mortality rate than they would have had if they had been treated conservatively, which supports the idea of late reperfusion in STEMI. However, whether all late presenters with STEMI should be treated invasively remains unanswered. Nevertheless, until a randomized trial is undertaken, late presenters with STEMI could be considered for reperfusion by primary PCI.