Real-World Evidence of Ribociclib Plus Aromatase Inhibitors as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer: The BrasiLEEira Study.

PURPOSE: Cyclin inhibitors plus endocrine therapy represent the reference standard for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC). Efficacy results on hard end points such as overall survival come from well-designed randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, a limitation of RCTs is the low external results validity, and their extrapolation to a broader population may not be appropriate. Real-world studies can overcome these limitations, also increasing the reliability of RCTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The BrasiLEEira was an observational, longitudinal, retrospective, multicenter study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ribociclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors in Brazilian women age 18 years or older with HR+/HER2- ABC. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of all 11 hospitals. Data were collected anonymously from medical records using an electronic case report form designed by an independent academic research organization, which conducted the study considering all recommendations of international guidelines. The primary end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end points included mortality, dose reduction, and safety. RESULTS: The mean age of 76 patients was 57 years, and 28.9% were Black/Brown. The most prevalent comorbidity was arterial hypertension (34.7%). About 26.0% had endocrine-resistant disease, and 54.1% had more than three metastatic sites. The PFS rate was 77.6%. Three patients died (3.9%). Dose reductions occurred in 37.7% of patients. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (68.4%). CONCLUSION: The high-quality evidence from the BrasiLEEira study corroborates the RCTs' findings, expanding its validity to a broader spectrum and underrepresented population who may benefit from ribociclib treatment.

Successful treatment with alectinib after crizotinib-induced hepatitis in ALK-rearranged advanced lung cancer patient: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Besides the clinical benefit of crizotinib in ALK-rearranged metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), concerns about its hepatotoxicity have arisen. It is not clear whether this is a drug class side effect or if the use of other selective ALKs inhibitors is safe after this serious adverse event. While evidence from clinical trials is scarce, reports of treatment after crizotinib-induces hepatitis may add to clinical decision. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we report a case of acute hepatitis induced by crizotinib in a 32-years-old female diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC, harboring the ALK-rearrangement. After 60 days of crizotinib therapy, the patient presented with acute hepatitis, diagnosed after investigation of non-specific symptoms, such as nausea and fatigue. Serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels had increased from baseline to 3010 IU/L and 9145 IU/L, respectively. Total bilirubin increased up to 7.91 mg/dL, but she did not develop liver failure. After crizotinib discontinuation, a gradual hepatic function recovery occurred. Unfortunately, during the period without specific oncology treatment, her disease showed an unequivocal progression. Therefore, she started on alectinib with great response, and no liver function alteration recurred. CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that alectinib, even belonging to the same drug class, could be used as an alternative agent when crizotinib is the etiology of liver damage, but more robust evidence has awaited.

Variation in the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for dose dense paclitaxel: A single institution retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The necessity of using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) during dose-dense (DD) paclitaxel (T) after doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) is unclear. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including patients with stage I-III breast cancer treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute with adjuvant DD-ACT between January 2011 and December 2013. Descriptive analyses evaluating patterns of G-CSF utilization during T were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 156 patients were treated with DD-ACT by 26 providers. The majority of patients (135, 87%) received at least one dose of G-CSF during T (group 1), 17% of these patients received it in only one cycle and 48% received it in all four cycles. Reasons for omitting G-CSF included high baseline absolute neutrophil count and pain. Twenty-one (13%) patients did not receive any G-CSF during T (group 2). Respectively, 94% and 90% of patients completed the treatment in groups 1 and 2. There were no cases of treatment cessation due to neutropenia. Six percent of patients in group 1 had at least one treatment delay. There were no treatment delays reported in group 2. Variation in the use of G-CSF by provider and by patient was found, with 11 providers choosing not to use G-CSF in at least one patient. CONCLUSIONS: We identified substantial variation in the use of G-CSF within the practice. However, omission of G-CSF was not associated with treatment delays or adverse events. Prospective studies are warranted to formally test whether routine G-CSF is necessary during dose-dense T therapy.