Prognostic value of coronary CTA vs. exercise treadmill testing: results from the Partners registry.

AIMS: We sought to compare the complementary prognostic value of exercise treadmill testing (ETT) and coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) among patients referred for both exams. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 582 patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD) who were clinically referred for ETT and CTA within 6 months. Patients were followed for cardiovascular (CV) death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or late revascularization (>90 days), stratified by Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) and CAD severity (≥50% stenosis). Mean age was 54 ± 13 years (63% male). In median follow-up of 40 months, there were 3 CV deaths, 7 non-fatal MIs, and 26 late revascularizations. ETT was inconclusive in 23%, positive in 31%, and negative in 46%. CTA demonstrated no CAD in 37%, non-obstructive CAD in 28%, and obstructive CAD in 35%. Among low-risk ETT patients (n = 326), there were 3 MI, 10 late revascularizations, and the frequent presence of non-obstructive (32%, n = 105) and obstructive CAD (27%, n = 88). When present, ETT features (i.e., angina, DTS, ischaemic electrocardiogram changes, and exercise capacity) individually failed to predict CV death/MI after adjustment for Morise score. Conversely, both obstructive CAD [HR 4.9 (1.0-23.3), P = 0.048] and CAD extent by segment involvement score >4 [HR 3.9 (1.0-15.2), P = 0.049] predicted increased risk for CV death or MI. CONCLUSION: Patients with a low-risk ETT have an excellent prognosis at 40 months, despite the frequent presence of non-obstructive (32%) and obstructive (27%) CAD. In patients with an intermediate- to high-risk ETT (DTS <5), CTA can provide incremental risk stratification for future CV events.

Impact of myocardial viability and left ventricular lead location on clinical outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) have scar segments that may limit ventricular resynchronization and clinical response. The impact of myocardial viability at the left ventricular (LV) pacing site on CRT response is poorly elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort of 160 ICM patients with single photon emission computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging before device implantation were included. Coronary venous angiography and chest radiographs helped classify segmental location of LV lead (LVL). The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure (HF) hospitalization and mortality at 3 years, and secondary outcome was change in systolic function at 6 months. The patients were divided into groups based on the myocardial substrate at the site of LVL: LVL on or adjacent to (1) normal myocardium (LVL-N, n = 64), (2) segmental scar (LVL-S, n = 62), and (3) scar and ischemia (LVL-SI, n = 34). Upon follow-up, 75 (47%) patients reached primary endpoint with a higher incidence noted in LVL-S (60%), and LVL-SI (53%), compared to 31% in LVL-N (P = 0.004). Kaplan Meier method demonstrated poor event free survival for primary outcome in LVL-S (P = 0.002), and LVL-SI (P = 0.03). In Cox proportional hazard model, LVL-S (HR: 2.26, P = 0.004), and LVL-SI (1.9, P = 0.047) were independent predictors of primary outcome. CONCLUSION: In CRT recipients with ICM, scar and reversible ischemia in or adjacent to LV pacing site were independent predictors of HF hospitalization and death.

Newer anticoagulants in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review of the literature.

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin have traditionally been the major therapeutic option for anticoagulation in clinical practice. VKAs are effective and extensively recommended for the prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolism in cardiovascular disease. Despite its effectiveness, warfarin is limited by factors such as a narrow therapeutic index, drug-drug interactions, food interactions, slow onset and offset of action, hemorrhage, and routine anticoagulation monitoring to maintain therapeutic international normalized ratio. During the last 2 decades, the approval of anticoagulants, such as low-molecular-weight heparins, indirect factor Xa inhibitors (eg, fondaparinux), and direct thrombin inhibitors (eg, argatroban, lepirudin, and desirudin), have expanded the number of available antithrombotic compounds with additional targets within the anticoagulation pathway. Although these medications offer several potential therapeutic advantages, they all require parenteral or subcutaneous administration and are substantially more expensive than VKAs. Thus, VKAs, despite several limitations, have remained the major option for most patients requiring chronic anticoagulation. These limitations have prompted interest in the development of newer oral anticoagulants. Novel anticoagulants targeting inhibition of factor Xa and thrombin (factor IIa) have now been incorporated into clinical practice based on the results of large randomized clinical trials, with the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of dabigatran for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and rivaroxaban for deep vein thrombosis and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, with multiple other agents in various stages of development for these and other indications. This review discusses the pharmacological properties, clinical results, and therapeutic applications of novel and new anticoagulants, thereby providing an outline for the future of anticoagulation in cardiovascular disease.