Monitoring differences in the function of the autonomic nervous system in patients with chronic insomnia using a wearable device.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: to characterize possible differences in the function of the ANS in patients with chronic insomnia compared to a control group, using a wearable device, in order to determine whether those findings allow diagnosing this medical entity. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with chronic insomnia and nineteen patients without any sleep disorder, as a control group, were recruited prospectively. Both groups of patients underwent an in-patient night with simultaneous polysomnography and wearable device recording Empatica E4 a diverse array of physiological signals, including electrodermal activity, temperature, accelerometry, and photoplethysmography, providing a comprehensive resource for in-depth sleep analysis. RESULTS: In polysomnography, patients suffering from insomnia showed a significant decrease in sleep efficiency and total sleep time, prolonged sleep latency, and increased wakefulness after sleep onset. Accelerometry results were statistically significant differences in the three axis (x, y, z) just in stage N3, no differences were observed between both groups in REM sleep. The lowest temperature was reached in REM sleep in both groups. Peripheral temperature did not decrease during the different sleep phases compared to wakefulness in insomnia, unlike in the control group. Heart rate was higher in patients with insomnia than in controls during wakefulness and sleep stage. Heart rate variability was lower in stage N3 and higher in REM sleep compared to wakefulness in both groups. Sweating was significantly higher in patients with insomnia compared to the control group, as indicated by Skin Conductance Variability values and Sudomotor Nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that patients with insomnia have increased sympathetic activity during sleep, showing a higher heart rate. Temperature and sweating significantly influence the different sleep phases.

Unraveling brain fog in post-COVID syndrome: Relationship between subjective cognitive complaints and cognitive function, fatigue, and neuropsychiatric symptoms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: "Brain fog" is a frequent and disabling symptom that can occur after SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, its clinical characteristics and the relationships among brain fog and objective cognitive function, fatigue, and neuropsychiatric symptoms (depression, anxiety) are still unclear. In this study, we aimed to examine the characteristics of brain fog and to understand how fatigue, cognitive performance, and neuropsychiatric symptoms and the mutual relationships among these variables influence subjective cognitive complaints. METHODS: A total of 170 patients with cognitive complaints in the context of post-COVID syndrome were evaluated using a comprehensive neuropsychological protocol. The FLEI scale was used to characterize subjective cognitive complaints. Correlation analysis, regression machine-learning algorithms, and mediation analysis were calculated. RESULTS: Cognitive complaints were mainly attention and episodic memory symptoms, while executive functions (planning) issues were less often reported. The FLEI scale, a mental ability questionnaire, showed high correlations with a fatigue scale and moderate correlations with the Stroop test, and anxiety and depressive symptoms. Random forest algorithms showed an R2 value of 0.409 for the prediction of FLEI score, with several cognitive tests, fatigue and depression being the best variables used in the prediction. Mediation analysis showed that fatigue was the main mediator between objective and subjective cognition, while the effect of depression was indirect and mediated through fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Brain fog associated with COVID-19 is mainly characterized by attention and episodic memory, and fatigue, which is the main mediator between objective and subjective cognition. Our findings contribute to understanding the pathophysiology of brain fog and emphasize the need to unravel the main mechanisms underlying brain fog, considering several aspects.

Development of criteria for cognitive dysfunction in post-COVID syndrome: the IC-CoDi-COVID approach.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop objective criteria for cognitive dysfunction associated with the post-COVID syndrome. METHODS: Four hundred and four patients with post-COVID syndrome from two centers were evaluated with comprehensive neuropsychological batteries. The International Classification for Cognitive Disorders in Epilepsy (IC-CoDE) framework was adapted and implemented. A healthy control group of 145 participants and a complementary data-driven approach based on unsupervised machine-learning clustering algorithms were also used to evaluate the optimal classification and cutoff points. RESULTS: According to the developed criteria, 41.2% and 17.3% of the sample were classified as having at least one cognitive domain impaired using -1 and -1.5 standard deviations as cutoff points. Attention/processing speed was the most frequently impaired domain. There were no differences in base rates of cognitive impairment between the two centers. Clustering analysis revealed two clusters, although with an important overlap (silhouette index 0.18-0.19). Cognitive impairment was associated with younger age and lower education levels, but not hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a harmonization of the criteria to define and classify cognitive impairment in the post-COVID syndrome. These criteria may be extrapolated to other neuropsychological batteries and settings, contributing to the diagnosis of cognitive deficits after COVID-19 and facilitating multicenter studies to guide biomarker investigation and therapies.

Neuropsychological Predictors of Fatigue in Post-COVID Syndrome.

Fatigue is one of the most disabling symptoms in several neurological disorders and has an important cognitive component. However, the relationship between self-reported cognitive fatigue and objective cognitive assessment results remains elusive. Patients with post-COVID syndrome often report fatigue and cognitive issues several months after the acute infection. We aimed to develop predictive models of fatigue using neuropsychological assessments to evaluate the relationship between cognitive fatigue and objective neuropsychological assessment results. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 113 patients with post-COVID syndrome, assessing them with the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery including standardized and computerized cognitive tests. Several machine learning algorithms were developed to predict MFIS scores (total score and cognitive fatigue score) based on neuropsychological test scores. MFIS showed moderate correlations only with the Stroop Color-Word Interference Test. Classification models obtained modest F1-scores for classification between fatigue and non-fatigued or between 3 or 4 degrees of fatigue severity. Regression models to estimate the MFIS score did not achieve adequate R2 metrics. Our study did not find reliable neuropsychological predictors of cognitive fatigue in the post-COVID syndrome. This has important implications for the interpretation of fatigue and cognitive assessment. Specifically, MFIS cognitive domain could not properly capture actual cognitive fatigue. In addition, our findings suggest different pathophysiological mechanisms of fatigue and cognitive dysfunction in post-COVID syndrome.

Machine-learning-based approach for predicting response to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor or ligand antibody treatment in patients with migraine: A multicenter Spanish study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several variables have been reported to be associated with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor or ligand antibody response, but with differing results. Our objective was to determine whether machine-learning (ML)-based models can predict 6-, 9- and 12-month responses to anti-CGRP receptor or ligand therapies among migraine patients. METHODS: We performed a multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data from patients with migraine receiving anti-CGRP therapies. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. Response rates in the 30% to 50% range, or at least 30%, in the 50% to 75% range, or at least 50%, and response rate of at least 75% regarding the reduction in the number of headache days per month at 6, 9 and 12 months were calculated. A sequential forward feature selector was used for variable selection and ML-based predictive models for the response to anti-CGRP therapies at 6, 9 and 12 months, with model accuracy not less than 70%, were generated. RESULTS: A total of 712 patients were included, 93% were women, and the mean (SD) age was 48 (11.6) years. Eighty-four percent of patients had chronic migraine. ML-based models using headache days/month, migraine days/month and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) yielded predictions with an F1 score range of 0.70-0.97 and an area under the receiver-operating curve score range of 0.87-0.98. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) summary plots and dependence plots were generated to evaluate the relevance of the factors associated with the prediction of the above-mentioned response rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that ML models can predict anti-CGRP response at 6, 9 and 12 months. This study provides a predictive tool that can be used in a real-world setting.

Cluster-Then-Classify Methodology for the Identification of Pain Episodes in Chronic Diseases.

Chronic diseases benefit of the advances on personalize medicine coming out of the integrative convergence of significant developments in systems biology, the Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence. 70% to 80% of all healthcare costs in the EU and US are currently spent on chronic diseases, leading to estimated costs of C=700 billion and $3.5 trillion respectively. The management of symptomatic pain crises in chronic diseases is based on general clinical guidelines that do not take into account the singularities of the crises, such as their intensity or duration, so that the pain of those particular crises may cause the medication to be ineffective and lead the patient to overmedication. Knowing in detail the characteristics of the pain would help the physician to objectively prescribe personalized treatments for each patient and crisis. In this manuscript, we make a step further on the prediction of symptomatic crisis from ambulatory collected data in chronic diseases. We propose a categorization of pain types according to subjective symptoms of real patients. Our approach has been evaluated in the migraine disease. The migraine is one of the most disabling neurological diseases that affects over 12% of the population worldwide and leads to high economic costs for private and public health systems. This study aims to classify pain episodes by the characterization of pain curves reported by patients in real time. Pain curves have been described as a set of morphological features. With these features the pain episodes are clustered then classified by unsupervised and supervised machine learning models. It is shown that the evolution of different pain episodes in chronic diseases can be modeled and clustered. Over a population of 51 migraine patients, it has been found that there are 4 clusters of pain types that can be classified using 4 morphological features with an accuracy of 99.0% using a Logistic Model Tree algorithm.

To what extent are patients with migraine able to predict attacks?

PURPOSE: Premonitory symptoms (PSs) of migraine are those that precede pain in a migraine attack. Previous studies suggest that treatment during this phase may prevent the onset of pain; however, this approach requires that patients be able to recognize their PSs. Our objectives were to evaluate patients' actual ability to predict migraine attacks based on their PSs and analyze whether good predictors meet any characteristic profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, observational study included patients with migraine with and without aura. Patients' baseline characteristics were recorded. During a 2-month follow-up period, patients used a mobile application to record what they believed to be PSs and later to record the onset of pain, if this occurred. When a migraine attack ended, patients had to complete a form on the characteristics of the episode (including the presence of PSs not identified prior to the attack). RESULTS: Fifty patients were initially selected. A final total of 34 patients were analyzed, recording 229 attacks. Of whom, 158 (69%) were accompanied by PSs and were recorded prior to the pain onset in 63 (27.5%) cases. A total of 67.6% of the patients were able to predict at least one attack, but only 35.3% were good predictors (>50% of attacks). There were only 11 cases in which a patient erroneously reported their PSs (positive predictive value: 85.1%). Good predictors were not differentiated by any specific clinical characteristic. However, a range of symptoms were particularly predictive; these included photophobia, drowsiness, yawning, increased thirst, and blurred vision. CONCLUSION: A large majority of patients with migraine experienced a PS and were able to predict at least one attack. Besides, only a small percentage of patients were considered as good predictors; however, they could not be characterized by any specific profile. Nonetheless, when patients with migraine believed that they were experiencing PSs, they were frequently correct.

Modeling methodology for the accurate and prompt prediction of symptomatic events in chronic diseases.

Prediction of symptomatic crises in chronic diseases allows to take decisions before the symptoms occur, such as the intake of drugs to avoid the symptoms or the activation of medical alarms. The prediction horizon is in this case an important parameter in order to fulfill the pharmacokinetics of medications, or the time response of medical services. This paper presents a study about the prediction limits of a chronic disease with symptomatic crises: the migraine. For that purpose, this work develops a methodology to build predictive migraine models and to improve these predictions beyond the limits of the initial models. The maximum prediction horizon is analyzed, and its dependency on the selected features is studied. A strategy for model selection is proposed to tackle the trade off between conservative but robust predictive models, with respect to less accurate predictions with higher horizons. The obtained results show a prediction horizon close to 40min, which is in the time range of the drug pharmacokinetics. Experiments have been performed in a realistic scenario where input data have been acquired in an ambulatory clinical study by the deployment of a non-intrusive Wireless Body Sensor Network. Our results provide an effective methodology for the selection of the future horizon in the development of prediction algorithms for diseases experiencing symptomatic crises.

Robust and Accurate Modeling Approaches for Migraine Per-Patient Prediction from Ambulatory Data.

Migraine is one of the most wide-spread neurological disorders, and its medical treatment represents a high percentage of the costs of health systems. In some patients, characteristic symptoms that precede the headache appear. However, they are nonspecific, and their prediction horizon is unknown and pretty variable; hence, these symptoms are almost useless for prediction, and they are not useful to advance the intake of drugs to be effective and neutralize the pain. To solve this problem, this paper sets up a realistic monitoring scenario where hemodynamic variables from real patients are monitored in ambulatory conditions with a wireless body sensor network (WBSN). The acquired data are used to evaluate the predictive capabilities and robustness against noise and failures in sensors of several modeling approaches. The obtained results encourage the development of per-patient models based on state-space models (N4SID) that are capable of providing average forecast windows of 47 min and a low rate of false positives.